Re: poblem: kannel times, please help me!urgent!

Ivone Uribe wrote: > > >> > >>Hi all! > >> > >>I have detected a problem with the Kannel. I'm using the kannel 1.2.0 and > >>Redhat 7.2. I'm using the patch kwtls-1.0.3.tar because I use the WTLS. > >> > >>When I try to access to a wrong url or one that don't exist( in the > >>cellphone I get this

Re: features kannel

why didn't you check the user's guide first before asking?! I'll treat it as FAQ and answer it once now ;) > -Subscribers authentication (including MSISDN) ? no, that's in the scope of an RADIUS daemon and corresponding NAS. > -Perform the standard WAP June 2000 ? That's 1.2.1, right?! Allmost

Re: Solaris packaging

Alan McNatty wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > make pkg simply does a cd solaris and then runs the mk-solaris-package - > or tries to if current directory is in your path (attached patch adds a > ./ to ensure it works). mk-solaris-package.sh first references > pkginfo.tmpl on line 12 (see below). I can'

Re: ppg smsc routing

Szymon Stasik wrote: > > I wonder if this matter has been solved in some recent cvs version? I > have found some thread about this. I would be useful to have possibility > of routing different push messages through apriopriate smsc. AFAIK, no. Aarno, this should go to the STATUS and/or TODO file?

Re: Requesting User Agent Profile

Azeemuddin Mohammed wrote: > > Hi, > > When the client sends a request it also sends this user agent information > by the help of this you can differentiate if its a WAP enabled client or > imode or something else. I don't think that i-mode devices will be sending WAP packets to an WAP gateway,

Re: ppg smsc routing

Aarno Syvänen wrote: > > Definitely. Actually this may be a simple thing to do. (Ppg should have > url parameters > as sendsms does.) so we need to duplicate code?! hmm, not that style we really want, or?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: Method not supported problem

I guess this would apply also then for the above if clause: ... if (octstr_str_compare(method, "GET") == 0 && octstr_compare(url, magic_url) == 0) { ret = HTTP_OK; resp_headers = list_create(); http_header_add(resp_headers, "Content-Type", "text/vnd.wap.wml");

Re: Method not supported problem

patch applied and commited to cvs. Thanks Vjacheslav! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-s

Re: Errors when compiling

> When I compile the development version 1.3.0 I get an "undefined reference > to 'gw_panic' error when it gets to the wmlscript folder. The errors occur > in wserror.c and wslexer.c. > > What should I do? did you compile from a clean source tree?! send us a log of the make process, including in

Re: Requesting User Agent Profile

> If you have a common Web/Application Server serving both WAP and CHTML pages, > it needs to detect the type of client and this is relevant only in > this kind of scenario. yes the application side with destinguish between WAP related and i-mode related clients. But the device will not do that.

Re: ppg smsc routing

Andreas Fink wrote: > > The suggestion would be to add &smsc=... to the ppg URL as it is in the sendsms URL. > This would allow the same mechanisms to work for SMSC selection for PPG and normal >SMS delivery. sounds reasonable and practible. +1 from me. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ppg smsc routing

Andreas Fink wrote: > > On Freitag, Januar 10, 2003, at 08:01 Uhr, Szymon Stasik wrote: > > But would it allow to controll access to aprticular SMSC? eg one wap-push-user >can only access some SMSCs and not some others. > > no this would not be implemented. However this is also not impleme

Re: [RFC] new development release

Paul Keogh wrote: > > I'm not sure that its a showstopper - its only relevant if you have > applications > that care about the values of recipient/sender in the DLRs and you're > switching > DLR store providers. hmm, now as we abstract the dlr_find() calls for the implementation technique, i.e. i

Re: WSPMachine destroying question

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Hi, list. > > May be someone who is familiar with kannel WSP layer may > answer to my question. > > WSPMachine is destroyed if state=NULL_SESSION > But how WSPMachine will be desroyed if client doesn't > send disconnect event but simply end his session without > a

Re: Memory leak suspicion in wap-appl.c

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Hi, list. > I suspect memory leak in wap-appl.c > It's about set_referer_url(): > > static void set_referer_url(Octstr *url, WSPMachine *sm) > { > gw_assert(url != NULL); > gw_assert(sm != NULL); > > sm->referer_url = octstr_duplicate(url);

Re: Memory leak suspicion in wap-appl.c

patch applied to cvs. Thanks Vjacheslav. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de

