El dom, 13-01-2002 a las 15:35, Scott escribió:
> Can anyone direct me to what kapm-idled is and why it takes on average 60%
> of my CPU. This is a test server with no power management enabled. I
> want to disable it if possible. Mandrake ProSuite 8.1 with kernel
> 2.4.8-34.
>
> The machine
On Sunday 13 January 2002 12:47 pm, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> If you are confused, you are in very good company. Over the couple of years
> I have been hanging on this list, this issue has come up time and time
> again. According to the Mandrake folks, i.e. Civileme, this is just the way
> the Mandr
On Sunday 13 January 2002 11:24 am, Scott wrote:
> I guess I am confused, in top it shows my system as being 50% idle,
> then kapm-idled is showing as 48% of the CPU and other processes
> making up the rest.
> -Scott
Another kapm-idled related question: In dmesg, I see "Checking
'hlt' instr
At 12:24 PM 1/13/2002 -0500, Scott wrote:
>I guess I am confused, in top it shows my system as being 50% idle, then
>kapm-idled is showing as 48% of the CPU and other processes making up the
>rest.
>-Scott
>On Sunday 13 January 2002 11:39 am, Michael Leone wrote:
> > kapm-idled is kpam-IDLEd - the
I guess I am confused, in top it shows my system as being 50% idle, then
kapm-idled is showing as 48% of the CPU and other processes making up the
rest.
-Scott
On Sunday 13 January 2002 11:39 am, Michael Leone wrote:
> kapm-idled is kpam-IDLEd - the time your CPU is idle. It's not an
> executing
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 09:35, Scott wrote:
> Can anyone direct me to what kapm-idled is and why it takes on average 60%
> of my CPU. This is a test server with no power management enabled. I
> want to disable it if possible. Mandrake ProSuite 8.1 with kernel
> 2.4.8-34.
kapm-idled is kpam-ID
Can anyone direct me to what kapm-idled is and why it takes on average 60%
of my CPU. This is a test server with no power management enabled. I
want to disable it if possible. Mandrake ProSuite 8.1 with kernel
2.4.8-34.
The machine is strickly for Internet Connection Sharing right now.
Tha
El mié, 12-12-2001 a las 23:47, Bill Kenworthy escribió:
> Also on a laptop is supposed to create power savings and reduced heat
> output from the cpu. Anyone know where the docs are for this? "man
> kapm-idled" produces nothing - easy to find documenmtation on the system
> via man, info etc is
Also on a laptop is supposed to create power savings and reduced heat
output from the cpu. Anyone know where the docs are for this? "man
kapm-idled" produces nothing - easy to find documenmtation on the system
via man, info etc is getting worse as Linux grows up!
BillK
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 01
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 11:35 am, you wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>I installed Mandrake 8.1 on my laptop compap presario 1200,
> apparently successfully. However, the kapm-idled is consuming 80% of my
> CPU!
>
>Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
It's not a problem -- kap
Hi everybody!
I installed Mandrake 8.1 on my laptop compap presario 1200, apparently
successfully. However, the kapm-idled is consuming 80% of my CPU!
Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Sergio
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft
On Friday 24 August 2001 11:43 am, Alfredo Cole may or may not have written:
> El Viernes 24 Agosto 2001 09:12, escribiste:
> > So sprach »Mark Weaver« am 2001-08-23 um 16:37:59 -0400 :
> > > Plain and simple i said what was on my mind and it was completely
> > > within the bounds as a proper resp
El Viernes 24 Agosto 2001 09:12, escribiste:
> So sprach »Mark Weaver« am 2001-08-23 um 16:37:59 -0400 :
> > Plain and simple i said what was on my mind and it was completely
> > within the bounds as a proper response to someone who made an
> > extremely
>
> Well, no, it wasn't. Insulting someone
So sprach »Mark Weaver« am 2001-08-23 um 16:37:59 -0400 :
> Plain and simple i said what was on my mind and it was completely within
> the bounds as a proper response to someone who made an extremely
Well, no, it wasn't. Insulting someone the way you did is always way
out of bounds.
Alexander S
o another topic.
>
> Doug Gough
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: J.P.Pasnak [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:10 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:Re: [expert] kapm-idled
> >
> > On August
On Thu Aug 23, 2001 at 11:10:01AM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> there's something strange here on my Mandrake 8.0 box and try as i might i
> can't find it to kill it! it seems to be a process of some sort that when
> it runs it cripples my system making it impossible to get any work done.
> what ev
So sprach »Alan N.« am 2001-08-23 um 12:02:25 -0400 :
> This is the main reason I'm using redhat now.
> I simply could not deal with the sluggishness.
Which nothing has to do with the kapm-idled
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
H
wap: 265032K av, 52372K used, 212660K free 29892K
>cached
>
>Steve Flynn
>NOP Data Migration Ops Analyst
>* 01603 687386
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Weaver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, Augu
O please Alfred...get a grip. Things aren't as nice, clean, utopian, and
"politically correct" as some would prefer them to be. now and then its
just good to speak whats on yer mind. tis always better to be "real"
rather than insult the intelligence of others by false, or pretended
politeness. Pre
On Thursday 23 August 2001 13:46, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Civileme,
>
> it's interesting that you would point that very thing out because i've got
> exactly that on this system. Windows lives on the WD drive and Mandrake on
> the Maxtor drive. Would this till have a bearing on the problem?
http://kt
El Jueves 23 Agosto 2001 11:56, escribiste:
> Doug,
>
> normally that is "not" the kind of response i post to the list as i
> stated somewhere in the this thread. however, that "is" the kind of
> response i send to people from time to time who _assume_ they're
> chastising a youngster who hasn't t
P Data Migration Ops Analyst
* 01603 687386
-Original Message-
From: Mark Weaver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] kapm-idled
so, are you saying th
read it.or who knows what MISTAKE I might
>make..please move on to another topic.
