[Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2

Hello guys, The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot of new features. I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after. End users are waiting the maintenance relea

Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2

Nobody? No opinion? 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Hello guys, > > The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot > of new features. > > I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then > IMO we should start the rele

[DISCUSS][CLOSED?] Extending the logo contest?

Guys, It's time to close now, isn't it? We may enter in the process to fire a vote or choose which one to keep. Jean-Louis

Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2

d to add low > bandwidth communicator. > > > > On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > > Nobody? > > No opinion? > > > > > > 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > >> Hello guys, > >> > >> The trunk (

Re: slow multicast discovery can be optimized by caching server...

Never went into connection strategies in OpenEJB client. Maybe David could help on that area. JLouis 2013/2/12 Sule BASOL > Hello , its too good to multipulse to find server on the same lan. > But also it will be good to cache server ip on localside. > Because connection takes time wit

Re: trunk = 1.6.0?

Yep, +1, go ahead (+ TCK i guess) Jean-Louis 2013/2/13 Romain Manni-Bucau > Hi guys, > > seems we all agreed on the fact trunk is the future 1.6.0 and the 1.5.2 > will be a branch from 1.5.1 tag > > so can we switch versions on trunk + jira? > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: trunk = 1.6.0?

It mostly depends on what we want to integrate. An end user would be more confident in branching from 1.5.1 and applying required changes or patches. For us, the alternative you purposed is definitely the simplest one. Le 14 févr. 2013 00:55, "David Blevins" a écrit : > In terms of branching from

Re: Tomee mvn plugin

As an end user, I would like to keep previous blocks even if we can't get the most from the new features (that's the life). If I want new features, I can still move to the new configuration. So +1 for new features or new lightweight configuration and +1 to keep as much as possible the old configur

Re: SNAPSHOT for next release?

Do you mean fork=branch ? 2013/3/5 Romain Manni-Bucau > We waited a lot for the 1.6.0 release > > The main issue is xbean (Mark will run OWB release soon, David can release > sxc). > > Any objection if we fork it? > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: On AIX 7.1, couldn't deploy tomee

Who answered the first time? I cannot recall the problem. Romain maybe. Jean-Louis 2013/3/6 Babu Xavier > If you want, I can setup a webex and show it to you. Please let me know. > > Thanks > Babu > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/On-AIX-7-1-coul

Re: On AIX 7.1, couldn't deploy tomee

Yes, I guess but don't think it will help. I would try instead using a snapshot just to let us know if it's still a problem. Maybe we already fixed the issue. JLouis 2013/3/6 Babu Xavier > Romain, > Did you mean, remove the whole tomee folder from > /data/tomee/apache-tomee-plus-1.5.1/webapps

Re: TomEE 1.5.2

Cool! Thanks David 2013/3/13 David Blevins > Hoping to start rolling binaries for 1.5.2. > > We had some issues in buildbot with OpenJPA build definitions preventing > any updates of ours. I think I fixed their build enough so I can get to > ours, but now hemera (the build machine) is down :)

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 6.0-5

+1 Jean Louis Le 18 mars 2013 15:34, "AndyG" a écrit : > +1 > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-javaee-api-6-0-5-tp4661574p4661597.html > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

+1 Jean-Louis 2013/3/24 Romain Manni-Bucau > +-0 > > tomee seems to have gotten some fixes but arquillian got some regressions > (-1 for ports etc...) > > basically for prod it works and for test you can still use the old version > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: cosmetic changes

I'm generally in favor of such a cleaning to avoid tons of unused code to maintain. Svn is there to help us restore in case we need it. Thanks for doing that 2013/3/28 Thiago Veronezi > Dear commiters, > > I was checking the stateless code a bit and I couldn't help to do some > cosmetic chang

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Hi Alex, The vote should be closed in my opinion. David is the one who opened it so he's the one to count and publish officially the result. Then, he just have to promote binaries on nexus and perform some minors official stuff. Finally, it's just a matter of some hours to sync everything. David

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Hey hey we are actually together in Paris. I can promote binaries if needed by Monday if David is busy. Thanks Mark for voting. Le 30 mars 2013 18:23, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Late +1 from here. > > I think David is currently on the road between a few conferences. > Maybe Romain can take over

