[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"ef2" == ef2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ef2> If you want that more people test the beta versions, you need to
consider ef2> the human psychology : the more the figure will be big,
the more people will ef2> want to try the distribution. I even suggested
after 9.1 to lie
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe there should be a policy on bugs ... bugzilla should not allow new
> bug submissions from when RC2 is released ;-).
>
This would be great if there were no new bugs introduced in the rc's, but as
9.2 clearly made plain, new bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| And then what do you do for the next release? Start at RC3, up to RC5?
|
| The only solution is to make people who are going to report bugs do it by
| RC1 at the latest.
|
| Maybe there should be a policy on bugs ... bugzilla
>> "ef2" == ef2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ef2> If you want that more people test the beta versions, you need to
> consider ef2> the human psychology : the more the figure will be big,
> the more people will ef2> want to try the distribution. I even suggested
> after 9.1 to lie about the e
> "ef2" == ef2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
ef2> I think that we need a lot more RCs, and on the contrary they should be more
ef2> frequent, a lot more frequent. Updating a cooker machine is not the same
ef2> than installing the distribution from scratch, considering the updating
ef2> scri
On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:40, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "john" == John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> john> What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, & RC
> john> testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
> john> functionality (hardware & software), and regres
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > Problem is that majority of the people don't test until the last RC or
> > Final :( Bugs reported during cooker & Betas are normally fixed.
>
> Well, to me the only test I'm interested in doing is a complete install from
> iso images (on CDRW disks),
Le Jeudi 23 Octobre 2003 14:12, Dave Cotton a écrit :
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:59, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > Why doesn't mandrake try to figure out WHY less people are testing cooker
> > than they'd like instead of blindly blaming people that "THEY" don't test
> > enough so therefore mandrake is
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:59, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> Why doesn't mandrake try to figure out WHY less people are testing cooker
> than they'd like instead of blindly blaming people that "THEY" don't test
> enough so therefore mandrake is buggy
>
> Mandrake is the one trying to make money doin
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:40:54PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "john" == John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> john> What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, & RC
> john> testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
> john> functionality (hardware & software), a
> "john" == John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
john> What is needed is a committed (and known) BETA, & RC
john> testers. Each one committed to testing a know set of
john> functionality (hardware & software), and regression issues.
But that things are already fixed in the Betas & RC.
11 matches
Mail list logo
