When you create reoccurring volume snapshot task, instead of transferring only
that volume all volumes that are associated with VM are transferred to
secondary storage.
That doesn't sound right.
Are you sure you're really creating a recurring volume snapshot and not a VM
snapshot?
I believe the
Hi,
Are you aware of https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40346 ?
Haproxy 2.0 through 2.5 has a vulnerability that can be exploited to smuggle
requests to backend systems.
If the CloudStack VR is using one of these versions, it should be patched
everywhere ASAP.
Regards,
Greg
Hi Dirk,
My second problem is with git branches. My problem here is that I wanted to use
the cloudstack version 4.13.1 as base, for this reason I checkout the 4.13.1
branch, but the build process goes wrong with a couple of errors, after this I
checkout the master and revert it to the commit
+1 (non-binding)
I tested a few common and less-common things and found no regressions.
Note: I built the binary locally, didn't try the binaries on the Github release
page.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 01 July 2020 06:51
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
us...@cloudst
not 100% certain this is exactly what Bobby was saying,
> but if this is the case then I think it should not block us.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:00 AM Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) <
> gregor.ri...@swisstxt.ch> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > Sorry for the late
Hi everyone
Sorry for the late response, but I have a few concerns:
* As Bobby stated, this bug seems to only occur with VMware 6.7+, and it
sounds to me like they should take action on it. Does someone track this with
VMware?
* Do I understand correctly that the issue only occurs when
Hi Rohit,
Let me comment on just a few of the topics:
> Release cycle
I think we should definitely have a daily/nightly build, at least as long as a
lot of changes are incoming.
I'm think along the lines of a parallel installation, so all versions can be
tested and users still get a fallback
Hi Rohit,
I'm also still waiting on official container builds for
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/ đ
The readme already contains a reference to
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/ , so could you
extend the request to the infra team to includ
Hi Wei,
Thank you for this proposal!
We are also very much interested in this feature.
There's a few things we're not quite happy with, though - but we still need to
discuss this internally a bit.
Liridon or myself will give some feedback soon.
Regards,
Gregor
F
ntents is
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
Am 16.01.2020 um 15:39 schrieb Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
mailto:gregor.ri...@swisstxt.ch>>:
Hi Rohit,
That surprises me a bit,
Welcome, Vladimir!
From: Vladimir Petrov
Sent: 16 January 2020 15:59
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New joiner!
Hello everyone,
I'm happy to announce that I just joined ShapeBlue as a QA engineer. I have
about 17 years of experience in different QA area
t; Thanks for replying. My dockerhub username is 'bhaisaab' [1]. Please
>> add me as an admin to both the groups. We can discuss later if we want to
>> favour one org name vs the other.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/bhaisaab/
>>>>
&
lue
https://www.shapeblue.com
____
From: Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 14:30
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack Kubernetes provider containers on DockerHub
Hi everyone,
We still need to publish the new
https://github.
(Resend, accidentally sent it to Andrija instead of the list)
Hi,
You can experiment with Dedicating a host to the customer. I can't advise
(from top of my head) if also the customer's VR will be created there (but
you can do one-time live migrate if needed to that host) - all customer VMs
will be
Just for my understanding: What is the reason that you need user-defined
passwords?
Ideally, you shouldn't even need a password at all. Log in using SSH keys
instead, which *can* be provisioned by users.
Are you deploying Windows VMs, perhaps?
But I suppose you could expose the parameter, then
Welcome, Pearl!
From: Pearl d'Silva
Sent: 06 November 2019 05:34
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Introduction
Hello Everyone,
I'm Pearl and have recently joined Shapeblue. Really excited about being part
of Cloudstack community. Looking forward to learn
Automated UI testing is usually done by running a web browser, generating
artificial user input, then verifying the result either by DOM analysis or
image recognition on screenshots.
Our devs have achieved good results with TestCafe:
https://devexpress.github.io/testcafe/
It's very easy to writ
anks.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
https://www.shapeblue.com
____
From: Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 14:30
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack Kubernetes provider containers on DockerHub
Hi everyone,
Hi CloudStack community,
We're still stuck with cloud-init's problematic way of searching for a metadata
server: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3557
Would you consider taking a look at our proposed fix and comment on it, so it
can be pushed ahead?
https://code.launchpad.net/~joschi
Hi everyone,
We still need to publish the new
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider on a public container
registry.
It looks like the ASF and/or CloudStack project already have accounts on
DockerHub:
https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
https://hub.docker.com/u/apachecloudstack
W
Isn't multi-master kind of a baseline requirement?
etcd should be operated on at least three nodes to have a quorum, so a there
should be at least three masters...
From: Abhishek Kumar
Sent: 26 September 2019 08:11
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISC
Hi all,
kubernetes-cloudstack-provider provides the missing link between Kubernetes and
CloudStack resources (firewall, loadbalancer, node information, ...).
There is one other component that you still need, though: Suitable images.
I'm not sure if this is something that CloudStack should provid
Hi Rohit
+1
Kudos to the plans and the work already done on the new UI!
I'm definitely in favour of something more modern and easier to maintain.
Also, the complete separation of the UI from the mgmt server is definitely the
way to go.
We've tested the current state of the frontend and while a
-ConfiguringaloadbalancerforanIPAddressofanIsolatedNetwork
We will create pull request later this year.
-Wei
On Tuesday, 17 September 2019, Rauklei P. S. GuimarĂŁes
wrote:
> Maibe in Panel/Global Config?
