. But
>>> that’s my opinion only.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bart
>>>
>>> On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:18, Jachym Cepicky >>
>>> <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
&g
t;> - today's projects and labs together under one hat.
>>
>> Or anybody thinks completely different?
>>
>> Just my $.02
>> J
>>
>> čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand
>> mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>
>> > napsal:
>>
>
al:
>
> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>
> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>
> Suchith
> __
> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl
> <mailto:bart...@osgis.nl>
>]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about inc
t;> <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>> napsal:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>>>>
>>>> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>>>>
>>>> Suchith
&
From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl
<mailto:bart...@osgis.nl>]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
ly different?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my $.02
>>>>> J
>>>>>
>>>>> čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand
>>>>> >>>> <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>> napsal:
>>>>>
&g
sgis.nl>]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? Tha
t: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubat
5 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s th
gt; napsal:
>
>> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>>
>> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl]
>> Sent: Thursday, March
his.
>>
>> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl <mailto:bart...@osgis.nl>]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
>> To: Vaclav Petras
>>
i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>>
>> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
>>
ijnden [bart...@osgis.nl <mailto:bart...@osgis.nl>]
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
> To: Vaclav Petras
> Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
>
is.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
> To: Vaclav Petras
> Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
> I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
>
> What about incubator projects? That’s the term that
.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org
Best regards,
Bart
On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras
mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com>&
gt; [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
> [jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
e...@gatewaygeomatics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
(we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an
issue and discussed[1])
Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab&
tics.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
> (we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an
> issue and discussed[1])
>
> Today, knowing how i
y thanks for your consideration.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Suchith
>
>
> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On
> Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:2
sts.osgeo.org] On
Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initi
From: Jachym Cepicky
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions ,
"incuba...@lists.osgeo.org"
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to
change their name.
My idea would r
ration.
Best wishes,
Suchith
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On
Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Su
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to
change their name.
My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and "projects"
and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating
system.
Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-proj
I think we could Vaclav. One of the more extreme ideas I have had is to
just call it "incubation" and only assign mentors when a project has
completed each of the five things we expect and wants a review /
recommendation. It would free us up to take on more projects (no longer
bottle necked on ment
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky
wrote:
> former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
> you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>
Hi Jachym,
do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs" by
something else
Hi Jachym,
I think this is a good idea.
Also to include in this discussion is streamlining our existing
incubation docs. In particular, retire "General Principles of
Incubation" [1], update our Project Graduation Checklist [2], and
update our Incubator Application Questionnaire [3]. The links
On 2/16/2015 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Hi,
I would like to dig a bit more into the topic "more fine incubation"
procedure and former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly
forgotten in past, but you can find more at
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
I would like to start talk abou
Hi,
I would like to dig a bit more into the topic "more fine incubation"
procedure and former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten
in past, but you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
I would like to start talk about it a bit (I suggest incubator mailing
list),
29 matches
Mail list logo
