Re: t-and-f: PA freshman sets national 1600 record

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Prizy
In Illinois, we used to have two or three hours of the boys meet, two or three hours 
of the girls
meet, and one hour of cross country taped for TV. Then, the state went from six 
football classes to
eight football classes with these games all shown live, plus a one-hour playoff 
pairing show.
Unfortunately, there suddenly was no money available for track and XC to be on TV. My 
argument fell
to deaf ears that the football TV package benefited 16 schools while a single state 
track meet
represented about 150 schools and communities. That meant 16 schools got about 40 
hours of live
coverage while 150 schools were told they were not worthy to get a couple of hours of 
a taped show.

William Bahnfleth wrote:

> For those with access to the Pennsylvania Cable Network, the entire
> Saturday state meet was broadcast live (with nicely condensed taped field
> events) and has been re-running periodically since then.  Lots of good
> competition throughout.  Aside from the announcers occasionally referring
> to the 1600 and 3200 as the mile and two-mile, I thought it was great
> coverage and commentary.  Too bad most other meets can't get a four hour
> block of  commercial-free time.
>
> At 10:37 AM 5/27/2003 -0400, Post, Marty wrote:
> >How does 4:14.26 auto-timed at 1600m compare to 4:15.5 hand-time ?[the US
> >frosh mile record]
> >
> >
> >http://www.dyestat.com/3state/PA/3out/statemeet/miller.htm
>
> _
>
> William P. Bahnfleth, Ph.D., P.E.
> Associate Professor
> Director, Indoor Environment Center
>
> Department of Architectural Engineering
> The Pennsylvania State University
> 104 Engineering Unit A
> University Park, PA 16802 USA
>
> voice: 814.863.2076 / fax: 814.863.4789
> e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.arche.psu.edu/faculty/WBahnfleth/
> _



t-and-f: [Fwd: KHALID KHANNOUCHI COMES HOME, The world's fastest marathoner to run Chicagoagain in 2003]

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Prizy


 Original Message 
Subject: KHALID KHANNOUCHI COMES HOME, The world's fastest marathoner to run 
Chicagoagain in 2003
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:00:23 -0500
From: marathon.office





PRESS RELEASE
from The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon

 

   Khalid Khannouchi comes Home
The world's fastest marathoner to run Chicago again in 2003

Chicago (May 27, 2003) To say that Khalid Khannouchi has dominated the
streets of Chicago is an understatement.  With four first-place feats,
including a record setting performance, Khannouchi's dominance is one of
the great sports stories in Chicago.

Khalid Khannouchi, 31, the fastest marathon runner in history, will return
to his home away from home to showcase his dominance in marathoning on the
streets of Chicago.  Khannouchi, who is in town this week meeting with
Executive Race Director Carey Pinkowski, has committed to run his sixth
LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon.

"Khalid Khannouchi is undoubtedly the greatest marathon runner of all
time," remarked Pinkowski.  "His epic performances and dramatic finishes in
Chicago are some of, if not the best, moments in the history of
marathoning."

Khannouchi finished first in dramatic fashion last year.  From the minute
the race began, Khannouchi went head to head with some of the greatest
distance runners of all time, including Paul Tergat, defending champion Ben
Kimondiu, and two-time London Marathon champion Abdelkhader El Mouaziz.

But it was Toshinari Takaoka who would provide Khannouchi with his biggest
challenge as the Japanese 10,000m champion broke out from the pack at mile
19 to take a 21 second lead at mile 23. But Khannouchi launched a
tremendous kick at mile 24 as he was set to accelerate past Takaoka.

And it seemed as though history was repeating itself.  The scene to come
was all too familiar.

Khannouchi and Takaoka were running side by side, shoulder to shoulder when
Khannouchi broke away from Takaoka like a roadrunner in the middle of the
McCormick Place Tunnel.  He then gracefully fell to the ground in a pool of
emotions as he crossed the finish line in 2:05:56.  Tears slowly rolled
down his eyes and his voice trembled as he realized what he had just
accomplished?four first place finishes in Chicago and the only marathoner
to have three sub 2:06 performances.

"Khalid's standard of success and his repeated dominance are beyond
impressive," added Pinkowski.  "I anticipate another strong performance
from him as he challenges his own world record in the 2003 LaSalle Bank
Chicago Marathon."

It was three years earlier in 1999 that Khalid broke away from Moses Tanui
in that same tunnel, making up a 40-second deficit to set the then world
record.  It is these storybook performances that have made Khalid
Khannouchi's name synonymous with The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon, which
has arguably become one of the best marathons in the world.  The Chicago
race has seen 37,500 registrants two years in a row and a field of some of
the greatest male and female marathoners in the world including once World
Record performances by Paula Radcliffe and Catherine Ndereba.

"Over the past six years, Chicago has been a super place for many athletes
who search for fast times," stated Khannouchi when asked about his thoughts
on returning to Chicago.  Khannouchi feels at home in Chicago and thrives
on the overwhelming support received from the hundreds of thousands who
line the course and cheer him on.  "I feel like I am running in my own
backyard every time I race in Chicago, especially with the strong support I
receive from the people of Chicago.  I'm very glad to be back once more and
to have the pleasure to hear my name once again all around the fast course
of the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon."

With Khannouchi leading the field of elite athletes thus far, the 2003
Chicago race is shaping up to have another impressive field.  Top athletes
seem to always perform extremely well in Chicago because of the flat, fast
course and the depth of the elite field that creates unparalleled
competition.  Chicago has built a solid reputation and has become the top
marathon in the U.S.

Khannouchi currently holds the World Record and the American Record.  His
unmatched marathon success started with his 1997 debut victory in Chicago
in 2:07:10?the fastest marathon debut ever. In 1998 Khannouchi placed
second in Chicago but came back to set a then World Record of 2:05:42 at
The 1999 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon. After becoming an American citizen
in May of 2000, Khannouchi set a then American marathon record of 2:07:01
with his third Chicago victory in the fall of 2000.

Khannouchi, who withdrew from the London Marathon this year, overcame one
of the strongest fields ever assembled to lower his own World Record in a
victory at the 2002 London Marathon with a time of 2:05:38. The dramatic
race included Khannouchi once again accelerating past two of the greatest
distance runners ever ? Paul Tergat and Haile Geb

Re: t-and-f: Chepchumba banned after positive test

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Prizy
Is your next writing assignment for TFN going to be an update to "Train Hard, Win 
Easy?"

malmo wrote:

> Actually, there are few sub 26:45s and few sub 12:50s ever.
>
> Last year, as you'll remember, produced the greatest mass finish ever in
> a 10k. Many smiling pastoral people who are afraid of needles in that
> race too.
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: Chepchumba banned after positive test
>
> Paul relayed:
>
> >NAIROBI (Reuters) -- Kenya's former national cross-country champion
> >Pamela Chepchumba was suspended from international competition by
> >Athletics Kenya on Wednesday after a positive test for the banned
> >blood-boosting drug EPO.
>
> Well, we all know this must be false, having been educated in the past
> that
> (a) Kenyans can't afford expensive performance enhancers like EPO, and
> (b) Kenyan athletes are loathe to take aspirin for a minor strain, much
> less take a performance enhancing drug.
>
> No story here folks.  This drug test was obviously ignorant of Kenyan
> culture and tradition.
>
> What happened to all the sub 26:45 10K's and sub 12:50 5K's in recent
> years, btw?
>
> Phil



t-and-f: Top Ill. Qualifiers;

2003-06-01 Thread Mike Prizy
Illinois High School Association
110th running of the Boys' State Track and Field Championships.
Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Ill. University

Class AA

LJ

1  Q-Leslie Majors (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood)   24' 1 3/4"
2  Q-Durrell Williams (Jr.), Aurora (West)23' 7"

TJ

1  Q-Steve Daniel (Sr.), Decatur (MacArthur)  49' 4"
2  Q-Britt Taylor (Sr.), Darien (Hinsdale South)  48' 6 1/4"
3  Q-Stephen Harden (Jr.), East St. Louis (Sr.)   47' 10"

400m (juniors dominating)

1  Q-Justin Harrison (Jr.), Wheaton (W. Warrenville South):47.99

1  Q-Matt Leffler (Sr.), Vernon Hills :48.48
2  Q-Lee McGinnis (Jr.), Glen Ellyn (Glenbard South)  :48.62

1  Q-Jeremy Johnson (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood)  :48.84

1  Q-Kyle Rose (Jr.), Kankakee (Sr.)  :48.91
2  Q-Stephen Taylor (Sr.), South Holland (Thornwood)  :48.97


300H

1  Q-Matt Harden (Jr.), O'Fallon  :38.61
2  Q-Keith Hopkins (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood)   :39.57


1600 (12 to final from three heats, 4:09, 4:17 to 4:20)

1  Q-Stephen Pifer (Sr.), Edwardsville (H.S.) 4:09.08

1  Q-Jeremy Williams (Sr.), Lockport (Twp.)   4:17.02


200

1  Q-Jeremy Johnson (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood)  :22.32

1  Q-Stephen Taylor (Sr.), South Holland (Thornwood)  :22.22

1  Q-Devon Brooks (Sr.), Edwardsville (H.S.)  :22.02
2  Q-Tyreese Andrews (Sr.), Chicago Heights (Bloom Twp.)  :22.07

1  Q-Martece Winston (Sr.), Crete (C.-Monee)  :22.06
2  Q-Waylond Ryan (Jr.), Rock Island (H.S.)   :22.17


4x800

1  Q-Charleston7:44.23
   Clint Coffey (Jr.), Nathan Homann (Jr.),
   Erik Werden (Sr.), Derek Fasnacht (Sr.)

4x100

1  Q-South Holland (Thornwood) :42.09
   Leslie Majors (Jr.), Stephen Taylor (Sr.),
   Floyd Davis (Jr.), Jeremy Johnson (Jr.)




t-and-f: Pifer 9:07; other Ill.

2003-06-01 Thread Mike Prizy
Illinois High School Association
110th running of the Boys' State Track and Field Championships.
Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Ill. University

64 degrees F
64 percent humidity
Cloudy and very windy (gusting to 30 mph)

Thornwood H.S. (South Holland, Ill.) on way to third state title in a row. Always 
solid in the
jumps, sprint relays, 200 and 400. Alums include Kathleen Raske, head coach at Central 
Michigan;
Reggie Torrian, low 13s for 110H, but retired early.)

Sad news for the week. Popular coach Pete Reiff, 52, Hoffman Estates H.S., dies of 
heart attach on
Monday. He was an All-State distance runner from York H.S. (Elmhurst, Ill.) in the 
late 60s and ran
at Mich. St.

Class AA (big schools)

Finals

3200

1  Stephen Pifer (Sr.), Edwardsville (H.S.)   9:06.93
2  Micky Cobrin (Sr.), Lincolnshire (Stevenson)   9:21.40

LJ

1  Leslie Majors (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood) 24' 1 3/4"
2  Durrell Williams (Jr.), Aurora (West)  23' 7"

PV

1  John Adamczyk (Jr.), Palatine (Fremd)  15' 9"
2  Dave Viken (Sr.), Rolling Meadows  15' 6"

HJ

1  Mike Petrone (Sr.), Carbondale 6' 10"
2  Obe Eruteya (Sr.), Niles (Notre Dame)  6' 8"

SP

1  Scott Block (Sr.), Roselle (Lake Park) 60' 10 1/4"
2  Sean Delahunt (Sr.), Pekin 60' 9"

TJ

1  Steve Daniel (Sr.), Decatur (MacArthur)49' 4"
2  Britt Taylor (Sr.), Darien (Hinsdale South)48' 6 1/4"

DT

1  Adam Schroeder (Sr.), Rockford (Boylan)182' 6"
2  Paul Lindsey (Sr.), Oak Lawn (Richards)178' 4"

4x800 (The locals went nuts. David beats Goliath. Charleston is the local small, 
college-town
school. York has a national reputation (Don Sage, Maria Cicero) and 22 state cross 
country team
titles.)

1  Charleston  7:51.21
   Clint Coffey (Jr.), Nathan Homann (Jr.),
   Erik Werden (Sr.), Derek Fasnacht (Sr.)
2  Elmhurst (York) 7:51.60
   Roger Billhardt (So.), Adam Manta (Sr.),
   Tom Rosinski (Sr.), Mike Corry (Sr.)


4x100

1  South Holland (Thornwood)   :42.24
   Leslie Majors (Jr.), Stephen Taylor (Sr.),
   Floyd Davis (Jr.), Jeremy Johnson (Jr.)
2  East St. Louis (Sr.):42.56
   Jamison Perry (Jr.), Andre Brewster (Jr.),
   Nolan Gardner (Sr.), Timothy Allen (So.)





t-and-f: 1.) Stephen Pifer, 4:14.29

2003-06-01 Thread Mike Prizy
Illinois H.S. Assoc.
Boys' State Finals

67 degrees F
59 percent humidity
Partly Cloudy
Widy - gusting to 30 mph

1  Stephen Pifer (Sr.), Edwardsville (H.S.)   4:14.29
2  Hunter Sheldon (Sr.), Vernon Hills 4:17.56
3  William McCann (Jr.), Decatur (MacArthur)  4:18.35



t-and-f: Notable Illinois Underclassmen

2003-06-01 Thread Mike Prizy
Notable Illinois Underclassmen

Illinois High School Association
Boys' State Track Meet
Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Illinois University
Charleston, Ill.
Finals, Saturday, May 31, 2003
www.ihsa.org

67 degrees F
partly cloudy
swirling wind, gusting to 30 mph


Class A (smaller schools of two-class system)

PLACE/ATHLETE/GRADE/SCHOOL TOWN and-or(SCHOOL NAME)/PERFORMANCE

PV

1  Josh Cullers (Jr.), Harrisburg 15' 0"


HJ

1  Jon Reagan (Jr.), Freeburg 6' 10"


TJ

1  Stephen Benjamin (So.), Chicago (Leo)  46' 6 1/4"


100

2  DeAndre Truss (Fr.), Sparta:10.88


1600

2  Dane Zeiler (So.), Metropolis (Massac County)  4:21.80
6  Michael Grieve (Fr.), Manlius (Bureau Valley)  4:26.63


200

7  DeAndre Truss (Fr.), Sparta:22.53




Class AA (bigger schools)

LJ

1  Leslie Majors (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood) 24' 1 3/4"
2  Durrell Williams (Jr.), Aurora (West)  23' 7"


PV

1  John Adamczyk (Jr.), Palatine (Fremd)  15' 9"


HJ

9  Jared Nuxoll (Fr.), Effingham (H.S.)   6' 4"


TJ

3  Stephen Harden (Jr.), East St. Louis (Sr.) 47' 10"



110H

1  Keith Hopkins (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood) :14.30
2  Matt Harden (Jr.), O'Fallon:14.34


200

1  Jeremy Johnson (Jr.), South Holland (Thornwood):21.68



Re: t-and-f: Pre- adidas outdoor championship preview interview with Chris Solinsky

2003-06-13 Thread Mike Prizy
Illinois runs state much like California. Pres on Friday in everything except the 
3200, Saturday is
all finals (3200/800/1600) in the early afternoon. Weather, competition, and about a 
three-hour time
span have held the dreamers at bay. We had one almost distance triple in foreign 
exchange student,
Marius Bakken, who attended Don Sage's York H.S. in Elmhurst, Ill.

I think Sage would have had a great shot at the triple, but maybe at the expense of 
his 8:42 and
4:07. Also, he had other great 800 guys on his team his senior year.

Also, note some of the other names in these finals.


1996 Illinois High School Association State Finals:

800-meter run
 1  Kyle Leonard (Sr.), New Lenox (Lincoln-Way)1:52.63
 2  Marius Bakken (Sr.), Elmhurst (York)   1:53.78
 3  Dan Billish (Sr.), Chicago (Brother Rice)  1:54.57

1600-meter run
 1  Marius Bakken (Sr.), Elmhurst (York)   4:12.40
 2  Edward Riegert (Sr.), Downers Grove (North)4:14.18
 3  Dave Gonzalez (Sr.), Bolingbrook   4:14.54

3200-meter run
 1  Marius Bakken (Sr.), Elmhurst (York)   9:07.34
 2  Matt Macievic (Sr.), Chicago (DeLaSalle)   9:15.88
 3  David Zabel (Jr.), Carol Stream (Glenbard North)   9:16.68
 4  Mark Pilja (So.), Naperville (North)   9:16.73
 5  Ted Higgins (Jr.), Naperville (North)  9:21.73
 6  Mark Reed (Sr.), Lockport (Twp.)   9:22.22
 7  Justin Young (Jr.), Peoria (Richwoods) 9:24.65
 8  Jorge Torres (Fr.), Wheeling   9:27.06



2000 Illinois High School Association State Finals:

800-meter run
 1  Tim Hobbs (Jr.), Elmhurst (York)   1:52.18
 2  Mike Lewis (Sr.), Cahokia  1:52.21
 3  Justin Amason (Sr.), Centralia 1:52.52
 4  Colin Quinn (Sr.), Chicago (Marist)1:53.66
 5  Gabriel Cruz (Jr.), Maywood (Proviso East) 1:53.94
 6  Scott Mahon (Jr.), Effingham (H.S.)1:54.08
 7  Chris Ashton (Jr.), Carbondale 1:54.66
 8  Felix Anderson (Jr.), Harvey (Thornton)1:54.67
 9  Ben Shumaker (Sr.), Moline 1:54.70

1600-meter run
 1  Donald Sage (Sr.), Elmhurst (York) 4:07.58
 2  Justin Amason (Sr.), Centralia 4:11.78
 3  Peter Cioni (Sr.), Elmhurst (York) 4:15.05
 4  Justin Motkowicz (Sr.), Crete (C.-Monee)   4:16.32
 5  William Artope (Jr.), Evanston (Twp.)  4:16.74
 6  Tim Keller (Sr.), West Chicago (H.S.)  4:16.94
 7  Ian Cronin (Jr.), Lincolnshire (Stevenson) 4:16.96
 8  Ed Umansky (Sr.), Park Ridge (Maine East)  4:17.00
 9  Carlos Mendoza (So.), Bensenville (Fenton) 4:17.18

3200-meter run
 1  Donald Sage (Sr.), Elmhurst (York) 8:42.89
 2  Tim Keller (Sr.), West Chicago (H.S.)  8:56.24
 3  Dan Glaz (Jr.), Palos Hills (Stagg)9:07.20
 4  Ryan Teising (Sr.), Naperville (Central)   9:08.68
 5  Tony Rakaric (Jr.), Palatine (H.S.)9:09.07
 6  Dan Trainor (Sr.), Freeport (H.S.) 9:13.60
 7  Adam Palumbo (Sr.), Elmhurst (York)9:13.77
 8  Micah VanDenend (So.), Glen Ellyn (Glenbard South) 9:15.34
 9  Dan Haut (Jr.), Lockport (Twp.)9:26.99

Gerald Woodward wrote:

> Ricky,
>
> It appears that some states give their distance runners a break by running
> the 3200 finals on Friday night and the 1600 finals on Saturday.  In
> California, they run qualifying heats in every event except the 3200 on
> Friday night, and ALL the running finals on Saturday within a two and a half
> hour window, girls and boys.
>
> If Solinsky runs the 800, 1600 and 3200, he would never be able to get a
> triple win in California as the overall talent is too great, i.e. Duane
> Solomon (Cabrillo) ran 1:51.1 in the qualifying Friday, and 1:49.79 (#3 US)
> on Saturday to win the championship; Phillip Reid (Rio Mesa) ran 4:11.? in
> qualifying on Friday and 4:08.9 (#9 US) to win on Saturday; Philip Reid also
> ran the 3200 (9:10.91) an hour after winning the 1600; Tim Nelson ran
> 8:53.59 (#7 US) to win the 3200 (he did run the 1600 as did not the first
> seven finishers in the 3200)!  The slowest qualifiers in the 800 ran 1:54.8;
> the slowest qualifiers in the 1600 ran 4:15.41.  As you can see, these are
> pretty swift high school times just to qualify.
>
> Solinsky may have had a shot at the 1600 and 3200 double, but not the
> trifecta here!
>
> Gerald "Woody" Woodward



t-and-f: Chapa protesting???

