Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-04-03 Thread Vadim Plessky
On Thursday 29 March 2001 12:29, Eleknader wrote: | > | > And by the way, I use Mandrake because it is pentium optimized, not | > because of something you call a nice gui. | | It's great that Mandrake is pentium optimized. But, for a user point of | wiev: | | I need just one window man

RE: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-04-02 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eleknader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > To be more exact: Menudrake itself works OK. But, KDE menus in Mandrake > 7.2 are not shown properly. K-menu items that have scandic characters > like a-umlaut > (ä) etc are not shown correctly. Some of these characte

RE: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-04-02 Thread Eleknader
> Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Eleknader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > I'd also like to set up a keyboard shortcut for launching an application > > in KDE. > > Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does not work OK. > > Could you elaborate on that point ? > What is b

RE: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-04-02 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eleknader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > I'd also like to set up a keyboard shortcut for launching an application > in KDE. > Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does not work OK. Could you elaborate on that point ? What is broken in menudrak

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Eleknader am Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:29:54PM +0300: > We have a great environment (libralies, tools etc) that are free, and they > work > wery well. Those tools are KDE libraries and KDE Control Center. Or GNOME and gnomecc... > Mandrake should not try to use Menudrake, since it does n

[Fwd: Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2]

2001-03-30 Thread Randy Kramer
I meant to send this to the list, but it doesn't have the Reply to header set to the list. Most other messages (but not all) from the list have the Reply to header set to the list, which made me think the list software sets that header. Does it? Should it? (It seems to on emails I send to t

RE: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-29 Thread Blue Lizard
> If most people were working for the same goal, maybe we could beat Win Stop fighting, children. We do need to work together. On the other hand, let us not all be sheep, that's for the dozer users. Comrades, let us unite! And let us also think as individuals. Just feeling philisophical. Blue

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-29 Thread Blue Lizard
On 29 Mar 2001 09:01:08 +0200, Klaas Barends wrote: > > > Look.. I am not being an extremist.. its a fact that the current (and all > > your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere compared to Qt/KDE > > GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if that is the case

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-29 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Sarang Lakare am Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:35:36PM -0500: > b4 and will again suggest it.. USE QT There is nothing like Qt out Okay, you like the look of Qt - I don't. Now what? I can't stand how Qt looks, and please don't tell me to piss off - I don't like this either! Gtk is mor

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-29 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Thursday 29 March 2001 07:39, Sarang Lakare wrote: > > > - PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening? > > > rpmdrake looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare > > > kpackage and rpmdrake.. they are MILES apart in looks.. And if u say > > > looks don't matter.. then

RE: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-29 Thread Eleknader
My two cents... > > your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere > compared to Qt/KDE > > GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if > that is the case > > then you guys shld make sure that gtk gets a theme which looks > good under > > both KDE and GNOME.. right no

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-28 Thread Klaas Barends
> Look.. I am not being an extremist.. its a fact that the current (and all > your GUIs till now) look really horrible. They are nowhere compared to Qt/KDE > GUIs.. this could be because i work with them under KDE.. if that is the case > then you guys shld make sure that gtk gets a theme which lo

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-28 Thread Sarang Lakare
> > - PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening? rpmdrake > > looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare kpackage and > > rpmdrake.. they are MILES apart in looks.. And if u say looks don't > > matter.. then go use debian/slackware/redhat.. We expect cool GUIs from > >

Re: [Cooker] more on LM8.0 beta2

2001-03-28 Thread Daouda LO
Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Here are some more impressions/experiences with LM8.0 Beta2 [...] > > SUGGESTIONS: > > - PLEASE IMPROVE GUI!! are the artists at LM listening? rpmdrake > looks yuck to say the least (sorry!).. Just compare kpackage and rpmdrake..