On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:56:12PM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
| At 12:53 PM 12/15/02 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
| ...
| >I think that a law which re-affirmed the rights to be anonymous, to
| >call yourself what you will, to be left alone, to not carry or show ID
| >would transform the debate about
> Speculation: I expect the battles over cyberspace to shift to the OS,
> with the leading private (non open source) OS makers "enlisted" in the
> War Against Illegal Thoughts. The easiest initial front in this war,
> one the OS companies like Apple and Microsoft have a corporate interest
> in,
Yeah, except for the scummy multi level marketing and the rather expensive
$25/month, it's nice, but I'm unsure how much nicer than say, hushmail :)
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
> Steve Schear[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> This crackpot idea is a follow-on to my suggestion for improving public
> library privacy in the face of TLA inquiries. The basic notion here is
> for
> na ISP to allow all its premises to be bugged. Every room (except maybe
> the restroom) by
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:54:57AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
| (Much has been made of how the Microsoft- and Intel-backed security
| regimes will be "opt in" or "voluntary." This seems dubious. It is
| precisely the non-volunteers who these companies, and Hollywood, and
| the Nation States, will be
On Thursday, December 19, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Michael Motyka wrote:
I believe that the primary battle, subversion of the proprietary OS
and mainstream
applications for intelligence purposes, was over before we even
thought about fighting
it.
Now the commercial interests are being brought into
This crackpot idea is a follow-on to my suggestion for improving public
library privacy in the face of TLA inquiries. The basic notion here is for
na ISP to allow all its premises to be bugged. Every room (except maybe
the restroom) by its clients (or their proxies). All communication could
--
On 18 Dec 2002 at 9:50, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> Yeah, the Objectivists (TM) seem to have been taken over by
> militant zionist interventionists too.
Of all the advanced states, Israel is arguably the one that
accords least with Objectivist ideals. It is nominally
socialist in land
I believe that the primary battle, subversion of the proprietary OS and mainstream
applications for intelligence purposes, was over before we even thought about fighting
it.
Now the commercial interests are being brought into the fold.
M
On Thursday, December 19, 2002, at 09:53 AM, Michael Motyka wrote:
My intuition is that the government is going to be slightly fairer
than,
for example, Disney. That's just a guess, though.
Bruce
With an emphasis on "slightly" I might tend to agree but it looks more
like the difference
betw
I just noticed a disclaimer in a t.v. ad for H-P computers.
"Intended only for lawful uses." at the bottom of the screen towards
the end of the commercial.
Strange. Why would H-P or any other computer company feel the need to
include this warning/disclaimer? Worries about legal actions against
>My intuition is that the government is going to be slightly fairer than,
>for example, Disney. That's just a guess, though.
>
>Bruce
>
With an emphasis on "slightly" I might tend to agree but it looks more like the
difference
between liver cancer and kidney failure than it does the difference
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Tim May wrote:
> I just noticed a disclaimer in a t.v. ad for H-P computers.
>
> "Intended only for lawful uses." at the bottom of the screen towards
> the end of the commercial.
>
> Strange. Why would H-P or any other computer company feel the need to
> include this warning/d
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Michael Motyka wrote:
> As I age I find my eyesight is changing and I have a tougher time discerning
> government from corporate entities. ( en what? ). Who writes our legislation? Who
> controls what is said in our mass media? Dumbing down the population so that when
> they p
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=564&u=/nm/20021219/ts_nm/attack_immigration_dc_3
Reuters
Yahoo! News Thu, Dec 19, 2002
Hundreds of Muslim Immigrants Rounded Up in Calif.
Wed Dec 18, 8:47 PM ET
By Jill Serjeant
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Hundreds of Iranian and othe
At 11:01 AM 12/19/02 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>Hundreds of Muslim Immigrants Rounded Up in Calif.
What, did you think the Park Service was renovating Manzanera for yucks?
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 10:31 PM, Anonymous wrote:
And again, who cares WHAT happens to governments, as long as I can say
what I want to whomever I want without worry about it being snooped
on. And there's no way they can stop that now, just make things suck a
little until they
This is what I was talking about when I said, "what does it matter?"
Why does anyone even THINK that Bruce Schneier should be informed on the issue of
governments and justice? And the fact that he opened his yapper about a subject he's
apparently thought about for 15 minutes should be no suprise
>> Yeah--you got it--Poppies...and now that the Warlords are back in
>> charge the cash crop is back.
>Remember that it was the US which encouraged the Taliban to crack down >on the
>cultivation of Afghanistan poppies. A gift of several million US
>dollars convinced the Taliban to ban the farming
19 matches
Mail list logo