Re: Woodstox

What's the question exactly? Woodstox is for parsing XML. As per some CXF users list exchanges, it looks like Woodstox is the more secure. Is that your concern? Can we get rid of the one we are currently using? What the impacts/benefits? 2013/4/2 Romain Manni-Bucau > Hi, > > Any objection if

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

Right! David did not promoted the binaries as far as I can see on Nexus. @David, any reason? 2013/4/3 Alex The Rocker > still no 1.5.2 official release ? > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, AndyG >wrote: > > > Late I know. But +1 from me. > > Was on Easter break, and just built/passed on

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

> > Binaries published: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.5.2/ > > > > Should hit the mirrors soon. > > > > -David > > > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 7:18 PM, David Blevins > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

created, still more work needed there. > > >> > > >> Binaries published: > > >> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.5.2/ > > >> > > >> Should hit the mirrors soon. > > >> > > >> -Dav

Re: [RESULT] TomEE 1.5.2/OpenEJB 4.5.2 (staging-008)

es wouldn't hurt our business, if it helps to > prioritize > > the todos... > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >wrote: > > > >> Ok, I will take th

Adding missing stuff to our website

Hi, Just added missing stuff as required by http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs I also managed to refactor a bit the website in order to make it more maintainable. Hope I did not break anything. In case, please ping. There is still work to do, but ... -- Jean-Louis

Re: Adding missing stuff to our website

; > > -David > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just added missing stuff as required by > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs > > I also managed to refactor a bit the website in order to make i

Re: Blog post - 1.5.2

Looks good to me. Thanks. Just one word missing maybe "we're doing everything we can do *TO *deliver you more TomEE" 2013/4/23 David Blevins > Crafted up this post for announcing the 1.5.2 release: > > - http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomee/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_2 > > States that 1

Re: contribution in documentation translation in french langage

Bonjour Eric et bienvenue ;-) All contribution even if no internal code is always welcome. I would say that it's really appreciated at the moment cause we need it. It's also a good to get into the project and maybe also push some patches. Anyway, I have to check how to manage properly internatio

Re: OPENEJB-1306 - EJB's cannot be declared final

Hey guys, did someone already committed David's patch? If not, I can do that. Thanks David anyway. Jean-Louis 2013/4/3 David Salter > I've attacked a patch to JIRA OPENEJB-1306 Validation: EJB's cannot be > declared as final - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1306 > > In the pa

Re: OPENEJB-1294

Same here, someone already committed? JLouis 2013/5/10 David Salter > Hi, > > I've just submitted a patch to JIRA for OPENEJB-1294 that validates > classes with the @StatefulTimeout annotation on them. > > The validation issues a warning if a non @Stateless bean (@Stateful, > @Singleton, @Mana

Re: tomee next classloading

1/ just adding a property for an app with values like parent-first (default - today) and parent-last (new value). 2/ that usually the way other apps servers are used to do (IBM Websphere AS IIR) 3/Don't know 4/No The first one looks the more simple to implement (at first glance) and the one which

Re: tomee next classloading

never a good > > > solution) > > > > > > so basically i'm for 1/ too if my tests show it works fine enough > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > *Blog: **http://

Re: Move KarafEE project to Apache Karaf

Hi Charles, Yes, we discussed that already and agree it's the best solution if KarafEE is considered as a relevant alternative. Jean-Louis 2013/5/13 Charles Moulliard > Hi, > > Some weeks ago (thx to Romain and others) we have discussed about KarafEE > future. This project which is until now

Re: Default include exclude order should be exclude-include

Guess we automatically exclude it. 2013/6/3 Romain Manni-Bucau > isn't it only because our exclusions exclude "quart-"? If so configuring > our exclusions could be easier. > > That said you can commit your fix, if it doesn't make our build failling > that's ok IMO, if the build fail we need to

Time for 1.6.0 or other maintenance release

Hey guys, Was just wondering if there is any plans for 1.6.0? We are currently waiting for releases on openwebbeans, xbean, openjpa AFAIR. I would love to have it before end of June or in July. Does someone have something to commit o a task to work on? Is there also some interest on creating a n

