During Ray Camden's demonstration of Canvas Wiki it occurred to me that that
may be a useful app if it was tweaked.
Heres what I need to happen.
We need to aquire proprietary information.
This info will not be for public viewing.
I will need lots of year/make/model specific
Two weeks from now on Tuesday Daniel and I will begin going through the
CFMX7 Web App Construction Kit book by Forta, and Camden.
If anyone is interested in meeting at 6:30pm in Kennesaw to go through this
book please contact me for further info.
Robert Reil
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
The recent posts on this "CSS-a little off topic" thread re upgrading
browsers was, I think, triggered by my comment/tip to Dusty to use Firefox
as a development browser while coding his CSS style sheets. My reasoning for
this was based on (sometimes painful) personal experience of having "styled
a
I didn't mean to insinuate that IE 7 is coming out so eveyone will
upgrade... i was just making the point that if you intend to future
proof your css build for the standard and work backwards because
eventually the non compliant browsers will die off and (hopefully) the
compliant ones will take ov
Yeah, that would be nice, but this is
the gubbment. Adding in hardware just isn't going to happen. Especially
not when they just have rolled out Northern Light.
mcg
Ben Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/04/2006 01:50 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
You might also want to check out the Google Mini, especially if you're going the file-on-server route. I did not have fun with CF's Verity, nor Lindex (CFMX 6). Both had poor admin interfaces, and did not provide results that our users trusted. Also, neither one allowed for spidering, which seem
Hi Guys,
I came across this in the blogs. A good heads up with the approach of IE 7
release.
Preparing Your Site for Internet Explorer 7
Here's the scenario: one morning you open your email and your inbox is
flooded with emails that your site isn't working properly. Maybe your text
or ima
What was causing the issue was setting the rowcount 1 and maintaining connections across client requests. Apparently this set the rowcount to all queries called after this to have a rowcount of 1. So access to the CF Admin was pretty critical to the resolution using the code as I originally wr
Douglas, while others may chime in with an exact answer, I
want to point out that the best resource to get started with XML in CFML (in my
opinion) is a 30-page guide by Nate Weiss. It was a chapter in the WACK book, if
you have that also. The guide is available online in the Adobe XML
CF De
Others have already clarified the issue with troubling
issues with the approach you used to get the last inserted record. I realize it
may have seemed logical to you. Just one of those "patterns" that you learn with
time in CFML. We've all been there.
But don't leave us in
suspense on the
geesh, what a noob. After recalling that I have Forta's Advanced CF7 book in my cube I 'parsed' the info out into me head. Seems there's a bug in things though maybe. If the below XML had its root node named 'xmlroot' then to get to the name is cake:
myXML['xmlroot']['customer-rec']['name'].xmlt
XMLParse turns your xml into a nice structured array. You can get
the customer's name using myXML.xml-root.customer-rec.name.xmltext. So
your code would look like:
name:#myXML.xml-root.customer-rec.name.xmltext#
HTH
Kevin Hellriegel Capital
Transportation Solutions http://www.shipwithct
We are looking at either storing files
on a server somewhere (and no "file server" anywhere, so they
would have to be synched via PeerSync) or in the database as blobs (Oracle).
The fun part of this is that we want to put in a search functionality.
We are looking at CF's Verity (potentially Nort
Also,
as a follow up - the reason you're having the problem is this - you're doing a
set rowcount 1 and cf is holding onto the connection. That means all
selects after that point are going to do only one row. If you want to keep
the code the way you currently have it, after your ORDER BY i
Well SET ROWCOUNT 1 will make the queries
stop processing after retrieving only one record. With maintain connections
set, the rowcount limit stays in effect for all queries.
A simpler approach is
INSERT INTO ATable(MyColumns)
VALUES (MyValues)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS id
I'm no SQL Server master, but I'd think you just use the SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() as ID; to fetch the last used id.so, in one cfquery tag you'd haveINSERT INTO table
(col1, col2)VALUES(val1, val2);SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() as ID;Then foo.id has your last inserted id. DK
On 10/4/06, Jeff Howard <[EMAI
Ok, been awhile since I did this. The E4X support in ActionScript 3 makes this cake by the way. Say I have a string of XML that I stuff in a var
Pat Smythe 5551212 I parse it into a XML object thingy
Now, how do I get to the customer name? I am using xpath stuff to get at
You
should probably look into using scope_identity() rather than the method you use
below...that may help you out a bit...
INSERT
into blah() values()
SELECT
ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()
Rowcount can cause some headaches...
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
So I got access to the CF Admin this morning and between that and Profiler I can see what is causing my issue and can resolve. Thanks for everyone's help once again. It was a comination of advice that got me to this point. Now I was wondering if anyone could tell me why this issue is happenin
*raises hand* :) we are also officially still on Office 97 too. I'm actually sort of spoiled though, as we officially only support IE 6 on our intranet where I do all my work. So I can sit in the stands and watch the CSS death matches.
DKOn 10/4/06, allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IE6 won't be
Well technically the EPA only supports
IE 6, but lots of people around here use FF, but I live in the IT world
over here. But also they are big on pushing auto updates out. And
I would think that those that have autoupdates IE 7 would be pushed out
(at least to XP users). So a good chunk of you
IE6 won't be going anywhere for a long time - do you really think corporate america will upgrade the minute 7 is final?Who is running win2k in 2006? :)- Original Message From: Steven Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: discussion@acfug.orgSent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 8:55:55 AMSubject: Re: Re:
Yeah i follow this same track... easier for me to get it right
(epecially since ie 6 will go away at some point) and support the
standards then hack backwards to get IE compatibility.
On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, when it comes to CSS, IE stinks. You can write
Yes, when it comes to CSS, IE stinks.
You can write relatively standard code in Firefox (heck even Safari),
and standards are good. But since the majority of people choose IE,
you then have to come up with fixes. Probably more time consuming,
but I start in FF, to get more standard oriented cod
24 matches
Mail list logo