2003-06-19 Thread Mike Prizy
What's the deal with this pix? Was Rudy protesting something?


http://libweb.uoregon.edu/exhibits/track_and_field/tf05.html



Re: t-and-f: Re: Oregon track website

2003-06-20 Thread Mike Prizy
Aside from the Heisman Trophy and the potential that some of its winners may or may 
not be felons,
does anyone know why Rudy Chapa - not a Heisman winner, and to the best of my 
knowledge, not a
felon, but rather a fine upstanding citizen - is apparently wearing his singlet 
reversed in this
pix? (See link below for photo.)

Richard McCann wrote:

> This is a pretty neat website with various pix of historic Oregon runners:
>
> http://libweb.uoregon.edu/exhibits/track_and_field/tandf.html
>
> Richard McCann
>
> At 10:04 AM 6/19/2003 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote..
> >- - Original Message -
> >From: "Mike Prizy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Track List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:34 AM
> >Subject: t-and-f: Chapa protesting???
> >
> >
> > > What's the deal with this pix? Was Rudy protesting something?
> > >
> > >
> > > http://libweb.uoregon.edu/exhibits/track_and_field/tf05.html



t-and-f: R.I.P. Playboy's "Men" & Princeton track alum

2003-06-20 Thread Mike Prizy
... Mr. Baber was a 1958 graduate of Princeton University, where he ran track on an 
athletic
scholarship and participated in a Marine Corps leadership program





During the fall of 1977, my freshman year at Eastern Illinois University, I had Mr. 
Asa Baber for
Creative Writing. I was on the cross country team and he mentioned that he had run 
track. I recall
him saying that he ran sub 50 for the 440y on a cinder track in the very early 1950s, 
and I believe
he said that was when he was in high school on the South Side of Chicago.

At Eastern Illinois University that fall back in 1977, we went on to win the NCAA D2 
National XC
Championship. I think those after-class conversations about running were responsible 
for this very
critical grader, tough Chicago South Sider, former Marine, and Princeton grad, to 
award me the two
points I needed to bump my grade up a letter.

Problem now is, I don't have a good reason to tell my wife why I'm "reading" a Playboy.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/chi-0306200081jun20,1,7869930.story?coll=chi-newsobituaries-hed

By Brett McNeil
Tribune staff reporter
Published June 20, 2003

They really did read it for the writing--his writing, anyway, the Men column, which 
for more than 20
years kept the erogenous, emotional and intellectual pulse of American masculinity for 
Playboy.

At turns defiantly anti-feminist and tenderly paternal, Asa Baber, 66, gave voice to 
the unspoken
grievances of millions of men who often feel misunderstood by almost every woman in
America--including the centerfolds.

A longtime Gold Coast resident, Mr. Baber--known to his friends as Ace--died of Lou 
Gehrig's disease
Monday, June 16, in Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

Born and raised on Chicago's South Side, Mr. Baber was a 1958 graduate of Princeton 
University,
where he ran track on an athletic scholarship and participated in a Marine Corps 
leadership program.



Re: t-and-f: Re: Oregon track website

2003-06-20 Thread Mike Prizy
If that's your answer, I'm sticking with it, too.

Runner Triathlete News / Inside Texas Running wrote:

> I'm tellin' ya, he was runnin' jayvee.  ;)
>
> Lance Phegley
> Editor
> Inside Texas Running
> www.InsideTexasRunning.com
>
> ---Original Message---
> From: Mike Prizy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 06/20/03 07:27 PM
> To: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: Oregon track website
>
> >
> > Aside from the Heisman Trophy and the potential that some of its winners
> may or may not be felons,
> does anyone know why Rudy Chapa - not a Heisman winner, and to the best of
> my knowledge, not a
> felon, but rather a fine upstanding citizen - is apparently wearing his
> singlet reversed in this
> pix? (See link below for photo.)
>
> Richard McCann wrote:
>
> > This is a pretty neat website with various pix of historic Oregon
> runners:
> >
> > http://libweb.uoregon.edu/exhibits/track_and_field/tandf.html
> >
> > Richard McCann
> >
> > At 10:04 AM 6/19/2003 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote..
> > >- - Original Message -
> > >From: "Mike Prizy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "Track List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:34 AM
> > >Subject: t-and-f: Chapa protesting???
> > >
> > >
> > > > What's the deal with this pix? Was Rudy protesting something?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > http://libweb.uoregon.edu/exhibits/track_and_field/tf05.html
>
> >



Re: t-and-f: Timing yourself in an indoor 5,000M?

2003-06-25 Thread Mike Prizy
I might have the wrong race, but I believe promotional shots for the Chicago Marathon 
some years ago
were staged because the ad agency refused to use the real race start photos because 
most of the
runners at the start were looking and grabbing their wrists. The word went out that if 
you wanted to
be in the ad, show up without your watch.

Jim Gerweck wrote:

> I love it when some kid who's so inculcated by the nuances of road racing
> reaches to hit his watch at the end of a race, and gets beat by another who
> ran through the finish and counted on the timers to do their job.
> --
> Jim Gerweck
> Running Times



t-and-f: test

2003-07-08 Thread Mike Prizy
test



t-and-f: [Fwd: Press Release: El Mouaziz to Challenge Khannouchi]

2003-07-08 Thread Mike Prizy


 Original Message 
Subject: Press Release: Abdelkhader El Mouaziz to Challenge Khannouchi
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:42:55 -0500
From: (LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon)

Press Release

  Abdelkhader El Mouaziz to Challenge Khannouchi
 Win gives El Mouaziz the grand slam?victories in Chicago, London, and New
   York

Chicago (July 8, 2003)?The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon's elite athlete
field grows deeper as two-time London Marathon winner Abdelkhader El
Mouaziz (AB-DEL-CATER / EL-MO-ZEEZ) commits to run the 2003 race.  El
Mouaziz, returning to Chicago for a second time, hopes to challenge
world-record holder Khalid Khannouchi for first place in the fall race.  El
Mouaziz set a personal best in Chicago in 2002 with a time of 2:06:46.

A win in Chicago would make El Mouaziz, 34, of Morocco one of a select few
to have first place finishes in the top marathons including Chicago,
London, and New York.  He is determined to achieve what he calls the grand
slam of marathoning.

"I'm excited to return to Chicago and my goal is to win the race because
this is the only top-marathon that I have yet to win," stated Mouaziz.
"After winning London twice and New York once, I need to win Chicago in
order to complete the grand slam of victories in marathoning.  I hope that
2003 will be the year that I can add Chicago to my list of marathon wins."

El Mouaziz is a two-time Olympian from Morocco and one of the most
consistent marathon performers over the past seven years. In 2002, he ran
his then personal best of 2:06:52 with a fourth place finish in London
while staying with Khalid Khannouchi, Paul Tergat and Haile Gebresalassie
throughout the race. El Mouaziz won the London Marathon twice (1999, 2001)
and also has two second-place finishes in London (2000 and 1998).

At the 2002 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon, El Mouaziz set a personal record
of 2:06:46 for fifth place, the fastest time ever for anyone finishing in
that position. In 2000, he won the New York City Marathon after a gutsy
surge in the first half of New York's difficult course.  He has performed
well in international competition as well, finishing sixth at the 2001
World Marathon Championships (2:14:41) and seventh at the 2000 Sydney
Olympics Marathon (2:13:49). He is also a three-time winner of the
Marrakesh Marathon (1996,1997 and 1999).

"El Mouaziz is determined to perform strong in Chicago this year," stated
Executive Race Director Carey Pinkowski.  "He is a great addition to our
field and with his eye on winning this year, he certainly adds a
significant degree of competition to the men's field and to Khannouchi.  It
will certainly be a competitive race all the way to the finish line."

World record holder Khannouchi announced that he would run Chicago for a
sixth time earlier this year.  With Khannouchi, former Olympian Rod
DeHaven, who will both compete in the U.S. Olympic trials in February, and
El Mouaziz leading the men's field, the LaSalle Bank Chicago will once
again have the best athletes in the sport competing against each other.

Elite athletes will compete this fall for the highest marathon purse ever,
$550,000. The male and female winners each will earn $100,000, the largest
first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
begins Sunday, October 12 at 8 a.m., starting and finishing in Chicago's
Grant Park and is expected to draw up to the increased registration cap of
40,000 participants.  CBS 2 CHICAGO is the official broadcast partner of
the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon and will cover the race live from 7:30
a.m. to 11 a.m. race day.

   # # #


t-and-f: Pix from USATF Nationals

2003-07-09 Thread Mike Prizy

http://www.usolympicteam.com/goldmedal/070103_p_pgtrack.html



Re: t-and-f: Swoosh! Nike Agrees to Buy Converse for $305 Million

2003-07-10 Thread Mike Prizy
In today's Chicago Tribune vie the Baltimore Sun, is a column about Kobe Bryant. In 
part, the
Baltimore Sun's Mike Preston says the reason kids aren't buying Kobe's shoes is 
because Converse is
now the hip brand to today's kids.



Marketing misfits miss point

BY MIKE PRESTON. Mike Preston is a sports columnist
for the Baltimore Sun, a Tribune newspaper
Published July 10, 2003

(long link - might have to be pasted together)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/printedition/chi-0307100260jul10,1,2378830.story?coll=chi-printsports-hed





Matthew Starr wrote:

>
>
>   Search NYTimes.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Thursday, July 10, 2003
>
>  Swoosh! Nike Agrees to Buy Converse for $305 Million
>
> Nike, known for its shoes and its swoosh, has Michael
> Jordan and Tiger Woods on its corporate team. Now it
> is lining up yet another sports legend: for $305
> million, Nike is buying Converse, a century-old
> footwear company and maker of the celebrated Chuck
> Taylor All Star shoe. The deal announced yesterday,
> for cash and debt, brings together one of the oldest
> names in athletic footwear with perhaps the world's
> best-known sports shoe brand.
>
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com



Re: t-and-f: Salaries and Sports being cut

2003-07-10 Thread Mike Prizy
In your scenario - which is a valid one regarding the outrageous salaries for college 
football and
men's basketball coaches - when the decision comes down to cutting either men's track 
or women's
track, which team in almost all cases ends up on the chopping board? The men's team 
because of
Gender Equity quotas.

Title IX is a good thing. Football and men's basketball are bad things, and Gender 
Equity has given
universities and the NCAA a cowardly method of turning their backs on one issue to 
pretend they are
doing something righteous.

P.S. I think this is rehash from last year?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The premise is that "non-revenue" sports are cut because of increases in
> "revenue" sports spending.  Case in point-- St. John's University.
> According to Guidestar -  Mike Jarvis was paid 705,000 in 1998 and
> 1,171,255 in 2001.I was rather shocked.  That is a significant budget
> increase in an athletic department.  Something would have to be cut in
> order to continue at that pace and they made the decision to cut Men's
> Track.
>
> It  goes to prove the point that it is not fair just to point the finger at
> Title IX for  a reduction in men's sports.
>
> Catherine Sellers



Re: t-and-f: Salaries and Sports being cut

2003-07-11 Thread Mike Prizy
Millions? Where is it going?

What did St. John's track AND cross country programs cost? Maybe $250,000? Is that 
about a sixth of
Jarvis' compensation package? All to one college coach?

Bowling Green showed that with mostly in-state athletes, the track program actually 
made money -
profit generating, NOT revenue generating  at a loss like almost all football and most 
men's
basketball programs operate.

If "NCAA Division I sports are BIG Business!" then universities - public and private - 
should
forfeit their tax exempt status and pay the local communities their fair share of 
property taxes
because they are not providing opportunities for all.

It is only right, that if college football and men's basketball programs are making so 
much money,
yet they can't fund less expensive programs that provide opportunities for a 
wide-range of
student-athletes, then universities should be paying taxes on these revenue-generating
non-educational "business."

In the business world, it is ROI. But aren't universities supposed to be about 
education - oops!
Don't respond to this question, it was flippant and rhetorical - and about 
opportunities for all?



Gerald Woodward wrote:

> And Mike Jarvis and the Men's Basketball Program brings in millions of
> dollars into the athletic program at St. John's because of their level of
> play.  In the business world it's called "Return on Investment," and let's
> face it, NCAA Division I sports are BIG Business!
>
> Gerald



Re: t-and-f: Salaries and Sports being cut

2003-07-14 Thread Mike Prizy
(((two items here)))


Football coaches cost too much to fire

By Ryan Gabrielson
Arizona Daily Wildcat

"Going into the 2001 season, 15 colleges hired new football coaches, including 
Arizona, which
brought on Mackovic, and ASU, which hired Dirk Koetter.

"The salaries given Mackovic and Koetter made them the state's two highest-paid 
employees."

http://www.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/uwire/112102aae.html



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> Debt service and capital expenses are not included in these totals.
>

I'm not an accountant - but there are at least a couple good ones on this list - but I 
think where
the expenses get real fuzzy are in the "capital expenses" area. I don't see any 
university football
team that could afford to build and pay the overhead and upkeep on a stadium - not 
without cost
shifting to the rest of the university, plus the added benefit of the school's huge 
tax exemption.
And, football insurance premiums alone could probably go far in funding the 
Olympic-type sports at a
university (I could not open the pdf file to see if insurance was listed as a line 
item.)

Eliminate the players' salaries from any NFL team and my guess is it cost more than 
$10 million to
run a high-profile football program. I think the true expense to run a major college 
football
program far exceeds the revenue these college football program takes credit for.








> >You're right that Title IX is not the only reason why sports programs are
> >being cut, and universities are making poor decisions about how to
> allocate
> >resources to the so-called "revenue" sports, most of which actually lose
> >money.
>
> Anyone have a good study on this?  I know that many college football
> programs are money losers - but I doubt that the elite programs that are paying 
> coaches
> seven-figure salaries are.
>
> >From the University of Texas, 2001
> http://www.utexas.edu/vp/irla/eada2001.pdf  :
>
>   Revenues Expenses
> Sport  Dollars Percent of  Dollars  Percent of
>Grand Total  Grand Total
> (1) Football$25,605,289   47.6% $10,291,08721.7%
> (2) Men's Basketball $4,461,5418.3%  $3,200,723 6.8%
> (3) Other Men's  $1,103,8822.1%  $4,050,042 8.6%
>
> Revenue includes ticket sales; student activity fees; guarantees and
> options; contributions from alumni and others; state or government support;
> institutional support; post-season compensation; concessions; radio and
> television; special events; program sales and advertising; signage,
> sponsorships, and royalties; sports camps; and all other revenues intended
> for intercollegiate sports.
> Expenses include appearance guarantees and options, athletically-related
> student aid, contract services, equipment, fund-raising activities,
> operating expenses, promotional activities, recruiting expenses, salaries
> and benefits, supplies, travel, and any other expenses attributable to
> intercollegiate activities.
> Debt service and capital expenses are not included in these totals.
>
> That makes football a nice $15 million a year cash steer that fuels the
> rest of the athletic department.
>
> Elite NCAA football and basketball programs are in the entertainment
> business - and if you have a coach who helps up the value of your
> entertainment package, you pay him what it takes to keep him.
>



t-and-f: Chicago Registration at 25,000

2003-07-17 Thread Mike Prizy






 Original Message 
Subject: Registration at 25,000 -- 40,000 Cap expected to close by end of August
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:04:53 -0500
From: LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon


  NEWS RELEASE

   Registered Participants Reach 25,000 at a Record Pace
  The 40,000 cap expected to be reached by end of August ? Register Now!


Chicago (July 17, 2003)?Registration for 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
is approaching the 40,000 cap at a rapid pace.  To date, more than 25,000
runners have signed up to run the 26.2-mile race that takes place on
Sunday, October 12.  The cap was increased this year to 40,000 from 37,500.
Registration will close on Sept. 5 or when the registration cap is reached,
which is expected by the end of August.

"We are reaching our registration cap at a record pace this year and I
fully expect that we will reach the 40,000 cap as anticipated," stated
Executive Race Director Carey Pinkowski.  "If you plan on participating
this year, you have to make your decision relatively soon and register."

Participation in the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon has increased
dramatically since 1996 when only 10,925 registered.  The 2003 marathon has
the potential to be largest marathon ever to take place.  Pinkowski attests
the record participation to the growing popularity of running and the fact
that the Chicago race has become engrained into the fabric of Chicago and
its sports scene.

"Running and marathoning have truly been recognized as part of the Chicago
sports profile. With a focus on healthy lifestyles and with the extremely
talented elite athletes who have produced epic performances in the Chicago
Marathon, the sport has become tremendously popular."

