,
perhaps you could get much quicker notification of potential integration
issues.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:05 AM Wim Jongman wrote:
> Thanks, great news.
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:01 PM Jonah Graham
> wrote:
>
>&
I believe the issue with Jetty is resolved and we are looking to make
another release for you folks shortly.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:15 PM Ondrej Dockal wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
> time
Open an issue with the project and we can discuss there, not sure the right
balance to strike for that value, thus far we have just told concerned
parties to simply use the previous slf4j versions.
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn
>From the jetty perspective, you don't need to use a slf4j version 2 unless
you're making use of the JPMS features. I believe you should be fine just
running with the older version of slf4j.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 05:58 Sravan K Lakkimsetti
wrote:
> Slf4j version 2 dependency is coming from jetty
Denis,
Is that a hard and fast rule everywhere? Because I get forced to sign on
the jetty.git website repository on git.eclipse.org
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:09 PM Denis Roy
wrote:
> As per the bug, Signed-off-by is NOT required
Presumably because Eclipse wants control of all Eclipse project web content
to maintain their desired standards, maintain their cookie and data
tracking policies, etc.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:09 PM Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
> &
whole thing was under review by the webmaster team for what approach they
wanted to allow and provide support for.
Seems like now is the time for a solid update on where the future of this
is intended to be!
Wayne? Denis?
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 11
I added an action item to discuss on AC call next week.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:33 AM Ed Merks wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I did repeatedly try to get this change, posting arguments such as this
> below (in which I did to remove some email
st on streamlining those
commits, and have a signed off requirement on things more substantial.
Even 'no signed off required for a 5 or less lines' would be an improvement
I think.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:16 AM Liviu Ionescu wrote
ablishing a web of trust around signing keys would work well to address
but if talking about that is arguing then I am happy to go back to lurk
mode.
cheers,
Jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 10:15 PM Wayne Beaton <
wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org&g
is
> impractical with having to deal with signed bundles?
>
> Best regards,
> Torkild
>
>
> > 22. jan. 2021 kl. 20:33 skrev Jesse McConnell >:
> >
> >
> > All bundles must be signed using the EF's certificate. Obvious
> exceptions will be made in cases
> *All bundles must be signed using the EF's certificate. *Obvious
>> exceptions will be made in cases where signing is impossible.
>>
>
>> We will be applying this standard to the next release and for every
>> release thereafter.
>>
>> The means by which the simultaneous release participation rule
where is this information coming from? none of the numbers under the Jetty
project make any sense to me :)
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Marcel Bruch
wrote:
> Greetings cross-projects,
>
> I’d like to announce the availability o
ditor?
In that way I think it is fine that CodeEnvy is saying what they are since
there is no clear name from the Eclipse Foundation for their flagship fancy
editor...at least that I am aware of...because to me it just changes every
year.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 3
I am not surprised the feature is here, I am more surprised that it is
opt-out and not opt-in.
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Pascal Rapicault
wrote:
> On 6/3/2016 4:39 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>
> I'll add to that. You say this is i
I don't think so, they were located in the old nexus repository that
was smoked a few months back...I think CBI has some of their own
recommended parent poms
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Henrik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
&g
hm, I should probably point out I pretty strictly using the command line
for all git interactions...just don't trust that eclipse plugin magic :P
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jesse McConnell
wrote:
> personally, I love the _idea_ of ger
personally, I love the _idea_ of gerrit, but when it comes to processing a
patch I prefer a more hands on process of reading the patching, applying
the patch, reviewing the patch inline and then committing any tweaks, then
pushing it
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri
jetty generally finds this to be the case as well
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> Yes. Patches attached to bugzilla are easier.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> On 2013-10-04 12:25 PM, Mickael Istria w
that sounds like something that should be cleaned up a la CLOSED/RESOLVED
reminds me of stackoverflow's recent close changes
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2013/06/the-war-of-the-closes/?cb=1
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Igor Fedo
> But it is quite scary we're relying on individuals performing manual tasks
> to get the releases out. I hope that we can automate more of what they do.
> The beauty of Maven/Tycho/Hudson is that you can automate everything from
> source to download pages. We talk of the big red button, it would b
> LTS currently relies upon the existence of a simultaneous release as its
> starting point. The LTS working group would be a very poor replacement for
> the Planning Council in running the simultaneous release. For example, one
> of the major features of the Planning Council is that it has represe
r Y or whatever...
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mike Milinkovich <
mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org> wrote:
>
> > On the flip side, we need to evaluate the benefits of more frequent
> releases to
> > see if it's w
not a
bad idea...and align to a template once one exists
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Wayne Beaton"
> > To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.
there are a number of maven plugins that provide this support, we use one
in jetty that scans all our java files at build time to ensure certain
licence block presence.