>
>Doug Gough
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:J.P.Pasnak [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:10 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PRO
so, are you saying that the amount of RAM that X is using is ok? or is
there something amiss here with the amount that it's using?
--
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
|%C++
"Beware of little sins. Mosquitoes drink more blood than lions."
Author unknown
On Thu, 2
HA! :)
J.P.
thats good and thank you for the links.
--
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
|%C++
"Beware of little sins. Mosquitoes drink more blood than lions."
Author unknown
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, J.P.Pasnak wrote:
>On August 23, 2001 09:50 am, Mark Weaver wr
Civileme,
it's interesting that you would point that very thing out because i've got
exactly that on this system. Windows lives on the WD drive and Mandrake on
the Maxtor drive. Would this till have a bearing on the problem?
--
daRcmaTTeR
=/\=???
|%C++
"Beware of little sins. Mosquitoes
t 23, 2001 10:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] kapm-idled
>
> On August 23, 2001 09:50 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > Ok, hoyt...
> >
> > clearly either you got up on the wrong side of the keyboard, or you're
> > just normally a sma
On August 23, 2001 09:50 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Ok, hoyt...
>
> clearly either you got up on the wrong side of the keyboard, or you're
> just normally a smart ass with few people skills. actually, since i've
> been a long time subscriber to this list the MAIL LIST ARCHIVES was the
> first place
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:10:01 -0400 (EDT)
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [kapm-idled]
Your poor 266 cpu is thanking you!
kapm-idled is a kernel daemon that constantly sends idle calls to your cpu. On
laptops, making the idle call actually puts the cpu into a state where it
save
On Thursday 23 August 2001 11:10, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> there's something strange here on my Mandrake 8.0 box and try as i might i
> can't find it to kill it! it seems to be a process of some sort that when
> it runs it cripples my system making it impossible to get any work done.
> wh
On Thursday 23 August 2001 11:50, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Ok, hoyt...
>
> clearly either you got up on the wrong side of the keyboard, or you're
> just normally a smart ass with few people skills. actually, since i've
> been a long time subscriber to this list the MAIL LIST ARCHIVES was the
> first p
deal with the sluggishness.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of FLYNN, Steve
>Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:30 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: [expert] kapm-idled
>
>
>It's an
So sprach »Mark Weaver« am 2001-08-23 um 11:50:27 -0400 :
> been a long time subscriber to this list the MAIL LIST ARCHIVES was the
Don't know about this list, but it's all over the common linux help
forums. But anyhow, you asked here, and you get an answer here.
> first place i looked. whereup
r
>machine - I don't have an Mandrake 8.0 machine here at work, to check but
>I'm sure my box with 256 meg doesn't have 37M sucked up by X!
>
>
>Steve Flynn
>NOP Data Migration Ops Analyst
>* 01603 687386
>
>
> -Original Message---
he sluggishness.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of FLYNN, Steve
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [expert] kapm-idled
It's an idle task there to soak up unused CPU cycles. It should
Ok, hoyt...
clearly either you got up on the wrong side of the keyboard, or you're
just normally a smart ass with few people skills. actually, since i've
been a long time subscriber to this list the MAIL LIST ARCHIVES was the
first place i looked. whereupon, finding NO information there OR on my
up by X!
Steve Flynn
NOP Data Migration Ops Analyst
* 01603 687386
-Original Message-
From: Mark Weaver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[expert] kapm-idled
H
On Thursday 23 August 2001 11:10 am, Mark Weaver methodically organized
electrons to state:
> Hi list,
>
> there's something strange here on my Mandrake 8.0 box and try as i might i
> can't find it to kill it! it seems to be a process of some sort that when
> it runs it cripples my system making
Hi list,
there's something strange here on my Mandrake 8.0 box and try as i might i
can't find it to kill it! it seems to be a process of some sort that when
it runs it cripples my system making it impossible to get any work done.
what ever this is it shows up in kpm and top like this:
[
Amen dude. It sucks, esp. with a laptop. The only way to get rid of the
damn thing is to recompile your kernel. Anyhoo - Mandrake - please get
rid of this! Thanks
Angus
Written by William Bouterse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Why does this process keep sucking up 50% of CPU ?
>
> Other posts have ask
On Thursday 05 April 2001 18:12, you wrote:
> Why does this process keep sucking up 50% of CPU ?
>
> Other posts have asked why this is compiled by default in
> the later stock Mandrake kernels and I switched from
> kernel-2.4.0-5mdkcrypto
> and have been using ;
> kernel-2.4.1-16mdk
> with no pro
Why does this process keep sucking up 50% of CPU ?
Other posts have asked why this is compiled by default in
the later stock Mandrake kernels and I switched from
kernel-2.4.0-5mdkcrypto
and have been using ;
kernel-2.4.1-16mdk
with no problem until recently when through
some rpm upgrade it has r
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:15, william bouterse wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Angus Beath wrote:
> > According to this from rpmfind : Advanced Power Management dock applet
> > for the K Desktop Environment. I don't understand why a
> > power management system uses up so much CPU time when the object of
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Angus Beath wrote:
>
> According to this from rpmfind : Advanced Power Management dock applet
> for the K Desktop Environment. I don't understand why a
> power management system uses up so much CPU time when the object of the
> exersize is to preserve power. Any ideas on how to
Can anyone shed some light on this.
My system mentioned earlier in another post
still finds itself the victim of 55-85% CPU usage
from 'kapm-idled' . What is this? Why is this happening?
Never have seen this in 5 years of LM use.
William Bouterse
Talkeetna, Alaskasu
45 matches
Mail list logo