AW: apache-ant-1.7.0: 115 * Java source code bugs

g, 11. September 2008 11:16 An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: apache-ant-1.7.0: 115 * Java source code bugs Hello there, I just tried to analyse the package apache-ant-1.7.0 with the most excellent Java static analysis tool pmd. A subset of the results were /usr/src/packages/BUILD/apache-ant-1.7.0/src

apache-ant-1.7.0: 115 * Java source code bugs

Hello there, I just tried to analyse the package apache-ant-1.7.0 with the most excellent Java static analysis tool pmd. A subset of the results were /usr/src/packages/BUILD/apache-ant-1.7.0/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/DefaultLogger.java:249 Avoid appending characters as strings in

deadlock with parallel task and custom BuildListener...(ant 1.7.0)

Hi, Bug 45194 I think I've tracked down a deadlock that happens when a custom BuildListener class is used. If a BuildListener retrieves a project property value inside the messageLogged() method, this can cause a deadlock when the Parallel

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45135] Ant 1.7.0: a patternset reference cannot be redefined through itself

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox > antlibs > > as a component in BZ? > > Props Antlib is there now. Many thanks, Stefan! -Matt > > Stefan > > ---

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45135] Ant 1.7.0: a patternset reference cannot be redefined through itself

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox antlibs > as a component in BZ? Props Antlib is there now. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45135] Ant 1.7.0: a patternset reference cannot be redefined through itself

Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox antlibs as a component in BZ? Thanks, Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45135 > > > Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: > >What|Removed > |Added > -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AW: Eclipse still using Ant 1.6.5 because of bug in Ant 1.7.0

Hi Jan, > I got no answer, so maybe you havent got my mail. > Did you recieve that? Maybe it was blocked because of my zip-attachement. > > Jan > >I have created mock classes for (most of) the external > >classes. Sure, original classes would be better ;) > >I thought about putting them sources to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

work.Test so it fails) I do not see any other duplicate classes related to ant, all the classes are coming from my apache-ant-1.7.0/lib. Please could you advise some more, there has to be something! I am thinking of deleting everything and starting from scratch, but I don't see how th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43586] New: - java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586 Summary: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant- 1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42967] - Path subclasses no longer call list() in Ant 1.7.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42967] - Path subclasses no longer call list() in Ant 1.7.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42967] New: - Path subclasses no longer call list() in Ant 1.7.0

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42967 Summary: Path subclasses no longer call list() in Ant 1.7.0 Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42735] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42735] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42735 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 10:01 --- Thanks for the report and especially thanks for the build file. Available has changed in ant 1.7.0, in ant 1.6.5 and lower available would search all the parent directories for a file. This w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42735] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42734] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42734] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42733] - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42735] New: - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42735 Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42734] New: - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42733] New: - New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42733 Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 task with Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

Ant 1.7.0, with maven2

255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: java.net.URISyntaxException: Illegal character in path at index 18: f ile:/C:/Documents and Settings/Kev/.m2/repository/org/apache/ant/ant/1.7.0/ant-1 .7.0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41587] - Ant-1.7.0 task, under JDK1.3.1_19, can't find junit.jar in ${user.home}/.ant/lib

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41734] - ant 1.7.0 always reports an error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41734] - ant 1.7.0 always reports an error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41734] - ant 1.7.0 always reports an error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41734] - ant 1.7.0 always reports an error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41734] New: - ant 1.7.0 always reports an error

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41734 Summary: ant 1.7.0 always reports an error Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41654] - "ant -version" returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41654] New: - "ant -version" returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41654 Summary: "ant -version" returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0 Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

Re: Ant 1.7.0 Maven2 repo version has problem

Hi, > > org.apache.ant > ant > [1.7.0,) ---^ Are you sure about the brackets? Looks weird :) - apparently this is how you state 1.7.0 or greater than or equal to in mvn pom language. So it should pick up the jar (which it

AW: Ant 1.7.0 Maven2 repo version has problem

Just without enough knowledge about poms ... > > org.apache.ant > ant > [1.7.0,) ---^ Are you sure about the brackets? Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-

Ant 1.7.0 Maven2 repo version has problem

Hi, The version of 1.7.0 at the maven2 repo seems to have a problem. my pom : org.apache.ant ant [1.7.0,) org.apache.ant ant-jsch [1.7.0,) When I use my maven plugin (which relies on these dependencies) I get a URL error in ${user.home}/.m2/repository/org/apache

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41587] - Ant-1.7.0 task, under JDK1.3.1_19, can't find junit.jar in ${user.home}/.ant/lib

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41587] New: - Ant-1.7.0 task, under JDK1.3.1_19, can't find junit.jar in ${user.home}/.ant/lib