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
tis a good goal to have :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn
et difficult...which is totally fine, it is a stated strength of
Eclipse to have the IP policies it does.
cheers,
jesse
>
>
>
>
>
> From:Jesse McConnell
> To:Cross project issues ,
> Date:11/08/2012 03:20 PM
> Subject:Re: [cross-projec
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=354756
and you even have the last nitpik comment on there :)
regardless, thanks for restarting, I actually have a p2 repo for
latest jetty 8 release \o/
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Why do you think we stopped using this hudson setup except for the
single job that requires the silly signing setup you guys wired up?
*pppssbbt*
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
> As a Jetty user I thought you'd be used to
i have had this on and off throughout the day
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
> Requests to hudson.eclipse.org are hanging. I am able to access
> www.eclipse.org just fine.
>
>
>
ditto here
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik <
konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I can confirm this issue. None of the project summary pages are accessible
> due to the SQL issue.
>
> ** *
Ha! someone is getting snarky now :)
Of course I was just about to reply that it certainly wasn't jetty's fault :P
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Denis Roy wrote:
> That's probably Jetty's fault :P
>
>
>
&g
download.eclipse.org was what was failing yesterday for us
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Denis Roy wrote:
> I thought I had, but I guess not.
>
> Do you have a link I can use? Is it on download.eclipse.org or on
> www.eclipse.org?
yes, we have seen that with jetty javadoc from the
download.eclipse.org/jetty urls
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
> I am seeing sporadic cases where the download server returns “download is
> invalid” pa
\o/ someone going to replace the signing plugin
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Matthias Sohn
wrote:
> let us know when this new signing plugin is available
>
> --
> Matthias
>
>
> 2012/8/15 Igor Fedorenko
>>
>&
the reasoning behind our decision I would
be happy to share, it just doesn't seem relavent for this announcement
:)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@ecl
I tweeted droy, he might get a chance to look today
good luck
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Eric Gwin wrote:
> Doug/Peter,
>
> As you know our Git migration is scheduled for this weekend. Unfortunately,
> while our svn r
ested to hear more of the theory behind these documents.
They rank somewhat high on the list of things I would like to stop
having to provide. :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> I am sorry if this is a quest
yep, that is much improved, thanks!
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out. I've done some edits to (hopefully)
> clarify things.
>
>
> Denis
>
>
> On 06/12/2012 12
I'll just point out the obvious confusing detail on that page,
In Services Covered:
Tier 2 is _called_ Best Effort
yet in Service Availability:
Tier 3 is actually Best Effort, while Tier 2 is 99%
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:
we have seen this off and on for a while now :/
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:28, David Carver wrote:
> Adding the dash-dev mailing list to this as well. Alex had discovered some
> errors with the maven.eclipse.org repository and was l
:)
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:47, David Carver wrote:
> It looks like some of this stuff should be doable using Tycho 0.14 and the
> Tycho P2 Extras plugin. Included is the ability to run the various Ant
> Tasks provided by eclipse.
yep, https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=354756
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:48, Denis Roy wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 01:46 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> heck ideally we could sign with a key that was signed by the
>
tion and chimed in by now. There is time though, it
will be a while til I can get to the plugin to tweak it so if someone
did the research that would be grand
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:40, David Carver wrote:
> Honestly, the p2.Mirror U
add a couple of properties for these settings and
inject them into the xml at that point
not ideal but little about the situation is so will make do with what I have
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:10, David M Williams
wrote:
>
> I think you
Not sure for tycho but given some time I could have that in the
signing plugin in an hour or so I would think.
I'll see if I can scrape some time together to get that support added
in, at least in the interm until tycho could support it
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmai
> could the eclipse-signing-maven-plugin provide a parameter to
> inject the p2.mirrorsURL property into artifact repositories and
> parameters to generate the p2.index file ?
can you give me a specific example of what that xml (assuming that
would be in some of the xml metadata) would look like?
..that is where the eye glazing comes in from my
previous statement :)
so by all means please continue improving p2 repositories! and if the
eclipse-signing-maven-plugin is supposed to be doing anything from
this conversation please bring that to my attention directly!
cheers,
jesse
--
I am able click around quickly right now..
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:08, Markus Knauer wrote:
> I've got two new problems today... :(
>
> One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am getting our
> &#
on a shortcoming of the signing plugin do chirp up
and let us know...past that igor will likely know more on the p2
details, I still find it a bit silly. :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 03:08, Marcel Bruch wrote:
> I'm evaluating ho
that is a new one to me...
if you find it an issue in the plugin open an issue on the dash
project and ping me
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:07, Zeb Ford-Reitz wrote:
> We recently made the switch over to the eclipse-signing-maven-plugin
ok...for the record...
if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
immediately jetty's fault.
thank you for listening :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> O
cessing of a request from start to finish...not that I know of.
more info on what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' would help
clarify that though
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:08, Winston Prakash
wrote:
>
>
I just saw a tweet about 3.0.0 milestone being released from eclipse
with lots of fixes and features...
would updating to this release perhaps help?
