1. Use exmerge 3.7.1 (the latest version for Exchange 5.5) to pull the
data off of the 5.5 server
2. Use Exmerge for E2K to put the data back into the E2K store.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:41 PM
Posted To
Hi,
We want to loop through the entire Exchange Database to generate
management reports. All items that are overdue or all items with a
specific subject should be reported. Is there anyone who can help us...
_
List posting FAQ:
You will need to learn how to build and run a metadirectory service
such as Microsofts' or Compaq\HP LDSU etc.
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why won't two
yes I have checked out that article.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Li
it clearly shows your relaying options are set incorrectly...
-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Relay with IIS
Well,
Here's yet another issue that I'm having that I hope someone
gago!
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
That one is a must try for everyone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Well,
Here's yet another issue that I'm having that I hope someone can help me
out with.
Exchange 5.5sp4 on w2k
IIS5 SMTP on w2k
I am tring to forward all email from my exchange server through the SMTP
server. I can recieve email just fine and although I have setup the relay
server to allow r
PSS helped me out.
The certificate has to be requested using key manager - what they Q articles
never explain is that key manager exists on the Windows 2000 OS, it's the
executable keyring.exe. I thought key manager went away with windows 2000
and was replaced by the certificate MMC. For exchan
That being the case, you might consider letting us know what you have
tried, what research you have done, and what the results were. :)
I'm presuming, based on the sparse information that you gave, that you
have two separate Forests with two Exchange Orgs that you are trying to
replicate informat
Oops...sorry about thathe said:
"Sounds like a consulting engagement to me..."
Arch
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate director
Arch, just an FYI, it's absolutely impossible to make any sense of a message when the
prior history has all been deleted. We don't have time to look back down the list and
see what you're talking about!
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesd
That was not the answer I was hoping for!
Arch
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope it's a secret. Don't mention a word of this to anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Found out how to create an exchange mailbox!
Sensitivity: Confidential
So we shouldn't
So we shouldn't tell anyone about this, just the 4,000 of us, right?
Plus anyone who searches the archives on the internet, too.
-Original Message-
From: Robert WALKER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:56 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: F
Sounds like a consulting engagement to me...
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info?
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm havin
Hi,
I eventually worked out what I was doing wrong and have got it
to work. That is creating a mailbox for exchange. Fairly Simple
really.
dim obj as iadscontainer
dim mobj as cdoexm.imailboxstore
set obj = getobject("LDAP://"; & Server & "/cn=" &
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm having problems figuring out how to get my two servers
to connect and replicate directory info. I'm running 2 windows 2k servers in 2
different, untrusted domains and in 2 different locations connected via WAN link. I
had the same setup with Exchange 5.5 and it ra
Well I'm responsible for IIS, Exchange and VB programming where I work
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT...Webmasters?
Yes, but how much is
Yes, but how much is still up in the air.
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT...Webmasters?
Do you get pa
You've read Q193922?
The option on the Connections tab is for multiple server sites, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Relaying problems
I understand that relaying is handled on
I understand that relaying is handled on the routing tab, and that's where
the problem is, I have put restrictions in place in there and had problems
with outside mail not coming in and users not being able to send outside,
maybe I'm missing something that is obviuos but from all the lit\info I
ha
Hi All,
Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay
connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe
router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider
and he informed us to use the default
If you want to receive outside mail leave the "any" option checked. Relaying is
handled on the routing tab.
What does this have to do with the Filthy Sanchez?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subje
Question, on the "connections" tab of the IMS properties in Exchange 5.5
there is an option under the heading "accept connections" that says "from
any host secure or non-secure" if this option is checked will people be
able to use us as a relay for SPAM? and is the second option of "only form
host
That one is a must try for everyone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Or the Flying Camel
-Original Message-
From: Christoph
.mpg or .jpg?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Or the Flying Camel
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesda
Or the Flying Camel
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Oh points if you figure out what the "The Bait N' Tackle" is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
Oh points if you figure out what the "The Bait N' Tackle" is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Never mind, I found it on Google. Now I mu
Do you get paid more?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT...Webmasters?
I'm wondering if any of you are also responsible for webmaster duties at
yo
Told you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Never mind, I found it on Google. Now I must go puke.
