I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc, which would support the
chip but...in any c
Maybe:
Your kernel is using modules for the 'old' mobo and cpu. While booting,
auto-hardware-detect changes the settings for another mobo, but it's not
installed so the modules are not found.
If that's more or less right, you can try to recompile your kernel ?
Steven
(just a wild guess... But I
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc, which would support
Larry Sword wrote:
Praedor Tempus wrote:
I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
XP1500+. It is an MSI KT333 ultra and the manual says
it can do a 200MHz FSB, etc,
On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
> Larry Sword wrote:
> > Praedor Tempus wrote:
> >> I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
> >> Duron 1100. The switch went fine except my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobo
> >> apparently doesn't support anything greater than an
> >> XP1500+. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
> > Larry Sword wrote:
> > > Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > >> I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
> > >> Duron 1100. The switch wen
Praedor,
H.. I thought with a bios upgrade you could run faster cpus on the kt333
Ultra. The 5.7 bios for the Ultra 2, which I have one of supposedly supports
XP 3000+. Yours is just the plain Ultra, correct? If so, I just looked at
this page, and looks like you are in good shape for much fa
Since you have a 2700+, and the chart says 2600+ is the max, you might drop
the multiplier to 15, and increase the FSB until it approaches the 2700+
rating.
Even if you couldn't reach it 2700+, you would still be in good shape running
your 2700+ a little underclocked with a higher FSB. I'm prett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 11:35 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> Since you have a 2700+, and the chart says 2600+ is the max, you might drop
> the multiplier to 15, and increase the FSB until it approaches the 2700+
> rating.
> Even if you couldn't reach it 2
Praedor,
Is the bios set to auto detect? Another thought is you might have a weaker
power supply than is needed- I ran into that a few times with new cpus. I
don't think the kernel would cause your problem- it has to be a hardware
configuration/bios setting. What bios did you say you flashed to?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
> > Larry Sword wrote:
> > > Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > >> I recently picked up an Athlon XP2700+ to replace my
> > >> Duron 1100. The switch wen
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 10:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 09 June 2003 09:27 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> > On Monday 09 June 2003 19:43, Larry Sword wrote:
> > > Larry Sword wrote:
> > > > Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > > >> I recently picked
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a new mobo to take
> advantage of the CPU. I have finally figured out the trick to "overclocking"
> the system and have found that this board will simply not do an FSB of 133
> M
Praedor,
The kt3 ultra with via kt333 chipset should do 133Mhz FSB (266) with no
problem. What is your cpu voltage set at? Also, like I mentioned, your power
supply might be marginal- especially on the 3v and 5v lines. John's point on
another older card causing this is valid too, but then your m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
>
>
> > Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a new mobo to
> > take advantage of the CPU. I have finally figured ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:15 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> >
[...]
> > > This board wont even handle what the MSI sites say it will
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 00:15, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:06 pm, John McQuillen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:18, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Well, all is well with the system now but I will still need a
Praedor,
You might try taking out the sound card, and seeing if you can resolve the
problems. I'm still thinking the power supply is a possible culprit.
Which bios have you flashed to?
Robert
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 17:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 00:15, Praedor At
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 05:45 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> Praedor,
> You might try taking out the sound card, and seeing if you can resolve the
> problems. I'm still thinking the power supply is a possible culprit.
>
> Which bios have you flashed to
If you only had a generic 250w PS, I'll bet that's it. I've had post problems
on two boxes, on several boards, and that was the problem. It's preety common
when you try to upgrade a board AND cpu with an older box. But if you are
still having problems with a 350w, you should check the actual ou
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 17:18, Robert Crawford wrote:
> If you only had a generic 250w PS, I'll bet that's it. I've had post problems
> on two boxes, on several boards, and that was the problem. It's preety common
> when you try to upgrade a board AND cpu with an older box. But if you are
> still
21 matches
Mail list logo