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:46, Konstantin Komissarchik
wrote:
> In my experie
some emails need the equivalent of bells and whistles :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:04, Markus Knauer wrote:
> Apologize for this one, Denis!
>
> eclipse.org-committers is certainly the better list, but I don't under
a new mailing list for hudson build issues?
how about
hudson-needs-rebooted-ag...@eclipse.org
it could be processed by a script even, after 5 distinct messages from
different addresses it could trigger the restart itself and free up
the webmasters time!
:)
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
minutes to disable 8 jobs because of the saving
configuration page issues
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 13:49, David M Williams
wrote:
> I'd agree with this general idea ... perhaps a general notice go out on a
> mailing list "
not much I can do til the network mess is sorted out, I am switching
our build back to the other machines for now
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:28, Nicolas Bros wrote:
> The Metacity window manager does not seem to be installed:
>
>
looks like the proxy goop for maven hasn't been wired up either
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Jetty-RT/job/jetty-8/72/console
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 13:01, Jesse McConnell
wrote:
> issue is on slave 5 as well
>
&
issue is on slave 5 as well
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:33, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
wrote:
> Ah, sorry about that. I've installed SVN and GIT on hudson slave6. I"m
> trying to get the SDK tools to be able to build them for hudson-sl
are the git issues being worked on right now or should I switch back
over to the other machines?
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:27, Henrik Rentz-Reichert wrote:
> yes, I already noticed that - but I found the meaning not really obvi
\o_
slave 5 - https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/jetty/1766/console - git issue
slave 6 - https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Jetty-RT/job/jetty-8/70/console
- git issue
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 19:18, Webmsaster(Matt Ward)
wrote:
>
yes, but jetty is the important part in all of this :P
anyway, saw talk about minimal versions and figured I would chime in
but looks like your all taken care of
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:07, Thomas Watson wrote:
> That is only
If your using jetty 8 like planned with servlet 3.0, I thought you
were going to minimum version 1.6 since that is what is mandated by
the servlet 3.0 api...
or is that just for components using the http bits
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:35
so far so good
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:04, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> **
> They seem fine to me. Is everybody else back in business?
>
> Wayne
>
>
> On 01/18/2012 12:11 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>
> And jetty, I think it
And jetty, I think its part of the SOPA blackout, eclipse must be
participating, just forgot to put up the banners..
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:09, Henrik Rentz-Reichert wrote:
> same for
> http://git.eclipse.org/c/
thanks, am watching that bug now
cheers and merry xmas
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:36, Kim Moir wrote:
> +1
>
> I see the same issue. I opened a bug, it has been bothering me too.
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bu
Is anyone getting reasonable performance from hudson lately? The UI
just seems incredibly unresponsive making the most mundane tasks take
far to long...
If its just me then I'll deal with it but if everyone is having these
issues maybe we can open an issue for it..
jesse
--
jesse mcco
> A better approach (for you) might be to work the test (and failure) into
> your own build and promotion procedures.
I would rather see there only have to be _one_ signing step, that of
the final aggregation :)
then you could just start signing at M1 and people could validate
things are working
anyway that we can resolve the terrible UI performance? sitting at ~5
minutes to save a build configuration atm
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:09, Mickael Istria
wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 19:08, Denis Roy wrote:
>
> I've restarted
wayne that is a
big no-no.
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 08:15, Mike Milinkovich
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> To make the maven.eclipse.org instance really useful it needs to have
> staging
>> support whic
ountless open source projects seeking a simple path to maven
centralits less a vendor repository in the traditional sense and
more of an open source repository, akin to pushing artifacts from
eclipse.org -> maven central
imo at least
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fr
ot, just give the keys to the
maven.eclipse.org instance and ask them to make it a best practices
setup for p2/mvn artifacts. Now that tycho is running into these
issues perhaps we can get momentum to address these things.
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 9,
you have to ssh to build.eclipse.org now, ssh access to
dev.eclipse.org is a thing of the past
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:21, Wim Jongman wrote:
>
>
> mail, you need to reply to that and then the IP should be fine.
>
>
note
here _just_ in case someone is pulling these in and this messes
someone up.
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/ma
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 07:12, Greg Watson wrote:
> All of a sudden our builds are failing with this:
>
> [INFO] o.h.m.e.h.MavenExecutionResultHandler - Build failed with exception(s)
> [INFO] o.h.m.e.h.MavenExecutionResult
75 matches
Mail list logo