-Original Message-
From: Chris
I'm wondering if any of you are also responsible for webmaster duties at
your companies. My boss wants me to start doing it here as we are losing
our guy. If you do, can you recommend courses to take or other curriculum?
Bill Lambert
Network Consultant
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL
Never mind, I found it on Google. Now I must go puke.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:37 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Group Mail
Subject: RE: Group Mail
If you really want to know mail me. It's pr
If you really want to know mail me. It's probably not a good idea for
the whole group to knowDon't know how many of them I would make sick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchang
Okay, I know what the "Dirty Sanchez" and "Cleveland Steamer" are, but
what the hell is a "Hot Karl?"
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:34 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Group Mail
Subject: RE: Group Ma
How about a good old fashion hot karl or pozzing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
I think somebody needs a dirty sanchez...
> -Origin
ROFLMAO
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
I think somebody needs a dirty sanchez...
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent
I think somebody needs a dirty sanchez...
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Group Mail
>
>
> BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in
> case you were
Stopped the DNS client but DNS still crapped out.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS
Keep looking. Their ad is next to the Equalizers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clark, John A
(FUSA)
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
Does anyone know how to hire the A-Team? I c
I have another exchange site connected via a site connector. They have
their own domain name, etc. Running ex.5.5. , my side is in mixed mode with
an ex2000 server. Trying to moved the other users in our AD along with
email accounts. I can create the accounts
and create new mailbox's, but, ha
Not so as you'd notice
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 21:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Dunno, but fsck is a *nix command, isn't it? ;-}
-Or
Absotively, posilutely. Wouldn't have it any other way. Proud of it, in fact.
;-}
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of per
You will find £2.20 in your left pocket. Pub/bar somewhere near you.
When you get back you can ask how the hell sterling got in your pocket and why the
barman accepted it.
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 21:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Is "MEC" another *nix utility?
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Group Mail
>
>
> Felicity:
>
> If you haven't noticed in your own IT group, most support people
I resent being called a support person gr
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Felicity:
If you haven't noticed in your own IT gr
Dunno, but fsck is a *nix command, isn't it? ;-}
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but inst
Chef?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but instead of them being candy they're all chocolate
Felicity:
If you haven't noticed in your own IT group, most support people
are, at the very least, weird. Most of us here resemble your remark
normally. It gets worst after a few beers, or fish tacos, at MEC.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Stan
On Wed, 22 May 2002, at 4:30pm, Thomas Di Nardo wrote:
> There is no excuse There is only Zuel.
Don't cross the streams.
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other
Gatekeeper Gatekeeper
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
There is no excuse There is only Zuel.
-Original Message-
From: Julian St
Kind of, but instead of them being candy they're all chocolatey (that's never spelt
right surely) but still round, with a strange whiff of salt. A pint of beer for the
1st to get the reference
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 21:
There is no excuse There is only Zuel.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
And that's an excuse ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: John Mattes
And that's an excuse ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Okay everyone be nice.. she's a Programmer.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Cor
Okay everyone be nice.. she's a Programmer.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
it
S&M's...is that a new candy?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Why should he fish when others can answ
Why should he fish when others can answer his question afresh and then create a nice
thread taking the rise out of him. Perhaps he's into S&M or something, not that I know
what S&M means, any more than I know what FSCK means (if you're following the other
threads)
-Original Message-
F
I dream of the lofty hights of being a pervert..
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in
If you keep up the good work, someday you will be promoted to Chief
Degenerate!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
I'll have you know that I've obtained the rank of Deg
I'll have you know that I've obtained the rank of Degenerate, 1st Class.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in c
do any of you know how to administer full text search programmtically?
CDOEXM doesn't work?
Nor do any of the other exchange management objects I have checked.
--Felicity
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exc
My cat's breath smells like cat food.
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Group Mail
>
>
> BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in
> case you were
> s
I resemble that remark!
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in case you were
somehow unaware of this fact.
--Feli
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in case you were
somehow unaware of this fact.
--Felicity
> I searched on the internet and it is a unix utility that does File System
> Consistency ChecKing.
>
> I thought it was a Unix applet, only I thought is was a finger like
> utility.
I searched on the internet and it is a unix utility that does File System
Consistency ChecKing.