New to this year's race are competitive and preferred start positions for
those who meet certain qualifying times based on completion of a marathon
or half-marathon since Jan. 1, 2001.  Qualifying times for the 2,500
competitive start positions are 3:15:00 or less in a full marathon and
1:30:00 or less in a half-marathon.  For the 5,500 preferred start
positions, the qualifying times are 3:45:00 in a marathon and 1:45:00 in a
half-marathon.

The competitive and preferred start positions are staged closer in
proximity to the start line and are offered based on registration date and
valid proof received.  Less than 1,000 positions remain for the competitive
start and 2,500 for the preferred start.

The marathon is open to all runners who can complete the course in less
than six hours.  For information, call 1-888-243-3344 (U.S. and Canada) or
(312) 904-9800.  Registration is $80 ($90 for international participants)
and can be completed online at www.chicagomarathon.com.

Elite athletes will compete this fall for the highest marathon purse ever,
$550,000. The male and female winners each will earn $100,000, the largest
first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
begins Sunday, October 12 at 8 a.m., starting and finishing in Chicago's
Grant Park and is expected to draw up to the increased registration cap of
40,000 participants.  CBS 2 CHICAGO is the official broadcast partner of
The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon and will cover the race live from 7:30
a.m. to 11 a.m. race day.

   # # #


t-and-f: [Fwd: TItle IX fyi]

2003-07-17 Thread Mike Prizy






"... OCR hereby clarifies that nothing in Title IX requires the cutting or reduction 
of teams in
order to demonstrate compliance with Title IX ..."


 Original Message 
Subject: TItle IX fyi
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:10:15 -0500
From: Brenda 
To: Mike Prizy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/title9guidanceFinal.html


Re: t-and-f: ESPN Track and Field Wire

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Prizy
Nando news had a nice track wire before they pulled the plug earlier this year. This 
fills a big
void. Kudos ESPN!

Lee Nichols wrote:

> >Not sure if anyone has posted this, but ESPN.com now has a page
> >dedicated to track & field wire coverage.  You can find it at:
> >
> >http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/gen/wire?sectionId=23
> >
> >Tom Borish
> >www.trackshark.com
> >
> Awesome! I've been wanting something like this ever since Yahoo!
> stopped carrying the track wire coverage. Thanks, Tom!
> --
> Lee Nichols
> Assistant News Editor
> The Austin Chronicle
> 512/454-5766, ext. 138
> fax 512/458-6910
> http://austinchronicle.com



Re: t-and-f: Michael Johnson spouts off again

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Prizy


The guy holds the WR at 200m and 400m and he "know's nothing about the
100m dash?" 
Kebba Tolbert wrote:

 
An expert on what? He know's nothing about the 100m dash? So what he
has the WR? As anyone who has watched NFL football will tell you being
a great player has no bearing on being able to commentate.
 
Kebba Tolbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])=
Head Coach -- Portland State University
Track & Field/Cross Country
GO VIKS!!
www.goviks.com
>From: Lee Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Lee Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: t-and-f: Michael Johnson spouts off again
>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:03:39 -0500
>
>>
>>Would someone tell MJ to shut up!! He's an idiot.
>>
>No he's not. He's an expert. Whoever was interviewing him wanted an
>expert opinion from someone who knows what it takes to get to the
>top of the sprinting world. His credentials, in case you've
>forgotten: 19.32, 43.18, and enough championship medals to armor a
>tank.
>--
>Lee Nichols
>Assistant News Editor
>The Austin Chronicle
>512/454-5766, ext. 138
>fax 512/458-6910
>http://austinchronicle.com


Add photos to your e-mail with MSN
8. Get 2 months FREE*.




Re: t-and-f: Slaney for Hall of Fame?

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Prizy
Maybe on par with Sotomayor.

"Wayne T. Armbrust" wrote:

> Netters,
>
> What is her status with the IAAF?
>
> --
> Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Computomarx
> 3604 Grant Ct.
> Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA
> (573) 445-6675 (voice & FAX)
> http://www.Computomarx.com
> "Know the difference between right and wrong...
> Always give your best effort...
> Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..."
> - Coach Bill Sudeck (1926-2000)



Re: t-and-f: Slaney for Hall of Fame?

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Prizy
I am looking for the story I did on this, but as I recall, T/E ratios were based on 
males. Nobody
ever checked to see if T/E ratios fluctuate during a woman's monthly hormonal cycle.

Dan Kaplan wrote:

> --- "Wayne T. Armbrust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > instead of coming up with the lame excuse that she did, that
> > somehow birth control pills caused her testosterone-epitestosterone
> > level to be more than 10 times normal.
>
> As lame as that excuse might have been, was it ever scientifically
> refuted?  Last I saw, people seemed to be suggesting it was actually a
> fairly credible explanation that should be investigated further.
>
> Dan
>
> =
> http://AbleDesign.com - Web Design & Custom Programming
> http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy T&F
> 
>   @o  Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  <|\/ <^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
> _/ \ \/\  (503)370-9969 phone/fax
>/   /
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com



t-and-f: [Fwd: Chicago Marathon Registration Reaches 35,000]

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Prizy


 Original Message 
Subject: Chicago Marathon Registration Reaches 35,000 -- Last Chance to Registerbefore 
40,000 CAP is Reached
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:14:12 -0500


Press Release
(From the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon)

   Last Chance to Register Before Cap is Reached
   35,000 Registered to Date ? Registration will Close at 40,000


Chicago (August 11, 2003)?Registration for the 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago
Marathon has reached 35,000 to date and is expected to reach the cap of
40,000 shortly.  Once the cap is reached, registration will be closed and
there will not be an opportunity to participate in this year's marathon.

"If you want to run this year's LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon, you'll need
to register immediately," advised Executive Race Director Carey Pinkowski.
"It's certainly common to have thoughts of running without actually
registering, so if you've been training and have made that kind commitment,
you need to register today so you can compete in this year's race. "

The 26.2-mile race takes place on Sunday, October 12.  The cap was
increased this year to 40,000 from 37,500.  The marathon is open to all
runners who can complete the course in less than six hours.  Registration
is $80 ($90 for international participants) and can be completed online at
www.chicagomarathon.com. For additional information, call 1-888-243-3344
(U.S. and Canada) or (312) 904-9800.

Participation in the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon has increased
dramatically since 1996 when only 10,925 registered.  The 2003 marathon has
the potential to be largest marathon ever to take place.  Pinkowski attests
the record participation to the growing popularity of running and the fact
that the Chicago race has become engrained into the fabric of Chicago and
its sports scene.

"The marathon has become an integral part of the fabric of the City of
Chicago and we see this more and more each year," added Event Chairman and
Chief Marketing Officer for LaSalle Bank, Mark A. Nystuen.  "Not only do
40,000 people run the race, but nearly 1 million spectators line the
course, 150,000 people attend the Health & Fitness Expo, and the event is
broadcast around the world?this has become an International event that
Chicagoans have truly embraced."

New to this year's race are competitive and preferred start positions for
those who meet certain qualifying times based on completion of a marathon
or half-marathon since Jan. 1, 2001. The competitive and preferred start
positions are staged closer in proximity to the start line and are offered
based on registration date and valid proof received.


Qualifying times for the remaining 350 competitive start positions are
3:15:00 or less in a full marathon and 1:30:00 or less in a half-marathon.
For the remaining 1,500 preferred start positions, the qualifying times are
3:45:00 in a marathon and 1:45:00 in a half-marathon.

Elite athletes will compete this fall for the highest marathon purse ever,
$550,000. The male and female winners each will earn $100,000, the largest
first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
begins Sunday, October 12 at 8 a.m., starting and finishing in Chicago's
Grant Park and is expected to draw up to the increased registration cap of
40,000 participants.  CBS 2 CHICAGO is the official broadcast partner of
The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon and will cover the race live from 7:30
a.m. to 11 a.m. race day.

   # # #


Re: t-and-f: Kenyan Drug Scandel

2003-08-20 Thread Mike Prizy
But, isn't Malmo the name of a tabloid that has an "underlying motivation of selling 
magazines and
making a lot of money?"

"Wayne T. Armbrust" wrote:

> B. Kunnath wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Kaplan
> >
> >  If you can enlighten me as to how that is no different from the T&F
> > drug accusation situation, then I will be quite impressed.
> >
> snip
>
> >  Likewise in the drug postings. Every time Ive asked someone to come
> > forward and actually put names, dates and locations, theres  some
> > major backpedalling. I have yet to see a single person come on here or
> > any other running page and claim point blank that he/she has witnessed
> > or specifically knows of someone doing the dope.
> >
> Malmo has.  He named the Eugene physician that was providing steroids
> for AW and even admitted to using Winsterol (sp?) himself.
>
> --
>
> Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Computomarxª
> 3604 Grant Ct.
> Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA
> (573) 445-6675 (voice & FAX)
> http://www.Computomarx.com
> "Know the difference between right and wrong...
> Always give your best effort...
> Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..."
> - Coach Bill Sudeck (1926-2000)



Re: t-and-f: WC TV SCHEDULE??

2003-08-20 Thread Mike Prizy
Zurich meet Saturday from the front page at http://usatf.org/

Sat. Aug. 23, 2:00-3:00 p.m. ET - ESPN2
IAAF Golden League presented by Finish Line
Welklasse Zurich


and the WC schedule for the U.S. TV market:

http://usatf.org/calendars/TVSchedule.asp




"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> Quite a bit everyday if you can access CBC somehow.
>
> "B. Kunnath" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Any idea how much of it, and where,  we'll be able to watch in the US?
> >
> > BK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >



Re: t-and-f: Kenyan Drug Scandel

2003-08-20 Thread Mike Prizy
I think the average (American) football fan realizes that today's football players are 
the sizes
they are from something other than being corn fed.

The difference is the media coverage. Most track stories in today's newspapers rarely 
lead without
some mention of drugs. Sunday's football game, which was shown on live TV and heard on 
radio in its
entirety, could have as many as five stories in the Monday paper. Here in Chicago, 
there are two
major Chicago papers and two large suburban papers. There could be a dozen reporters 
writing about
one game, plus it was live on TV and the radio (Here in Chicago, real Bear fans watch 
the TV with
sound turned off and listen to the radio for the hometown biased announcers.)

For the big American team sports, even with the reporting of domestic violence 
charges, drug busts,
and DUIs, there is still an overwhelming amount of column space to what happened in 
the game and
what happened on the field. So if the bad takes up a very small percentage of the 
reporting, it must
not be important for the fan to know.

On the other hand, there are few track stories in the big papers. When a track story 
does appear,
there is only one story and there is a good chance most of it is has to do with drugs. 
If one story
is devoted to a drug issue, that is an overwhelming amount of negative information and 
readers
(fans) are going to associate the sport with being bad.

I think USATF is doing a good job of marketing the sport to fans.

Maybe what we need is USATF and Track and Field Writers of America (I am a 
card-carrying member of
both organizations) to come up with a better marketing and education plan that targets 
editors and
reporters who lack knowledge of our sport.



t-and-f: Chicago registration at 39,200

2003-08-21 Thread Mike Prizy







 Original Message 
Subject: News Flash: Last Chance to Register!
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:27:52 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon 
www.chicagomarathon.com
October 12, 2003

NEWS FLASH
LAST CHANCE TO REGISTER BEFORE CAP IS REACHED  
39,200 REGISTERED TO DATE - REGISTRATION WILL CLOSE AT 40,000

Registration for The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon has reached 39,200 to date and 
is expected
to reach the cap of 40,000 shortly.  Once the cap is reached, registration will be 
closed and
individuals who have not registered will be unable participate in this year’s 
Marathon.  

Online registration is available at .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _


t-and-f: [Fwd: Chicago Marathon Registration Closed - 40,000 Cap Reached in Record Time]

2003-08-22 Thread Mike Prizy


 Original Message 
Subject: Chicago Marathon Registration Closed - 40,000 Cap Reached in Record Time
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:54:26 -0500
From: marathon.office



PRESS RELEASE

  MARATHON REGISTRATION IS CLOSED
  40,000 REGISTRATION CAP REACHED IN RECORD TIME
 LIMITED ENTRIES AVAILABLE THROUGH MARATHON CHARITY ORGANIZATIONS


CHICAGO (August 22, 2003)?Registration for The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago
Marathon is now closed.  The cap of 40,000 participants was reached
yesterday.  Limited entries may be available through charity organizations
associated with the Marathon.  A complete list of these organizations is
available on the event's Web site at www.chicagomarathon.com.

"We have reached our registration cap in record time this year," remarked
Event Chairman and Chief Marketing Officer for LaSalle Bank, Mark A.
Nystuen.  "This is a testament to the quality of the event and to how
mainstream the sport of running has become.  We are delighted to bring this
event to the 40,000 participants and to the one million spectators who
rally the runners race day."

Participation in The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon has increased
dramatically since 1996 when only 10,925 registered.  With 40,000
registered for the 2003 race, this year's Marathon has the potential to be
the largest road race ever, which will be based on the number of
participants who actually complete the 26.2-mile race.  The cap was
increased this year from 37,500, which was the set cap for the past two
years.

"From our modest beginnings in 1977 with just 4,200 runners to our present
popularity, The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon has made history, established
traditions and helped dreams become a reality," remarked Executive Race
Director Carey Pinkowski.  "We will carry on our prestigious legacy and
continue to add pages to the record books this year."

Elite athletes will compete this fall for the highest marathon purse ever,
$550,000. The male and female winners each will earn $100,000, the largest
first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon
begins Sunday, October 12 at 8 a.m., starting and finishing in Chicago's
Grant Park.  CBS 2 CHICAGO is the official broadcast partner of The LaSalle
Bank Chicago Marathon and will cover the race live from 6 to 11:30 a.m.
race day.

   # # #


t-and-f: Today's WC results

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Prizy







http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/gen/wire?sectionId=23



Re: t-and-f: 12:57 last 5000

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Prizy
Speaking of 1964 and wild 10,000s, the other night on digital cable I stumbled on the 
movie,
"Running Brave."

And, the tape I used for the Zurich meet Saturday happened to have the 1992 (?) 
MobilOne Indoor meet
on it. It was in Fairfax, Va., the first year with the Martin surface. Noureddine 
Morceli won the
mile. Eamonn Coghlan ran 4:07 in a master's mile (was he 40 yet in early 1992???) with 
Ken Popejoy
second.

Two of the announcers were? Frank Shorter and Craig Masback.

As a bonus, the last hour of the tape had the 1996 Ill. H.S. state XC meet with Jorge 
Torres winning
as a sophomore, the first of his three state XC titles. There was a pretty good 
freshman in 24th
place named Don Sage.

Signed,

Track-on-TV starved American



Lee Nichols wrote:

> But if you look at the major championships, going back at least to
> the 1964 Olympics, the 10K is consistently one of the wildest races.
>
> Lee Nichols
> Assistant News Editor
> The Austin Chronicle
> 512/454-5766, ext. 138
> fax 512/458-6910
> http://austinchronicle.com



Re: t-and-f: Slattery's race

2003-08-26 Thread Mike Prizy
"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit
there."

- Will Rogers (1879-1935)
American humorist



Tony Banovich wrote:

> Ed points out what I think is one of the fundamental differences between the
> US athletes and many of the rest of the world.  Slattery sees this as a
> learning experience and a drive for 5 years from now.  How many of the
> Africans do we see taking their time and seeing if they mature and worry
> about two Olympics down the road.
>
> Yeah, I know that you can't develop overnight.  But Geb certainly wasn't
> looking at the worlds in 93 as a learning experience.  And he was only 20.
> And has he flamed out just because of his push in his younger years.  Hell
> no.
>
> We need to not always be "looking down the road" or "it's all part of the
> big picture".  Sometimes you have to live, and train, in the here and now.
> It's amazing how the learning experiences of many of our distance athletes
> have not lead to medals or finals births 4 to 7 years later.
>
> Tony Banovich
> Billings, Montana
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ed Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "track net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 10:24 PM
> Subject: t-and-f: Slattery's race
>
> > Netters:
> >
> > Steve Slattery did just about what I expected he would at Paris,
> > though I didn;t think he would get quite that close to a final berth. And
> he
> > might have made it but for the minor inuury which cut into his training
> > schedule a month or so ago.
> >
> > His comments summed up things very well. This was a learning
> > experience for a career which if still in its infancy. The next step is to
> > make the Olympic team next year, get past the opening round and perhaps
> into
> > the finals and lower his PR to around 8:15. Then the real drive toward a
> > U.S. record and at least a top six finish by 2008.
> >
> >
> > On another note: why did Gail Devers run the 100M? I can;t believe
> > the four rounds will do anything to help her hurdles bid, which sees
> pretty
> > solid at this point. Hoiw much better would it have been to accept a relay
> > spot and let one of our younger sprinters gain the experience of running
> the
> > 100 in her place.
> >
> > Also, I'm conusd abouyt the 100M situation. I had thought the new
> > rule put a false start on everyone on the first break, but the posts seem
> to
> > indicate some other interpretation. of course, I am firmly oppoed to te
> > rule--no one should be penalized for something he hasn't done. The way
> > things are going, we might even see a repeat of the (in)famous 1944 AAU
> > final when everyone was d/qed.
> >
> > Ed Grant
> >
> >



Re: t-and-f: (The real) TV mystery

2003-08-28 Thread Mike Prizy
The Big TV Mystery as I see it (((NOT))) was why even ESPN2's on-screen cable listing 
here in
Chicago states track and field 9-11 p.m., but instead there is baseball on. The WCs 
were on 7-9 p.m.
I sat down at 8:58 p.m. to see a near empty stadium and hear the closing comments. 
Baseball NOT
berry, berry good to me.

