JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expects .so shared librar
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:32 -0800
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> As Jesse says, they _are_ passed by reference. The struct itself _is_ the
> reference.
(Well, that is a sensible redefinition of "reference"; but it is simply _not_
what the word means in any other context.)
It is true that the inne
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 02:14:17 +0100
Daniel Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Jesse Phillips
> wrote:
> >
> > The array-struct is the reference, so it is what gets compared. That means
> > both the internal pointer and length must be the same. Just because the
> > reference is more
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/7/10 6:33 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
So D community will be split in 2. And D1 continue to evolve without
D2 community, D1 frontend is open source and he coulb be used for
improve and fix D1
The current situation and the dynamics are quite i
On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expe
On 2010-11-09 06:17, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult such
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
> If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot
> because of a compiler regression, please specify which bug is the
> blocker (and whether you are using D1 or D2).
> I'll try to get any such compiler regressions fixed in the next
> D1+Tango is working well enough for my project (Yage), but I like the
> direction of D2. I figure the longer I wait, the more stable it will
> become and the easier my job will be.
Pretty much the same here, except I use D1 + Phobos.
To me there is little doubt that D2 is better.
On 09/11/2010 02:01, Don wrote:
If anyone would like to use the latest compiler release, but cannot
because of a compiler regression, please specify which bug is the
blocker (and whether you are using D1 or D2).
I'll try to get any such compiler regressions fixed in the next release.
Well not
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We definitely want to avoid the nastier issues, but the lack of default
constructors continually pops up as being a major problem. The QtD folks
in
particular were have a lot of problems because of it as I understand.
I've
certainly had problems with it my code. Even
oldtimer Wrote:
> Some of us hoped D2 would solve the ugly corner cases of the language and
> unify a lot of features. Unfortunately not any kind of macro system was
> implemented, templates got even uglier, the alias this hack, snake oil
> template!X syntax shortcut and all kinds of unnecessary
> > What's the general use of a = new A() in the above code? Where is it
> > useful?
> >
> > Jens
>
> I don't really have any good use-case examples. Maybe an initialization
> function? Developed your own number object (big int) and were thinking in
> terms of it being a refrence you thought
>
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 02:22:31 Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > We definitely want to avoid the nastier issues, but the lack of default
> > constructors continually pops up as being a major problem. The QtD folks
> > in
> > particular were have a lot of problems because of
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:27:22 -0500er wrote:
thank> If you come up with something better than D, I might be one of
thank> the first developers making the switch.
+1
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
signature.as
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 02:43:57 Jens Mueller wrote:
> > > What's the general use of a = new A() in the above code? Where is it
> > > useful?
> > >
> > > Jens
> >
> > I don't really have any good use-case examples. Maybe an initialization
> > function? Developed your own number object (big in
On 02/11/2010 03:26, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:24:43 -0400, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 29/10/2010 02:32, Robert Jacques wrote:
[snip]
The programming language Cilk popularized the concept of parallelization
through many small tasks combined with a work stealing runtime. Futur
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:29:42 -0500, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Well, if you can come up with a good definition for what "increasing the
size of a class" would do, then maybe it should be added.
It really doesn't matter. Arrays are their own type, the have their own
semantics. It does help to
Steven Schveighoffer:
> I think of an array as a hybrid between a reference and a value type. The
> data is passed by reference, the length is passed by value. This mean
> changing the length only affects the local copy, but changing the data
> affects all arrays that point to that data.
> > > I don't really have any good use-case examples. Maybe an initialization
> > > function? Developed your own number object (big int) and were thinking
> > > in terms of it being a refrence you thought
> > >
> > > a = a + BigInt(7);
> > >
> > > would result in a being resigned in the calling f
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:29:27 -0500, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> No, it doesn't. If you are appending to data that was passed in, you
are
> not changing the *original data* passed in. You are only appending
to it.
I must be remembering an old behavior. I think appe
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:29:27 -0500, Ali Ãehreli wrote:
[...]
> > I must be remembering an old behavior. I think appending could
> > affect the original if it had enough capacity.
