Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

> "magallon" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi magallon> A plain copy will lead to inconsistencies for sure. No, this way will lead to inconsistencies. magallon> The problem is that glibc maintainers will not scan through magallon> kernel headers to extract public IOCTLs and s

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

On 2007 Juan Quintela wrote: >> "magallon" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Hi > >magallon> What should be done is to split the public part of the kernel headers from >magallon> the private one that changes so much. Do you know if there are any >magallon> plans about that fo

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

> "magallon" == J A Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi magallon> What should be done is to split the public part of the kernel headers from magallon> the private one that changes so much. Do you know if there are any magallon> plans about that for 2.5 ? Linus stated in a lot of ocassio

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

On 2005 Juan Quintela wrote: >> "fabrice" == Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Hi > >>> That will be fixed, kernel-source package needs to be rethought >>> (kernel-headers needs to dissapear and be included in glibc), > >fabrice> what ? glibc ? Do you mean that files in kerne

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

> "fabrice" == Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi >> That will be fixed, kernel-source package needs to be rethought >> (kernel-headers needs to dissapear and be included in glibc), fabrice> what ? glibc ? Do you mean that files in kernel-headers never change ? fabrice> Upgrade

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

le jeu 15-11-2001 à 12:05, Juan Quintela a écrit : > > "fabrice" == Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > fabrice> le lun 12-11-2001 à 09:40, Blue Lizard a écrit : > >> Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > >> > >> >Is it released? > >> > > >> >>Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

> "fabrice" == Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: fabrice> le lun 12-11-2001 à 09:40, Blue Lizard a écrit : >> Borsenkow Andrej wrote: >> >> >Is it released? >> > >> >>Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) >> >>peaceful coexistence with (standard issue)

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

Op ma 12-11-2001, om 12:32 schreef Fabrice FACORAT: > I don't see the point. if you do rpm -ivh > kernel-source.whateveryouwant.rpm, you can install several kernel-source > package side by side but : > + /usr/src/linux will point to only one > + kernel-headers will overlap previous so in fact you

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

le lun 12-11-2001 à 09:40, Blue Lizard a écrit : > Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > >Is it released? > > > >>Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) > >>peaceful coexistence with (standard issue) kernel? > >>This is mainly a matter of proper installkernel-age. > >> > > > >A

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel!

Borsenkow Andrej wrote: >Is it released? > >>Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) >>peaceful coexistence with (standard issue) kernel? >>This is mainly a matter of proper installkernel-age. >> > >And will it finally be possible to have two kernel sources side by sid

RE: [Cooker] hackkernel!

Is it released? > > Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) > peaceful coexistence with (standard issue) kernel? > This is mainly a matter of proper installkernel-age. > And will it finally be possible to have two kernel sources side by side? -andrej

[Cooker] hackkernel!

Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) peaceful coexistence with (standard issue) kernel? This is mainly a matter of proper installkernel-age. /* Gearing up for 3.0 */

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel

Michal Rokos wrote: > > Hello! > I'm using hackkernel for a long time. BUT(!!!) only one that > works for me is hackkernel-2.4.0-0.25mdk. > > Newer hackkernels (from hackkernel-2.4.0-0.26mdk to > hackkernel-2.4.0-0.35mdk) doesn't work for me. > > On bootup command 'mount

[Cooker] hackkernel

Hello! I'm using hackkernel for a long time. BUT(!!!) only one that works for me is hackkernel-2.4.0-0.25mdk. Newer hackkernels (from hackkernel-2.4.0-0.26mdk to hackkernel-2.4.0-0.35mdk) doesn't work for me. On bootup command 'mount -f /' causes coredump and booting stop

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.35 include/pcmcia ?

Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > where are the include/pcmcia ? > the include/pcmcia of the afficial pcmcia package humm in the include directory... i do not believe that they should be copied to linux/ asm/ and so on, why you need it ? > (pcmcia-cs-3_1_20.tar.gz or pcmcia-cs-3

[Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.35 include/pcmcia ?

where are the include/pcmcia ? the include/pcmcia of the afficial pcmcia package (pcmcia-cs-3_1_20.tar.gz or pcmcia-cs-3_1_21.tar.gz) do not fit, because a new symbol should be defined: --- cs.c.orig Tue Sep 19 00:11:51 2000 +++ cs.c Sun Oct 22 05:56:15 2000 @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ if (val & SS_DETE

[Cooker] hackkernel-header STILL does not have the ALSA headers!!