Re: Adding unit tests to org.apache.tomee.util.SimpleTomEEFormatter

We want to keep TomEE as thin as possible. We already have a lot of dependencies so as a best practice principle, we try to use them as much as possible and only import new things only of necessary. JLouis 2013/6/5 Oz M > *Romain,* > *Thank you very much for committing the unit tests.* > * > *

Re: CMS diff: JMS Resources and MDB Container

Hi, just saw this contribution. I did not committed it cause I'm not sure of the content regarding what we want. We usually don't deliver activemq-spring for example because we don't need it. thoughts, JLouis 2013/6/4 Anonymous CMS User > Clone URL (Committers only): > > https://cms.apache.o

Re: Default include exclude order should be exclude-include

Is there somebody talking about beers here? If so, I'm also one of them ;) JLouis 2013/6/7 Romain Manni-Bucau > np, i looked for it a moment the first time and David is the guy we need to > pay a beer ;) > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *

Re: Javaee-api

Afair same discussion already occurred. Can't recall the details. Le 4 juil. 2013 07:14, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a écrit : > Hi guys, > > For app dev javaee-api is great but i always wondered why we use it in our > packages. I'd replace it by geronimo jars (patched if needed). > > This will let peop

Re: Javaee-api

I just said the discussion already occurred and maybe we could have a look. I didn't say to not do that. Le 4 juil. 2013 07:46, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a écrit : > Ok, so take into account thats a user issue today > Le 4 juil. 2013 07:33, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"

Re: CMS diff: Spring EJB and JPA

This page is no more relevant as the Spring support as been dropped. It does not make a lot of sense with CDI now. JLouis 2013/7/8 ch...@chris-owens.com > Clone URL (Committers only): > > https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://tomee.apache.org/spring-ejb-and-jpa.m

Re: CMS diff: TomEE and Eclipse

Updated according to your comments. JLouis 2013/7/6 ch...@chris-owens.com > Clone URL (Committers only): > > https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-and-eclipse.mdtext > > ch...@chris-owens.com > > Index: trunk/content/tomee-and-eclipse.mdte

Re: CMS diff: Using EnvEntries

This are documentation generated from examples sources code. Are the import the only lignes impacted? JLouis 2013/7/1 stefa...@yahoo.fr > Clone URL (Committers only): > > https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://tomee.apache.org/examples-trunk%2Finjection-of-env-ent

Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hey guys, was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0. Is there any other releases we have to wait for? Does anybody has important things in progress? It's been a very long time since latest release and it's necessary in my opinion to get it out soon now. Any thoughts? -- Jean-Louis

Re: Example+request

Not clear as well for me. Checkout the download page and you will see a standalone version with a structure, script files, etc. Jean-Louis 2013/7/17 Nrkkalyan > Hi > > I want to use open ejb in a standalone java application. I don't want any > application server to deploy my application. > The

JAX London (October 2013)

Hi all, Out of curiosity, who plans to go to JAX London this year (28th - 30th October, 2013)? Would be great to try to get together in London. -- Jean-Louis

Re: JAX London (October 2013)

conference for the day after? > > My current thinking is... no effing way... but if anyone else is doing the > http://dublinmarathon.ie/ we could have a get together at the finish line! > > > On 30 July 2013 13:48, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > > Hi all, > > >

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

; > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > &g

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

eady to do it, let's just release IMO. > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *G

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

realistic. > Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit > : > > > Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better and > more > > frequent releases, at least with bugfixes. > > > > JLouis > > > > > > 2013/9

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > I know that almost everybody is curren

Re: JIRA Spam

Thanks Andy. Maybe we should forward to infra, dunno if others projects already faced that. JLouis 2013/9/24 AndyG > Just deleted the first ever spam I have seen on JIRA! Looks like we're in > for > a spate of it :-( > > Andy. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.

Re: Today's announcement

Welcome Timitribe and well done David. JLouis 2013/9/25 Jacek Laskowski > Hi Dave and all, > > As you may have noticed, I've been quiet for so long that I almost > lost track of the project. I however noticed that you were too much > silent to the extend that I thought you resigned. It turned

Re: Example+request

Hi, Indeed, that's is not the primary objective of TomEE ;-) Go to openwebbeans project. It our CDI implementation and it can be used in a servlet container as well as in standalone mode. JLouis 2013/10/13 Radhakrishna Kalyan > Hi, > > Because there are various examples but, sorry to say that

Re: Error EJB sample

That is a JBoss annotation if I recall so not surprised it does not work. JLouis 2013/10/18 nesrine > thinks for replyin, > imy problem was rsolve until i add > @RemoteBinding(jndiBinding="bean1") > to my EJb class , it'is the problem of naming > > > > -- > View this message in context: > htt

Re: sxc: was it a good idea or not?