> Before the array append changes were introduced (somewhere around
> 2.040 I think?),
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:14:40 -0500, Pillsy wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:29:27 -0500, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
[...]
> I must be remembering an old behavior. I think appending could
> affect the original if it had enough capacity.
Before the array append changes
On 02/11/2010 04:25, BCS wrote:
Hello Bruno,
On 31/10/2010 05:35, BCS wrote:
Hello Bruno,
Which degree did 'Software engineers' take then?
You know, that's one thing that kinda irks me: Why is it called
'Software engineers' when I've never seen engineering taught in a CS
course (not to be
> Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source files is deprecated hello.htm
On 02/11/2010 15:16, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:06:24 -0400, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 06/10/2010 17:34, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
or similar. However, a sealed range does not offer references, so trying
e.g.
swap(r1.front, r2.front);
will not work. This is a probl
Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
"so" wrote in message news:op.vlv3iukp7dt...@so-pc...
There's no usage of an undeclared variable, but the right-hand-side of
the
second line uses 'i' before *the programmer* initializes it. Yes, the D
compiler chooses to automatically initialize it, but by doing so it
On 30/10/2010 02:13, Walter Bright wrote:
div0 wrote:
There's nothing special about a systems language; it's just they have
explicit facilities that make certain low level functionality easier
to implement. You could implement an OS in BASIC using PEEK/POKE if
you mad enough.
I suppose it's li
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> It depends on your definition of reference type. I agree with Daniel. If
> you want to get into academic definitions, yes, 'technically' an array is
> a reference, but it's confusing to someone who's not interested in
> exploring the theoretical parts of compu
On 29/10/2010 21:30, retard wrote:
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:54:03 +0100, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 14/10/2010 13:30, Justin Johansson wrote:
Touted often around here is the term "systems language".
May we please discuss a definition to be agreed upon for the usage this
term (at least in this commun
Ahh, I see that's written by the ANTLR/StringTemplate guy. I never read that
paper, but the docs for his StringTemplate were a big part of what convinced
me that template engines shouldn't try to be full-fledged imperative
programming languages.
I've done web development for a chunk of my care
On 2010-11-09 04:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/8/10 4:37 PM, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function.
I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be
callable
On 01/11/2010 22:58, Diego Cano Lagneaux wrote:
In most Europe, Engineering is always a 5 years (masters) degree,
oriented to big project developers who'll (supposedly) lead teams. I've
heard it's different in the Anglosaxon systems.
Whoa! :o
Shit, I'm going to go on a big tangent here, but I'm
Daniel Gibson wrote:
Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
"so" wrote in message news:op.vlv3iukp7dt...@so-pc...
There's no usage of an undeclared variable, but the right-hand-side
of the
second line uses 'i' before *the programmer* initializes it. Yes, the
D
compiler chooses to automatically initiali
On 11/9/10 1:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It is my perception (though I might be wrong) that the dichotomy has
become to some extent political. D2 offers little political incentive to
a Tango port. Tango is currently the de facto standard library f
On 11/9/10 1:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It is my perception (though I might be wrong) that the dichotomy has
become to some extent political. D2 offers little political incentive to
a Tango port. Tango is currently the de facto standard library f
On 11/7/10 9:12 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/7/2010 8:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/7/10 5:34 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D
examples
on his Scriptometer site.
http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripti
ponce Wrote:
> > D1+Tango is working well enough for my project (Yage), but I like the
> > direction of D2. I figure the longer I wait, the more stable it will
> > become and the easier my job will be.
>
> Pretty much the same here, except I use D1 + Phobos.
> To me there is little doubt that
Andrei:
> Someone proposed to add something like
> http://docs.python.org/library/fileinput.html to Phobos. I think it's a
> good idea.
Good. That someone was me (But I don't use Python fileinput often, so I have
never written an enhancement request on this).