I reported this a while back, and even provided the spec file code that is missing, but this is still not fixed. The hackkernel-headers package is missing the alsa header files. Can we please have the next hackkernel with these installed? It's a real pain having to try to snag them from the ker

[Cooker] hackkernel, devfs and reiserfs? Anyone?

Is anyone using hackkernel, devfs and reiserfs together? It is supposed to be stable or should I steer clear of that combination for a while still? I am getting process hangs trying to access a reiserfs filesystem on my hackkernel-2.4.0-0.33mdk box. Got a kernel oops once too. That is in bugzi

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and hard disk optimization problem

Michael Powell PhD a écrit : > > pgeorges wrote: > > > > Be careful while booting kernel 2.4 and using disk optimisations like > > > > /sbin/hdparm -X66 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hda > > > > After some nice messages like 'DMA intr lost' and so on, it corrupted > > badly my filesystem. > > > > I think

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and hard disk optimization problem

pgeorges wrote: > > Be careful while booting kernel 2.4 and using disk optimisations like > > /sbin/hdparm -X66 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hda > > After some nice messages like 'DMA intr lost' and so on, it corrupted > badly my filesystem. > > I think with alpha kernels, a good choice is to be real

[Cooker] hackkernel and hard disk optimization problem

Be careful while booting kernel 2.4 and using disk optimisations like /sbin/hdparm -X66 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hda After some nice messages like 'DMA intr lost' and so on, it corrupted badly my filesystem. I think with alpha kernels, a good choice is to be really conservative.

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel ppp contains bug

Thankyou very much Steve. This has indeed solved my problem. I used the following to change it:- sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0 Steve Ponsford wrote: > > Hi Antony, > What you might be having problems with is explicit > congestion notification. Try this to see if your > kernel supports it and h

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel ppp contains bug

Hi Antony, What you might be having problems with is explicit congestion notification. Try this to see if your kernel supports it and has it activated cat /proc/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn if it returns a 1 then its activated. Do an echo 0 >/proc/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn to turn off the ecn bits then try your b

[Cooker] hackkernel ppp contains bug

There seems to be a bug in the ppp code in kernel 2.4.0 that stops me from going to certain web sites. This bug does not occur when I take the same system to a friends and access the Internet via ethernet. This bug also did not occur when I was running a 2.2.16 kernel with the latest ppp.rpm ppp

[Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.18mdk.i586.rpm i82365.o not exist.... 3c589_cs can't start...;o/ (little report)

I can't use on laptop kernel 2.2.17-4 (neither -3 and -2) for strange LCD behaviour(as reported) Than I tried hackkernel-2.4.0-0.18 (positive thing: speed ,nice 1280x1024 LCD resolution , sound work , gnome seems ~ok ; negative: KDE2 goes KO and freeze laptop on starting with KDEsplash on screen,

[Cooker] hackkernel uses iptables

To use the iptables features in kernel 2.4.0 needs the iptables package. http://netfilter.kernelnotes.org/ Another package to look at is iproute2. "Netfilter - o o o

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

Frederic Crozat wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eugenio Diaz) writes: > > > --- Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The names of the ppp modules have been changed in > > > kernel 2.4.0. > > > To get my system to dial like it used to under > > > kernel 2.2.16 I had to > > > modprobe

[Cooker] hackkernel problems

Two problems with hackkernel-source 0.15: In configuration menu, category general setup, disabling CONFIG_PM disable its depedencies CONFIG_ACPI, CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER (normal), but this enables their own dependecies CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER, CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER, etc... During compilation, i

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eugenio Diaz) writes: > > > Actually the message for char-major-180 appears every > > time I restart cups. > > You can try to add to your modules.conf (or conf.modules) ^^ It is deprecated. You should not use this anym

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eugenio Diaz) writes: > Actually the message for char-major-180 appears every > time I restart cups. You can try to add to your modules.conf (or conf.modules) alias char-major-180 off alias char-major-81 off to disable autoload of these modules (since you don't have them)

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

--- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know what 81 and 180 are under 2.2.16 > (or > > how can I find out myself; I guess I would have to > go > > on the module sources, but which file?): > > From /usr/src/linux/Documentation/devices.txt > > char-major-180 is usb > > cha