+1 not sure it's of a big benefit and even more nowadays. beans.xml, web.xml, ejb-jar.xml most of the time do not exist or they are almost always empty or missing. The counter part of using SXC is definitely the maintenability and if the gain is negligable, I would choose to get back to the old st

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

t something > people can beat on. > >> > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using > 2.2.2? > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > >

Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-108)

Hi David, I finally also succeeded pushing a set of binaries on Nexus. Closed my repo and I will delete it as yours are up and ready. Anyway, if the baby still does not want to join us, I'll try to work on the delivery tools. And also run rat and all that stuff to prepare the final release, let's

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hey guys, Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please, whatever it is (work or not). All information are available on the other thread. JLouis 2013/11/8 David Blevins > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due > to shade plugin limita

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

& development teams to test ASAP and report any issue. > > > > I'll keep you updated > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >wrote: > > > >> Hey guys, >

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

It does work for me. Only compiled on my Mac. +1 JLouis 2013/11/12 AndyG > OK, I have a single test failing: > > testWithTransaction(org.superbiz.injection.tx.MoviesTest) Time elapsed: > 0.285 sec <<< ERROR! > javax.ejb.EJBException: The bean encountered a non-application exception; > neste

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

Here is my +1 Only ran a full build locally. JLouis 2013/11/12 David Blevins > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. > > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're >

Re: [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-108)

Hi Bjorn, Thanks for the feedback Would you give it a try with the other set of binaries and let us know? The vote is currently opened so feel free to vote as well. Thanks, JLouis 2013/11/13 Bjorn Danielsson > For whatever it's worth, my application works fine with the > "staging-108" version

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE. As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday. If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday morning. JLouis 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf > +1 > > updated my test suite - works fine > > -Matthias > > > On

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)

Of course. AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday or so. JLouis 2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau > @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass > Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit > : > > > David has been out the

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

Thanks David, here is my +1 JLouis 2013/11/17 David Blevins > Ok, TCK clean so far. > > Maven Repo: > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-147/ > > Binaries: > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-147/tomee-1.6.0/ > > Tag: > > - https://svn.

Re: Would like to contribute

Thanks Abhijit! Everyone is more than welcome. There is no small help. Feel free to have a look to examples, validation controls, documentation, or anything else you want. Let us know if you need some guidance and welcome. Jean-Louis 2013/11/17 Abhijit Sarkar > Hi,I mentioned to David Blevins

Re: GitHub?

Hi, there is a git mirror available, but read only AFAIR. For the moment, the only valid referential for TomEE is svn.apache.org JLouis 2013/11/20 Abhijit Sarkar > Sorry if this's been asked before, has moving the code to GitHub been > considered? > --Abhijit > > -- Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-147)

So much feedback. That's awesome. vote is going to close. David is currently sleeping, but he should do that after i guess. JLouis 2013/11/20 Bjorn Danielsson > +1 > > Switched from EclipseLink to OpenJPA in my app and did a quick test. > Fixed a bug in my own code as a result :-) Everything o

Re: Hello, Tomee!

Hi Ivan, Thanks for joining and giving such a great feedback. JLouis 2013/11/20 Ivan St. Ivanov > Hello Tomee contributors, > > I would like to say *Hi *to all of you. I hope that we will make Tomee a > great server! > > Regards, > Ivan > -- Jean-Louis

Preparing 1.6.1 maintenance release

Guys, I plan to move the trunk to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT. The objective is to deliver a 1.6.0 maintenance release by the end of this year. In that release, there are small fixes: - security issue fixed by Andy - Rest undeploy/deploy issue To name a few important ones. I would like also to include the To

Re: Changelog for 1.6.0

Yet another big release :) 2013/11/24 David Blevins > Closed the 1.6.0 version number in jira. > > Here's a preview of our JIRA-generated Release Notes: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12324263 > > Some cleanup necessary, but looks better