Bye,
bearophile
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:42:13 -0500
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote:
> I think of an array as a hybrid between a reference and a value type. The
> data is passed by reference, the length is passed by value. This mean
> changing the length only affects the local copy, but changing the data
> a
"Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
news:ibbp25$ls...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
>> "so" wrote in message news:op.vlv3iukp7dt...@so-pc...
There's no usage of an undeclared variable, but the right-hand-side of
the
second line uses 'i' before *the programmer* initia
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ibc4h2$1mm...@digitalmars.com...
> "Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
> news:ibbp25$ls...@digitalmars.com...
>> Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
>>> "so" wrote in message news:op.vlv3iukp7dt...@so-pc...
> There's no usage of an undeclared variable, but the rig
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
news:op.vlwul8tuvxi...@biotronic-pc.lan...
> Daniel Gibson wrote:
>
>> Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
>>> "so" wrote in message news:op.vlv3iukp7dt...@so-pc...
> There's no usage of an undeclared variable, but the right-hand-side
> of the
> second line u
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ibc5ve$1q7...@digitalmars.com...
> "Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
> news:op.vlwul8tuvxi...@biotronic-pc.lan...
>>
>> Yup. Also, as opposed to certain other solutions, it does not require
>> advanced flow control, that is likely to be incomplete. Incomp
Question of possible interest:
http://news.ycombinator.net/item?id=1886849
Andrei
On 09/11/10 14:24, JFD wrote:
Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Also, as I've said when this was discussed in the past, I wouldn't even
want
the flow analysis to be perfect because all that would accomplish is to
encourage garbage like the above (which would just end up being highly
fragile anway).
But if it isn't, we must either
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ibbjmv$e8...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-11-09 04:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 11/8/10 4:37 PM, JFD wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
>>>
>>> One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function.
>>
I agree with Nick Sabalausky in this discussion.
Simen kjaeraas:
> But if it isn't, we must either define what it should do, or accept that
> some compilers will catch some of the uninitialized variable bugs, where
> others do not. We do not want that.
Right. There are ways to write formal specs
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I seem to remember hearing that was being depricated. And it was never
anything like what Andrei's describing. IIRC, all it did was completely
ignore all the HTML stuff (ie, treat it like comments). It didn't send it to
Stdout or anything.
Right. It was not a good idea
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:14:40 -0500, Pillsy wrote:
[...]
> > Ah! This is a lot of what was confusing me about arrays; I still thought
> > they had this behavior. The fact that they don't makes me a good deal
> > more comfortable with them, though I still don't lik
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/9/10 1:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It is my perception (though I might be wrong) that the dichotomy has
become to some extent political. D2 offers little political incentive to
a Tango port. T
Latest: http://is.gd/gSwDv
After some discussion on the runtime list, it was decided that core.time and
std.datetime should share their Duration type, so I created time.d as a
prospective core.time and moved or copied datetime's Duration and any other
types or functions that it needed to time.d
On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/7/10 9:12 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/7/2010 8:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/7/10 5:34 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D
examples
on his Scriptom
On 11/9/10 12:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/9/10 1:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It is my perception (though I might be wrong) that the dichotomy has
become to some extent political. D2 offers l
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:03:10 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Ugh. The datetime.d file is 1.5 MB? 0_o
--
Yao G.
On 10.11.2010 0:51, Yao G. wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:03:10 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Ugh. The datetime.d file is 1.5 MB? 0_o
That must be huge unittests :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if Tango chose to turn away from compatibility
for the second time (be it theoretical compatibility for now since there
is no Tango for D2). The technical reasons are dwindling and became
tenuous to arg
On 11/09/2010 09:36 AM, spir wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:32 -0800
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As Jesse says, they _are_ passed by reference. The struct itself _is_ the
reference.
(Well, that is a sensible redefinition of "reference"; but it is simply _not_
what the word means in any other c
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote in message
news:op.vlw3ohvavxi...@biotronic-pc.lan...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Also, as I've said when this was discussed in the past, I wouldn't even
>> want
>> the flow analysis to be perfect because all that would accomplish is to
>> encourage garbage like the abo
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:13:55 -0500
Pillsy wrote:
> There's a difference between appending and appending in place. The problem
> with not appending in place (and arrays not having the possibility of a
> reserve that's larger than the actual amount, of course) is one of
> efficiency. Having
>
>
Hi all,
before I start, let me introduce myself:
I'm Tobias, currently PhD student (Computer Graphics). I did some toy
project in D back in the D1/Tango days. Recently I decided on trying out
whether D2 will work for a new research project once a 64bit compiler is
out (still hoping someone wil
Tobias Pfaff wrote:
1. Bitter fighting about a possible non-nullable type for D3(!).
Discussion style: "Noone will take away my right to write unsafe code !"
vs. "Down with the reckless cowboy coders". Are we discussing guns or
coding here?
That, and purposedly overhearing the other's real poi
On 8/11/10 1:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/7/10 5:34 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D
examples
on his Scriptometer site.
http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripting-language/
D comes 17th out of 28, so i
Yao G.:
> Ugh. The datetime.d file is 1.5 MB? 0_o
It contains too-much-repetitive code like:
assertEqual(SysTime(DateTime(2010, 8, 1, 23, 59, 59),
FracSec.from!"msecs"(999)).dayOfGregorianCal, 733_985);
assertEqual(SysTime(DateTime(2010, 8, 31, 23, 59, 59),
FracSec.from!"msecs"
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
page. I'm not sure how difficult su
Sean took all the code he had written. The other minor contributors did
not yet give permission for their code to be used, so of course it could
not be included.
This is the single big thing on this tango vs phobos issue i never
understand.
What are the reasons/motives behind this other tha
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 15:48:30 bearophile wrote:
> Yao G.:
> > Ugh. The datetime.d file is 1.5 MB? 0_o
Heavy unit testing and documenting everything adds up. The implementation isn't
all that small either, but it's the unit tests and ddoc comments which really
increase the size. Most of
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think that the real question here is how good the API is.
I think that the sheer size of the library, specially with a datetime.d
file with almost 31,600 lines of code (granted, most of them are unit test
and documentation),
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ibcn72$2u3...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
>>> might
>>> be he
Jonathan M Davis:
> While there seem to be a lot of tests, they've turned out to be _really_
> helpful
> and by their very nature, they _need_ to be repetitive.
Repetitive doesn't mean it has to take lot of space. Tests are a cross between
code and documentation, and both are better not too mu
++1
2010/11/9 thank you oldtimer
> oldtimer Wrote:
> > Some of us hoped D2 would solve the ugly corner cases of the language and
> unify a lot of features. Unfortunately not any kind of macro system was
> implemented, templates got even uglier, the alias this hack, snake oil
> template!X syntax
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company might
>> be helped if they could simply write to insert D code into a
>> page. I'm not sure h
> An option may be to modify the compiler so it allows to override protection
> in code contained inside unittest{...}.
Another option is to modify the compiler so it sees unittests modules as part
of another module (using a mixin() on a string import is too much hacky).
Bye,
bearophile
Pelle Månsson Wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 11/7/10 9:12 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
> >> On 11/7/2010 8:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>> On 11/7/10 5:34 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
>
> > This wraps up a thread from a few d
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
>
> > This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D examples
> > on his Scriptometer site.
> >
> > http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripting-language/
> >
> > D comes 17th out of 28, so it's so-so for scripting.
> >
> > --
>
First, forgive my poor english.
we all known , Walter good at compiler writing, but not good at language
design and development management , if can't change this, just be silent.
I think, on language desgin, wisdom and leadership are more more important
than technology.
Ether continue working on
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Gary Whatmore wrote:
>
> I think optimizing this particular test is important for the publicity of D.
> Once the scripting community acknowledges D, we could redesign it. We should
> make all current test cases one liners, if possible. I'm dreaming of a Linux
>
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:23:56 Yao G. wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > I think that the real question here is how good the API is.
>
> I think that the sheer size of the library, specially with a datetime.d
> file with almost 31,600 lines of co
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Boris Wang wrote:
> First, forgive my poor english.
> we all known , Walter good at compiler writing, but not good at language
> design and development management , if can't change this, just be silent.
If he isn't good at language design (in other words: D sucks)
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:42:32 bearophile wrote:
> > An option may be to modify the compiler so it allows to override
> > protection in code contained inside unittest{...}.
>
> Another option is to modify the compiler so it sees unittests modules as
> part of another module (using a mixin(
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:34:15 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That's quite understandable, but that's part of the reason that the ddoc
html files are there.
Yes, but I also wanted to look at the implementation.
You don't actually have to go trolling through the code to look at the
API.
On 11/9/10 5:38 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Boris Wang wrote:
First, forgive my poor english.
we all known , Walter good at compiler writing, but not good at language
design and development management , if can't change this, just be silent.
If he isn't good at la
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 17:34:15 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:23:56 Yao G. wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I think that the real question here is how good the API is.
> >
> > I think that the sheer size
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 17:45:51 Yao G. wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:34:15 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > That's quite understandable, but that's part of the reason that the ddoc
> > html files are there.
>
> Yes, but I also wanted to look at the implementation.
>
> > You don't a
Jens Mueller Wrote:
> I see your point. You argue that the behavior is consistent. My point is
> that this consistency can lead to bugs. I may forget the ref. But I'll
> keep in mind to never forget the ref if it is needed.
>
> Jens
Well, in the case of classes, I don't think it would be very co
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> On 11/9/10 5:38 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Boris Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> First, forgive my poor english.
>>> we all known , Walter good at compiler writing, but not good at language
>>> design and devel
so Wrote:
> > Sean took all the code he had written. The other minor contributors did
> > not yet give permission for their code to be used, so of course it could
> > not be included.
>
> This is the single big thing on this tango vs phobos issue i never
> understand.
> What are the reasons
On 11/9/10 6:10 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/9/10 5:38 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Boris Wangwrote:
First, forgive my poor english.
we all known , Walter good at compiler writing, but not good a
On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity
and static typing of C#, and the "immediate mode" of php?
On 11/9/2010 5:27 AM, thank you oldtimer wrote:
ankh, anonymous troll, another lurker, anton smith, arnoldsschwartz, bjarne
yesterday, blaise pascal, cal, chmod+x, crap, darth tango, domino, ellis peters,
foobar, gareth charnock, gcc-lurker, girlprogrammer, godworshipper, gryphon, her3tic,
jam
Thanks.
Apple no sorry for it's fault, but the fans still aroud it and support it.
why ?
2010/11/10 Andrei Alexandrescu
> On 11/9/10 6:10 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/9/10 5:38 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
>>>
>>>
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed
>> view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
>
> Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer t
"than you oldtimer" wrote:
[about his fantasies with trolls and forking D? (You are one sick
pup! Forking D!)]
D is a fantasy and the largest example of group think that I know
of. You know what happens when lot's of people start living real
close together: disease sets in and they whither and Di
On 11/9/2010 11:39 PM, Led Zeppelin wrote:
You know what happens when lot's of people start living real
close together: disease sets in and they whither and Die!
This is why the family unit is such a failure. Maybe trolls come from
broken families?
They want C++ (whether they know it yet or not), because it is less
complex, is easier to learn and use, is stable and has a well-
defined/directed/managed evolutionary path. That it has some weird
constructs is a trivial issue relatively. D has its own weirdness
too. C++ is THE systems programming
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Zuzu's Petals wrote:
> They want C++ (whether they know it yet or not), because it is less
> complex, is easier to learn and use, is stable and has a well-
> defined/directed/managed evolutionary path. That it has some weird
> constructs is a trivial issue relativ
*feeds
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:28:09 -0600, Andrew Wiley
wrote:
Please do not feed the trolls.
But he's the same troll :/ Using a bunch of socket puppets.
--
Yao G.
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 20:39:48 Led Zeppelin wrote:
> D will not pass Go will not collect $200.
That post was definitely trolling, but I have to laugh at that last line.
- Jonathan M Davis
99 matches
Mail list logo