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eugenio Diaz) writes: > --- Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The names of the ppp modules have been changed in > > kernel 2.4.0. > > To get my system to dial like it used to under > > kernel 2.2.16 I had to > > modprobe ppp_generic and modprobe ppp_async. I thin

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

--- Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The names of the ppp modules have been changed in > kernel 2.4.0. > To get my system to dial like it used to under > kernel 2.2.16 I had to > modprobe ppp_generic and modprobe ppp_async. I think > the better solution is > to put the following line i

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel 2.4.0 and nvidia drivers 0.95 work fine

Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yay. > I have a self compiled hackkernel 2.4.0 and a reiserfs /usr partition and > XFree86 4.0.1 and NVIDIA's one day old 0.95 drivers installed... > > And its all working! Yes, but what are we supposed to do with that!? I had hoped we could put it in

[Cooker] hackkernel and pppd problem

The names of the ppp modules have been changed in kernel 2.4.0. To get my system to dial like it used to under kernel 2.2.16 I had to modprobe ppp_generic and modprobe ppp_async. I think the better solution is to put the following line in my modules.conf:- alias char-major-108 ppp_async I think

[Cooker] hackkernel 2.4.0 and nvidia drivers 0.95 work fine

Yay. I have a self compiled hackkernel 2.4.0 and a reiserfs /usr partition and XFree86 4.0.1 and NVIDIA's one day old 0.95 drivers installed... And its all working! These .RPMs are installed:- NVIDIA_kernel-0.9-5 NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5 XFree86-4.0.1-9mdk (and friends) hackkernel-headers-2.4.0-0.14mdk

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.12mdk

Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Humm on this case it's the pixel changes who broke it. I'll be glade > > to fix them if pixel don't have time. > if you're glade, please do it ;p one liner : Index: detectloader === RCS file: /

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.12mdk

Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 1) The /usr/sbin/detectloader script doesn't seem to work. In a cursory > > examination of it, it appears that it should print either LILO or GRUB. > > With GRUB installed (whether on the /boot partition (/dev/hda1) or on > > the MBR) it prints not

Re: [Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.12mdk

Anton Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is my first dalliance with the 2.4 series kernels (and my first > binary kernel install in a while), so please forgive (and correct) any > misconceptions: > > 1) The /usr/sbin/detectloader script doesn't seem to work. In a cursory > examination of

[Cooker] hackkernel-2.4.0-0.12mdk

This is my first dalliance with the 2.4 series kernels (and my first binary kernel install in a while), so please forgive (and correct) any misconceptions: 1) The /usr/sbin/detectloader script doesn't seem to work. In a cursory examination of it, it appears that it should print either LILO or GR

[Cooker] hackkernel-source problem

The problem is still there. the "-test4" needs to be removed. [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm -Uvh hackkernel-* error: failed dependencies: hackkernel-headers = 2.4.0-test4-0.9mdk is needed by hackkernel-source-2.4.0-0.9mdk [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/

[Cooker] Hackkernel 2.4.0-0.9mdk

Hello Further to my previous e-mail (Which went unanswered) I have a problem with this kernel: I have installed the kernel and amended grub accordingly. (It is running as the linux-up option) I have the initrd image which preloads reiserfs (Which is my filing system) I then get a VFS kernel p

[Cooker] Hackkernel 2.4.0-0.8mdk

HELP! I have compiled the above kernel, and made my initrd with a preload of reiserfs. However, it complains that supermount is not supported by the kernel, nor is reiserfs. Has anyone else come across this? Many thanks in advance Alex

[Cooker] hackkernel 2.3 & xfree4.0

looking to trying to giving it a go @ hackkernel 2.3 & xfree4.0 in the contribs dir. is all info in the rmps for installing etc? if not, where else should i look at for info? (eh, already compiled 2.3 from kernel.org...so shouldn't have a prob here...just wanna try to get mdk working with the 2

[Cooker] Hackkernel and initrd

initrd support in hackkernel is still partly broken and you _must_ have an initrd in order to boot. -- Warly

[Cooker] hackkernel-2.3.21-3mdk

Have some PPP problem with this kernel (I think ) fmirror: can get the file names, but does not download IglooFTP & gftp : get the directory tree very fast but not download Netscape: does not complete the pages, selecting 'STOP' can go on Not a provider trouble, with Windows98 the protocol speed