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome Mark Struberg as a new Apache TomEE committer

Everyone, The Apache TomEE PMC is pleased to announce Mark Struberg has accepted our invitation to become a committer on the project. Join me to welcome Mark! Congrats and Thanks Mark. -- Jean-Louis

Re: trunk build fails for different reasons on different times

Hi Thiago, I committed 2 possible related changes. First ... svn ci -m "Add a salt when initializing the Random" src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/client/RandomConnectionStrategy.java svn ci Envoi src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/client/RandomConnectionStrategy.java Transmission des données .-m "

Re: Quartz, next

Maybe the second (shaded) one is easier to manage at first glance. So that is my preferred solution 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau > Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in org.apache.openejb.quartz > Le 2 déc. 2013 22:23, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a > écrit : > > > Hi > > > > How do we handle q

Re: Quartz, next

Did not get time to dig into, was just my first feeling. Could you elaborate a bit more? Not sure I understood the extension issue? JLouis 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau > The 3rd ;). The issue is we loose all quartz extensions then > Le 3 déc. 2013 10:10, "Jean-Louis MONTEIR

Re: Quartz, next

t; Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/12/3 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Did not get time to dig into, was just my first feeling. Could you > > elaborate a bit more? > > Not sure I understood the extension issue? > > > > JLouis > > > &g

Re: Preparing 1.6.1 maintenance release

Small update: finally got an answer on Tomcat mailling list. Tomcat 7.0.48 should be opened next week. Jean-Louis 2013/11/25 AndyG > +1 Works for me > > Andy. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Preparing-1-6-1-maintenance-release-tp4666324p4666384.

OpenEJB Client incompatibility between 3.1.x and 4.x

Guys, Remember Romain doing some changes in the client part in order to make the serialization pluggeable. He broke somehow the compatibility and Andy did some fixes by introducing the property *openejb.client.protocol.version* ( http://tomee.apache.org/properties-listing.html) . It looks like

Re: OpenEJB Client incompatibility between 3.1.x and 4.x

> Hi > > Was tested (and is used) by at least 2 users + we have a test for it > (itests -> LegacyTest iirc)so would need more details > Le 9 déc. 2013 13:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit : > > > Guys, > > > > > > Remember Romain

Re: Quartz, next

I don't care really about the naming as soon as it gets as stable as possible and consistent. Just for you information, the usual naming convention adds "shadded" at the end of the artifact. For example, we already have xbean-finder-shadded and xbean-asm-shadded. JLouis 2013/12/11 AndyG > So h

Re: 1.6.0 writeup

The TomEE Maven plugin is still moving forward with more new features. Enhanced lightweight http serveur to support servlet deployments. Useful for testing. 2013/12/10 Bjorn Danielsson > User experience of out-of-the-box performance is better in general. > For example tweaks like org.terracott

Re: Preparing 1.6.1 maintenance release

in Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > > > since we use a shade of quartz (some real life validation would be > > > great) shouldn't we set 1.7.0? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > &g

Re: OpenEJB Client incompatibility between 3.1.x and 4.x

Thanks a lot Andy for summarizing the whole story :) That really helps. Ok so the conclusion, is that we can not have any backward compatibility from 4.x client to 3.1.x servers. @Romain, I don't see how a shaded version of the 3.1 client could help, btw So the only way is just to do like you did

Re: OpenEJB Client incompatibility between 3.1.x and 4.x

.but not an > elegant solution > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/12/18 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Thanks a lot Andy

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OPENEJB-2030) Default include exclude order should be exclude-include

Same kind of bad memories in that area :D 2013/12/20 Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA) > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13853843#comment-13853843] > > Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OPE

Re: CMS diff: Installing TomEE using the drop-in .war approach

Thx Fernando. Committed for you. Up on the staging website http://tomee.staging.apache.org/installation-drop-in-war.html Should hit the final repo soon. Thanks again. Jean-Louis 2014/1/5 Fernando Scherrer (fernando.scher...@gmail.com) < anonym...@apache.org> > Clone URL (Committers only): > > h

