Great idea, Steve. Seems to me though that it would only work if you've
got that kind of money. But then, if you did, wouldn't there be better
uses for it?
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > > There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
> > > [...]
> >
> > There are other ways. The simplest:
> >
> > [x] notify me by email for spends worth more than [1] [USD]
> > [ ] do not let me recieve any spend worth less than [__0.1] [USD]
>
Steve Foerster wrote:
>
> JP wrote:
>
> < kilogram gold reward to anyone who can state how to reach e-gold users.
> State it.>>
>
> Autospend 1 mg to each user in numeric sequence and put your message
> in the memo field.
JP, I think you owe the man 50kg.
CCS
---
You are currently subscri
> > There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
> > [...]
>
> There are other ways. The simplest:
>
> [x] notify me by email for spends worth more than [1] [USD]
> [ ] do not let me recieve any spend worth less than [__0.1] [USD]
You're talking about something comple
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > giving businesses the option to SPAM E-Gold's Email Addresses
>
> Am I the only one who doesn't want e-gold to officially turn into yet
> another place to receive SPAM from?
>
> There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
> [...]
There are other
> giving businesses the option to SPAM E-Gold's Email Addresses
Am I the only one who doesn't want e-gold to officially turn into yet
another place to receive SPAM from?
There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
A one-time payment for an account holder's email address.
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Spam their *accounts* - an importat distinction; everyone gets it, not
> > everyone gets emailed about it. The others will still see it in theor
> > statements, if they bother reading them.
>
> Actually, I was thinking it would be more elaborate than that: It would be a
> sp
> Spam their *accounts* - an importat distinction; everyone gets it, not
> everyone gets emailed about it. The others will still see it in theor
> statements, if they bother reading them.
Actually, I was thinking it would be more elaborate than that: It would be a
special function that could be
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Only trouble wth this is that the ad people are blinded to the amount
> > they need to spend. Perhaps another of those nifty graphs of
> > accounts-by-mass?
> >
> > So for e-gold what they should do is
> >
> > - allow email notifies of spends along with the memo
> > - allow t
> Only trouble wth this is that the ad people are blinded to the amount
> they need to spend. Perhaps another of those nifty graphs of
> accounts-by-mass?
>
> So for e-gold what they should do is
>
> - allow email notifies of spends along with the memo
> - allow turning it off or setting a minimum
> So it's offered as an option in the setup screens, "notify me if
> somebody pays me", and the default is "don't". Spends will still go onto
> the statements, they just won't result in users recieving emails.
That still requires e-gold to spend time & resources on making e-gold a
better get-paid
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > > All who want e-gold to be turned into a get-paid-to-read-mail program,
> > > please raise your hand.
> >
> > With the idea of spamdonations being out there now and trivial to
> > implement, I see little way to prevent it.
>
> I think everyone would go for it, if they could
> > All who want e-gold to be turned into a get-paid-to-read-mail program,
> > please raise your hand.
>
> With the idea of spamdonations being out there now and trivial to
> implement, I see little way to prevent it.
I think everyone would go for it, if they could choose the amount of gold
that
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> Being forced to dig around in the acct pages just to turn off that
> 'convenience' would also annoy the hell out of people.
So it's offered as an option in the setup screens, "notify me if
somebody pays me", and the default is "don't". Spends will still go onto
the statem
> On the other hand, making people pay to avoid being spammed by some
> official list will just annoy the hell out of them, and make them switch
> to GoldMoney.
Being forced to dig around in the acct pages just to turn off that
'convenience' would also annoy the hell out of people. A new user cre
Ken Griffith wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's a cool idea if someone does it to you once. But, if you start
> getting five to ten ad spends a day it will clutter up your financial
> statements real fast. I think I would get pretty po'ed about it. But it is
> possible now, isn't it.
There's a good soluti
>The idea here is that E-Gold could set the price to allow businesses to
>'Broadcast' messages to ALL account holders which subscribe to this
>service,(and subscriptions would be added automatically, requiring the
>user to turn them OFF manually -- maybe even at a cost to the account
>holder).
> There's a good solution to this: e-gold should add the ability to
> categorize spends so as to make agregating or ignoring a slew of
> spamdonations easier. "show all, show spams, show MMs, show
> purchases..." etc.
If you went this route -- to allow 'Spam Spends' -- then a category could be
se
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > 2) Any business could use the feature, but they would have to pay E-Gold
> for
> > its use.
>
> The idea here is that E-Gold could set the price to allow businesses to
> 'Broadcast' messages to ALL account holders which subscribe to this service,
> (and subscriptions would b
> 2) Any business could use the feature, but they would have to pay E-Gold
for
> its use.
The idea here is that E-Gold could set the price to allow businesses to
'Broadcast' messages to ALL account holders which subscribe to this service,
(and subscriptions would be added automatically, requiring
On the bright side, actually getting paid for spam is a nice concept.
- Original Message -
From: "SnowDog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: e-gold-list digest:
> Yeah, it's a cool idea if someone does it to you once. But, if you start
> getting five to ten ad spends a day it will clutter up your financial
> statements real fast. I think I would get pretty po'ed about it. But it
is
> possible now, isn't it.
OK, E-Gold could add a feature to their webs
From: "SnowDog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: e-gold-list digest: June 20, 2001
> > Autospend 1 mg to each user in numeric sequence and put your message
> > in
> Autospend 1 mg to each user in numeric sequence and put your message
> in the memo field.
Steve, I think this is a brilliant idea -- especially if E-Gold would ad
code to send an email message to a customer when they receive a payment!
"You've been Paid! Buy anything from Amazon.com at www.Ban
> Nice try Steve
> But would it be cost effective?? :-)
> 95,000mg is a lot of gold...isn't it?
No, that's 95 grams -- about $800 USD.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice try Steve
But would it be cost effective?? :-)
95,000mg is a lot of gold...isn't it?
Geoff
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Foerster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject:
JP wrote:
<>
Autospend 1 mg to each user in numeric sequence and put your message
in the memo field.
Please donate the 50 Kg to the Ninth Amendment Foundation, e-gold account
number 9.
Thanks,
-=Steve=-
Stephen H. Foerster, COO
3PSecure.com, Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http
27 matches
Mail list logo