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:17 AM Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) <
> gregor.ri...@swi
> haproxy.cfg is generated by this file
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/HAProxyConfigurator.java
Allowing changes to the HAProxy config via the CloudStack API could be
a very useful addition, as the defaults are sometimes a bit limiting.
Fo
> Just to add some context, this was awhile back that I tried it,
> years. The idea was that we could just set max memory to some crazy
> high number and then âunlockâ just the amount in the offering, and
> adjust on the fly. As mentioned I found it was trivial for VM users
> to unlock the full amo
> > Wido, makes sense that log4j and logrotate would conflict. Log4j
> > has its
> > own rotate functionality.
>
Note that a few CS log files are not generated by log4j.
You still need external logrotatation if you don't want them to fill up
your disk.
I had this issue with access.log, for exam
Thanks, everybody!
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 02 September 2019 09:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache CloudStack 4.13.0.0
Great, congrats all.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
htt
Welcome, Radu!
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 15:06 +, Simon Weller wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to introduce Radu Todirica to the community. Radu is a
> new(er) member of the ENA team and has been making lots of
> contributions to CloudStack and you can expect to see some PRs from
> him pretty soon.
>
Congratulations, Nathan!
From: Paul Angus
Sent: 19 July 2019 16:58
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
us...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Nathan Johnson has joined the PMC
Fellow CloudStackers,
It gives me great pleas
peblue.com
____
From: Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:15:12 PM
To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack Kubernetes Provider
Hi Rohit,
> One of
Hi Jean-François
> I have always used NFS to install the SSVM templates and the install
> script (cloud-install-sys-tmplt) only takes a mount point. How, if
> possible, would I proceed with S3 only storage ?
CloudStack doesn't support object storage as a backend for the
secondary storage. You'd
Congratulations, Boris!
Congratulations, everyone!
Good work everybody!
This release contains a few crucial fixes for us, so we're happy it's
there!
On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 16:52 +0100, Paul Angus wrote:
> Announcing Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.11.30
>
>
>
> The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of
> Cl
Hi Rohit,
> One of the community contributors from SwissTxt Gregor Riepl
> (@onitake) have also offered to contribute their provider (which is
> already under the Apache v2.0 license) which they have based on the
> original provider:
> https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672#issueco
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3417
>
>
> The issue only affects 4.11.2.0 users for which the upgrade path does
> not run (a noop upgrade path runs) and it does not automatically fix
> any registered 4.11.3 systemvmtemplate to be used post-upgrade. I've
> mentioned workaround steps
> @Riepl
> nmap -sS -O does help in fetching the OS type only if they have
> public ip. I cant ssh into the machines because they are customer
> machines and I dont have credentials for them.
We had such a situation a few times, and simply asked the affected
customer if they would permit us to de
> version. Another way is to open the console and see the login screen.
> This will get the actual data but I want to do automation to see for
> all VM's and opening the console is not feasible to automate. Is
> there any other way to get it?
Are the VMs networked?
You could fetch their public I
+1
Based on:
- Packages from http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41130rc1/ and
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41130rc1/
- Upgrade of our test cloud from 4.11.2 to 4.11.3 worked without problems
(aside from the mentioned template issue)
- Our internal smoke test stack ran succes
s DB values so it becomes a "SYSTEM"
instead of "USER" type that it was initially.
Andrija
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 16:46, Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) <
gregor.ri...@swisstxt.ch> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the
Hi Darrin, welcome!
From: Darrin H?sselmann
Sent: 13 June 2019 14:14:00
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Hello
Hi All,
I have joined Shapeblue as a software engineer and look forward to contributing
to the cloudstack project
Hi Paul,
> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm
> template upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the
> following for systemvm template upgrade testing:
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html
Thanks!
We're doi
> - You did the upgrade on a newly built MySQL / MariaDB server (keep in mind
> you can not at this point run MariaDB version 10.x)
> - AND you imported database dumps to the new DB servers
> - AND you didn't give 'cloud@%' permissions before the import:
> GRANT ALL ON *.* TO 'cloud'@'%' IDENTIF
+1
> In order to be more transparent, I would like to propose that we put
> something like ' [WIP DO NOT MERGE]' in the PR title as my colleagues
> and I have done on some new PRs you can follow. Labels cannot be used
> as not every contributor is a committer. Once the PR is ready for
> merging, we c
Hi Giles,
> I would *expect* 4.13.0 (LTS) to be released in Q2, which will
> supersede the 4.11 branch as the current LTS branch
Are you confident that this schedule can be kept?
4.12 is still in RC right now, and I don't think it's a good idea to
rush another major release in just 3 months...
> I create a new iconset for cloudstack and we think we will implement
> it. There is a Vote Formular and some examples. I oriented myself on
> the original one. Its a lot of work to make them all looks good but
> if you do not start it will be nothing. Lets start with the dashboard
> and left con
No sure if my vote counts, but a
[x] +1 approve
from me.
I built the tag 6.0.0 locally with Go 1.11.5 and tested against a CS
4.5.2 and a CS 4.11.2 instance.
Listing VMs and stopping/starting instances works as expected, on both
CloudStack versions.
I also filed a few minor issues on Github, but
> Iâm happy to announce that the CloudStack PMC has elected Paul Angus
> as our new VP of CloudStack.
Congratulations, Paul!
Looks like it's only temporary:
https://community.synopsys.com/s/article/Coverity-Scan-Update
Their old hosting provider shut down, but they want to restore the service as
soon as possible.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 17 January 2019 20:49:21
To: dev@cloudstack.ap
51 matches
Mail list logo