Re: Notice of issue in SMPP Driver

Michael Mulcahy wrote: > > Hi All, > > There is a bug in the current SMPP driver that stops the driver from > accepting messages to be submitted to the SMSC. > > Scenario: > SMPP SMSC configured as receiver and transmitter, transmitter and > receiver connected and bound successfully. > 1) Receiv

Re: Notice of issue in SMPP Driver

should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags, like smpp->conn->status->receiver = SMSCCON_RECONNECTING; smpp->conn->status->transmitter = SMSCCON_ACTIVE. ?? Any patch for the suspected rade condition yet? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Bug in EMI2 driver?

kanelek wrote: > > Hi All, > > I use Kannel with EMI2 connection to smsc. > I think there is a bug in EMI2 driver in cvs version of Kannel. > Termination of bearerbox ends with: > > 2003-01-13 13:46:21 [20] PANIC: gwlib/thread.c:79: mutex_lock_real: Mutex > failure! (Called from gwlib/counter.c:

Re: Notice of issue in SMPP Driver

Alexander Malysh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Stipe, all, > > On Monday 13 January 2003 22:54, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags, > > like > > > > smpp-&

Re: Extensive DLR testing with SMPP found lots of bugs

> 5) In many test cases (dlrmasks 9,10,11,13,14,15,25,26, 27,29,30 or 31) > Kannel says "DLR not deleted because we wait on more reports" but after > receiving a correct deliver_sm (DLR) it just didn't find the mysql row, > telling "no rows found" and then "got DLR but could not

Re: Extensive DLR testing with SMPP found lots of bugs

> 1) Wrong type of MySQL dlr field 'ts'. I used TIMESTAMP type and now using > VARCHAR type for correctness. It would be great to have sample dlr field > data types in userguide! > > oh... this is an excellent idea. never came to my mind that this could be your >problem. there is

Re: WSPMachine destroying question

Paul Keogh wrote: > > I have also seen quite different behaviours from devices and disconnects > and agree with what you say. I also suspect that this may cause resource > problems with sockets not being closed. what about timeouting the idle conntects?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WSPMachine destroying question

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Ok, if we talk about not closed sockets than there is problem in http library. > > See in http.c : > /* XXX re-implement socket pools, with idle connection killing to > save sockets */ > > Every http request to new host create socket and didn't close it e

Re: Nokia 7210 Problems

Andreas Fink wrote: > > the problem is the nokia site, not the nokia phone. right. The discussion has been up here some weeks ago. Some HTTP servers have very restrictive configured entity length acceptable. Which means in practical words, they don't accept that much HTTP headers as the phone is

Re: Nokia 7210 Problems

two questions: 1. this patch hasn't been incorporated to the cvs tree right? has anyone checked and voted for it? 2. if we assume this works, what about breaking the HTTP specs for the horizontal length of an HTTP header? If you pack 100 vertical HTTP headers that contain one value each to one HT

Re: black/white list question

Dziugas Baltrunas wrote: > > hallo, > > I would like to ask, if kannel does automatic filtering of messages > send/received to/from the same number. I tried to send few logo one after > another to the same number, and after few tries I got: > > 2003-01-15 10:13:09 send-SMS request failed - Numbe

Re: Nokia 7210 Problems

> which may impricate that they may use Kannel as WAP gateway ;) > > no they use some phone.com/openwave stuff. arrrgg, why the hell *bla bla bla bla* Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Dü

Re: Q: How to extract SMPP gateway code from Kannel

> Could you give me some thumb of rules which are relevant if > I has to > - cut out some parts of Kannel (e.g. SMPP interface) > - integrate it into my code. first of all read COPYING ;) you should consider using the SMPP module as it is intended, for Kannel usage. Let your application interface

Re: Nokia 7210 Problems

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Yes, http_header_pack control length of header. > I don't aware about documented limits, so I limit it to 256. you may check the HTTP RFC to see what it says. Onother "limit" may be the hard coded limit Apache uses, it's at least the 62% market share leader, so we

Re: Extensive DLR testing with SMPP found lots of bugs

> I am, but the default specified in Userguide seems not to be working... I > solved this using 0x01. the user's guide in cvs is fixed now. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-

Re: Does Kannel work in MMS retrieval?

yes, Kannel 1.3.0 and up will support WTP-SAR that is required to download MMS from an MMSC. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMA

Re: WAP

Hi Belay, Belay Desta schrieb: > > Hello there! > I happened to put interest on the new technology,which is WAP and > search information about mobile toolkit and come across to your site > by chance. I wonder If you have a few minutes to spare and share your > expereience with baby WAP developer.

