Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs on the mirrors.

2003-11-16 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Galileo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O> Ouch > There is no need for it now since the LG released > updates for their > firmware and procedure how to fix the dead drives. > It would be nice if Mandrake would release updated > iso-s for > club members or a howto on how to do it ourselves. > btw

Re: [Cooker] idea for MDK 10: rpm packages compatibility

2003-11-11 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
The LSB project www.linuxbase.org aims to do exactly that. This compatibility is what the LSB option during Mandrake install is for. However it has a very long way to go. In order to have these "universal RPMs": - Linux needs to standardise on a certain set of libraries. LSB has mostly achieved

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-11-02 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > put them at the end after dm start Wouldn't work, because dm service just calls prefdm with a fork, so it's effectively executing X and KDE and everything else in parallel. As I've said, this makes X start veeery slowly. When I remove the fork, the

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, just accept the username and password, and show > some moving > graphics until you have authenticated the user. > > Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your > password is wrong on > first start? Couldn't we just hack the bootsplash so tha

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hello, I agree with most of your points. --- Jos Hulzink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Vedran Ljubovic wrote: > > - I don't think parallelizing helps on computers > with > > a single CPU that doesn't support hyperthreading. > Sure

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-30 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Jos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.stack.nl/~josh/Mandrake Hello Jos! I think you have an excellent page there. Here are some thinkings: - Harddrake should *not* be disabled by default. If one changes some piece of hardware (they'll probably do that while their system is off :) st

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-29 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I was on dial up (DSL now), but I have a lan, > and the server shares the > inet connection, and I need NFS enabled by default. > > Perhaps the installer/control panel should ask > whether you want NFS > (server/client), or not at all. Yes, but

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > don't even own a network card. Therefore I > probably > > don't need sshd at all. > > Isn't xinetd startup of ssh disabled by default, in > favour of starting as > a daemon? Hm you're right. It seems that xinetd is used for fam. > > - While I'm at it, I also don'

Re: [Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Michael Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Do we need to run depmod if no new modules are > > installed (many ways to check)? > > i think it use -A switch and so is runned only if > it should. Well if there are new modules it takes almost 30 seconds, without them it's 4 seconds consis

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6251] [Installation] New: Mdkkdm not installed at first 9.2 install.

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- "[zeb]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First install of 9.2 DE final. > mdkkdm is not installed and kdm is running instead. Hey! I though that was a feature!!! lol __ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britne

[Cooker] Boot-up speed

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hi, Recently there were some articles on Slashdot proposing alternative boot procedures. Most of them advocate parallelizing of SysV-init tasks. Motivated by these I've decided to make a detailed analysis of boot procedure and see how can I make it faster. I have an oldish PC that can run most m

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] The Windows widow shows wrongly 9.1 !

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in > the distro. The > fact that the updates are big in size does not mean > there are a lot of > bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and > anyway have to release > 100MB of updated rpm. T

Re: [Cooker] Fwd: [plug] Mandrake Bug announce warning rant ahead

2003-10-28 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > where "Errata" points to > http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/lgerrata.php3 > which has quite comprehensive coverage of the issue. That's a great page! Very informative. Somehow you missed my submission. I have a GCE-8400B CD-RW that works fine. Possib

Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] 9.2 Updates a total mess

2003-10-25 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well if you haven't seen it a loot of others have. > > But that doesn't help fix it. Mandrakesoft has > problems reproducing it too > (and 'just install a package' isn't a reproducible > test case), so it's > difficult for them to solve it. Hope this helps: steps

Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives

2003-10-25 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Élie Charest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 24 Octobre 2003 11:04, Guillaume Cottenceau a > écrit : > > Régis Wira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mine has a 1.01 firmware > > > > Very interesting then. > > > > Listing all firmware versions needed will be long > though :/. > > Pardon my ig

Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives

2003-10-24 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
I have here a HL-DT-ST GCE-8400B CD-RW. MB is a taiwanese (i think Chaintech) with VIA KT-266. RC2 installed fine, didn't have time to try 9.2 final though, I'll probably do it over the weekend and let you know. How do I find the firmware version? --- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-09 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
I just hope that others don't find this little discussion of ours boring. if you do, please yell :) --- illogic-al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That's a typical windows user. mdklinux is not > > > windows and users installing > > > linux know that (at least most of them do). > > > > It's the

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-09 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No offense, but > there already is a > distribution (several) like this, why do we want to > create another one? They are not free (as in freedom) Ok, as I've said in the original mail, it's a community decision and if any of my ideas is accepted, I'l

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- Pierre Jarillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes your idea is very good and ergonomic. As GC > said, "There would take very > much diskspace, especially screenshots!" > To avoid this, it could be useful to create a > database hosted by Mandrake: [...] That's an excellent idea! I'd like to co

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
--- illogic-al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you suggest sticking a screenshot in the rpm? > Further down you say certain people have no business > installing an OS. > Well by extension of that logic they wouldn't have > gotten to the installation > point so this doesn't need to be worried abo

Re: [Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hi, Thank you all for your responses! This thread is much more than I've expected. These are a few clarifications, cause I see that there are already some ideas better then what I originally had. --- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vedran Ljubovic <[EMAIL P

[Cooker] [Mandrake 10] Ideas for RpmDrake [long]

2003-10-08 Thread Vedran Ljubovic
Hello list, I wasn't much involved in Mandrake development until now (except translation), but I hope that that will change. First I must say that, as a long time Mandrake user, I very much appreciate the fine work done by Mandrake developers, especially from a technical point of view. However, I