[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8449: Include zoneid parameter...

GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/234 CLOUDSTACK-8449: Include zoneid parameter in base library for updateConfiuration method Some test cases pass zoneid for Configurations.update method but it is absent in base library. You

Re: Coverity Scan : cloudstack project

Hi, We have re-added the build into the queue with some modification as it got timed out after 5 hours of database commit. Thanks Dakshesh Vyas * Marketing Operations / Technical Manager-Coverity Scan dv...@coverity.com Office: +1 (415) 935 2957 www.coverity.com

Re: Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates: CLOUDSTACK-4757

Likitha, Thanks for updating, I think it is a very useful feature and will ease the work of migrating from VMWare setup to a cloudstack setup. -abhi > On 07-May-2015, at 9:11 am, Likitha Shetty wrote: > > The feature is code complete and is present in feature branch > (https://git-wip-us.ap

[CLOUDSTACK DAY SEATTLE] CFP Deadline June 12

Hi everyone, As many of you are aware, CloudStack Day Seattle is going to be held the day after LinuxCon/CloudOpen North America 2015 on August 20th. The deadline for submitting a proposal for CloudStack Day Seattle is Friday, June 12. To submit a proposal visit: http://events.linuxfoundation.

RE: Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates: CLOUDSTACK-4757

The feature is code complete and is present in feature branch (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova ). But since it has been a while I don’t think it will be an easy merge into master. In any case, I will soon start working on the m

Re: Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates: CLOUDSTACK-4757

I also would like to know, i was under impression this was slated with CCP 4.5 release.. On 5/5/15 11:57 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: Can anyone comment what state this feature is in ? On 05-May-2015, at 11:58 am, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: The work on support for ova with multiple disk wa

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user mlsorensen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99635718 Yeah, I think this is a big enough change that we should give all KVM "stakeholders" an opportunity to review and test before merge. At least the committers, but a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99553213 Please, do not merge it before I test it with a KVM hypervisor. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

Re: github

Github had a severe service degradation this morning https://status.github.com/messages --David On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > is it just me or is github very very slow this morning ?

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233 Refactor/libvirt resource This PR contains the refactor of the LibvirtComputingResource. The motivation behind this effort is to increase maintainability and testability of the code.

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

Will do tomorrow On Wed, 6 May 2015 17:27 Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Daan, > > I've merged awsapi after it passed travisCI tests and packaging worked > (Here's a test repo without awsapi package: > http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi/). > Please go ahead with merging 4.5 on master. L

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=tr

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Good news, we have found the cause of the problem I was experiencing with upgrade testing. It appears that when you register the new system vm template in 4.3 or 4.4 using the UI, it sets the HVM flag to true. As I was testing on a system using Nested Virtualisation which does not support HVM

Re: Use

OVS sintaxys is pretty much the same ( as brctl ) but it was a pain to write all the configs for mine situation - actualy its default case when you creating advanced zone with GRE isolation in cloudstack ( but ovs and cloudstack manuals are realy poor) About fake bridges : For compatibility with

Re: Use

Yeah, I'm really familiar with the standard linux bridge methods, but not so much on OVS. It seems a bit strange to me that you only have a bridge 'cloudbr' and the traffic labels refer to ports rather than bridges, but what do I know. There are lots of ways to configure networking. If you want to

Re: Use

I did everything according to manual http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html Default service offering is working good ( every vnet is made in bridge where it should be and etc ) So should I open a bug ? Because I dont see that something is even trying to create

Re: Shared networks and 'View IP Addresses'

Hi Erik, It could be an issue, when I reach that page in a shared network the API (listPublicIpAddresses with listall=true) returns empty list so we don’t see any ip addresses. I’m not sure if it worked before. > On 29-Apr-2015, at 11:58 am, Erik Weber wrote: > > Is there a good reason for why

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

Hi Daan, I've merged awsapi after it passed travisCI tests and packaging worked (Here's a test repo without awsapi package: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi/). Please go ahead with merging 4.5 on master. Let me know you've time and bandwidth to do it otherwise I can help with tha

Re: Use

Yeah, so cloudstack will take those labels to the KVM hypervisor and try to resolve them to bridges, and then to the physical devices that host those bridges, so it knows where to create new bridges. I was just wondering if your labels were matching your bridge names. By 'default', I was asking if

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99506844 All green, merging now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup tier, for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the vpc and

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

Fcourse On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:02 Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Can you sync with Rohit, who is merging the noawsapi stuff as well.. > > > On May 6, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > > I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of the > > RMs, not to be the RM!

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, I always test upgrades (from whatever versions we have in prod) and no problems, but I only run Adv+SG zone.. I can destroy/create system VMs without problem. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Geoff Higginbottom"

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

Can you sync with Rohit, who is merging the noawsapi stuff as well.. > On May 6, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of the > RMs, not to be the RM! > > Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa : > >> So no -1 on this. >>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8445: Keep only dvs tag for te...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/232 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8445: Keep only dvs tag for te...

GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/232 CLOUDSTACK-8445: Keep only dvs tag for test case which tests the VCenter port groups The test cases is tested only for DVS. This will prevent it to run on normal configuration. You can m

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

I just did a test merge: ~/cloudstack/cloudstack (master)> git merge --no-ff --edit -s ours 4.5 gives a clean merge of the last bits from 4.5 and merges without conflicts I will rerun a merge and push if the RC passes Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 10:59 schreef Daan Hoogland : > I can have a look at the m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder > On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom > wrote: > > For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible > please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated n

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Rega

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>: > Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with > a '+1' but was not voting for t

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Or

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi all, I'm glad to let you know that ACS 4.5.1 has my +1. Environment: XenServer 6.2 MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.41 Management Server running CentOS 7 Component: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack (test/integration/component and smoke) Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:

Re: Shared networks and 'View IP Addresses'

Ping - anybody have some insight here? -- Erik On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > Is there a good reason for why you can't see allocated IP addresses under > 'Network' for a Shared Network? > > This is on ACS 4.5.1 RC2 in case it has worked earlier. > > -- > Erik >

Re: Use

Marcus writes: > > What is your default OVS bridge name? Are your traffic labels matching the > OVS bridge cloudbr0? > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aleksandr Ivanov wrote: > > > Sure > > [root node2 /]# cat /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties > > #Storage > > #Mon May 04 23:29:33 MSK

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99421168 merging 4.5.1 looks like will cause a lot of conflicts; I'm merging it after rebasing and pushing to master and if travis and packaging works --- If your project is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8394: Skip test cases through ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/231 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99402058 Maybe do it after Daan merges 4.5.1….? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99401968 let's go for it, there has been enough warning. So if you can rebase, make Travis happy….and squash everything that would be good. --- If your project is set up fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Geoff, > > Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to > have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers > have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99400796 @runseb is this good to go now that ec2stack is an apache cloudstack sub-project? I'll rebase and do some tests again if it's okay merge this PR. --- If your projec

Re: [DONE] IP clearance for ec2stack and gstack has passed

Great, thanks Sebastien! > On 06-May-2015, at 10:13 am, sebgoa wrote: > > Folks, > > Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place. > ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack > https://github.com/apache/clouds

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Daan, Private gateway is not for this purpose, but let's not confuse this thread, we can discuss it in more detail over a beer at the next User Group (far more fun) Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com ---

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and rou

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8394: Skip test cases through ...

GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/231 CLOUDSTACK-8394: Skip test cases through setUp() instead of setUpClass() Doing the changes for regression test cases. This has already been done for BVTs. Reason: When raise "unittest.

Re: [arhitecture help] Management vs. Secondary network connectivity dependencies

anyone :) On 3 May 2015 at 13:49, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was wondering if someone experienced would be kind to share their > opinion on folowing subject - since I'm 95% clear with design/ho stuff > works, but again missing some info - after I have done my RTFM many times, > and I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>: > Hi Vadim, > > My first question is why would you want to?

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of the RMs, not to be the RM! Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa : > So no -1 on this. > > Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ? > > I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tell everyone that starting > f

Re: [VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

Yes. For default nic those entries should be cleared. -Jayapal On 06-May-2015, at 2:16 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got deployed >> or ne

Re: [VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got deployed > or new nic is plugged. > For non-default nic there will be entries in dhcpopts.txt. > > 10_125_2_150,3 > > 10_125_2_150,6 > > F

Re: [VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got deployed or new nic is plugged. For non-default nic there will be entries in dhcpopts.txt. > 10_125_2_150,3 > 10_125_2_150,6 For default nic there won't any entries in dhcpopts.txt for this nic. Thanks, Jayapal On 06-May-2015, at

Re: [VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > >> I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default >> gateway nor dns servers. >> >> And it seems to be due to the following lines in /etc/dhcpopts.txt: >> 10_125_2

Re: [VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default > gateway nor dns servers. > > And it seems to be due to the following lines in /etc/dhcpopts.txt: > 10_125_2_150,3 > 10_125_2_150,6 > > Does anyone know why we insert th

[VR] Usage of /etc/dhcpopts.txt

I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default gateway nor dns servers. And it seems to be due to the following lines in /etc/dhcpopts.txt: 10_125_2_150,3 10_125_2_150,6 Does anyone know why we insert those lines, and/or where it comes from? -- Erik

[DONE] IP clearance for ec2stack and gstack has passed

Folks, Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place. ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-gcestack We just need to create two releases for these. Note that while ec2stack

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it > seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at > production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from > different ti

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important .

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.6 release management

So no -1 on this. Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ? I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tell everyone that starting from that tag all commits to master except from RM will be reverted. will need to make sure that all of 4.5.1 is in master -sebastien On May 1, 2

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at us

github

is it just me or is github very very slow this morning ?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and t