Ed Grant wrote:

> Netters:
>
> Having been lavish (quite deserved) criticism of Tursday;s TV
> offering from Paris, I have to be just as lacish in praise of today;s
> progtam. My only question is, why such a complete reversal?
>
> Today's show opened with full coverage of the two events which were
> missed the day before because (I guess) a time overrun. Not only were they
> shown in full, but they were introduced properly as something that had
> happened the day before, unlike the pitiful Tuesday masquerade that would
> have had us believe the 100M finals came after the women's 200M trials, not
> a day or two days later,
>
> I can only conclude that different hands were at the controls of the
> two shows (or that the first-day gaffs were so obvious that something had to
> be done about it). The Tuesday coverage was typical network-style bilge,
> treating fans as if they were a bunch of ignorant boobs. Today's show was
> what we have come to expected from the ESPN international coverage, as good
> an attempt as U.S. coverage can make to match the kind of TV coverage
> European fans take for granted---given the limitations of time allotment.I
> would expect we we will see the same kind of coverage the next two days, It
> is the weekend that worries me.
>
> Because of the wall-to-wall college football coverage on both ESPN
> channels Saturday, the Parish coverage will begin at midnight here on the
> East Coast (and maybe elsewhere as well, for all I know.) Then we get the
> network coverage the next day, which, if past performances give any
> indication, will simply ignore the fact that ESPN has been covering the meet
> for five days and waste a lot of the three and a half hours showing events
> we have already seen.
>
> Another indication of a possible difference in the production these
> past two days was the cutdown today in the number and length of commercials.
> Fortunately, where was even time left after the closing decathlon 1500M to
> show a few events which had been earlier neglected: the second semi of the
> women's 200M, the women's TJ..
>
> Ed Grant



Re: t-and-f: TV nystery

2003-08-28 Thread Mike Prizy
Walt,

I think the coverage is just fine. But, who is going to be watching if ESPN/ESPN2/ABC 
can't put the
show on during the advertised time slot?



>The Big TV Mystery as I see it (((NOT))) was why even ESPN2's on-screen
cable listing here in
Chicago states track and field 9-11 p.m., but instead there is baseball
on. The WCs were on 7-9 p.m.
I sat down at 8:58 p.m. to see a near empty stadium and hear the closing
comments. Baseball NOT
berry, berry good to me.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In a message dated 8/27/03 8:22:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> <
> two shows (or that the first-day gaffs were so obvious that something had to
>
> be done about it). >>
>
> Sorry to debunk your theory, Ed, but  the same people were at the controls
> for both shows (and will be for the ABC show).
>
> I'm not going to try to defend some of the things that went on Tuesday, but
> you have to remember that we were trying to fit four days of competition into
> one show, and then the false starts and "pullups" in the sprints during the
> live portion of the show forced us to push the steeple and 400 to Wednesday.
>
> As for ABC's show on Sunday, of course you're going to see events from the
> whole Championships. Why do you think the show is 3-1/2 hours long?
>
> Walt Murphy



t-and-f: Advantage in 5000? Predicto M/200

Who has the advantage in the WC 5000 final? El G moving up from 1500 or Kenny B moving 
down from
10,000?

What will the last mile and the last 200 be run in?



Re: t-and-f: Edwin Moses Comeback?!!

Moses turns 48 on Sunday. Here's a story that appeared in the Chicago Tribune this 
week.



Moses hurdles different challenge

   By Michael Hirsley
   Tribune staff reporter
   Published August 27, 2003

   Edwin Moses used to take hurdles 400 meters at a
   time. These days he approaches them thousands of
   miles at a time, about 250,000 over the past two
   years by his own count.

   As a former world-class hurdler whose unbeaten streak of 122 
stretched over
   nearly a decade, including Olympic gold medals in 1976 and 1984, 
Moses
   remains an athlete known all over the world.





   He has parlayed that into a leadership role with the Laureus Sport 
for Good
   Foundation, which tries to use sports as a catalyst for 
humanitarian efforts.

   As he prepares to celebrate his 48th birthday Sunday, Moses is 
trying to steer
   education and resources to needy destinations worldwide. Last week 
he flew from
   New York to Paris, ending a two-month break from a travel schedule 
that took
   him to 30 countries in two years.

   Although he often travels alone, Moses is part of a team of former 
top athletes
   and significant financial backers. He is chairman of the World 
Sports Academy,
   comprising more than three dozen of the world's best-known retired 
athletes such
   as Boris Becker, Nadia Comaneci, Emerson Fittipaldi, Dan Marino, 
Martina
   Navratilova and Mark Spitz.

   Why athletes?

   "We bring name recognition from sports, and sports bring so many 
possibilities
   for pulling diverse people together to solve common problems," 
Moses said.

   After the athletes' team recommends potential projects, the 
foundation follows up

   with a million-dollar annual commitment, endowed by 
Daimler-Chrysler and
   Richemont, whose holdings include Cartier.

   "We're not there to teach sports, although I've demonstrated 
hurdling at times,"
   Moses said. "We use sports as a hook for social change."

   Since the foundation was created four years ago, 21 projects have 
been funded,
   including:

   - A 10 p.m.-2 a.m. basketball league in Richmond, Va., is also a 
drug- and
   crime-intervention program.

   - A soccer program in Nairobi, Kenya, also teaches participants 
about AIDS and
   family planning as well as addressing other health and 
environmental issues.

   - A partnership with Special Olympics helps to create teams in the 
Czech
   Republic, Slovakia and China. They unite individuals with and 
without mental
   handicaps for training and friendly competition.

   - Sports projects in Cape Town, South Africa, and in New York City 
seek to
   combat homelessness among youths. In Sierra Leone, the focus is on 
children
   who were abducted into sex slavery or military service.

   - A new project in Sao Paulo, Brazil, has expanded from martial 
arts and soccer
   to include instructions in computers, music and the arts. It 
established a
   musicians' and artists' studio in a converted warehouse.

   Moses admits he sometimes believes he and fellow Laureus 
ambassadors are
   swimming upstream against the bad publicity of athletes' problems 
ranging from
   greedy behavior to criminal behavior to abusive behavior with
   performance-enhancing or social drugs.

   "Bad news travels faster and louder than good news," he said.

   The foundation he heads has tried to pump up the volume by staging 
an annual
   awards ceremony honoring exceptional athletes.

   Winners have been as well-known to Americans as golfer Tiger Woods, 
as
   little-known as the French soccer team and Olympic track star Cathy 
Freeman of
   Australia, and as obscure as equator circumnavigator Mike Horn of 
South Africa.

   The Laureus program draws its name from a universal sports symbol 
of triumph,
   the laurel wreath. The Latin word "Laureus" can be translated to 
mean both the
   wreath and its triumphant recipient.

   Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune





















Dan Kaplan wrote:

> What is he now, 45 or 50?  Maybe coming back in the Masters ranks...
>
> Dan
>
> =
> http://AbleDes

Re: t-and-f: The unknown positive?

Didn't Ben have a third positive? What was the problem there?

Jonas Mureika wrote:

>
> This is very interesting, because this is exactly what happened with Ben
> Johnson's second positive test in 1993 (which in that case was a T:E
> ratio, which has even vaguer thresholds).



t-and-f: [Fwd: Khannouchi Withdraws From Chicago Marathon]



 Original Message 
Subject: Khalid Khannouchi Withdraws From Chicago Marathon
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:02:44 -0500
From: LaSalle Bank Chicago marathon



  PRESS RELEASE

 KHALID KHANNOUCHI WITHDRAWS FROM CHICAGO MARATHON

CHICAGO (September 3, 2003) ? Khalid Khannouchi, 31, who has dominated
the streets of Chicago in the past five years has withdrawn from next
month's 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon.  With four first-place
feats, including a record setting performance, Khannouchi's dominance
in Chicago will have to wait at least one more year.

Khannouchi, the fastest marathon runner in history, contacted Executive
Race Director Carey Pinkowski to personally inform him of his decision.
He made the call from Limerick, Ireland where he is currently receiving
treatment from Gerard Hartmann, a world-renowned physical therapist.

"I was truly disappointed that Khalid would not be able to compete this
year," said Pinkowski   after hearing the unfortunate news.   "His
presence will be missed.  He has been a great   ambassador for our event,
the City of Chicago and marathoning."

Khannouchi has a nagging injury that hasn't allowed him to train with
the same intensity as in years past.  This would have been Khannouchi's
sixth LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon.  Khannouchi will be in town
marathon weekend in an entirely unfamiliar role?watching the race as
the most experienced spectator from the grandstands rather than from
his most familiar position of crossing the finish line tape.

"I was looking forward to another competitive performance in Chicago,
but a minor injury is forcing me to reduce the intensity of my
training," stated Khannouchi.  "As a result I have to withdraw from the
2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon."

This also comes at a unique time for Khannouchi and other athletes
knowing the Olympic Trials are fast approaching in Birmingham, Ala.
(February 2004) and the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens.  Khannouchi's
focus is now on the Trials and the Olympics.

"If I ran the Chicago Marathon I might risk my chances to participate
in the Olympic Trials as well as loosing my hope to make the Olympic
Team," added Khannouchi.  "The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon will be
there every year and I will have another chance to come back and give
the performance Chicago deserves."

With Khannouchi leaving the field of elite athletes, the 2003 Chicago
race will still have another impressive men's field.  Top male athletes
include Abdelkhader El Mouaziz, Rod Dehaven, Mike Donnelly, Dan Browne
and Jeff Schiebler.


El Mouaziz, 34, and two-time London Marathon winner, will return to
Chicago for a second time, and hopes to challenge the world record held
by Khannouchi.

Rod DeHaven, 36, a former Olympian from Madison, Wisc., who set his
personal best marathon time in Chicago with a 2:11:40 performance in
the 2001 race, sees the Marathon as a tune up for the upcoming Trials.

Others already have secured the qualifying time and will compete in
Chicago to stay competitive leading up to the trials, but like DeHaven,
Donnelly, 26, and Schiebler, 30, have Olympic aspirations.  Browne, 28,
set his personal best in the Twin Cities Marathon with a time of
2:11:35, which coined him the 2002 USA marathon champion and gave him
the Olympic "A" standard qualifying time to compete in the trials for
the 2004 Olympics.

Elite athletes will compete this fall for the highest marathon purse
ever, $550,000. The male and female winners each will earn $100,000,
the largest first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank
Chicago Marathon begins Sunday, October 12 at 8 a.m., starting and
finishing in Chicago's Grant Park and registration has recently been
closed since reaching the cap of 40,000 participants.

- 30 -


t-and-f: Tough press: Chambers' final flop turns golden baton to silver

Chambers' final flop turns golden baton to silver


http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,10082,1033215,00.html



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

Could be that those old East German labs have been leased to the old wives because 
there's plenty of
science out there just on vit. C and zinc.

http://www.vitacost.com/science/hn/Concern/Common_Cold.htm

However, the key benefit of Vit. C for runners might be as a great antioxidant. When 
hammering a 20
miler, the body is producing mega ATP. The energy it takes to produce the ATP also 
produces a lot of
waste in the form of free radicals. Antioxidant enzymes help convert free rads to 
harmles waste.

IMHO, vitamin C provides a bigger boost than much of the stuff on the current banned 
list.

malmo wrote:

> If you are taking vitamins in an attempt to stop an athlete from
> catching colds, I suspect that you are victim of many more old-wives
> tales.
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew H
> FraserMoat
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 6:25 AM
> To: 'Randy Treadway'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> This is the best post I have read on this list for many years.  I am in
> the same camp as you, Randy.  The only slight difference is that I think
> it is OK to take daily doses of multi-vitamins to stop the athlete
> catching colds etc.
>
> Matthew Fraser Moat
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Treadway
> Sent: 05 September 2003 22:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> 
>
> Which camp are YOU in?
>
> Anybody who claims that they were caught for stuff like "nandro" because
> it was in a mismarked supplement that they were taking (specifically as
> a compliment to their athletic training)- well it's hard for me to have
> much sympathy for them, because I think they were violating the spirit
> of the sport to begin with. If you had any doubt which camp I'm in, it's
> now obvious.



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

Show you what? Vitamin C is probably one of the most researched and studied substances 
on the
planet.

malmo wrote:

> Plenty of science out there? Show me.
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Prizy
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: malmo
> Cc: 'Matthew H FraserMoat'; 'Randy Treadway';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> Could be that those old East German labs have been leased to the old
> wives because there's plenty of science out there just on vit. C and
> zinc.
>
> http://www.vitacost.com/science/hn/Concern/Common_Cold.htm
>
> However, the key benefit of Vit. C for runners might be as a great
> antioxidant. When hammering a 20 miler, the body is producing mega ATP.
> The energy it takes to produce the ATP also produces a lot of waste in
> the form of free radicals. Antioxidant enzymes help convert free rads to
> harmles waste.
>
> IMHO, vitamin C provides a bigger boost than much of the stuff on the
> current banned list.
>
> malmo wrote:
>
> > If you are taking vitamins in an attempt to stop an athlete from
> > catching colds, I suspect that you are victim of many more old-wives
> > tales.
> >
> > malmo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew H
> > FraserMoat
> > Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 6:25 AM
> > To: 'Randy Treadway'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > This is the best post I have read on this list for many years.  I am
> > in the same camp as you, Randy.  The only slight difference is that I
> > think it is OK to take daily doses of multi-vitamins to stop the
> > athlete catching colds etc.
> >
> > Matthew Fraser Moat
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Treadway
> > Sent: 05 September 2003 22:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > 
> >
> > Which camp are YOU in?
> >
> > Anybody who claims that they were caught for stuff like "nandro"
> > because it was in a mismarked supplement that they were taking
> > (specifically as a compliment to their athletic training)- well it's
> > hard for me to have much sympathy for them, because I think they were
> > violating the spirit of the sport to begin with. If you had any doubt
> > which camp I'm in, it's now obvious.



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

Show you what? Vitamin C is probably one of the most researched and studied substances 
on the
planet. There some info right here. But, do your own search or consult with that 
Oregon doc. All I
said was that there's plenty of science out there just on vit. C and zinc. And, there 
is.

malmo wrote:

> Plenty of science out there? Show me.
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Prizy
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: malmo
> Cc: 'Matthew H FraserMoat'; 'Randy Treadway';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> Could be that those old East German labs have been leased to the old
> wives because there's plenty of science out there just on vit. C and
> zinc.
>
> http://www.vitacost.com/science/hn/Concern/Common_Cold.htm
>
> However, the key benefit of Vit. C for runners might be as a great
> antioxidant. When hammering a 20 miler, the body is producing mega ATP.
> The energy it takes to produce the ATP also produces a lot of waste in
> the form of free radicals. Antioxidant enzymes help convert free rads to
> harmles waste.
>
> IMHO, vitamin C provides a bigger boost than much of the stuff on the
> current banned list.
>
> malmo wrote:
>
> > If you are taking vitamins in an attempt to stop an athlete from
> > catching colds, I suspect that you are victim of many more old-wives
> > tales.
> >
> > malmo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew H
> > FraserMoat
> > Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 6:25 AM
> > To: 'Randy Treadway'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > This is the best post I have read on this list for many years.  I am
> > in the same camp as you, Randy.  The only slight difference is that I
> > think it is OK to take daily doses of multi-vitamins to stop the
> > athlete catching colds etc.
> >
> > Matthew Fraser Moat
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Treadway
> > Sent: 05 September 2003 22:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > 
> >
> > Which camp are YOU in?
> >
> > Anybody who claims that they were caught for stuff like "nandro"
> > because it was in a mismarked supplement that they were taking
> > (specifically as a compliment to their athletic training)- well it's
> > hard for me to have much sympathy for them, because I think they were
> > violating the spirit of the sport to begin with. If you had any doubt
> > which camp I'm in, it's now obvious.



Re: t-and-f: Another EPO cheat

Wow! Can you image the return volley if an American had made this comment:


"I will not be making a comment. I am scandalised by the leaks in this matter. It 
shows a lack of
respect for the laws and procedures," Amsalem (French Athletics Federation president 
Bernard
Amsalem) said, adding that a meeting had been scheduled for 8 October.



"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> "French 1500m runner Fouad Chouki tested positive for EPO at the World
> Athletics Championships last month, according to a report."
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/athletics/3105684.stm



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

Might as well prepare for two more categories:

Clean Clones and Drug Clones

"P.F.Talbot" wrote:

> In bodybuilding "natural" tends to mean you can pass a drug test at the
> competition.  Same with powerlifting.
>
> But ideas of what is "clean" and what is not is going to be severely changed
> in coming decades.  With medical changes in the next 100 years we may find
> that "natural" athletes are smaller, weaker and slower than regular folk who
> are not even athletes.  Will anyone watch a "clean" SP competition if there
> are a dozen guys at their local gym who could throw farther if the bother to
> pick up a shot?
>
> I wonder what will happen the first time an amputee athlete runs faster than
> the best "able-bodied" athlete?
>
> Maybe this is ridiculously far-fetched and these days will never come, but
> one thing is for certain the greater involvement of medical/technological
> change in daily life in the future will certainly radically alter sport and
> how we think about it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kurt Bray
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> >Is there no game for the CLEANIES to play professionally?
>
> Maybe do it like the body builders do: split it into two separate sports.
> Some body builders compete in the "natural" tournaments and others in the
> no-holds-barred events.
>
> Maybe track should consider something like that so that we could see what
> actual athletes are capable of and also see what formerly-human dope freaks
> accompanied by their pharmaceutical pit crews are capable of.  Both contests
> could be appreciated for their similar events but also for their ultimately
> different merits and philosophies.
>
> Kurt Bray
>
> _
> Try MSN Messenger 6.0 with integrated webcam functionality!
> http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_webcam



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

I believe Butch's case was overturned on appeal in a U.S. court on a jurisdiction 
ruling, negating
his $27 million award.

Butch got screwed on poor chain-of-custody procedures (regardless of what King George 
thinks.)
Somebody peed a positive. It just wasn't his.


