On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >>>
> >Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
> >http://
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:09, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
> > > > > http://outerthought.net/~b
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I don't want to spend very much time on this thread anymore, but here's
the short summary:
Understandable. Again, I do want to fix the issues. Also note that it is
accessible to Cocoon committers.
I don't have any problem with the concepts behind the
CommandManager/ThreadMana
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Behalf Of Giaco
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on ma
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
> > > > http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
> > >
> > > Never mind, I can reproduce the
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:24, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> >
> > Looking at the code again, I still think that all events from one
> > CommandManager are handled by one thread.
> >
> > If you look at the code of the AbstractThreadManager:
> >
> > In the method "register( EventP
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:52, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Or maybe not so great. I'm not sure the CommandManager is well suited
> > for a general purpose scheduler.
> >
> > What follows now should be read with a 'AFAIU' disclaimer:
> >
> > All commands added to the Co
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Looking at the code again, I still think that all events from one
CommandManager are handled by one thread.
If you look at the code of the AbstractThreadManager:
In the method "register( EventPipeline pipeline )" one PipelineRunner is
created to handle events from the given Eve
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I'll have to start to play golf just to find a
use for my tonsils)
Eeeck. Spare us the details! ;-)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > >
> > > Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
> > > http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
> >
> > Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
> >
> Great, so I'm not ins
Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 02/09/2003 15.21:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
Great, so I'm not insane! (I tried your version anyway, but w
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Or maybe not so great. I'm not sure the CommandManager is well suited
for a general purpose scheduler.
What follows now should be read with a 'AFAIU' disclaimer:
All commands added to the CommandManager are executed sequentially and
on one thread. So if there is one command th
Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> > Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
> > http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
>
> Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
>
Great, so I'm not insane! (I tried your version anyway, but without success)
Carsten
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:42, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
> > > that's the same.
> > >
> > > Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> >
> > Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
> > that's the same.
> >
> > Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1.4.2 and it also
> > works. With "working" I mean I added a Syst
Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
>
> Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
> that's the same.
>
> Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1.4.2 and it also
> works. With "working" I mean I added a System.out.println to the
> ContinuationsInterrupt.execute() method and s
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:10, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> > I just verified and it works here (both jdk 1.4 and 1.3), so I'm looking
> > for alternative explanations: did you remove the old util.concurrent jar
> > from your WEB-INF/lib ?
> >
> Yes. Hmm, strange - just to make
Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> I just verified and it works here (both jdk 1.4 and 1.3), so I'm looking
> for alternative explanations: did you remove the old util.concurrent jar
> from your WEB-INF/lib ?
>
Yes. Hmm, strange - just to make sure that I did nothing wrong when testing,
I changed the following
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:16, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just tested the last changes and it seems that the
> > continuation manager
> > > is still not working correctly.
> > >
> > > It seems that
Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tested the last changes and it seems that the
> continuation manager
> > is still not working correctly.
> >
> > It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
> > as jetty is l
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tested the last changes and it seems that the continuation manager
> is still not working correctly.
>
> It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
> as jetty is listening. Can someone confirm this?
Hi,
I just tested the last changes and it seems that the continuation manager
is still not working correctly.
It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
as jetty is listening. Can someone confirm this?
Carsten
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hoc
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
> From: Bruno Dumon
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Just in case
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
> Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
>
> > > I did this once upon a time, I think in C code. As I recall it's
> > > basically the equivalent of building a Map of tasks and the
> > calculated
> > > delta time until they need to be executed next and
Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
> > I did this once upon a time, I think in C code. As I recall it's
> > basically the equivalent of building a Map of tasks and the
> calculated
> > delta time until they need to be executed next and then using the
> > minimum of these deltas. I don't t
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
> Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> > First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see
> > that the ability to define repeated tasks are somehow
> > limited. Business apps can easily request administration
> > tasks to be run t
Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see
> that the ability to define repeated tasks are somehow
> limited. Business apps can easily request administration
> tasks to be run twice a day on work days. To define this with
> the Corne
From: Bruno Dumon
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Just in case you didn't know
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> >
> > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Just in case you didn't know:
> > > > Did you have a look at the Quartz Sch
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
>
> On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
>
> > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Just in case you didn't know:
> > > Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
> > > http://www.part.net/quartz.html
> > > http://www.part.net/q
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just in case you didn't know:
> > Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
> > http://www.part.net/quartz.html
> > http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
> > Perhaps it already does what you need
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just in case you didn't know:
> Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
> http://www.part.net/quartz.html
> http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
> Perhaps it already does what you need.
> It's licensed under a BSD and Apache-Style li
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
Perhaps it already does what you need.
It's licensed under a BSD and Apache-Style license.
Here's another one:
http://jcrontab.sourceforge.net/
I
Giacomo Pati wrote:
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
easily request administration tasks to be run twice a day on work days.
To define this with the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll need to add
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >
> > First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
> > ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
> > easily request administration tasks to be run twice
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >
> > > > I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
> > > > Carsten m
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> > > I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
> > > Carsten more than the CommandManager way because of its
> > > componenti
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
> > Carsten more than the CommandManager way because of its
> > componentisation. Still, I like to see a Scheduler as a single
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> Is someone on the Doug Lea list (if there is any) to report this?
I got an answer from him, he provided me with a slightly edited change:
protected synchronized void workerDone(Worker w) {
threads_.remove(w);
if (--poolSize_ == 0 && shu
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >
> > if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
> > PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems to-- work:
> >
> >
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
> PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems to-- work:
>
> if (!shutdown_) {
> if (poolSize_ < maximumPoolSize_) {
>
Jeff Turner dijo:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> ...
> [on bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131]
> ...
>> ok, 10 minutes later now, got an idea:
>>
>> if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
>> PooledExecutor.workerDon
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote:
...
[on bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131]
...
> ok, 10 minutes later now, got an idea:
>
> if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
> PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seem
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> > For me it works with Linux/Sun jdk 1.4.2, it doesn't work with 1.3.1.
> > For Carsten it doesn't work with Windows/jdk 1.4 either. I've done all
> > my testing with the Jetty which ships with Cocoon.
>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> For me it works with Linux/Sun jdk 1.4.2, it doesn't work with 1.3.1.
> For Carsten it doesn't work with Windows/jdk 1.4 either. I've done all
> my testing with the Jetty which ships with Cocoon.
>
> I've added some println's here and there and it appears
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> >>to make sense.
> >>
> >>I can make a release next week, but I really would like to hav
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> > to make sense.
> >
> > I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
> > scheduling (CommandMan
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:35, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> >>to make sense.
> >>
> >>I can make a release next week, but I really would li
Have a look at this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106189194527050&w=2
and this bug
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131
Now, it seems that the CommandManager is not working in all environments.
In my it's not working but I don't have the shutdown pr
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
to make sense.
I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone
wo
Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> > to make sense.
> >
> > I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
> > scheduling (CommandManager) problem fi
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> > > to make sense.
> > >
> > > I can make a release next week, but I r
Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> > to make sense.
> >
> > I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
> > scheduling (CommandManager) problem fi
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> to make sense.
>
> I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
> scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone
> workin
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
> to make sense.
>
> I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
> scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone
> working already
59 matches
Mail list logo