Re: Status of cygwin port

Andrea Viscovich wrote: > > > Anyone know what the status of the current cygwin port is? I have been > > able to get bearerbox and wapbox up and running as a wap gateway. I am > > having trouble however in terminating the processes with what I think > > are the equivalent of SIGTERM > > Hi Josh,

Re: MO directed to my GW

Jeetendra Singh wrote: > > I have configured my GW to talk to a Live SMSC. My problem is: > "How to get MO's in reply to my messages directed towards me." > > I have seem some chat servers which display different numbers for user > logins when the SM is sent to mobile from chat server and reply t

[PATCH] unneeded counter increase?!

Hi list, is this patch making sense: RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_emi2.c,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -r1.7 smsc_emi2.c 713d712 < counter_increase(conn->received); Can someone who runs emi2 in production state a comment and/or vote please?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: (no subject)

David Holland wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:26:02PM +0100, Andrea Viscovich wrote: > > You have the wrong link to download kannel, > > http://www.kannel.3glab.org is the right one. > > actually www.kannel.org points to the same place as www.kannel.3glab.org > these days, thanks to the guy

Re: Serious bug in wml_compiler.c

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Hi, list. > There is bug in wml_compiler.c that forces wapbox panic > in some circumstances. > Problem is in string table. > string_table_add() returns unsigned long offset for new entry and > after that wml_compiler uses output_st_char()->octstr_append_char() to >

Re: [PATCH] unneeded counter increase?!

Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Hi list, > > is this patch making sense: > > RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_emi2.c,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > diff -r1.7 smsc_emi2.c > 713d712 > < counter_increase(conn->received); > > Can someone who runs emi2

Re: [PATCH] Race between boxc_sender and smsbox identification

Hi Robert, Robert Galach wrote: > > I found a problem in Kannel gateway (CVS version). > Let's check scenario. Consider bearerbox and 1 smsbox named "some_box_id". > > 1) Start bearerbox, it is waiting for smsboxes. > 2) Start smsbox with smsbox_id = "some_box_id", connect to bearerbox. > 3) In

Re: Serious bug in wml_compiler.c

Vjacheslav, the attached .wml file contains non-textual characters?! Is this hence supposed to be a valid WML document? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

Peter Löfman wrote: > > Thanks alot Bernd! > > I will try this out! why do you want to live in "hard land"?! while Aarno has written the PPG in wapbox that does all the WAP push magic. We use it for MMS notification pushing via SMS. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: SAR panic

Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > > Hi, Igor. > I think, first of all, panic must be eliminated. yep, agreed. Panics do stop wapbox service. Hence a download of a "too large" file kills wapbox, which is not the way we want it in an operational environment. If something can't be done, then other cli

Re: Bug in gw/wap_push_pap_compiler.c - infinite loop

Paul Keogh wrote: > > In the function parse_content (), the lines > > while (octstr_get_char(*address, pos) != >octstr_get_char(nameos, 0) && pos >= 0) { > pos = drop_character(address, pos); > } > > should be replaced with > > while ((octstr_len (*address) >

Re: LAPI

Andreas Fink wrote: > > Anyone implemented LAPI protocol for Kannel? > If not I'll do it today but I don't want to reinvent the wheel if I don't have to. nop, never heard of that beast ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems A

Re: LAPI

the protocoll looks similar to SMASI which we implemented using Kalle's SMPP code as a base. I guess you could addopt this one very easily using our SMASI code too. Just a hint ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogels

[RFC] putting SMSC protocoll specification on the web site

Hi list, I'd like to put the protocoll specs - mainly the PDF files - of the SMSC protcolls we support in kannel to the web site. I guess we would have to ask for permission by the copyright holders of those documents, right?! Anyone having closer relationsships to the companies that publish the

Re: MMS over WAP

Andreas Fink wrote: > > MMS travels on top of WAP. So without WAP, you wont have MMS. I disagree in some sense. MMS is a part of the WAP protcoll stack, that's true. In theory you could use a proterietary SMS MT (or even the normal MMS notification) to indicate the URL where the phone should pu

Re: MMS over WAP

Shridhar Raju wrote: > > In my opinion, MMS is nothing but a glorified WAP. As capabilities of Mobile > terminals increasing day by day, newer media are transfered over WAP. WAP is > a building block for MMS. that's true. But remember that basically you need only HTTP to transfer MMS messages. So

[RFC] new development version?!