I thought it was a Unix applet, only I thought is was a finger like
utility. It thought maybe is was a Microsoft port like eseutil.
--Felicity
> Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't.
File System Check. It's a Unix thing.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't.
> -Original Message-
> From:
Ill take mine without nuts please
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orr, D
Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Group Mail
>
>
> ! fsck.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Ser
Andy?
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
! fsck.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM
Yes!
Fsck! New from Hershey!
The commercials are like the "Make 7-UP yours!" one's; only different.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soys
! fsck.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the reso
fsck has nothing to do with Exchange. Ask your *nix admin about it.
Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardo
You must be kidding
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit and
::Biting tongue::
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit and it is
Well Felicity, when a Man Exchange Administrator loves a Woman Exchange
Administrator very much..
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chri
Hope so. This man refuses to learn to fish, so he can just starve.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Majik.
- Original Message -
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: Group Mail
How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server?
_
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there.
TIA
--Felicity
> What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro?
>
> Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a
> while? Christ on cracker
What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro?
Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a
while? Christ on cracker you people...
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussi
Beats me.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Assistance required with exchange mailbox's
Argh! Why the hell was the original message marked as confidential?
> -Original Me
Probably runs a little SMTP engine on your desktop.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Group Mail
How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server?
_
How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA
Because only his closest 4,000 friends were supposed to see it, silly.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: RE: Assistance required with exchange mailbox's
Argh! Why t
Argh! Why the hell was the original message marked as confidential?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:11 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Assistance required with exchange mailbox's
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> Try the code s
For future reference, there's a great tool at www.swinc.com which checks AD
for duplicate SMTP addresses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Probably stupid ? but got two recipien
I have it but I have never had a change to install it on her PC.
Again, my crying fit.
- Original Message -
From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
> VNC?
>
>
Error: failed #include humour.h
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: JDBGMGR.EXE Hoax?
>
>
>
> hope your mouth is big enough for your foot.
>
> --steve
>
>
>
> >
www.cdolive.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Jenniskens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Retrieval data from exchange
>
>
> I want to loop through the entire Exchange Database and
> create a report wich contain
The error below?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jutla, Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exmerge permissions problem
>
>
> try running this from your actual server, the best way is to
> log in as the exc
Try the code sample at www.swinc.com/resources (written in perl) and/or the
free Microsoft tool which sounds amazingly like what you are currently
working on.
http://www.microsoft.com/SERVICEPROVIDERS/webhosting/downloads/Web_Admin_too
l.asp At the very least the underlying code from the MS to
That got him where it hurts Lori.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 19:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing
used
Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking
We were thinking about putting BIND 8 servers to be used as forwarders that
would only cache external DNS info
-Original Message-
From: Steven McCaa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
This is
XIMS: Troubleshooting POP3/IMAP 13002 Errors w. SSL on Exchange [Q251097]
My experience was getting a certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't permit getting
mail over [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example. You'd need to set DNS up for one dns name only,
which should be ok since you're using different
If this is true - THANK YOU!
-Original Message-
From: Steven McCaa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
This is a known issue with bind 8.x based DNS servers. Bind 9.x sends
multi-packet respon
VNC?
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
Server A is gone.
Trying to walk her through creating a new profile is what my crying fit was
about.
Thanks f
Gotcha. A cold beer usually dries my tears :0
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
Server A is gone.
Trying to walk her through creating a new profi
Server A is gone.
Trying to walk her through creating a new profile is what my crying fit was
about.
Thanks for bringing me back to your point.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:28 PM
That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS Client
service does.
The DNS Client Service acts as a client side DNS cache. There is no need for
the DNS Client to run on ANY machine on the network. It can help, but on an
active server running the DNS service, it causes problems
This is a known issue with bind 8.x based DNS servers. Bind 9.x sends
multi-packet responses to some queries, bind 8.x servers are supposed to
drop the packets, MS DNS can't keep up with all the packet drops and
stops resolving, One of my clients fixed this buy putting a *nix bind
8.x server in be
I'm trying to configure the IMAP protocol to only accept connections over
SSL. I have obtained an SSL certificate from Verisign and imported it into
the certificate store. I know that it works because I can connect to OWA
over https without errors or warnings.
In the exchange administrator I ha
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