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587 Summary: Ant-1.7.0 task, under JDK1.3.1_19, can't find junit.jar in ${user.home}/.ant/lib Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: other Status: NEW Sever

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > > I have checked in code to fix this. Those > > experiencing the problem might want to test > against a > > build from SVN HEAD to verify the problem is fixed > for > > them. It wouldn't hurt to remind the Maven folks > to > > set the

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

Hi Matt, I have checked in code to fix this. Those experiencing the problem might want to test against a build from SVN HEAD to verify the problem is fixed for them. It wouldn't hurt to remind the Maven folks to set the Project instance on artifacts they create, either. That was quick! And

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It looks like it is some strange stuff with > > path through the code that just avoids an NPE in > > ant.1.6.5. > [SNIP] > > I am not sure how to fix this in ant. > > > > I've got it. It is indee

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like it is some strange stuff with > path through the code that just avoids an NPE in > ant.1.6.5. [SNIP] > I am not sure how to fix this in ant. > I've got it. It is indeed a case of the Maven code not having set Project references on the

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

be triggered here would seem to > indicate > the task passed null as the project argument to > getDirectoryScanner(). Looking at Ant 1.6.5's code > it > appears that the same exception would be thrown, > however, so I am confused how this problem only > showed > up

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

it > appears that the same exception would be thrown, > however, so I am confused how this problem only > showed > up with Ant 1.7.0. > > -Matt > > --- Loic Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have submitted the follow

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

this problem only showed up with Ant 1.7.0. -Matt --- Loic Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have submitted the following problem to the Maven > mailing list which > redirected me to this Ant mailing list. > > The problem occurs when I use the maven ant ta

Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

Hi, I have submitted the following problem to the Maven mailing list which redirected me to this Ant mailing list. The problem occurs when I use the maven ant task 2.0.4 with Ant 1.7.0. The fileset created by the task raises a NullPointerException when used in the Ant task. The following

Re: Maven Ant Task problem when used with Ant 1.7.0

Hi, Are the maven ant task supposed to work with the last Ant 1.7.0 version ? Any idea about what causes this problem ? Ant 1.7 introduced the concept of ResourceCollections, this code would have affected filesets, but I cannot diagnose the problem further without a full

Thread about Ant 1.7.0 on theserverside

Hi, I have seen an interesting thread of discussion on "theserverside" concerning Ant 1.7.0. There are the typical discussions about whether ant should be procedural out of the box (if, try/catch, for, foreach) and comparisons between ant and maven. Regards, Ant

Ant 1.7.0 jars in maven repository : now available

Hi, the Ant 1.7.0 jars are now available in the maven repository for maven2 based builds. Note that the groupId is org.apache.ant, not ant like for ant 1.6.5. Checksums fail though - I do not know the reasons but the colleagues at repository@ are aware of this. Regards, Antoine

Re: AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

On 12/20/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with > ? > > Do we want to? > > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing > feature

Re: AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with > ? > > Do we want to? > > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing > features in beta2, is > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?

AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with ? Do we want to? I haven't seen anybody complain about missing features in beta2, is AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release? Stefan -

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi Steve, actually, the org.apache.ant artifacts seem not to be available yet in the maven repository. I knew that :) I have just posted something to repository@ to find out whether it is just a delay, or whether I did something which does not follow the expect

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:01:24 + Von: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Hello Steve, > > > > the libs should already

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello Steve, the libs should already be in the maven repository. But pay attention : groupId is now org.apache.ant, not ant any more. That's ok, I'm only moving our project to Ivy this week; we have no hard coded commitments to the old paths. ---

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

s List Betreff: Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0. > > Oh, we need to put the libs up on the maven repository, along with > Ant-testutil.jar. > >

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0. Oh, we need to put the libs up on the maven repository, along with Ant-testutil.jar. Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with ? -steve

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0. Congratulations! Thanks for being the release manager; take a rest now and let the rest of the team handle the support calls. I'm waiting for the first 'doesnt work on win98 with

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Hello Kevin, On Dec 19, 2006, at 10:31 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi Antoine, - as penance for my screwup last week, No need for penance, this happens I offer to do the next release Much appreciated. (hopefully in a while!) We will see ... Kev Antoine -

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Hi Antoine, We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0. Thanks for taking the time to be release manager this time around - much appreciated - as penance for my screwup last week, I offer to do the next release (hopefully in a while!) Kev

[ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released

Hi, We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0. Ant 1.7 introduces a resource framework. Some of the core ant tasks such as are now able to process not only file system resources but also zip entries, tar entries, paths, ... Resource collections group resources, and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>> RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace >>> (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. > >>> [j