Hi list, we had a couple of bug fixes now since 1.3.0 and I'd like to release a new development version. Any vetos?! Which versioning should be used for it? 1.3.1? BTW, anyone working on the long outstanding WTLS issue?! I think it would be pretty cool to have that fully implemented. Stipe [E

Re: Bug in HTTP when proxying

Michael Mulcahy wrote: > > Hi All, > > There is a bug in HTTP module when connections are proxied and > the connection is persistent. > > The host:port key of the target server is put into the connection pool > rather than the host:port key of the proxy. > > The proxy connection never gets reus

Re: Changes to smsc_cimd2.c

"Arne K. Haaje" wrote: > > Hello, > > I have two changes to the CIMD2 module; > > 1. Turn off REPLY_PATH as default. This avoids some phones (at least > Ericsson T68i) asking the user if he want to reply to every message. > > 2. Support for alphanumeric sender. This was the itch that needed > s

Re: [PATCH] make SMPP's PDU parsing more robust

Hi Alexander, Alexander Malysh schrieb: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > attached patch make parsing of SMPP optional parameters more robust (IMHO). > Patch include some cleanups , increasing MAX_SMPP_PDU_LEN (because > message_payload can be up to 64K octets) and

[RFC] smppbox cvs module

Hi list, if Wapme releases it's SMPP server implementation (smppbox) to kannel, would we include it directly to kannel's gateway cvs module, or would we inheritate an own module called smppbox? The benefit of having an own module would imply that other SMSC server implementation, i.e. EMI/UCP may

Re: [PATCH] make SMPP's PDU parsing more robust

> BTW, after sending this patch I found a small BUG ;) > > +{ /* Read optional parameters */ \ > +while (pos+4 < len) { \ > > Here must be: > +{ /* Read option

Re: [PATCH] New SMSC driver - OIS Direct

Dariusz, Dariusz Markowicz wrote: > > I'd like to introduce new smsc driver for Sema Group SMSC Center G8.1 (OIS 5.8). > This implementation use direct TCP/IP access interface. > > This code is strongly architecture based on CIMD2 driver, and have all > its features (dlr support etc.) and maybe

Re: [RFC] smppbox cvs module

Nisan Bloch wrote: > > What of potential merges with Kalle's Netikos (some of which is much better > than Kannel) and the path they have taking of combining bearerbox and smsbox? yep, I asked if Kalle or other's at Netikos would take the effort to incorporate a couple of cool feature of their ver

Re: Changes to smsc_cimd2.c

patch commited to cvs. Thanks Arne. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de

Re: [PATCH] cimd2 validity period

Nicholas Rahn wrote: > > Attached is a patch implementing the validity period (relative) for > CIMD2 connections. It has been tested with one of our swiss CIMD2 > connections. patch commited to cvs. > The documentation for the "validity" parameter (sendsms interface) in > the User's Guide does

Re: [PATCH] http smsc crash

thanks Angel. patch commited to cvs. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ---

Re: [PATCH] New SMSC driver - OIS Direct

Dariusz Markowicz wrote: > > I'd like to introduce new smsc driver for Sema Group SMSC Center G8.1 (OIS 5.8). > This implementation use direct TCP/IP access interface. > > This code is strongly architecture based on CIMD2 driver, and have all > its features (dlr support etc.) and maybe bugs :). I

Re: [PATCH] make SMPP's PDU parsing more robust

Hi Alexander, patch applied to cvs. Thanks. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems

Re: [PATCH] SMPP trivial

Alexander Malysh wrote: > > Stipe I believe you have not seen corrected patch for smpp pdu parsing ;( It > was my fault not to resend my patch ;) > Please apply , this trivial patch will fix parsing of opt. parameters with > length = 0... yep, missed it. Sorry. Done. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [RFC] smppbox cvs module

Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > I like the idea of modules although I'd prefer the apache solution than a *box > executable one. > > Like a kannel executable, then a /usr/lib/kannel/1.4/mod_emi.so, a mod_http, > mod_rpc, mod_jabber, mod_piggeons for inputs, a mod_db_file, mod_db_xSQL. ye

Re: [RFC] new development version?!

Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > Citando Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi list, > > > > we had a couple of bug fixes now since 1.3.0 and I'd like to release a > > new development version. Any vetos?! > > +0 for me > > >

Re: SMSC simulator

Tronet Sarah wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have a PC terminal application in charge of receiving SMS via UCP-EMI from an SMSC. > Is it possible to simulate the SMSC with Kannel. It means, is it possible to connect >my terminal application with Kannel and to send SMS directly from a mobile to Kanne

Re: Bug in HTTP when proxying

Hi Michael, does this patch solve the problem? http://www.kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/http.c.diff?r1=1.180&r2=1.181 Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-748

Re: Bug - sent messages counted twice in SMSC AT2 driver.