Re: Some contribution questions

Hi Ivan, Apologize for the late answer. First of, happy new year. - any committers can assign the Jira to you. But I need your Jira ID to find you and add you as a contributor. - you can just create a patch file for the changes and attach it to the Jira. Someone can review it and commit it for y

Re: Some contribution questions

cts. > I would appreciate if you tell me how I can create the patch file for you > to review. Otherwise, here is my commit in github: > > https://github.com/ivannov/tomee/commit/f0c0b486a0254b7b01b0bb6b46bb39f87d126efc > . > > Cheers, > Ivan > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at

Re: Some contribution questions

pull request: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2 > > I would appreciate if you tell me how to create the patch myself :) > > Thanks, > Ivan > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > The JIRA is affected

Re: anyone to release?

No no no, we must release the 1.6.1. I've been out so to be honest, I haven't got time to follow the activity for a week or so. Is there something we are waiting for? Otherwise, I should be able to give it a try. So definitely +1 JLouis 2014/1/19 Romain Manni-Bucau > Hi > > just wonder if an

Fail to compile DS under windows

Hello guys, at the office, i'm using Windows to develop. When I try to clone the repo and just fire a build with "mvn clean install" It fails with the following [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.11:test (default-test) @ deltaspike-cdictrl-weld --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: D:\cygwin\tmp\d

Re: Fail to compile DS under windows

Thanks Andy, my fault. Sent that email to tomee instead of Deltaspike :) need to reforward it. JLouis 2014-02-07 13:12 GMT+01:00 agumbrecht : > Works for me on trunk. > > Andy > > Win7 and Win8.1 > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fail-to-compile-D

Re: Fail to compile DS under windows

He he thanks then. Le 8 févr. 2014 08:11, "agumbrecht" a écrit : > I kind of guessed, but thought it would be rude not to answer. I happened > to > have it local so just updated and built it. No problems. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Fail-to-com

Tomcat Security vulnerability also affecting TomEE

Hello guys, There is a security issue (DoS) on Tomcat 7/8 (all versions included). http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201402.mbox/%3c52f373fc.9030...@apache.org%3E I will move the trunk to the latest 7.0.51 that fixes the issue. But I was rendering if there is any request or ne

Re: svn commit: r1568973 - in /tomee/tomee/trunk: server/openejb-cxf-rs/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/catali

With even it's even simpler I guess. JLouis 2014-02-17 14:33 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi Andy > > please revert it since it was the first version of the code we had in > tomee jaxrs integration and needed to be refactored to match real > needs. If your issue is with wadl generator pleas

Re: svn commit: r1568973 - in /tomee/tomee/trunk: server/openejb-cxf-rs/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/catali

but +1 with Romain. JLouis 2014-02-17 14:43 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > With even it's even simpler I guess. > > JLouis > > > 2014-02-17 14:33 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi Andy >> >> please revert it since it was the first version of the

Re: svn commit: r1568973 - in /tomee/tomee/trunk: server/openejb-cxf-rs/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java tomee/tomee-catalina/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/catali

Ok, let's retry :D I wanted to say, with Server Events (@Observes), you can maybe also add some configuration. JLouis 2014-02-17 14:44 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > but +1 with Romain. > > JLouis > > > 2014-02-17 14:43 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > With e

Code quality, formatting, and patches

Hello guys, would it be possible to do different commits for: - reformating, and code quality (final, etc) - features, fixes, etc Sometimes, there is a fix or a new feature in between and it's totally unreadable and hard to follow the changes. Thanks in advance. -- Jean-Louis

Re: Code quality, formatting, and patches

gt; LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2014-02-17 14:53 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Hello guys, > > > > would it be possible to do different commits for: > > - reformating, and code quality (final, etc)

Re: Code quality, formatting, and patches

+1 no worries, we all do that. But we should avoid ;-) We also don't always write document, but we should ;-) We don't always write tests, but we should ;-) All the same because, we start we something and finally go into other things, because no time, because something else is more funny. Anyway,

Re: Security reporting requirements

+1, go ahead with a security page. 2014-02-18 1:26 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > we are all up to date normally > > Le mardi 18 février 2014, David Blevins a écrit > : > > Hey All, > > > > I've been chatting with security@ about what our requirements are for > reporting issues. > > > > Backg

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >