I have been reading the posts on pax2 with great interest and I would
like to participate in experiments with it.
A lot is going on on Europe and the USA on frequencies and times which
we here in vk-zl cannot participate.
I wonder if there are any other Amateurs in this area with similar
though
Walt,
What you are describing sounds very close to MT-63.
73,
Rick, KV9U
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:
>There has been some discussion about what mode does what and what is
>needed/desired.
>
>We have had a little discussion on what the problems were during Katrina
>with digital commu
Am on 3.610, AF freq of 1000 Hz in PAX2 mode, repeater on, 15 watts out
to a 280 foot loop.
Connected earlier to W6JVE (Jim) on 40 meters..mode seems ok with
decent signal to noise levels even in QRM. Guess time will tell on the
lower HF bands; seems to work as expected on the higher bands...
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "MM0DFV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> European Phase Shift Keying Award Programme - EUPSKA
> This is to promote an interest in Amateur Radio in Europe and to
> sponsor a series of awards and badges based on the administrative
> geography of European countrie
>why should anyone have
> to modify their already existing interface that is satisfactory on
ALL
> other digital modes, just for one mode.
>
Kevin, I am a little thick when it comes to the interfacing issues,
what am I missing? PC-ALE works quite well with my PC and TS440, no
need to change
European Phase Shift Keying Award Programme - EUPSKA
This is to promote an interest in Amateur Radio in Europe and to
sponsor a series of awards and badges based on the administrative
geography of European countries by using the PSK31 mode.
For more info please have a look at www.eudx.srars.org/e
will sit on 7075 USB for the next few hours. on
repeater mode
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan
expeditionradio wrote:
>>Kevin VK5OA
>>The program only uses one serial port for PTT and CAT when
>>ALL other programs use two or more. [...]
>>[...]
>>I would dearly love to use the program but until some other
>>author will take over the development (Charles has ceased
>>working on it)
>>
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Another look at ALE
There has been some discussion about what mode does what and what is needed/desired.
We have had a little discussion on what the problems were during Katrina with digital communications.
During hurricanes Katrina and Rita, I worked with a
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> Are you talking about Automatic Link Establsihment capability to
connect to
> stations or the service messaging protocol of ALE just to send
text with?
>
>
Good question. I started m
Hello John,
Glad you succes with Txema. Juts a remark:
Pax2 (125 bauds) is a clone of Olivia but with 32 bits
frames (as in Contestia), so there are a short set of characters 64
characters instead of 128. This to double the throughput speed. The
protocol is a mix between Pactor1 and Pack
Title: RE: [digitalradio] OK, so do we think PAX2 is any good?
I have to jump in here...
Any HF digital mode that uses more than 45-50 baud on a single tone carrier that does not have the ability to regress to a 45-50 baud rate is going to get clobbered on HF much of the time. Years of re
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Another look at ALE
Andy,
Are you talking about Automatic Link Establsihment capability to connect to stations or the service messaging protocol of ALE just to send text with?
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digi
John me too John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I had the computer knowledge to design a perfect mode. (note the large "if") It might look like this: ( in no particular order) ARQ/FEC olivia mode , with the ability to speed up or slow down aut
From what I have read here and elsewhere on ALE,
the potential is there, but the software is not.
Look forward to new software
development
...ALE
protocols are only 125 baud (375 bps) and not very wide and not a constant
flow (such as MT63, FS-1052, PACTOR etc.) so I do feel t
If I had the
computer knowledge to design a perfect mode.
(note the large "if")
It might look like this: ( in no particular
order)
ARQ/FEC olivia mode , with the ability to speed up
or slow down automatically dependent on the number of bad packets
recieved
Hi Rick,
Aside from the limitations imposed on U.S. hams by FCC Part 97 which
preclude the use of full ALE Sounding and LQA based calling (which
over time may change) ALE can be applied in many ways for Amateur
Radio communications and excels as such in a number of ways when you
have a proper
Good luck with software development, since I am not
about to run out for another rig.
- Original Message -
From:
expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 5:21
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Have Some
ALE
We may see some
I think that many of us have played around a bit with ALE but not found
it very compelling as a mode. It may be useful for applications where
you have users who do not understand HF propagation and who just want to
make a connection automatically. This is perhaps more common for
military or gov
John and others, I would urge you to check out the MARS-ALE receive
only software at the link Steve posted. If this is an indicated of
how PC-ALE might function when updated, it will be a great step
forward. ALE-MARS is working well at my QTH. The receive-only
functions should give you all a
Ok so this has probably been asked before, but with all the different
modes out now, along with the different programs to use them, where can
a newbie get a list of freq's that are used.
I know about PSK,RTTY,SlowScan, etc but where do the others hangout
like MT63,Oliva,Throb,Chip?
The list in
If I understand it correctly, the PAX modes do use the Olivia 8 tone
modulation form. The difficulty that I see is that in order to get a
useful throughput (and even PAX2 is not all that fast) the baud rate is
very high at 125 baud. Too high for difficult conditions on HFespecially
on the lower
> Andy wrote
> > 2) There are two new "low cost" HF ALE transceivers entering the
> market:
> > Icom IC-F7000
> > Vertex VX-1700 (Yaesu)
> Bonnie, what makes the above transceivers "ALE transceivers" ?
>
Hi Andy,
They are "stand alone" HF ALE transceivers, with ALE built in.
They do not requir
> Kevin VK5OA
> The program only uses one serial port for PTT and CAT when
> ALL other programs use two or more. [...]
> [...]
> I would dearly love to use the program but until some other
> author will take over the development (Charles has ceased
> working on it)
Hi Kevin,
PTT and CAT on t
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" .
>
> 2) There are two new "low cost" HF ALE transceivers entering the
market:
> Icom IC-F7000
> Vertex VX-1700 (Yaesu)
>
>
Bonnie, what makes the above transceivers "ALE transceivers" ?
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet
We may see some progress with ALE over the next year due to a few events:
1) A project has been under development for the past 6 months among a
core group of ALE ham operators, and is likely to have a snowball
effect on ALE use after it starts up.
2) There are two new "low cost" HF ALE transcei
26 matches
Mail list logo