Conway Hill wrote:

> But it is ok to leave the door open for athletes to be wrongly occused and
> to lose medals and tears of competition to a poor testing system that has
> only an inherent moral basis  And of course the opportunity for
> litigation thtat that provides ... Is that correct ??
>
> For example Butch Reynolds and his trip down litigation lane ... Now there
> was a great example of looking out after our athletes !!! Didn'tb he win ??
> Oh wat, he never got paid !!
>
> Yeah ... Let's base a system on the potntial nature of litigation !!! That
> works ...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dan Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> > The problem with your proposal is that it does open up the use of drugs
> > which MAY be harmful.  Given the litigious nature of our society today, I
> > can already see an athlete suing the IAAF for allowing the use of a
> harmful
> > substance, which in effect required the athlete to use the substance to be
> > competitive.  You only need to look at the actions on electromagnetic
> > radiation from cell phones and electric appliances to realize that this
> > could be a very substantial liability.  (And there are many more
> > examples--just look at Superfund litigation.)  This situation means that
> we
> > need to err on the side of caution on this issue.
> >
> > Richard McCann
> >
> >



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

My reading skills have nothing to do with it. Maybe I need to brush up on mind reading 
or telepathy.

malmo wrote:

> Perhaps Mike, you should brush up on your reading skills. I didn't say
> anything about Reynolds guilt. I said I "wouldn't be so sure."  As a
> matter of fact, here on this list in the past, I've noted the Reynolds
> passed tests both immediately before and after he got popped. Added to
> this, his demeaner (unlike Slaney's) was that of an innocent man.
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Prizy
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 12:55 PM
> To: Conway Hill
> Cc: Richard McCann; Dan Kaplan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> I believe Butch's case was overturned on appeal in a U.S. court on a
> jurisdiction ruling, negating his $27 million award.
>
> Butch got screwed on poor chain-of-custody procedures (regardless of
> what King George thinks.) Somebody peed a positive. It just wasn't his.
>
> Conway Hill wrote:
>
> > But it is ok to leave the door open for athletes to be wrongly occused
>
> > and to lose medals and tears of competition to a poor testing system
> > that has only an inherent moral basis  And of course the
> > opportunity for litigation thtat that provides ... Is that correct ??
> >
> > For example Butch Reynolds and his trip down litigation lane ... Now
> > there was a great example of looking out after our athletes !!!
> > Didn'tb he win ?? Oh wat, he never got paid !!
> >
> > Yeah ... Let's base a system on the potntial nature of litigation !!!
> > That works ...
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Dan Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > > The problem with your proposal is that it does open up the use of
> > > drugs which MAY be harmful.  Given the litigious nature of our
> > > society today, I can already see an athlete suing the IAAF for
> > > allowing the use of a
> > harmful
> > > substance, which in effect required the athlete to use the substance
>
> > > to be competitive.  You only need to look at the actions on
> > > electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and electric appliances
> > > to realize that this could be a very substantial liability.  (And
> > > there are many more examples--just look at Superfund litigation.)
> > > This situation means that
> > we
> > > need to err on the side of caution on this issue.
> > >
> > > Richard McCann
> > >
> > >



Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport

Yea, I'll turn the radar off and let your cosmic dust fly by.

malmo wrote:

> Or perhaps you need to stop looking for something that's not there?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Prizy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:27 PM
> To: malmo
> Cc: 'Conway Hill'; 'Richard McCann'; 'Dan Kaplan';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
>
> My reading skills have nothing to do with it. Maybe I need to brush up
> on mind reading or telepathy.
>
> malmo wrote:
>
> > Perhaps Mike, you should brush up on your reading skills. I didn't say
>
> > anything about Reynolds guilt. I said I "wouldn't be so sure."  As a
> > matter of fact, here on this list in the past, I've noted the Reynolds
>
> > passed tests both immediately before and after he got popped. Added to
>
> > this, his demeaner (unlike Slaney's) was that of an innocent man.
> >
> > malmo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Prizy
> > Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 12:55 PM
> > To: Conway Hill
> > Cc: Richard McCann; Dan Kaplan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> >
> > I believe Butch's case was overturned on appeal in a U.S. court on a
> > jurisdiction ruling, negating his $27 million award.
> >
> > Butch got screwed on poor chain-of-custody procedures (regardless of
> > what King George thinks.) Somebody peed a positive. It just wasn't
> > his.
> >
> > Conway Hill wrote:
> >
> > > But it is ok to leave the door open for athletes to be wrongly
> > > occused
> >
> > > and to lose medals and tears of competition to a poor testing system
>
> > > that has only an inherent moral basis  And of course the
> > > opportunity for litigation thtat that provides ... Is that correct
> > > ??
> > >
> > > For example Butch Reynolds and his trip down litigation lane ... Now
>
> > > there was a great example of looking out after our athletes !!!
> > > Didn'tb he win ?? Oh wat, he never got paid !!
> > >
> > > Yeah ... Let's base a system on the potntial nature of litigation
> > > !!! That works ...
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Richard McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Dan Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:25 PM
> > > Subject: Re: t-and-f: major philosphy difference for the sport
> > >
> > > > The problem with your proposal is that it does open up the use of
> > > > drugs which MAY be harmful.  Given the litigious nature of our
> > > > society today, I can already see an athlete suing the IAAF for
> > > > allowing the use of a
> > > harmful
> > > > substance, which in effect required the athlete to use the
> > > > substance
> >
> > > > to be competitive.  You only need to look at the actions on
> > > > electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and electric appliances
>
> > > > to realize that this could be a very substantial liability.  (And
> > > > there are many more examples--just look at Superfund litigation.)
> > > > This situation means that
> > > we
> > > > need to err on the side of caution on this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Richard McCann
> > > >
> > > >



Re: t-and-f: Butch Reynolds

This is my second attempt at this, my first version got trashed when I left my comp. 
in the care of
my kids.

If I am recalling the details correctly - not from first-hand knowledge - but, Butch's 
case had to
do with a couple names being scratched over and names being re-written on different 
lines on the
Chain-of-Custody collection form. I believe there were about a dozen or so names on 
this one COC
collection form.

I am involved with employment drug testing in the U.S., and this would have been a 
fatal flaw, such
that the drug testing lab would have refused to test the sample because the chain of 
custody would
have been considered broken - that there would be doubt as to which sample matched up 
to which donor
name on the COC collection form.

With regards to U.S. employment testing - and this is what was odd with the IAAF 
collection
procedures that were in place at the time of Butch's case - there would not have been 
a donor
collection list, but each specimen has its own self contained COC. The list with 
multiple names
would have been a log to verify how many specimens were in a particular shipment, not 
for
identifying and matching bottles of urine to names on a list (which was a flawed 
procedure to begin
with, but I think this was an attempt to maintain anonymity.)

Also, if I recall correctly, the steroid that was reported in the specimen was one 
that was
generally considered used by throwers and not sprinters. After the apparent final 
order of donor
names on the COC form was determined, Butch's name was between two throwers, which was 
part of his
evidence.

Again with regards to U.S. employment testing, there would have been more than enough 
evidence to
show doubt in the integrity of the chain of custody, or that specimens were not 
properly matched up
to donors' names on the collection list.

I don't recall what evidence - if any - the IAAF presented in the lower court case. 
But I think it
was interesting that the IAAF showed up on the appeal to use the U.S court system 
against Butch and
to successfully argue that the lower court had no jurisdiction to award a $27 million 
judgment on an
organization outside of the U.S.


IMHO, Butch's case had more to do with an individuals rights and "European 
aristocrats" than what
might be considered philosophical reasoning that has been discussed on this thread.





Michael Contopoulos wrote:

> I know the butch reynolds case but don't know what his evidence was, or how
> he could have known, that his sample was someone else's.  can someone
> enlighten me on Butch's "facts"
>
> Thanks,
> M
>
> _
> Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month.  Limited time offer--
> sign up now!   http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup



Re: t-and-f: Latest on White

How about - "Let me sleep on it."

Kurt Bray wrote:

> >"I'm trying to be vague with
> >my answers.
>
> That's the most refreshingly (if unintentionally) honest answer I've heard
> in a long time!
>
> Kurt Bray
>
> _
> Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE!
> http://msnmessenger-download.com



Re: t-and-f: Drugs

I think most of the A leaks have been announcements by the NGBs of the respective 
countries (I know,
not the U.S.)


Richard McCann wrote:

> At 11:15 AM 9/27/2003 -0700, Gerald Woodward wrote:
> >Richard,
> >You and I and just about everyone else on this list knows of instances where
> >"leaks" of a positive "A" hit the streets long before the results of the "B"
> >test were publicized!
> >
> >The labs that leaked this info should be banned from participating in the
> >testing program for "life!"  That will eliminate people from trying to get
> >the "scoop" on every other lab that is running the same type of testing.
> >Hopefully, it will also eliminate the rumors and innuendos.
> >
> >Gerald
>
> I agree this position.  There need to be stronger sanctions on these labs.
>
> RMc



Re: t-and-f: Drugs

The answer might be here:

http://www.usantidoping.org/files/USADAmgmtdiagram11_00.pdf

For some reason, I can't open these PDF files.

I called USADA to ask if both samples go to the same lab. I was told they do, but, I 
suspect that
the athlete may have the option to have the B sample - while it is still sealed in a 
tamper-evident
container along with chain-of-custody forms - sent to another certified/IAAF/IOC 
approved lab. It
probably is standard procedure to have the B sent elsewhere if the A is positive. If 
the A is
negative, the B is not tested.

Even if the B sample is tested where the A positive sample was tested, it probably 
would not be on
the same day and maybe not on the same machine or by the same technician. If 
notification goes out
on an A positive and the athlete or federation is given options, there is plenty of 
time to spring a
leak - IMHO.

But, the question(s): What is the procedure after an A sample comes up positive; when 
and where does
the B sample get tested? If names are NOT used on the COC forms, who has access to the
identification numbers to be able to know who the A sample belongs to?

I am more familiar with U.S. employment drug testing. These answers might be in the 
PDF files or
maybe somebody on this list knows.





Richard McCann wrote:

> If its the federations doing the leaking, then the labs should hold the A
> results until they get the B results.  There's really no reason to release
> the A results beforehand.
>
> RMc
>
> At 09:18 PM 9/28/2003 -0500, Mike Prizy wrote:
> >I think most of the A leaks have been announcements by the NGBs of the
> >respective countries (I know,
> >not the U.S.)
> >
> >
> >Richard McCann wrote:
> >
> > > At 11:15 AM 9/27/2003 -0700, Gerald Woodward wrote:
> > > >Richard,
> > > >You and I and just about everyone else on this list knows of instances
> > where
> > > >"leaks" of a positive "A" hit the streets long before the results of
> > the "B"
> > > >test were publicized!
> > > >
> > > >The labs that leaked this info should be banned from participating in the
> > > >testing program for "life!"  That will eliminate people from trying to get
> > > >the "scoop" on every other lab that is running the same type of testing.
> > > >Hopefully, it will also eliminate the rumors and innuendos.
> > > >
> > > >Gerald
> > >
> > > I agree this position.  There need to be stronger sanctions on these labs.
> > >
> > > RMc



Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative

This is why positive A samples should never be released - or leaked - to the public. 
Now the
conspiracy folks are going to have a field day.

Michael Contopoulos wrote:

> http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/general/features/2003/lagat_b_netative_20031001.html
>
> www.trackandfieldnews.com
>
> _
> High-speed Internet access as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local
> service providers in your area). Click here.   https://broadband.msn.com



Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B sample... now equal chance of being clean or dirty...

How many other A samples have been positive that we don't know about because the B was 
negative,
because the rules were followed by not releasing the results of the A positive before 
the B test?

The rule says:

A positive + B positive = Positive

A Positive + B negative = Negative

If we did not know the A results, we would not be discussing this now, nor would we 
have to take
sides or form opinions.

Lagat does not deserve to have this cloud of suspicion following him around.

Michael Contopoulos wrote:

> For all those who will love to write this off as if Lagat is a saint and he
> never did anything wrong... isn't it just as likely the negative result is
> wrong as the positive result is wrong?  In the eyes of our sport, he is
> free.  In my eyes, he either tested positive for something and then got off
> on a bad  B' test, or, he was unjustly accused after a bad 'A' test and was
> vindicated with the 'B' test.  In no way, in my mind, is he clean based on
> the B sample.  He's just not guilty.  Unless someone has more to offer on
> things done differently with the B, I will actually believe the B sample
> falsely read a negative.  I actually think it would be better for the sport
> had Lagat been busted.  Of course if he truly is clean, I'm glad he's back,
> but I will hold my judgement.  Life aint fair... and I never said it was.
>
> Michael
>
> _
> Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy
> patented spam protection and more.  Sign up now!
> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa



Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative

Conspiracy theories??? For a sport most could careless about??? Collaboration between 
some or all
200 federations who can't get along with each other???

And, on Page 2 of the supermarket tabloid ... the IAAF and USATF are actually ruled by 
Ollan Cassell
at his double-secret headquarters at Area 51, near the hanger where the alien 
spaceship is housed,
next to Elvis' office.

alan tobin wrote:

> Why would we Mike? It's not like there is a lot of money at stake or that
> other sports are filled with cheats. In my world the sky is always clear and
> people help old ladies cross the street.
>
> Alan
>
> >From: Mike Prizy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Mike Prizy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Michael Contopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative
> >Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:59:07 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc9-f25.hotmail.com ([65.54.166.32]) by mc9-s13.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:13:06 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.13]) by
> >mc9-f25.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 1 Oct 2003
> >11:04:53 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])by
> >darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h91HuiIK011974for
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:56:44 -0700
> >(PDT)
> >Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by darkwing.uoregon.edu
> >(8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h91HuiUO011968for t-and-f-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct
> >2003 10:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net
> >[204.127.202.64])by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
> >h91HugIK011530for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:56:43
> >-0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from comcast.net
> >(12-248-211-198.client.attbi.com[12.248.211.198])  by comcast.net
> >(sccrmhc13) with SMTP  id <20031001175637016005uf3je>
> >(Authid: mikeprizy);  Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:56:37 +
> >X-Message-Info: QY4hSA9XRFMMSePXohvdfHfvte0BQUfJyVk9xOTiDwY=
> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
> >X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Precedence: bulk
> >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2003 18:04:55.0245 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[84BB1FD0:01C38846]
> >
> >This is why positive A samples should never be released - or leaked - to
> >the public. Now the
> >conspiracy folks are going to have a field day.
> >
> >Michael Contopoulos wrote:
> >
> > >
> >http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/general/features/2003/lagat_b_netative_20031001.html
> > >
> > > www.trackandfieldnews.com
> > >
> > > _
> > > High-speed Internet access as low as $29.95/month (depending on the
> >local
> > > service providers in your area). Click here.   https://broadband.msn.com
> >
>
> _



Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative



Who says he's clean? The European Aristocrats at the IAAF who make the
rules say he's clean. NOT U.S. courts. NOT Johnny C. or any other hotshot
U.S. attorney. NOT world sports arbitration. No lame defense. No sex, cheap
wine, rock N' roll, or toothpaste. Can't blame USATF. Just the IAAF rules
in plain black and white say he's clean. Cut and dry. Move on.
 
alan tobin wrote:

Who said he was clean? One test said he was dirty, the other said clean. So 
which is it? Why don't we take a 3rd test? Best two out of three...like 
rock, paper, scissors...

Alan


>From: "B. Kunnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative
>Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:17:43 +
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Originating-IP: [24.58.161.241]
>X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from 24.58.161.241 by by1fd.bay1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;Thu, 
>02 Oct 2003 00:17:43 GMT
>

_
High-speed Internet access as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local 
service providers in your area). Click here.   https://broadband.msn.com


Subject: Re: t-and-f: Lgat's B Sample Negative
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:17:43 +
From: "B. Kunnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From Alan on Sept 4th re Lagats positive
A Sample:
Am I the only one not shocked? Once we all
realize that most of the top athletes in the sport are on something then
we all will cease to be shocked. Track is like Cycling. In order to be
a champion you have to be doped on something.
Alan
 
Today:
>Why would we Mike? It's not like there is a lot of money at stake or>that
other sports are filled with cheats. In my world the sky is
>always clear and people help old ladies cross the street.
>
>Alan
 
 
Alan,
 Are you just as shocked that hes turned out to be clean after
all? Does this negative test make that drugtakers iceberg seem a little
smaller now?
 Too many people want to believe the worst without even waiting
for the full facts to come out.
bob
 
 





Re: t-and-f: Status of Felix 22.11 as WJR? Word Youth Records?

Do these fit the "world best" category and sidestep "world record?"


Roger Ruth wrote:

> Earlier today, Karl Steinhoff made a very good point and raised an
> interesting question, writing:
>
> >Also, I notice in this year's ATFS Annual that the records section
> >contains a new category - World Youth (under 18) records. Are these
> >officially recognized by the IAAF? If so, do they require the same testing
> >regimen as other records?
> >
> >It would seem that athletes this age are more likely to compete in meets
> >without a testing protocol, and so we would find more records disallowed.
>
> How appropriate is it to require drug testing as a condition of record
> ratification, when the nature of competition for the U18 group is such that
> many (probably most) meets in which they are involved will not provide that
> testing?
>
> Would the solution be to recognize that circumstance and *not* require
> testing for record ratification?
>
> Is there any database available that would show how frequently all under-18
> athletes who were tested have been found to have used banned substances?
>
> For now, the best source I have available for approaching an answer to that
> question is the one-year data provided in Peter Matthews' 2003 edition of
> the ATFS Athletics Annual. There, he lists the athletes suspended by the
> IAAF for drug violations in 1992. The youngest (of 17) men in that list
> were 23 years old at the time of the suspension. The youngest woman (of 17)
> was 22 years old. The ages of athletes who have been suspended seem to
> center around 30 for the men and 25 for the women.
>
> Let me propose a theory about age/ranking and drug enhancement: It is that
> athletes do not resort to drugs during the years when they are improving
> their accomplishments, but only when they fail to meet their expectations
> (or that of their coaches/sponsors) or begin to decline in their
> performances. If that is correct, there may be no need for drug testing of
> younger athletes.
>
> Cheers,
> Roger



Re: t-and-f: Templeton on Lagat



He even said so:
"... I also represented Dieter Baumann  (since Munich 2002)."
"B. Kunnath" wrote:

 
>From: "alan tobin" :<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>", I also represented
Dieter Baumann"
>
>Well, that says it all.
>
>Alan  Actually it doesn't. Im pretty certain Templeton became
Baumanns manager AFTER the whole drug fiasco. So whats your point?bob 


Share your photos without
swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!




Re: t-and-f: who would use drugs?

I think 85 percent of human parents surveyed said that some times, they would like to 
eat their
young.



"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> Gerald Woodward wrote:
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > Thanks for the info.  I would not think that that high a percentage of
> > athletes would say yes, knowing that they would die in five years, just to
> > win an Olympic gold medal...
>
> Well...this doesn't necessarily mean the study took place or that it was
> scientific if it did and it seems to me that I have heard various versions of
> this since well prior to 1995.
>
> "A Scenario, from a 1995 poll of 198 sprinters, swimmers, powerlifters and other
> assorted athletes, most of them U.S. Olympians of aspiring Olympians:
>
> You Are offered a banned performance-enhancing substance, with two guarantees:
> 1) You will not be caught. 2) You will win. Would you take the substance?
>
> One hundred and ninety-five athletes said yes; three said no.
>
> Scenario II: You are offered a banned performance-enhancing substance that comes
> with two guarantees: 1) You will not be caught. 2) You will win every
> competition you enter for the next five years, and then you will die from the
> side effects of the substance. Would you take it?
>
> More than half the athletes said yes."
>
> http://www.horizon-hs.net/~pe/gary%20paulson/wt%20lifting%20II/overtheedge.html
>
> Gerald Woodward wrote:
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > Thanks for the info.  I would not think that that high a percentage of
> > athletes would say yes, knowing that they would die in five years, just to
> > win an Olympic gold medal!  I would love to have one, but not at that cost!
> > I enjoy life for the most part and have a lot of things that I still want to
> > accomplish.  The gold medal is not that important to me that I give up my
> > life in five years, and I hate to lose even if I'm playing tiddlywinks!!!
> >
> > Gerald
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Martin
>
> Martin J. Dixon, B. Math. (Hons), C.A.,
> Millard Financial Consulting Inc.
> P.O. Box 367
> 96 Nelson Street
> Brantford, Ontario
> N3T 5N3
> Direct Dial: (519) 759-3708 Ext. 231
> Telephone: (519) 759-3511
> Private Facsimile: (519) 759-8548
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web site: www.millards.com
> Practice Areas: http://www.millards.com/profs/mjd.htm
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE:
> This email may be confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for
> the intended recipient only.  Access, disclosure, copying, distribution
> or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a
> criminal offence.  Please delete if obtained in error and email
> confirmation to the sender.



Re: t-and-f: who would use drugs?

Chicago, Boston, or both?

Jim Gerweck wrote:

> on 10/6/03 8:13 PM, Tom Derderian at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Must be the pitchers are using.
>
> Well, not the Sox relievers.



t-and-f: Study: Can Coffee Improve Your Performance?

Can Coffee Improve Your Performance?

"A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia has found 
evidence that
caffeine taken prior to exercise can lessen the muscle pain experienced during intense 
exercise. In
the past research has shown that caffeine improves endurance during exercise. This 
study suggests
that improved endurance may be related to caffeine's hypoalgesic properties."

http://sportsmedicine.about.com/b/a/029526.htm



t-and-f: [Fwd: CHICAGO: Bonus incentive for Americans



 Original Message 
Subject: NEWS RELEASE - CHICAGO MARATHON
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:28:28 -0500

LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon press release.  


  LASALLE BANK CHICAGO MARATHON TO OFFER BONUS INCENTIVE
   FOR AMERICAN OLYMPIC HOPEFULS
   Up to 100 American Athletes Competing for Bonus Purse
and U.S. Olympic Marathon Qualifying Times

October 7, 2003 (Chicago)---With the confirmation of the American women's
elite athlete field last week and the American men's field this week, The
LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon will offer a bonus incentive for runners
looking to earn qualifying times for the 2004 Olympic Trials.

"The Marathon has been very supportive of young athletes with Olympic
aspirations," said Carey Pinkowski, executive race director.  "We decided
to offer this incentive program to reward and help offset the cost of
training for and traveling to Birmingham, Alabama and St. Louis, Missouri
for the men's and women's U.S. Olympic Trials.  Our hope is that we will
assist American marathon runners in achieving their goals of competing in
the U.S. Olympic Trials."

The Marathon will offer $3,500 to any American Male that has a sub 2:20:00
effort (the "A" U.S. Trials Standard), $2,500 to any American Male that has
a sub 2:22:00 effort (the "B" U.S. Trials Standard), $3,500 to any American
Female that has a sub 2:40:00 effort (the "A" U.S. Trials Standard) and
$2,500 to any American Female that has a sub 2:48:00 effort (the "B" U.S.
Trials Standard).

Up to one hundred American athletes will compete for both qualifying times
and the bonus prize purse during this year's Marathon.  Among the American
men are two previously confirmed runners: Dan Browne and Mike Donnelly.
They will be joined by Trent Briney, Nick Cordes, Josh Cox, Rod DeHaven,
Shawn Found, Mike Fox, Dan Held, Mebrahtom Keflezighi, James Lander, Todd
Reeser, Ben Rosario and Brian Sell.

Four of these runners ? Mike Fox, James Lander, Ben Rosario and Brian Sell
? have participated in the Hansons-Brooks Olympic Distance Running Project
and three of them will make their Chicago Marathon debut this year.
Rosario is the only member of the group who has run in the Chicago
Marathon.

The American women's elite athlete pool includes: Jenny Spangler, Colleen
De Reuck, Jennifer Tonkin and Kimberly Fitchen-Young, who have competed in
the Chicago Marathon in years past.  They will be joined by Chicago
Marathon newcomers Julia Stamps, Deeja Youngquist and Rachel
Sauder-Kinsman.

Elite athletes will compete this Sunday for the highest Marathon purse
ever, $550,000.  The male and female winners each will earn $100,000, the
largest first place payout in the sport.  The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago
Marathon begins Sunday, October 12 at 8:00 a.m., starting and finishing in
Chicago's Grant Park.  The Marathon has drawn its registration cap of
40,000 participants.  CBS 2 CHICAGO is the official broadcast partner of
The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon and will cover the race live from 6:00
a.m. to 11:00 a.m. race day.

   # # #


Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll

But, I guess that proves something. If a guy will give his left and right ones for 
$2500, surely
he'll dope up for $60,000.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Alan Tobin wrote:
>
> >That is pretty freaked up Malmo. I would give my left and right nut to get
>
> >$2500 for the male equivalent 2:37 marathon.
>
> Thanks for sharing, Alan.
>
> Phil



t-and-f: Q for stat geeks

At the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon yesterday, Jenny Spangler, 40, ran 2:32:38 
(missed A standard
by 38 seconds) to set U.S. masters best for the marathon (13th/3rd US/1st Masters/1st 
Illinois - she
picked up a lot of bonus cash.)


Question: Jenny Spangler currently holds the U.S. best at the junior and masters level 
for the
marathon. Has anyone ever held a junior and a masters best/record at the same time?


Junior mark: marathon 2:33:52a JENNY SPANGLER (IL/19) DULUTH, MN (061183)


Old Masters' mark: marathon 2:35:08 LAURIE BINDER (CA/44) MINNEAPOLIS, MN (100691)





Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago

His PRs in the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon press guide: 13:02/27:21, both in 2000. 
He is 25
(4/8/78) (8/4/78 for the Europeans.) There was a pack of about six Kenyans at about 
M20 until Ruttu
threw in a 4:34 (1:03:35/1:02:15) (last 10K:29:26) and it was over.

With first place money and timed bonuses, he earned $225,000US, plus what ever New 
Balance - his
sponsor - gave him. Also, Paul Koech, second place, is sponsored by New Balance. New 
Balance is also
the shoe sponsor of LBCM. So, there could be a good argument that he was highly 
incentivesed to run
well. Maybe a lot of green checks with George Washington's face on them is the only 
drug he needed.

For some reason, his agent and coach are not listed. I know at least one of the elite 
runners
trained with Tergat and had Rosa as a coach. I forget who it was, so I'm not adding 
icing to your
cake just yet. But, I will get this info if someone has not supplied it yet.

alan tobin wrote:

> When a runner I barely heard of runs his first ever marathon 8 seconds off a
> record that was just broke I start to wonder. 27:30 10k  2:05:50 marathon.
> Call me a pessimist if you want. Icing on the cake would be if he's a part
> of Dr. Rosa's camp. Anyone know?
>
> Alan
>
> >From: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: (T&FMail List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win
> >at  Chicago
> >Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:16:41 -0700
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc11-f33.hotmail.com ([65.54.167.40]) by
> >mc11-s17.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 12 Oct
> >2003 11:59:16 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.13]) by
> >mc11-f33.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 12 Oct
> >2003 11:58:24 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])by
> >darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9CIMqE8021882for
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:22:52 -0700
> >(PDT)
> >Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by darkwing.uoregon.edu
> >(8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9CIMqjY021881for t-and-f-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct
> >2003 11:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us (velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us
> >[168.150.193.10])by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
> >h9CIMoE8021862for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:22:50
> >-0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from user-dp1el8yc6y.cal.net (dcn235-28.dcn.davis.ca.us
> >[168.150.235.28])by velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us (8.11.4/8.11.4/Omsoft) with
> >ESMTP id h9CIEng22159;Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
> >X-Message-Info: yOfSAGsvVmXUyZvKoX7IYkust6GnxSMllxkgGYAi1YY=
> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Precedence: bulk
> >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2003 18:58:24.0778 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[D04E3EA0:01C390F2]
> >
> >Sunday October 12, 06:50 PM
> >
> >Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago
> >http://uk.sports.yahoo.com/031012/323/eawyq.html
> >
> >Click to enlarge photo
> >CHICAGO (AFP) - First-time marathoner Evans Rutto of Kenya and reigning
> >Boston Marathon champion Svetlana Zakharova of Russia won titles at the
> >Chicago Marathon.
> >
> >Rutto won in 2hr 05min 50sec, eight seconds off the race mark, American
> >Khalid Khannouchi's old world best of 2:05:42 in 1999.
> >Click to enlarge photo
> >Kenya's Paul Tergat set the world marathon best of 2:04:55 at the Berlin
> >Marathon on September 28.
> >
> >But Rutto's run does break the world mark for first-time marathon runners,
> >which had been 2:06:47 by Wilson Onsari in Paris this year.
> >
> >"I was very surprised by the time," Rutto said. "I'm very happy. I felt
> >good all the way, very strong."
> >
> >Zakharova won in 2:23:07 with runner-up Constantina Tomescu-Dita 28 seconds
> >behind.
> >
> >"It was hard to hold up at the end," Zakharova said. "It was hot. I like it
> >here very much and I'll be back next year."
> >
> >Rutto took home 225,000 dollars while Zakharova received 110,000 dollars.
> >Each won 100,000 dollars for the victory but the Kenyan captured more in
> >bonus prize money.
> >
> >A late-race surge brought victory for Zakharova, pulling away from her
> >Romanian rival in the final mile for the triumph.
> >
> >"I tried to hold on for the win, but it was not possible," Tomescu-Dita
> >said. "I had pain in my legs and my stomach."
> >
> >Latvian Jelena Prokopcuka was third, followed by Russia's Albina Ivanova
> >and Poland's Grazyna Syrek.
> >
> >Kenyans swept the top five men's spots with Paul Koech second in an
> >unofficial time of 2:07:07 and Daniel Njenga third in an unofficial 2:07:41
> >over the 26.2-mile course. Peter Chebet was fourth with Jimmy Muindi fifth.
> >
> >Moroccan Abdelkader El Mouaziz was sixth, followed by American Mebrahton
> >Keflezh

Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champZakharova win at Chicago

Which record? He missed Chicago's record (2:05:42) by eight seconds.

But, Ruttu has the record for the fastest debut.

"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> Alan was talking about the record that was just broken and it was 12 seconds off.
>
> Richard McCann wrote:
>
> > Actually, he's 55 seconds off the WR.
>
> > At 06:35 PM 10/13/2003 +, alan tobin wrote:
> > >When a runner I barely heard of runs his first ever marathon 8 seconds off
> > >a record that was just broke I start to wonder.



Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago

She's a tall, good looking blond. Gave up her job as an air traffic controller in 
Albuquerque so she
could train more. I would stake Alan's life on it that she's not taking 
performance-enhancing
drugs;)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> not barely heard of...
> U. S. girl debut in sub 2:30. Where is the rant??
>
> In a message dated 10/13/2003 12:47:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >When a runner I barely heard of runs his first ever marathon 8 seconds
> >off a record that was just broke I start to wonder. 27:30 10k  2:05:50
> marathon.
> >
> >Call me a pessimist if you want. Icing on the cake would be if he's a part
> >
> >of Dr. Rosa's camp. Anyone know?
> >
> >Alan
> >



Re: t-and-f: soul

Hey, Heeey, HY, I got Martin's bookmark:

http://www.funky-stuff.com/jamesbrown/



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hell, Martin has soul
>
>  I've got too much soul
> -James Brown
>
> In a message dated 10/13/2003 2:57:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >Where do you suggest people go that are looking for that lost soul? I'm
> >not being facetious. I'd like to know so I can bookmark it.
> >
> >Robert J Howell wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Regardless of what Randy says, Kim has it right.  This list has no soul,
> >> no personality.  It is only a shell of what it was.
> >>
> >> Robbie Howell



Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago

27:45 July, 4, 1999 - Atlanta
13:24 Sept. 14, 1997 - Providence, R.I.

Looking for a blank VCR tape, I found an indoor meet from about 1995. I'll have to go 
back and
review it, but Khannouchi finished fourth in a 3000, two Americans beat him, one was 
Bob Kennedy.

Steve Shea wrote:

> What's Khanouchi's 10k PR?
>
> Steve S.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: alan tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova
> win at Chicago
>
> > When a runner I barely heard of runs his first ever marathon 8 seconds off
> a
> > record that was just broke I start to wonder. 27:30 10k  2:05:50 marathon.
> > Call me a pessimist if you want. Icing on the cake would be if he's a part
> > of Dr. Rosa's camp. Anyone know?
> >
> > Alan
> >



Re: t-and-f: rutto

Wow! So, "State of the sport..." whatever that means ... gives you some right to blame 
an entity,
which then gives you carte blanche to make accusations on any individual your opinion 
stirs you to,
even though you do NOT have a shred of evidence to vilify that person.

That reminds me of a book I read in h.s. or college. I think it was called, "Salem 
Witch Trials."

P.S. Is this what the list was like in the good old days?

alan tobin wrote:

> If the state of this sport was different I wouldn't be so suspicious. Don't
> blame me, blame the sport.
>
> alan
>
> >From: peter watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: peter watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: t-and-f: rutto
> >Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc5-f16.hotmail.com ([65.54.252.23]) by mc5-s15.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:08:57 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.13]) by
> >mc5-f16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 15 Oct 2003
> >06:05:47 -0700
> >Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])by
> >darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9FCnTJf019915for
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:49:29 -0700
> >(PDT)
> >Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])by darkwing.uoregon.edu
> >(8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9FCnSqv019906for t-and-f-outgoing; Wed, 15 Oct
> >2003 05:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from web21107.mail.yahoo.com (web21107.mail.yahoo.com
> >[216.136.227.109])by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id
> >h9FCnRJf019750for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:49:27
> >-0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from [152.163.252.196] by web21107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed,
> >15 Oct 2003 05:49:27 PDT
> >X-Message-Info: x4V9WGjv0S9twfp7C5v5wrqAONg8KFxDIrczlQydMTo=
> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Precedence: bulk
> >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2003 13:05:49.0480 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[0E013280:01C3931D]
> >
> >Alan think how you would feel had you just run the
> >race of your life only to have people suspecting the
> >worst. If you witnessed the training and dedication
> >evans (and paul)went through you would have no
> >questions. Try having 5 hard workouts a week an doing
> >nothing in your life but running, sleeping and eating
> >properly. If it were not for having massage 3 times a
> >week and being completly commited to the marathon
> >buildup they would not have made it. Even so Paul
> >ended up with hamstring problems that did not allow
> >him to race to his fullest potential.
> >Evans life has just changed so much and he is the
> >happiest guy in the world right now. Why to you have
> >to assume drugs in every situation in this sport and
> >belittle such an outstanding run.
> >There were times in my life when people ran fast and i
> >would think like you "oh drugs" but my eyes have been
> >opened to the natural talent that is in this world.
> >Evans has one of the most efficent and smooth strides
> >i have ever seen he was made to run.
> >One last comment on this long post. We were in the car
> >coming home from training and talking about drug
> >allegations and such when paul said something to the
> >effect "had i ever taken drugs i would not have run
> >26:30 i would have run 24 minutes"
> >
> >__
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> >http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> _
> Get 10MB of e-mail storage! Sign up for Hotmail Extra Storage.
> http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es



Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago

Here are some thoughts from Arthur Lydiard. There was some related discussion at the 
Chicago
Marathon a couple years ago, because of a comment by Frank Shorter that elite American 
distance
runners wait too long to run a marathon. His comment was a little more critical than 
this, but I
don't want to paraphrase and take a chance of misrepresenting what he meant. But, I 
think it was
obvious that Shorter believes athletes should be running the marathon at earlier ages. 
Because of
this, I posed the following two questions to Mr. Lydiard.

The "elite marathoner" referred to here in the second question was Paul Evans.

Sorry for the shameless plug.


Chicago Athlete Magazine
Speedplay column March 2003
Q&A with the god of jog

http://www.chicagoaa.com/features/speedplaylydiard03.html#

Q: There was some discussion at the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon two
years ago regarding when an
elite 5000-10,000 track competitor should run a marathon. Is there a
best age when an elite distance
runner should race at the marathon distance? Should they mix high-level
track meetings with marathon
racing? Many American distance runners focus just on the track, and then
"move up" to the marathon
and never or seldom ever race on the track again.


A: Your aerobic development is a gradual thing.  It takes years and
years of marathon-type training
to develop your aerobic capacity to the fullest.  That is why, when in
1984 Carlos Lopes was running
a marathon for the Olympics, people said that he was too old.  I said
that it would be to his
advantage because he had developed fine aerobic base through years and
years of training.  Another
good example is Lorraine Moller.  In 1992 people thought she was too
old, in fact, her shoe company
dropped her contract because they thought she was too old.  She won the
bronze medal.  Now, that
does not mean you should wait till the very last moment to run a
marathon.  I found out years ago,
and this is the fundamental concept of my training program, that when I
started to train for the
marathon, my track time got better.  This is because of all the long
running I started to do.  Barry
Magee is a bronze medallist in the Olympic marathon in 1960 and he ran a
couple of seconds off the
world record for the three-mile run in 1961.  In fact, he became a
better track runner after he
started running marathons.  You see the same thing with the English girl
who set the world record
for the marathon (Paula Radcliffe).  She started running marathons last
spring and she had the best
track season of her life this past summer.  It’s just a matter of
balancing your training.


Q: One elite marathoner said to me that he thinks there might only be
about five good marathons in
the body. Is there a limit an elite athlete should race at the marathon
distance?


A: That’s a lot of rubbish.  You can run more than that.  That’s the
question of recovery.  With so
much money involved in marathon running today, some elite runners have
run a marathon, pick up a
check and move on to the next marathon to get paid again without
adequate recovery.  That shortened
their career.  But if you’re careful about recovery, you can keep on
running marathons and keep
improving.