Paul Keogh wrote: > > In the function at2_send_one_message()/smsc_at2.c, the lines > > counter_increase(privdata->conn->sent); > bb_smscconn_sent(privdata->conn, msg); > > increment the sent messages counter twice because bb_smscconn_sent() > also does; > > counter_i

[Fwd: [PATCH]bb_boxc vs smsbox and wapbox]

Hi list, attached is a redirected mail concerning the mutex lock for bearerbox's internal smsbox routing. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299

Re: kannel 1.3.0 lacks rc5 algorith

Ivone Uribe wrote: > > I'm trying to install the kannel 1.3.0,I had the kannel 1.2.0 running, well > I uninstalled it for install the kannel 1.3.0 :::(( > > But I don't understand why I get this error when I run the make, > > gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -DBROKEN_PTHREADS=1 -I/

Re: Urgent Query ??? PLEASE RESPOND

Umesh Kain wrote: > > I know that wap kannel 1.2.1 is not 100% wap 1.2.1 specifications > compliant. I want to know what are the features which kannel 1.2.1 > supports which are enlisted in wap 1.2.1 specs. i have gone through > kannel user guide, seen some of the questions on the mailing list, &

Re: kannel 1.3.0 lacks rc5 algorith

Ivone Uribe wrote: > > I want to know if the kannel 1.3.0 supports already WTLS? it's partly implemented, but it's yet in pre-alpha stage, which means it's not useable with current phones, AFAIK. > And for the push (ppg )module, do I need to enable something in the > configure script, or it come

Re: mysql and kannel

Ivone Uribe wrote: > > Hi all!! > I have a doubt. > I have the mysql in these directories: > > /var/lib/mysql > /var/lib/mysql/mysql > /usr/bin/mysql > /usr/lib/mysql > /usr/share/mysql > > for this option > --with-mysql[=DIR] where to look for MySQL libs and header files >

Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]

Hi, > Why is this patch ? I liked the "FOO". This one and the 202 responses are very > important. ehmm, ok this goes to my credit. > BOFH story: > .net programmer [.NOT]: Hei, I've tryed to send a message but kannel gave me an > error > BOFH: really ? but I heard your mobile beeping, you got y

PPG: wap-push-user specific smsc-id config

Hi list, Hi Aarno, I'm wondering how we can do something like this: (has been discussed already) ... group = ppg ... default-smsc-id = # the default smsc-id to use in bearerbox this is pretty easy, but what about this: ... grou = wap-push-user ... smsc-id = # user specific sm

Re: PPG: wap-push-user specific smsc-id config

Andreas Fink wrote: > > I think both variants make sense. I would actually recommend the following approach: > > a) if &smsc=... is set on the push, use it otherwhise use the one defined in >group=ppg > b) if group wap-push user has a default-smsc-id, use it if &smsc=.. is not set by >step a) >

Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]

ok, Bruno will get it's "Foo" back :)) For the sake of foo'ness ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: h

Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2

Andreas Fink wrote: > > Kannel should send the originator in the format it was submitted. > I dont think adding another parameter is the right way to solve this. yep, I disagree also in adding more SMSC module specific config directives. It's already complicated enough. So I'd vote -1 for this.

Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2

Andreas Fink wrote: > > I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 it arrives >on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as +123. So is this not >good enough?? agreed! I don't see any reason for issue either. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2

"Arne K. Haaje" wrote: > > I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 > > it arrives on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as > > +123. So is this not good enough?? > > Not it looks like the operators MC adds the + sign even when sending > just 12

Re: Text messages with UDH, bad DCS

Enzo dell'Aquila wrote: > > I tried to send text messages with UDH with emi2 driver. This feature > appears as y? (driver probably has this feature, has not been tested). I > would like generate TP-DCS = 00h (it's good also 11h or 12h), I need 7 bit > coding in DCS > > I use these parameters: >

Re: PPG: wap-push-user specific smsc-id config

Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > Don't we have a "forced-smsc-id" in sendsms ? please use it instead of smsc-id > to maintain consistency ;) yep, that's for the sendsms-user group, *not* for the wap-push-user group. They are not the same. I agree that we may name the "smsc-id" config directive in the

Re: RedHat spec file

Oleg Titov wrote: > > Hello Kannel list, >I was looking for kannel-*.rpm package and was unable to find it. > >I have downloaded v.1.3.0 sources and there I found 2 spec's files >for RedHat system. > >Let me ask some questions: >1. Do Kannel developers team support RedHat? y

Re: RedHat spec file

Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > (Zeca, are you there ? lunch at 13h30 ?) slightly off-topic, right?! :) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-

Re: Need assistance....

