Hi,
I am CCNP-WAN certified and have 3+ years of Cisco (formely StrataCom) WAN
switches experience. Is there anything you're looking for in particular?
Thanks,
Angel
Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hi,
I am CCNP-WAN certified and have 3+ years of Cisco (formely StrataCom) WAN
switches experience. Is there anything you're looking for in particular?
Thanks,
Angel
MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Surya Prakash
Larry,
You've not missed a thing. I felt like I was going a round about way of
doing something when there may be an easier way.
Agreed on the need to restrict access from DMZ to outside. I think I was
aiming more to get back to the point that I was at with conduits, rather
than trying to achieve
Hi all,
Probably this question has been asked before but
Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written)
and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco website.
I'm very curious (since it seems that the WAN + IP part is already
configured and
i want to take ccie written examination !
who can make a plan of study for me !
and please list the books and documents i should read !
thanks very much !
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34187&t=34187
--
FAQ, list a
Priscilla,
You're correct in that Fears' real fear at this point has not
been answered. ;-> In doing some quick research, I found that as you
mentioned IGMP(costly) and CGMP(a less costly solution) would assist in
providing one the ability to control multicast flooding. This is what
Thank you to all who post and answer my questions.
I am 3/4 of the way there. :)
I hope to get a book on Troubleshooting this week.
I used the Cisco Press Study Guide and a bit of Cisco Interactive Mentor
(CIM). I didn't really like CIM though. I found the labs to be very
confining. You coul
Chris,
Thanks for that...
I am working on CCNP right now, but the security is next on the list.
I noticed you are from Cleveland I am originally from ohio myself. I
bet it is cold right now.
Anyway thanks for the information and congradulations :) !!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groups
Hi all,
Have 2 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 and MSFC2 modules in each switch in the core.
And 4 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 in the access layer.
Have about 10 VLAN using using ISL. There is a multicast server connecte to
vlan 10 on CoreSwitch1.
Is using pim dense mode on the MSFC2 and igmp snooping enabl
That makes sense!
Thank you.
Pierre-Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34150]
The "Host Requirements RFC" (RFC
Thank you!
Pierre-Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152]
At 07:23 PM 2/1/02, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote:
>How
did you put the global frame-relay switching command on?
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I had problems while confguring my lab environment.
> I configure a 2600 router with 8 serial as FR switch.
> Please can any one post me a working config because my con
Mitch,
See Inline...
- Original Message -
From: "Eve Mitch"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 7:18 AM
Subject: Multicast in catalyst 6500 environment [7:34192]
> Hi all,
>
> Have 2 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 and MSFC2 modules in each switch in the
core.
> And 4 Catalyst 6509
test
Just trying to figure out why it's taking anywhere from 6 - 20 hours for my
posts to reach the site. Am I the only one?
Allen
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34197&t=34197
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscr
Need a little more information.
So I am clear you have:
CPE - T1 Telco - PRI-- CPE
Is it a full T1 point to point, all 24 channels? If it is full T1, I don't
understand the reasoning behind wanting it this way, and I don't see it
working.
On the same physical T1, can you have
""Ronnie"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> Probably this question has been asked before but
>
> Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written)
> and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco websi
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K
while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting.
I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.
Re
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K
while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting.
I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.
Re
All,
This is a little off topic, but I need help quick. I have been using
Netviz for a long time and really become to like it and proficient in
it. But now my job is requiring us to convert all of our Netviz docs to
Visio. I do not know to much about Visio at all so I was looking around
amazon fo
Hr... try again...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#4
""Ronnie"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> Probably this question has been asked before but
>
> Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (
What type of connection is between site A and B ?
Without knowing you layout, it might be possible to use queuing to limit
what address's get a percentage of the bandwidth.
If you can't do it internal, and assuming you can assign each site a
different external IP address, you could just filter on
Another important factor is where the sites are located. congestion is most
prevelant in the
NNI's.
"McCallum, Robert" wrote:
> I have seen circuits built and have been working absolutely perfectly with
> 5:1 contention. For this scenario I would easily suggest a 2 or 3:1
> contention. Lets
Have you tried disabling ip route-cache?? In the past couple weeks I have
run into
two route-cache bugs.
Dave
Brian wrote:
> so what does sh ip ro 193.0.0.193 give? If only the one static, then try
> debugging icmp on a ping test..
>
> Bri
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Hamid wrote:
>
> >
Hello Larry,
My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building) And
using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get
terminated to the same switch. But using different subnets for two sites
with Vlans on the Switch.
I want Site B to keep from bursting the l
look up the command rate-limit
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Shiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 February 2002 15:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Limit Internet BW [7:34200]
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want
Is there any way to get NAT (not PAT) to use as an outside interface,
an Async interface that has IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATE and PPP IPCP
ACCEPT-ADDRESS on it, or is it only possible to have NAT use an outside
interface with a static IP address?
Thanks,
Tim Booth
Message Posted at:
http://www.group
Check out Easy IP:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/easyip.html
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/
12cgcr/dial_c/dcezip.htm
HTH,
John
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
cb car
""Fernando Shiran"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Larry,
>
> My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building)
And
> using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get
> terminated to the same switch. But using
Fernando,
To limit traffic there is basically two places :
Ingress and Egress (but usually on ingress) : Rate limit using "Commited
Access Rate - CAR"
Egress only : Shaping with "GTS"
Frank s.
Fernando Shiran wrote:
> Hello Larry,
>
> My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (
I'm having some problems wit CEF and so enabled a number of CEF
debug commands (ip cef drops, events, received). I'm getting periodic
debug output which says "CEF: slow service". What does this mean?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34218&t=34218
-
Being skilled in Visio is like being skilled in MS-Word. You can either use
it or you can't. The fundamentals will come to you immediately.
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> All,
>
> This is a little off topic, but I need help quick. I have been
Added note for anyone who may be interested::
The well-known CGMP multicast MAC address is: 0x0100,0cdd,,
dj
""Nigel Taylor"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Priscilla,
> You're correct in that Fears' real fear at this point has
not
> been answ
Mahesh,
When you run 'sh ip mroute' on your hub, do you see the serial interfaces
for both of your spokes in the outgoing interface list for that specific
group address?
dj
""Mahesh Manjanatha"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am sorry to post same question sec
My subscription to the lab mailing list hasn't gone through yet so I
figured I should post this question here. We know that in preparation
most folks use various products to emulate a Frame Relay switch. Cisco
also details the questions I have about FR, but in regards to ATM.
http://www.cisco.c
I just went to start the download of an image to see what the License
agreement says.
The text below is a quote from the license agreement. So it's cleared up one
of your questions.
I would guess that you would have to have a valid license for all routers
with IOS installed.
I should think there a
At 06:18 AM 2/2/02, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>Even in an design where the host and the server reside on the same
>VLAN(segment) IGMP and CGMP still provide the ability to control flooding
>of multicast traffic. Specifically, when the host multicasts the IGMP
>membership report to the group with the a
Re your questions:
1 - I think you are correct. In the past candidates were required to
configure the F/R switch but I believe this is done for you now. Whether or
not you have any access to it is another question...I would have to assume
no but I won't know for sure for another 7 days :)
2 -
Does anyone no what the passing score is for the CCNP 640-504 switching
exam?
Thanks...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34226&t=34226
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cis
Can anyone tell me what is the passing score for the 640-504 exam?
I'm looking to take the exam very soon.
Thanks
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Message Posted at:
http://www.
Like I said before, as long as you have a router connected to that segment
(VLAN), multicast flooding will be constrained to the ports that have sent
membership report. Non-registered clients will not be able to receive the
multicast traffic, even though they are on the same VLAN as the sender. Th
I am taking the BCMSN on Monday (finally). Are there any fill in the blanks
on this test, or is it like the BSCN with the command list? Or are there
both types of questions on the test? Also what is passing for this exam?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34230
It's been a while, so let me restate the problem.
R1--internet---R2--ethernet---R3---frame_relayre
st of network
|-IPsec_tunnel---|
IPX encapsulated
IPX RIP | |-IPX
EIGRP---|
hope t
690-710
-dlb
""Charles McKnight"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone no what the passing score is for the CCNP 640-504 switching
> exam?
>
> Thanks...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34233&t=34226
690 - 710
-dlb
""Charles Mcknight"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone tell me what is the passing score for the 640-504 exam?
> I'm looking to take the exam very soon.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> ___
I had a couple of fill in the blank. Mainly, pick from a list. It is the
easiest of the CCNP tests.
-dlb
""Jesse Loggins"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am taking the BCMSN on Monday (finally). Are there any fill in the
blanks
> on this test, or is it like
Anybody has the following training material (softcopy) ?
Cisco SS7 Interconnect for Access Server
Cisco SS7 Advanced Troubleshooting
Cisco SS7 Interconnect Solutions
Cisco SS7 Interconnect for Voice Gateways Solution
Cisco SS7 Packet Tandem Solution
Can mail it to me ?
Thanks!
Message Poste
Sorry - I missed your original post. There is a (resolved) bug (CSCdv16876)
in IOS 12.2(3) where traffic does not pass across IPSec (or GRE) tunnels if
fast switching is enabled on the tunnel interfaces - and it is by default.
What often confuses is that ICMP pings are usually successful.
--
Rega
thanks. I looked at the bug report, which does not mention IPX, nor IOS
12.1.x, which my customer is running ( on different platforms ) first found
in 12.2.3, but probably exists in a lot of other earlier versions. Also, the
report speaks of GRE/IPSec tunnels in a hub and spoke setup. My troubles
Hey Frank,
I'm trying to hook up a Cisco 1750 ethernet port & a Linksys router to my
Roadrunner cable modem. The 2nd ethernet port on the 1750 will have lab
routers connected to it, the Linksys router (4-port switch) will have a few
computers connected to it.
I want all to have access to the Int
Linksys deals do nat by default, so youd have a private ip block on the
lan. Perhaps do a port forward deal to access the ether of the 1750,
then just plain ole telnet to the Ciscos, I suspect this would work.
Brian
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Wesley J wrote:
> Hey Frank,
> I'm trying to hook
See in-line :
Irwan Hadi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I need to know, for Cisco IOS :
> 1. If we buy a used Cisco Routers with IOS installed, do we need to buy
> separate IOS license again ?
Yes. The license's right are not transferable. You must buy the IOS
software to be legal.
Also,
before I shut down for the evening, a few random thoughts on the CCIE Lab
and NDA. Inspired by several posts here of late from persons asking about
topology, IOS versions, or speaking of rumors about equipment changes.
1) It is unclear what really constitutes NDA. Caslow? The ECP1 class? NLI's
pr
699!
i passed it just yesterday !
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34246&t=34226
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Hi
I am also CCNP Wan.
I am also very much concern about this.
Regards
Siva
-Original Message-
From: Paul Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 5:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: WAN Switching [7:34035]
Hey Mike,
What do you think about the future o
Chuck,
Thanks... for another great post. Maybe we could get Paul to
make this standard reading for all who join the list, this way we avoid what
we all fear...I dare not say the letters..for they spell "fear" themselves..
Of course the letter I refer to are NDA!
This definitely is
55 matches
Mail list logo