Matthew Harber wrote:

> I'll ask this question acknowlegding that I haven't spent the time doing
> the research:
>
> It seems that more of the younger African runners are focusing on the
> marathon earlier in their careers and perhaps this has helped lead to an
> abundance of fast debuts.  The question: is it more common now for the
> young superbly talented africans to focus on the marathon at a younger
> age and thus develop quicker into the marathon then say ten years ago?
>
> The point was brought up last week that these trends and 'bursts' in
> performance take decades to build so it is likely that this was
> recognized several years ago and what we are witnessing now is the
> product of better marathon development for young runners.
>
> matt
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of alan tobin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ
> Zakharova win at Chicago
>
> "running a near a WR in one event implies drug use.  He's going to have
> to
> use a completely different basis for coming to that conclusion."
>
> It's not just running near a WR that implies drug use. It's when
> numerous
> people run near a WR that bothers me. It's when a marathon VIRGIN runs
> near
> a WR that bothers me. If KK runs a WR it wouldn't strike me as
> mysterious at
> all. He's been in the game for a while. He didn't debut at 2:05. The
> problem
> I have is that 7 of the top 10 marathon times in HISTORY have been run
> in
> 2002 or 2003. From 1988 to 1998 no one went under Dinsamo's record.
> Since
> then there's been 25 performances by 21 runners under that record. You
> will
> not find such a statistic duri

t-and-f: 'Spangler smashes masters record'







Spangler's unexpected U.S. masters record at the LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon earned 
her some
unexpected cash - $11,500

$5000 - third American
$3500 - U.S. "A" standard bonus
$1500 - first masters
$1000 - first from Illinois
$ 500 - first masters from Illinois

www.chicagoaa.com/news/chicagomarathon03spanglerrecord.html



Re: t-and-f: 'Designer' drug scandal looms

There was a segment on this on NBC's Today Show this Saturday morning.

Ed & Marsha Prytherch wrote:

> One positive from this is that USADA was able to maintain secrecy as they
> developed and used tests for the new drug. That alone justifies their
> existance.
> Ed Prytherch



Re: t-and-f: Potential retesting



"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> "The retestings could be the tip of a doping iceberg, Pipe suggested.
> Thousands of urine samples dating back several years are frozen at the
> Olympic-approved Montreal lab. Pipe said that as the identities of
> athletes who fail a new test become known, the CCES would consider
> looking back at old samples to find out how long the athlete had been
> using the drug and when its use became popular in the doping
> underground."
>
> This next quote is actually funny. Somehow I don't think the coach's
> motives were all that pure:

Are there any coaches who might be ticked off with their current or past athlete(s)?



>
>
> "“When you‘ve got a coach going to USADA with evidence, that speak to
> two things,” Pipe said. “It shows USADA is gaining credibility as a
> legitimate entity in addressing drug use. And perhaps there's a change
> in the culture of sport and the attitudes toward cheating. Someone has
> said ‘enough is enough.'”"
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031017.wstero1017/BNStory/Sports/
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin



Re: t-and-f: Another THG mystery

This is a Buck Q, but not unusual for there to be different forms of a med. Under the 
tongue would
be sublingual, but could be pill or tablet, chewable, liquid, injectable. Generally if 
something can
be produced and taken in different forms, the potency varies because absorption rates 
will differ.
Plus, there are cost and production factors, and maybe the injectable was a first 
generation and the
sublingual is a later version, which would leave little evidence behind, i.e. 
syringes, maybe less
metabolites in the system, etc.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> This THG stuff is said to be placed under the tongue- apparently it's not a pill
> and it's certainly not injected.
>
> So what was it doing in the syringe that was turned in to USADA by the
> 'mystery coach'.  Why would it be in a syringe?
>
> This story has as many red herring mysteries as that pair of women's
> underwear in the Kobe Bryant case.
>
> RT



Re: t-and-f: Chambers positive

Get ready for the Stone Age or BC Olympics, as in nothing but B and C teams in Greece.

"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> "Dwain Chambers, the fastest man in Europe and one of Britain's main
> hopes for an Olympic gold medal next year, has tested positive for a new
> banned designer..."
>
> http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,10082,1068204,00.html



Re: t-and-f: Chambers positive

Yea, typical overreaction, because this is just another typical lab raid. But, I don't 
overreact for
every lab raid, just the raids that involve multi government agencies, NGBs and other 
agencies
secretly collaborating, when possibly a few thousand drug screens will be retested, 
and only when 40
or more athletes get subpoenaed to testify. Other than that, I didn't overreact for 
any of the lab
raids we had last month.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> >Get ready for the Stone Age or BC Olympics, as in nothing but B and C teams in 
> >Greece.
>
> Typical overreaction.  So far no names have been kicked around that weren't involved
> with Conte.  So who all is a member of that club that Conte and Chambers were 
> involved
> with?  Even if we lose Montgomery, Toth, Marion, Chambers and some others, why
> wouldn't it still be an exciting Olympics?  I don't need them.
> I'd rather watch a bunch of honest athletes producing circa-1958 performances than a
> bunch of cheatin' suicidal 'roid-heads going ape-wild setting the bar up in the 
> stratosphere
> far out of reach of honest play-by-the-rules folks.
> Send Chambers, Toth & their like to the NFL where they'll be welcome among their
> fellow chemical addicts.
>
> RT



Re: t-and-f: Chambers positive

In a telepress conference Wednesday morning, Craig Masback, USATF CEO, said there were 
four THG A
sample positives from the U.S. Track Championships last June. He added that only three 
of these
athletes advanced to the World Championships and none were medalists.

"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> "Dwain Chambers, the fastest man in Europe and one of Britain's main
> hopes for an Olympic gold medal next year, has tested positive for a new
> banned designer..."
>
> http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,10082,1068204,00.html



Re: t-and-f: Chambers positive

You offer simple solutions for a problem that is apparently much more complex.

No, I think this time is different. When Craig Masback comes out and says, "USA Track 
& Field is at a crossroads," I think it is a bit more serious than just trotting out a 
couple of cheaters and handing out token suspensions.
Apparently, that message hasn't worked. IMHO, I think sponsors and NBC are getting 
restless, it's about credibility, and maybe there is an NGB status at stake.

I'm not sure what the real impact of big fines and life-time DQs will have; these 
won't discourage all. But, if a sponsor pulls money, if T&F loses money because of the 
doping issue, or if the sports reputation is hurt, then
the only American thing to do is sue the convicted dopers for damages.

Randy Treadway wrote:

> The 'back to the stoneage' and BC arguments are bogus, and are always trotted out 
> when cheaters get caught and people like the good TFN editor claim we'd be better 
> off just letting 'em dope all they want.
>
> It's very simple.  Keep catching as many cheaters as we can, and suspend their 
> butts.  DQ 'em for life if necessary.
> The resulting "fields" at major competitions will then be as they should be- as 
> clean as we can make them and a fair and level playing field.
>
> Yes, that might mean that many if not all world records should be thrown out and 
> start over again.  Don't take records "away" from anybody.  Just retire the records 
> the same way as when implement specifications are changed.
>
> It's not going back to stoneage.  It's pulling it back in where it should have 
> remained all along.  Using what the man upstairs gave us, and nothing else.

> (and the man upstairs isn't named Conte! :-)

But, I think there is a midlevel guy named Allmighty Dollar, and he's holding the 
starter's pistol now;)



Re: t-and-f: Chambers positive



I believe that question came up, but I am not sure of the answer. The teleconference
lasted about one hour and is on the USATF website:
 

The digital audio
replay of today’s USATF teleconference on its new “Zero Tolerance” anti-doping
plan is now posted at www.usatf.org

The
link is under the “Featured Items” section of the home page. You can access
it by going to www.usatf.org or clicking
on: Listen
to the "Zero Tolerance" teleconference
 
 
"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:
Wasn't the original rumour 20. Maybe that included
the modafinil positives?
Mike Prizy wrote:
> In a telepress conference Wednesday morning, Craig Masback, USATF
CEO, said there were four THG A
> sample positives from the U.S. Track Championships last June. He
added that only three of these
> athletes advanced to the World Championships and none were medalists.
>
> "Martin J. Dixon" wrote:
>
> > "Dwain Chambers, the fastest man in Europe and one of Britain's
main
> > hopes for an Olympic gold medal next year, has tested positive
for a new
> > banned designer..."
> >
> > http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,10082,1068204,00.html
--
Regards,
Martin
Martin J. Dixon, B. Math. (Hons), C.A.,
Millard Financial Consulting Inc.
P.O. Box 367
96 Nelson Street
Brantford, Ontario
N3T 5N3
Direct Dial: (519) 759-3708 Ext. 231
Telephone: (519) 759-3511
Private Facsimile: (519) 759-8548
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: www.millards.com
Practice Areas: http://www.millards.com/profs/mjd.htm
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email may be confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for
the intended recipient only.  Access, disclosure, copying, distribution
or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a
criminal offence.  Please delete if obtained in error and email
confirmation to the sender.




t-and-f: ACSM on steroid use







>From ACSM:

October 23, 2003

For immediate release


STEROIDS THREATEN HEALTH OF ATHLETES AND INTEGRITY OF SPORTS PERFORMANCE



American College of Sports Medicine Calls for Increased Vigilance in
Identifying and Eradicating Steroid Use



INDIANAPOLIS ?  The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) today
condemned the development and use of new “designer” steroids.  ACSM
considers chemicals, such as the recently identified Tetrahydrogestrinone, or THG, 
developed and
cloaked to avoid detection by doping tests, as serious threats to the health and 
safety of athletes,
as well as detriments to the principle of fair play in sports.  Any effort to veil or 
disguise
steroid use in sports through stealth, designer, or precursor means, puts elite, 
amateur and even
recreational athletes at risk.

The health risks associated with steroid use are severe.  Anabolic steroid use has 
been implicated
in early heart disease, including sudden death, the increase of bad cholesterol 
profiles (increased
LDL, lower HDL), an increase in tendon injuries, liver tumors, testicular atrophy, 
gynecomastia
(abnormal enlargement of breasts in males), male
pattern baldness, severe acne, premature closure of growth plates in adolescents, 
emotional
disturbances and other significant health risks.  The health risks of designer 
steroids compared to
or beyond symptoms of anabolic steroid use are currently unknown.

“No one knows the extent of this yet,” said Gary I. Wadler, M.D., FACSM.  “If there is 
one great
concern that THG has exposed, it’s the potential that other non-detectable anabolic 
steroids may be
in the pipeline.  The scientific and public health implications of this issue
are quite disconcerting.”  Wadler, an ACSM sports medicine physician who serves on the 
Health,
Medical and Research Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and is a leading 
international
authority on doping in sports, says the appearance of these new drugs and their use 
models dangerous
behavior, potentially causing physical and psychological damage to young athletes.

ACSM calls for national compliance with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) 
regulations and
to the World Anti-doping Code.  Further, the College stresses the need for “clean” 
athletes, those
not taking performance-enhancing drugs or supplements, to publicly deplore the use of 
steroids among
their teammates and peers.  ACSM underscores the critical leadership role clean 
athletes can take in
disavowing performance-enhancing drug use and advocating fair play to protect the 
integrity of
sports competition.  Other individuals who influence young athletes, such as parents 
and coaches,
should establish a no-tolerance policy for performance-enhancing substances, and 
intervene whenever
necessary.

In the past 20 years, sports governing bodies have made substantial efforts to 
eradicate steroid
use.  Drug testing implemented by the National Collegiate Athletic Association, for 
example, has
been instrumental in decreasing the use of steroids among college athletes.  Last 
year, ACSM called
for mandatory testing for steroid use in Major League Baseball.  (ACSM’s Position 
Stand, “The Use of
Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids in Sports,” ACSM condemns the use of these drugs among 
athletes.  To
read a copy of this Position Stand, please visit http://www.acsm-msse.org).  Yet, 
information
gathered very recently, over just the past few years, indicates an upward trend in 
steroid use among
amateur athletes at the college and even high school levels.

ACSM will conduct a national news teleconference, Friday, October 24, 2003 at 1:00 
p.m. EDT to
address the issues of athlete health, the importance of fair play, and the call for 
increased
vigilance on the part of athletes, coaches, parents, and others. Participants will 
include Wadler,
ACSM President-elect William O. Roberts, M.D., FACSM,
and Andrew Pipe, M.D., FACSM, Chairman of the Canadian Center for Ethics in Sport.



The American College of Sports Medicine is the largest sports medicine and exercise 
science
organization in the world.  More than 20,000 International, National, and Regional 
members are
dedicated to advancing and integrating scientific research to provide educational and 
practical
applications of exercise science and sports medicine.


-30-



Re: t-and-f: more or less cheating

Hey! Hey! I resemble that remark! No one got hurt - yet. Besides, it was Sox fans that 
attacked the umpire. We are still waiting on the results of the B sample from the 
designer brats.

"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:

> Oh come on Randy. We aren't neanderthal Cubs' fans.
>
> Randy Treadway wrote:
>
> > Looking at the darker side of recent developments, I wonder if UCLA (or USADA) is 
> > providing a security guard for Catlin and his team?  When large amounts of money 
> > are at stake, snakes tend to come out of their holes
> > ...see the recent unsolicited offer by some Russian emigre to Kobe Bryant to knock 
> > off the Colorado woman for a healthy fee...
> >
> > RT



Re: t-and-f: did you see regina's picture on espn.com?http://espn.go.com/oly/index.html

Tell your tech guy track is the sport for those advanced degree, techie types, 
especially those with
chemistry and pharmaceutical backgrounds;)


Geoff Thurner wrote:

>  i can't take credit for finding it - our info tech guy

> showed it to me (and he's never run track in his life, although he still knows a 
> heck a lot about
> the sport)

>
> g
>
> 
>
> Geoff Thurner
> Assistant Director - Track & Field, Cross Country, Soccer Contact
> University of Oregon Media Services - Athletics
> Len Casanova Center
> 2727 Leo Harris Parkway
> Eugene, OR  97401
>
> Phone: (541) 346-2250
> Fax: (541) 346-5449
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.GoDucks.com
>
> GO DUCKS!!  -  GO DUCKS!!  -  GO DUCKS!!



Re: t-and-f: Track v other sports

But does the Easter Bloc occur at the same time in the northern and southern 
hemispheres?

malmo wrote:

> The Easter Bloc occurs on the first Sunday after the first full on or
> after the Spring Equinox.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randall Northam
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:10 AM
> To: Dan Kaplan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: Track v other sports
>
> Dan
> I think this discussion has gone far enough without bringing religion
> into it. Some of don't even know when Easter is next year so we are at
> a disadvantage - guilty until proven inoccent you might say - when it
> comes to the dissolution of what I understand is an important Christian
> festival.
> Randall Northam
>
> On Tuesday, Oct 28, 2003, at 19:25 Europe/London, Dan Kaplan wrote:
>
> > I've always felt the plateau of various events' marks is easily
> > explained
> > by the dissolution of the Easter Bloc.
> >



t-and-f: LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon Olympic Payout







Release from the LBCM:

 Original Message 
Subject: The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon Olympic Payout
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:23:33 -0600



LASALLE BANK CHICAGO MARATHON PAYS OUT $115,000 TO
 AMERICAN OLYMPIC HOPEFULS
   Nearly 40 Athletes Earned U.S.
Olympic Marathon Qualifying Standard

CHICAGO (October 29, 2003)?The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon helped many
American runners continue their Olympic dreams by providing a cash bonus
for U.S. Olympic Standard qualifying times.  A total payout of $115,000 was
given to 39 American runners who met the required times for the 2004 U.S.
Olympic Trials at The 2003 LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon.

"We focused on supporting our male and female American marathon runners
with this incentive program because we knew this year was a special year
with the U.S. Olympic Trials coming up," said Carey Pinkowski, executive
race director.  "It's financially challenging for these athletes to
properly train for these Trials and pay their bills, so we hope this money
will offer them assistance to achieve their Olympic goals."

The Marathon paid $3,500 to every American male who had a sub 2:20:00
effort (the "A" U.S. Trials Standard), $2,500 to every American male who
had a sub 2:22:00 effort (the "B" U.S. Trials Standard), $3,500 to every
American female who had a sub 2:40:00 effort (the "A" U.S. Trials Standard)
and $2,500 to every American female who had a sub 2:48:00 effort (the "B"
U.S. Trials Standard).  There were 22 men (10 "A" standard and 12 "B"
standard) who received a payout and 18 women (five "A" standard and 13 "B"
standard).

The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon had the most qualifying times for any
2003 marathon for both men (36) and women (33).  (Some runners qualify more
than once.)

The American runners who achieved their Olympic Standard were pleased with
the outcome of the race and seemed grateful for the added bonus.

"The Chicago Marathon has always been extremely supportive of all its
runners, regardless of ability and this is one more example," said Brian
Sell who is a part of the HANSONS-Brooks Distance Project based in
Rochester Hills, Mich.  "I just wanted to remain competitive throughout the
entire race and I was able to achieve my Olympic Standard.  The next step
is the Trials and the Marathon is helping me get there."

"There were a lot of American women who finished in a pack for the 'B'
Standard.  I think there were about 15 of us right around the 2:48:00
mark," said Lucie Mays from Carmel, Ind.  "It was an overwhelming
experience for all us to celebrate right after the finish line knowing we
were all going to the Trials and even better we got some extra money."

The men and women U.S. Olympic Standard qualifiers are all listed below.

Male "A" Standard Qualifiers  Male "B" Standard Qualifiers
Dan Browne, Portland, Ore.  Paul Aufdemberge, Redford,
Mich.
Josh Cox, El Cajon, Calif   Trent Briney, Utica, Mich.
Peter Clusener, Arcata, Calif.  Edmund Burke, Burtonville,
Md.
Mike Donnelley, Portland, Ore.  Nick Cordes, Utica, Mich.
Peter Gilmore, Menlo Park, Calif.   Rod DeHaven, Madison, Wisc.
Jason Lehmkuhle, St. Paul, Minn.Nick Gramsky, McLean, Va.
Mebrahtom Keflezighi, Mamoth Lakes, Calif.  Mark Manz, Kiel, Wisc.

Steven Moreno, Oakland, Calif.  Matthew Marcini, NY
Todd Reeser, Rochester, NYTom McGlynn, Burlingame, Calif.
  Brian Sell, Utica, Mich.
  Terrance Shea, Somerville, Mass.
  Kevin Taylor, Raleigh, NC

Female "A" Standard Qualifiers  Female "B" Standard
Qualifiers
Colleen DeReuck, Boulder, Colo. Mina Caron, Andover, Mass.

Kimberly Fitchen-Young, Santa Cruz, Calif.  Mimi Fallon, Walpole, Mass.
Rachel Sauder-Kinsman, Archbold, Ohio   Katy Hollbacher, San
Francisco, Calif.
Jenny Spangler, Gurnee, Ill.Heather Hunt, Englewood,
Colo.
Deeja Youngquist, Alburquerque, NMNicole Kulikov, Fort Collins,
Colo.
  Michelle Lafleur, Savannah, Ga.
  Erica Larson, Los Alamos, NM
  Susan Loken, Phoenix, Ariz.
  Lucie Mays, Carmel, Ind.
  Doreen McCoubie, Malvern, Penn.
  Zika Palmer, Blowing Rock, NC
  Julia Stamps, NY
  Jennifer Tonkin, Seattle, Wash.



   # # #


t-and-f: Great Spivey stuff






Many here have already seen this, but I think it is good reading for youger runners or 
any one
coaching younger or up-and-comming runners.

http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/tfn/displayArticle.jsp?id=71



Re: t-and-f: LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon Olympic Payout

Right about the different committees. The men's and women's committees can pay money, 
not pay money,
or do what they want with it. I am holding the 1996 USATF Marathon Media Guide 
(Shooting Star Media
- thanks Larry Eder.)

For the 1996 U.S. Trials, the women were paid 20 deep, $45,000, 40,000, 35,000, 18,000 
down to
$1,000. Total purse: $250,000 Note: $3500 was 15th and $2500 was 16th.

Below the prize list: "The ultimate prize for the first three runners is the honor of 
representing
the United States during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta. These three women will 
be the first
track and field athletes to be selected for the U.S. Olympic team."


The men paid out to 15th: $100,000, $40,000, 30,000, 20,000, down to $1,000 for a 
total purse of
$250,000. The 100K was listed as the largest payday ever for first, excluding time 
bonuses, etc. If
I recall correctly, the big hit on first and the nice purse was an attempt to get 
fast, hungry
people out for the marathon, plus the Olympics were on American soil. Note: 10th: 
$4000; 11th:
$3000; 12th: $2500.



edndana wrote:

> >BUT you failed to answer my question about fairness at least as to what
> > you would say if women were the victims of the disparity instead of men.
> If
> > you were going to the Trials and winning money, and women who were better
> > than you (i.e.proportionally closer to the world and Amerixcan records)
> were
> > not similary rewarded, can you seriously say you would defend such
> > discrimination as fair?   Geoff
>
> Actually, am I wrong, or is there more money at the men's trials this time
> around?  If not, hasn't there been a time or two where that has been the
> case?  Another function of two different committees, two different races.
>
> - Ed Parrot



Re: t-and-f: 2004 Club XC Championships

Isn't it where the 2004 national convention - Portland, Ore. - is?

Tony Banovich wrote:

> Question for anyone out there who may know.  Has the location/date/etc. of
> the 2004 Club XC Champs been set?  Or, will that not be determined until the
> annual meeting in December.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tony
>
> Tony Banovich
> Billings, Montana



Re: t-and-f: This Week's Sign that Track Apocalypse is Upon Us

Two issues:

1. How can someone be considered athlete of the week if the beat Oprah's time by ONLY 
14 minutes?

2. Don't brag Sean, I think Oprah's was a gun time!


Jim Gerweck wrote:

> 3P. Diddy2 Combs named Athlete of the Week
>
> INDIANAPOLIS ? Sean 3P. Diddy2 Combs has been named USA Track &
> Field1s Athlete of the Week for raising $2 million for charity by finishing
> the ING New York City Marathon on Sunday.
>
> A first-time marathoner, P. Diddy finished with a chip time of 4
> hours, 14 minutes, 54 seconds, accomplishing his goal of bettering Oprah
> Winfrey1s marathon time of 4:29:00 she set at the 1994 Washington D.C.
> Marathon.  His performance raised $2 million for charitable causes, which
> was double the amount he had expected to raise.  A native of Harlem, P.
> Diddy trained two months for the race and ran with an injured right knee.
>
> Combs plans to split the money between New York City1s public
> school system, the Children's Hope Foundation and Daddy's House Social
> Programs, which are two children1s advocate groups.   The entertainment
> mogul called his charity effort, 3Diddy Runs the City.2  Major donors to
> Combs1 cause included New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, rapper Jay-Z,
> Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez.  "We set a bar and we crushed that bar,2
> said P. Diddy.  3This is just a start. This wasn't a publicity stunt."
>
>   Combs' efforts generated interest to thousands of kids about long
> distance running in bringing it to a new light due to his pre-marathon
> coverage through non-sporting and track & field media outlets.



t-and-f: My third grader's math

My 9-year-old son asked me to help him with his third-grade math. He is studying 
decimals. This
particular section asked the students to correctly place the decimal in each word 
problem. Of the 23
possible answers, three were about track and field, one was on auto racing, and no 
other sports were
included.

Our sport still has hope in the United States!

Part A

No. 2 - Linford Christie ran the 100-meter dash in 996 seconds in the 1992 Olympics.

No. 3 - In the Same Olympics, Jan Zelezny threw the javelin 294166 feet.

No. 4 - Valentina Yegorova ran the marathon in 2 hours, 32 minutes, 41 seconds. She 
ran a distance
of 413 kilometers.



Re: t-and-f: My third grader's math

The lactate query might be more of a group project for him and his buds. But he takes 
his math with
the fourth graders. Maybe someone there knows;)

malmo wrote:

> Wow, that's pretty tough for a nine year old. Would require a little
> research on the internet.
>
> I still haven't found one student of exercise physiology who could tell
> me how many milligrams of lactate is 4.0 millimoles/liter. So much for
> "advanced science."
>
> I'll bet your kid could?
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Prizy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:21 PM
> To: Track List
> Subject: t-and-f: My third grader's math
>
> My 9-year-old son asked me to help him with his third-grade math. He is
> studying decimals. This particular section asked the students to
> correctly place the decimal in each word problem. Of the 23 possible
> answers, three were about track and field, one was on auto racing, and
> no other sports were included.
>
> Our sport still has hope in the United States!
>
> Part A
>
> No. 2 - Linford Christie ran the 100-meter dash in 996 seconds in the
> 1992 Olympics.
>
> No. 3 - In the Same Olympics, Jan Zelezny threw the javelin 294166 feet.
>
> No. 4 - Valentina Yegorova ran the marathon in 2 hours, 32 minutes, 41
> seconds. She ran a distance of 413 kilometers.



t-and-f: [Fwd: Marathon World Ranking System]



 Original Message 
Subject: Marathon World Ranking System
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:29:07 -0600
From: LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon



   LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon Chooses Not to Support
the Proposed World Marathon Ranking System
London, Berlin and Boston Marathons Share Decision

CHICAGO (November 12, 2003)?The LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon, along with
the London, Berlin, and Boston Marathons, has chosen to not support the new
world marathon ranking point system proposed by a major marathon title
sponsor last week.

The Chicago, London, Berlin, and Boston Marathons believe such a ranking
system could raise the profile of the sport, but must be organized and
administered by an independent organization rather than an event title
sponsor.

"We value the importance and critical component of sponsor involvement in
the sport of marathoning and we have worked very hard to get to this level
through the years," said Carey Pinkowski, executive race director for the
LaSalle Bank Chicago Marathon.  "Using an independent body is the only way
to fairly and systematically implement such a ranking system.  Furthermore,
this will allow all major marathons to participate without infringing upon
title sponsor's commitments."

Another challenge to this proposed world ranking system is that the
Chicago, London, Berlin, and Boston Marathons were not included in any
preliminary planning discussions.  Each marathon's race director was asked
to make an on-the-spot decision as to their support, involvement, and
participation in the system.

"It was frustrating for me not to have been involved in the development of
this concept or asked to participate in the planning process," added
Pinkowski.  "If all the race directors were involved in the initial
discussions, we could have added more value to the proposed system and
perhaps reached a more favorable outcome for the entire sport, which is
precisely what this world-class sport deserves."

The Chicago, London, Berlin, and Boston Marathons hope with added
discussion a collective decision-making process can be developed that will
allow all major marathons to participate in such a system.  If organized
and implemented properly, a system like this would bring the sport together
throughout the world and be a welcomed advancement.

   # # #


Re: t-and-f: My third grader's math

My kids' school district has been using a math curriculum developed by the University 
of Chicago.
Apparently none of the UC nor UCTC people on this list were consulted.

Jim Gerweck wrote:

> Mike, ya gotta follow the word problem - place the decimal point. 41.3 km
> comes up a little more than half a mile short of the requisite distance -
> but then, maybe the same folks writing it think the marathon is exactly 26
> miles.
>
> Jim
>
> > ...I don't know about that Jim...seems to me that 413 kilos is an awfully
> > long marathon2:32...what pace does that work out to for 413 kilometers??
> >
> > MF
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Gerweck
> > To: Track List
> > Sent: 11/12/2003 4:24 AM
> > Subject: Re: t-and-f: My third grader's math
> >
> > on 11/11/03 10:21 PM, Mike Prizy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> No. 4 - Valentina Yegorova ran the marathon in 2 hours, 32 minutes, 41
> >> seconds. She ran a distance
> >> of 413 kilometers.
> >
> > Well, I guess the Russians are known for cutting the course ;-)
> > --
> > Jim Gerweck
> > Running Times



Re: t-and-f: My third grader's math

If these questions are for my son's third grade class, I would like to omit No. 3 
until after they
have their family living lecture in the sixth grade.

sprintfinish wrote:

> The questions seem a little outdated. A more pertinent test might read as
> follows:
>
> 1. A test is conducted for a previously undetectable designer drug. What
> percentage of World Championship competitors will test positive?
>
> 2. A 40 year old woman runs 1500m in under 4 minutes. How much
> tetrahydrogestrinone will accidentally find its way into her urine sample?
>
> 3. A man wishes to run 100 metres in under 10 seconds. How many litres of
> beer should he drink on the previous night? (Answer may also be expressed in
> quantity of sexual partners)



Re: t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Results of Steroid Testing Spur Baseball to Set Tougher Rules

Yea, but MLB will have to start using a Chicago-style softball to keep the ball from 
being hit into
orbit.

Jorma Kurry wrote:

> The good news is, if the steroid usage keeps up, there may soon be no more
> juiced balls in MLB.
>
> - Original Message -
>
> > >Even after the first test - what is the punishment - TREATMENT?  MLB is a
> > joke and the
> > >constant work stoppages are just one problem.  The balls may be juiced,
> > but no more so than the players!



Re: t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Results of Steroid Testing Spur Baseball to Set Tougher Rules

And this was mainly Spring Training testing, pre-THG. What would the avg. number per 
team be if MLB
retested for THG?

Michael Bartolina wrote:

> 7% of 1438 athletes tested is 100 athletes!  They had
> 100 positives and they were not trying to catch
> anyone!  Imagine how many guys have used in the past
> and just happened to be clean for the test!  I feel
> unable to use any other punctuation than 's
>
> 100 positives!  100 positives!  100 positives!
> That averages out to 3 or 4 positives per team.
>



t-and-f: [Fwd: Fraley named Nike Coach of the Year]




 
 Original Message 


Subject: 

Fraley named Nike Coach of the Year



Date: 

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:34:04 -0500



From: 

"USATF Communications" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Organization: 

USA Track & Field



To: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Contact:  
Nick Karas


   
USATF Communications Intern

   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
317-261-0500 x357

   
http://www.usatf.org



FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tuesday,
December 2, 2003



Fraley
named Nike Coach of the Year



GREENSBORO,
N.C. ­ Bob Fraley, the chair of USATF men’s pole vault development
and Director of Track & Field at Fresno State University, has been
named USA Track & Field’s 2003 Nike Coach of the Year.
Fraley will receive the award Friday, December 5, at Jesse Owens Awards
Dinner and Xerox Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony, held at USATF’s 2003
Annual Meeting in Greensboro, North Carolina.



Fraleyplayed
a pivotal role in rejuvenating the pole vault in the United
States when in 1989 he created the Pole Vault Summit, now held in Reno,
Nevada. Featuring competitions and an exchange of knowledge about pole
vaulting, the event attracts more than 2,000 male and female athletes,
from teen-agers to Olympic gold medalists. His work has reaped dividends:
in the last three years alone, Team USA men’s pole vaulters have won the
gold and silver medals at both the 2000 Olympic Games and 2001 IAAF World
Indoor Championships, as well as the bronze medal at the 2001 World Outdoor
Championships.



In
2003, his contributions reached a new level when he donated his salary
to the school’s men’s track program in order to prevent it from being cut
due to budgetary reasons.



“I
feel very honored, but I’m more shocked than anything,” Fraley said. “This
honor is huge and I’m just very thankful to be selected. USA Track &
Field has always been supportive of my activities to try to improve the
sport and they’ve given me a platform to do a lot of things. We have to
get out and sell the sport, and USA Track & Field has done a really
good job of giving me the opportunity to get out and do those things.”



A
graduate of Fresno State, Fraley has coached
37 NCAA All-Americans at his alma mater. He coached three individual NCAA
titles, all of which were by his son, Doug, in the pole vault. In addition,
Fraley has coached 64 league titlists, and has been named the Region 8
head indoor coach of the year five times.



“Coach
Fraley’s contribution to the sport of track and field, and particularly
to the pole vault, cannot be understated,” said USATF CEO Craig Masback.
“He almost single-handedly made pole vaulting the popular phenomenon it
is today in the United States,and
our recent success in the event speaks for itself.
He is very deserving of this honor.”




“Nike is proud to congratulate Coach Fraley as the Nike Coach of the Year
honoree,” said John Capriotti, Global Sports Marketing Director of Nike.
“He has made a phenomenal difference in the lives of thousands of young
people over the years."



#
# #







PLEASE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE: If you would like to respond, please direct
your e-mail to the "Contact" person listed at the top of the text of this
message. To be removed from this mailing list or to notify us of a change
in your e-mail address, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED].








t-and-f: [Fwd: Pappas, Drossin Kastor win Jesse Owens Awards]




 
 Original Message 


Subject: 

USATF Teleconference Excerpts - 2003 Jesse Owens Awards



Date: 

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:49:45 -0500



From: 

"USATF Communications" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



To: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]






2003
Jesse Owens Awards teleconference excerpts




USA
Track & Field on Monday announced Tom Pappas andDeena
DrossinKastor
as winners of the 2003 Jesse Owens Awards. Pappas and Drossin Kastor
appeared Monday afternoon on a USATF media teleconference. Below are excerpts
from the teleconference. A full, digital audio replay also will be posted
online at www.usatf.org. Also visit
www.usatf.org for the full press release
announcing the awards.



TOM
PAPPAS



Q:
What is your reaction to winning the Jesse Owens Award?



Tom
Pappas: This is quite an honor. I was looking at the previous winners,
and to have my name put up alongside those guys is definitely exciting
for me. I noticed I was the first decathlete to win it, which was a nice
feeling. This is a huge award. For me, this is as big as it gets, to win
the Jesse Owens Award and be named the male athlete of the year in the U.S.
There were many great performances ­ Allen Johnson, Dwight Phillips
winning World Indoor and Outdoor. I thought I had a chance, but to be voted
the athlete of the year was a huge achievement for me.



Q:
Will you compete again at the World Indoor Championships in 2004?



Tom
Pappas: I will compete in the World Indoors. I think that’s definitely
a meet that gets me ready for the outdoor season. I wouldn’t want to change
anything. Last year at World Indoors was a great meet. I felt like I still
left a lot of points out there.



Q:
Other decathletes have become multimedia superstars. You’re a humble guy;
what kind of opportunities do you think might come your way?



Tom
Pappas: I’ve already had a lot of things come my way. I am of Greek descent,
and I think that’s the biggest thing on everyone’s mind. It’s always been
my goal to the win the Olympics, and I think some good things would be
in store if I could pull it off.



Q:
Have you gotten inquiries from the Greek media?



A:
Through my web site, about 75 percent of my emails are from Greeks ­
media or fans. They are mostly from Greece, but
I get several from Greek Americans as well. I’ve never been there (to Greece).



Q:
What event is there the most room for improvement?



A:
Definitely the 1,500. My shoulder was bothering me in the javelin last
year. If I can get my shoulder better so I can practice, that should be
a huge event for me. I think my biggest improvements will come in the technical,
second-day events.



Q:
Did you have shoulder surgery after Paris?



Tom
Pappas: Yes I did. It was bothering me all of 2003. I had an MRI and they
decided nothing was really wrong. They went in and scoped it. The rotator
cuff and tendons were fine. There was some fraying of cartilage they cleaned
up, and that was about it. It’s been about 8 weeks since the surgery, and
I’m back to pretty much all of the normal lifts.



Q: 
Does being the reigning World Champion affect how you approach the Olympics?



Tom
Pappas: To end the season with the confidence I have right now is a good
thing, but it won’t change the way I compete.



DEENA
DROSSIN KASTOR



Q:
What is your reaction to winning the Jesse Owens Award?



Deena
Drossin Kastor: To win this award is very flattering.
It’s the greatest honor in track and field, so it’s extraordinary to think
of my name joining that list. It’s extremely humbling. It was an incredible
year that I was able to reach some of my goals.



Q: 
What have you learned from the marathon distance?



Deena
Drossin Kastor: The marathon is extremely humbling.
I don’t think anybody can say they’ve conquered it completely. There’s
always something in that race to lessen the perfection of it, to keep you
coming back for more thinking you can do better next time.



Q:
When you were running in high school, could you imagine yourself winning
these honors?



Deena
Drossin Kastor: I guess not. What keeps me coming
back year after year is hat my goals keep elevating and escalating. That’s
what athletics is all about. Any athlete on any level will admit that the
Olympics are always in the back of their mind, even at the young age of
11, when I started.



Q:
What will you focus on at the Olympic Trials?



Deena
Drossin Kastor: As of right now, the marathon is my
main focus, but I plan on running the 10 and 5 km on the track. I will
definitely go in the marathon if I get in the top 3 at the Trials. … If
I feel good after the Olympic marathon, I would like to run a fall marathon
as well.



Q:
What is your thinking in making the marathon your emphasis right now.



Deena
Drossin Kastor: I think it’s my strongest chance at earning a medal for
the United States. I wrote out a list of pros
and cons, and at the top of the list of pros is that it’s my best chance
for a  medal.



Q:
Where will your biggest improvements come?



Deena
Drossi

  1   2   >