-Original Message-
From: David BAUDENS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 July 2000 12:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
Alex Boag-Munroe écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
Yes, it is.
* Well it ain't for me, and the previous version was fine. Besides
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
I don't know. Everyone seems to kick Netscape. Why ? It browses, it uses the
standard plugins, it does java and javascript. I haven't had Netscape crash
for
ages, although j-tull.co.uk used to do it every time ! It is by far the best
br
-Original Message-
From: Civileme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2000 1:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
David BAUDENS wrote:
Alex Boag-Munroe écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
I would suppose that depends on your definition of stable.
I
: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 June 2000 1:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
Excuse me master beta tester *scoffingly sarcastic remark* but which java
sites was it that "your" Netscape was choking on. Mine doesn't miss a
beat!
Alex,
I must ask you and the list to forgive and I humbly apologize for my
rude outburst. That was totally uncalled for. I honestly don't know what
got into mt that day.
Please, forgive me.
--
Mark
I love my Linux Box...
REASON # 1 ...it's not windows!
Registered Linux user #
David BAUDENS a écrit :
Guillaume Rousse écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
Yes, it is.
I'm still facing systematic crash when using some of the adressbook
feature (lists, for example).
Here's an exemple of the crash log :
netscape-communicator:
X Error of failed request: BadGC
FWIW, my machine is an incremental upgrade from ancient RH releases,
and something has crufted Netscape to near death: The mime-types are
crippled, all Java sites lock it solid (using Sun JDK 1.2) and the
fonts are sub-visible. Mozilla, where it works, is far preferrable,
but lacks essential
As for konquerer, It bairly managed to load a very basic page before it fell
over !
Try the current one...
What plugins are they planning to use ? Different ones again !?
konqueror supports Netscape plugins.
http://www.konqueror.org/
--
David FAURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Boag-Munroe écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
Yes, it is.
AhemI don't call having to delete your Netscape folder
every week because Netscape keeps hanging stable.
What are you doing to must erase your ~/.netscape every week? Mine is
more than one year old.
When, how, where and on what
David BAUDENS a écrit :
Alex Boag-Munroe écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
Yes, it is.
I'm still facing systematic crash when using some of the adressbook
feature (lists, for example).
Here's an exemple of the crash log :
netscape-communicator:
X Error of failed request: BadGC (invalid GC
: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 June 2000 4:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
-Original Message-
From: bobby dowling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker
Guillaume Rousse écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
Yes, it is.
I'm still facing systematic crash when using some of the adressbook
feature (lists, for example).
Here's an exemple of the crash log :
netscape-communicator:
X Error of failed request: BadGC (invalid GC parameter)
Major
David BAUDENS wrote:
Alex Boag-Munroe écrivit :
4.73 is stable?
I would suppose that depends on your definition of stable.
I have a little script running in the background that checks at
5-minute intervals to see if anything that greps ux.so.2 is
hogging 98% or more Cpu time and kill -9s
-Original Message-
From: bobby dowling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
Why didn't 7.1 include the latest Netscape?
because it's beta
I have read reviews that it is not the
Why didn't 7.1 include the latest Netscape?
I have read reviews that it is not the improvement that was hoped for. Is
this true?
If I want to install 6.0, is it as simple as just removing the current
Netscape rpm's and then installing new binaries or source?
I hate to ask what seems to be a
bobby dowling wrote:
Why didn't 7.1 include the latest Netscape?
I have read reviews that it is not the improvement that was hoped for. Is
this true?
If I want to install 6.0, is it as simple as just removing the current
Netscape rpm's and then installing new binaries or source?
I
Netscape 6.0 is really a custumized version of Mozilla. It is not complete
they are still at what they call milestone 16. They have plans for bug fixes
and features all the way up till milestone 20. so it will be a while until
there will be a stable release of mozilla. Because of this,
for one thing Netscape 6 is still a beta release. It hasn't even made it
passed PR1 (preview release 1) secondly, it's no where near as stable as
4.73, not all the features are functional...i could go on and on forever
but I think you get the idea.
--
Mark
I love my Linux Box...
REASON
Netscape doesn't suck. The porblem alot of times is that users get it all
messed up and don't know how to clean up after themselves.
--
Mark
I love my Linux Box...
REASON # 2 ...X-windows is just a suedonym.
Registered Linux user # 1299563
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Geoffrey Lee
Excuse me master beta tester *scoffingly sarcastic remark* but which java
sites was it that "your" Netscape was choking on. Mine doesn't miss a
beat! Never has and likely never will. Can't think of a one and I've been
using Netscape since version 2.02. Now using version 4.73 on Linux
Mandrake
John Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Netscape 6.0 is really a custumized version of Mozilla. It is not complete
they are still at what they call milestone 16. They have plans for bug fixes
and features all the way up till milestone 20. so it will be a while until
there will be a stable
-
From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 June 2000 11:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
for one thing Netscape 6 is still a beta release. It hasn't even made it
passed PR1 (preview release 1) secondly, it's no where near as stable as
4.73, not all
as getting the kde2 stuff from
Mandrake-devel contribs.
Civileme
-Original Message-
From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 June 2000 4:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Cooker] Netscape 6.0 and good?
-Original Message-
From: bobby dowling [mailto:[EMAIL
Mark Weaver wrote:
Excuse me master beta tester *scoffingly sarcastic remark* but which java
sites was it that "your" Netscape was choking on. Mine doesn't miss a
beat! Never has and likely never will. Can't think of a one and I've been
using Netscape since version 2.02. Now using version
24 matches
Mail list logo