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. [junit] Testcase: testIIOP(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicAdvancedTe

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Stefan. Rebuild the machine, Just installed Service Pack 1 for VS2005 today, felt like rebuilding the machine, no less. It took about 85 minutes, at least twice as long as the initial installation of VS2005, Guidancy Automation Extensions and Toolkit and the VS2005 SDK

AW: [VOTE-RESULTS] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

>the vote for the release of Ant 1.7.0 will close tomorrow evening. > >So far I have recorded 6+1s (from Kevin, Matt, Steve Loughran, >Stefan, Martijn, Peter). > >Jan Materne had done a -1 vote right after my first upload, >but, since the reasons for his -1 (I think a piec

[VOTE-RESULTS] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi, the vote for the release of Ant 1.7.0 will close tomorrow evening. So far I have recorded 6+1s (from Kevin, Matt, Steve Loughran, Stefan, Martijn, Peter). Jan Materne had done a -1 vote right after my first upload, but, since the reasons for his -1 (I think a piece of code which was

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace >> (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. >> [junit] Testcase: testIIOP(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicAdvancedTest): >> Caused an

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Jan, Yes, I did not branch Ant yet, so you can work on SVN HEAD. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:40:40 +0100 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > > * conc

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

> * concerning the WHATSNEW file : I did not have the time and >the knowledge to do an intelligent merge of the 4 sections >which were in the file (Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0Beta1 ... to the >new section 1.6.5 to 1.7.0. I would suggest that you correct >it. The corrections will only be in 1.7.1 (un

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:19:35 +0100 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > Having a deeper look into the distros ... > > Jan > > > Binary distro: >

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

hange from Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0". Also delete the paragraph * On Java1.5+, Ant automatically sets the system property java.net.useSystemProxies to true, which gives it automatic use of the local IE (Windows) or Gnome2 (Unix/Linux) proxy settings. This may break any build

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. > >We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support >jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is >triggering the bug - hopefully to g

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

>It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. > >We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support >jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is >triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1. > >Have you tried using gree

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. +1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good. RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1. Have you tried using green threads? (were they still

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

I just downloaded the latest builds from http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ * binary distro with MD5 ac30ce5b07b0018d65203fbc680968f5 *apache-ant-1.7.0-bin.zip * source distro with MD5 f3c9e94df5f4cc639ad8067700b3d571 *apache-ant-1.7.0-src.zip Using Java Classic VM (build JDK-1.2.1_004

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

+1 Peter On 12/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ apache-ant-1.7.0

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef: On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that the official release does not w

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

1.2.2 D:\data\eclipseworkspace\ant-trunk>d:\apache-ant-1.7.0\bin\ant test Buildfile: build.xml A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has occurred in : 'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Objec t;)V': Interpreting

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be > present. +1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good. RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks like a deeply confused

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

To be honest I don't see where an argument comes in... shouldn't the final release ALSO be an RC? That's what a Release Candidate is, isn't it? +1 -Matt --- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Antoine, > > On my part I'm happy to say that we should release > as final not RC2, I >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/apache-ant-1.7.0/ Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Antoine, On my part I'm happy to say that we should release as final not RC2, I agree with the fact that people will not test until it becomes a final release (so if we do a RC2, it won't be tested by the users anyway). yes [x] Kev

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Alexey, Jesse, I am getting impatient to get the impact of a real release. In any case, there will be bugs. Which bugs will be found and will be deemed critical nobody knows. We might be in search of perfection, but no matter how many RCs you generate you will never be perfect. Reg

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

I would also call it RC2. - Alexey. On 12/14/06, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Do you vote for the release of these binaries ? Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do you vote for the release of these binaries ? Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call this build RC2 and make that the final release after a week or so - permitting no further

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be > added after 1.7.0 is released? > > shouldn't we wait for that? > > Martijn > > - T

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Steve, yes, this is it. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:00:27 + Von: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Just to interrupt you guys for a sec. This is regarding the mention of the Virtual Ant GUI in the manual. As you probably know, I had submitted modifications to the external.xml file which contains the description of Virtual Ant now. But I also see that the Ant Manual has an 'Editors/IDE Integrati

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

> Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be > added after 1.7.0 is released? > I pulled out the o.a.t.a.util.java16 package as it wasn't used, the hasfreespace condition wasn't pulled as it compiled and ran on both vm's I have (although this isn't an extensive te

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Who has upgraded to java 6 yet? I may do it on my laptop I upgraded to java6 (my current boss wanted to upgrade immediately so...), first thoughts - ack it makes eclipse run like an 'asthmatic ant with some heavy shopping', have yet to try it with IDEA, command line usage seems about the same as

  1   2   >