> group = smsc > smsc = at2 > smsc-id = check > modemtype = nokiaphone > device = COM1 > validityperiod = 167 > speed = 9600 > > Is this correct for device.. variable under windows because it's not working > with /dev/ttyS0? device = /dev/com1 would be the cygwin style to define COM1 serial devi

Re: Does Kannel log support logrotation

Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > Citando Alan McNatty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > This might be useful for you ... (add to /etc/logrotate.d or similar). > > Note: you need to restart Kannel as it doesn't have full signal support. > > you just need to killall -HUP bearerbox smsbox wapbox. > -HUP doesn't

Re: Does Kannel log support logrotation

Bruno, Alan, can one of you guys (or someone else) provide a section for the User's Guide on this, using logrotate? This would be great. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-2

Re: MMS files.

Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > Citando Maria Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Does anyone know if there is a difference between MMS formats between nokia > > 7650 sony ericsson T68i and the GX10. > > Yes, they are. > But there's a common mms format that works in them all (including Panasoinc GAD8

Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent

> The issue here is that the end user phone doesnt request device:home which you can >then map to your default page but your device requests the URL www.phone.com. So the >only way to fix this is to change the settings of the phone to request something >else. This is not an issue of Kannel but o

Re: MMS binary

Maria Turk wrote: > > I tried those but they don't work with T68i and GX10. any suggestions. hip hip hurrey, f**k the standards. :( Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74

Re: Can I use CDMA Network?

Hi Jose, Jose Bernardo Ortega wrote: > > I live in Dominican Republic and work for an telco> I want to know > if can I use Kannel on CDMA Network and what make do for this? for what purpose do you want to use kannel? as WAP gateway? if yes, yes, you can use kannel to act as WAP gateway. Kannel

Re: [PATCH] bug in urltrans.c

patch has been commited to cvs. Thanks a lot. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-system

Re: smscconn cimd2

Kalle Marjola wrote: > > The attached patch changes cimd2 to use SMSCConn instead of old SMSCenter. > However, notes: > > - diffed against latest CVS version (just did cvs udpate) > - not tested! We do not have cimd2 currently available. Compiles, however > =] > - had some problem with merge, s

Re: Query regarding OTA specification

Yogesh Chugh wrote: > > Hello Sir/Ma'am... > Our Software development firm is using Kannel Gateway. Now we want to implement OTA >specification in the current Kannel gateway. Is it possible and if yes then how we >can implement this specification? > Is there any need regarding SMSC for using OTA

[RFC] CIMD2 smscconn style patch from Kalle

Hi list, can anyone who is using CIMD2 be so kind to test this patch: * CIMD2: rewrite to smscconn style Posted by: Kalle Marjola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: Stipe: requested another diff -u patch against current cvs from Kalle. I have requested K

Re: User Guide for Palm OS

Oleg Titov wrote: > > Hello Kannel developers and users, > > I have converted User Guide v.1.3.0 for iSilo document reader for Palm OS. > > In future plans - conversion for Weasel. > > You could get pdb, zip and pia files from > http://www.aleph-tec.com/gsm.kannel.html that URL replies with an

Re: EMI Driver Bug

Ok, I'm a bit confused now. What is the consensus of the discussion? I currently see only Alexander's patch here. Any votes? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fa

Re: [PATCH] cimd2 validity period

Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > Citando Nicholas Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi list, > > > > Attached is a patch implementing the validity period (relative) for > > CIMD2 connections. It has been tested with one of our swiss CIMD2 > > connections. > > > > The documentation for the "

[RFC] rolling for 1.3.1 development release

Hi list, I'd like to clear up the latest EMI2 DLR msg discussion with an group consensus and then tag and roll for 1.3.1 development release. Any other heavy objections? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg

Re: Fw: [PATCH]bb_boxc vs smsbox and wapbox

> Index: gw/bb_boxc.c > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/gateway/gw/bb_boxc.c,v > retrieving revision 1.60 > diff -u -r1.60 bb_boxc.c > --- gw/bb_boxc.c23 Jan 2003 23:52:37 - 1.60 > +++ gw/bb_boxc.c30 Jan 2003 16:01:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >