"Alessandro Pardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did. I experimented with various settings (long exposure pass, exposure,
> gamma etc.) but it seems that the most dense parts of PAN-F are beyond
reach
> for this scanner
I wonder if anyone has tried PAN-F with a SS4000 or other Polaroid scanner?
"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I noticed in both systems that since
> > the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows
proportionately
> > less system resources being used than previously (ie
"Dana Trout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A 25% faster drive won't necessarily get you 25% faster load/store
> times. PhotoShop seems to be inordinately slow in dealing with
> compressed TIFFs
Paintshop Pro is the same. Opening a film scan in PSP takes *far* longer
than in Irfanview.
> BTW, Ed'
"Michael Greger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rented an LS4000 today and I'm trying to use the SF-200 Slide
> Autofeeder with VueScan. I do not remember seeing any information about
> this feeder being supported or unsupported. In any case, I can't make
> it work!
Vuescan's help file says thi
"Colin Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Slightly off topic here, sorry about that. Recently installed a Matrox
G450
> on my W98 (not SE) machine, and now I can't wake the computer/monitor
> up after the monitor only has gone into Standby after x minutes of
idleness.
> It hangs, and has to be
"Raphael Bustin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, this doesn't sound right. For a given image,
> a given file format, and compression method, the
> file size should be deterministic.
You're wrong, Rafe. :) I agree with what you're saying in principle but
what was said is true - Vuescan's LZW
"Steve Greenbank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Further, in my experience of Win NT 4.0 the claimed reliability of desktop
> PC's is a fallacy. At work I have used around a dozen PC's and all have
been
> much less reliable than my home PCs on Win9x.
Gah. I use NT 4.0 SP6a on my computer at work a
"B.Rumary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> full, when the freezing starts again! Anyone any ideas on how to cure
this?
Try the gigabyte newsgroup since you have a GA motherboard, although
I suspect an ATI discussion group may be more productive.
alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.giga-byte
PNP is a wonder
David wrote:
> Yeah, me too. I had expected rather more professional
> commitment - just glad I was only taken for $40.
Presumably this is the sort of invective that made Ed want to drop support
for the Mac. I can't see how it helps the cause.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROT
se to an excellent piece of software
with free updates and support is a bargain IMO.
If it wasn't for Vuescan, I would have trashed my LS30 long ago.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
pressed by it. I thought the colour was fine, and the grain wasn't too
bad for 400ASA. Anyone expecting the lack of grain seen in 100F is being
unrealistic and will be disappointed.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ay for such petty reasons.
If I was in Ed's position I wouldn't find his reasons petty but then maybe
I'm not thick skinned enough. I suppose I was disappointed that Ed was
getting flack for stupidity on the part of Apple.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
teruupt problems caused by the SCSI controller and
the graphics card insisting on sharing the same interrupt.
I don't know anything specifically about ATI cards.
Again, the best resource for these issues is the gigabyte newsgroup.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Ed wrote:
>What's new in version 7.1.8
> * Changing "Filter|Infrared clean" changes "Device|Bits per pixel"
Huh? Does this mean that setting "Infra-red clean" automatically sets the
input bits to RGBI?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ave to be corrected anyway?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
e on the
screen that I like than one which accurately reproduces what the film produced.
The film's image is only a representation of reality anyway!
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
r side. But
it may not take too long to get higher densities. Yes, you could lose a
lot of data - one of the things DVD-RAM has going for it is a case around
the disk akin to the case on a 3.5" floppy. Reducing the likelihood of
damage has to help.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Colin wrote:
>Rob Geraghty wrote:
>>I have had interuupt problems caused by the SCSI controller and
>>the graphics card insisting on sharing the same interrupt.
>They are on the same interrupt (11) in my computer, but Windows just does
>that. They are under the control of PC
shAF wrote:
> You may want to check you mobo's manual with regard to which PCI
> slots need share IRQs.
I should have mentioned that the SCSI device is on the motherboard. I can't
physically move it or the AGP slot.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am very intrigued by the number of people on this list how have color
> deficiency. Does anyone know how common this is in the general
> population (or even just the male population)?
I'll have to look that one up. I *think* it's more common in me
"Mark T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a 4000dpi scanner, probably. But I find with 2700 dpi, the
> grain-aliasing makes it harder to get good enlargements (8x10 and up) off
negs.
Really Mark? You can't get a good enlargement to A4 at 2700dpi?
That really surprises me - larger print
> > >It is hard to imagine this Sony monitor not having the ability to tweak
> > >the individual guns (... is this some type of "consumer" model? ...).
Is this stuff necessary? I discovered that under Win98SE just about any
fully supported video card can do the required gamma adjustments. The
m
able way is unlikely
to represent a legitimate business.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Lynn wrote:
> I'm running Win98 with an NVidia TNT2 card, and don't see anything
> in the monitor controls that resembles a "tweak" or gamma adjustment.
Lynn, are you running 98 or 98SE? I don't think the gamma adjustments came
until SE with its updated version
rovia 100F scans compress far better.
Compression generally works well if there is little variation in the pixels;
no grain means good compression and coarse grain means poor compression.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Some may argue that the Windows CMS is still broken
however. :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
in the background, but in scans it just comes up blue and dull. :(
I'll have to try one of the slides on the SS4000 at work and see if there's
a difference (other than ppi).
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Lynn Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turquoise has a lot of yellow, cyan, and almost no red (other than
shadows,
> ripples, etc), in terms of CMYK. It can be a bugger on a monitor, where
RGB
> are your working colors.
I tried printing it, but the print looks like the screen - not like the
sl
papers? Are there *any* aftermarket inks?
> I just don't personally have a strong enough need for colour prints
> to want to mess around that much.
I'd love to buy a CIS, archival inks and papers, and a profiling system,
but I can't afford it. :(
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
easy access to, and would have to use after-hours.
Unless I can successfully scan the slide with some other scanner, I can't
show you the colours for a comparison between what the slide actually looks
like and what the LS30 produces.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
lide looks like, let
alone what the colour of the ocean actually was that day. Until I can get
an image online somewhere, it's not very useful continuing the discussion
on the list since nobody else can see what I'm talking about!
I guess I was wondering if anyone else has had similar problems with similar
colours.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Mike wrote:
>Early tests using the Stouffer gray scale obtained with Vuescan (Slide
>setting and B&W=0.001) show exceptional linearity down
>to an OD of 2.11, then an abrupt flattening of the curve above that.
Dumb question - are you using 48 bit output from vuescan?
Rob
Rob Ge
x27;t typical of the sensor problem I guess we'll have
to send it back for repair. :(
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
or or brush on the Polaroid website
or in the errata PDF for the SS4000. Is there any documentation describing
where the sensor is located and how to clean it?
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
I wrote:
> Is the brush available in the land of Oz?
I just answered my own question; Polaroid in Sydney are send me a brush.
I hope it comes with instructions or at leas a diagram of where the sensor
is located! :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
SB scanner; a lot
are still SCSI. Have a look at the Polaroid SS4000, Canon 2720, Minolta
Scan Dual II, Acer Scanwit and Nikon Coolscan IV.
There's probably someone on the list with each of those scanners, so hopefully
they can tell you how well the scanner behaves with films similar or the
same as those you'll use.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Thanks to everyone who has responded about the SS4000 problem. Hopefully
the brush will arrive on monday (sunday US time) and the problem will be
solved. Then I can try scanning that annoying slide. :)
Rob
Rob wrote:
> Is that from Maxwells - who service Polaroid? or what source?
I looked up Polaroid in www.whitepages.com.au and looked in Sydney where
their headquarters are. So the answer to your question is I rang Polaroid.
Maxwell Optics are the local agents for Nikon AFAIK.
Rob
>I seem to be getting two and three copies of messages but not at the same
>time-I just got a batch that I recall getting earlier today
Can anyone please contact Tony Sleep directly about the message duplication?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Rodrigo Amestica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. after getting a preview, why does the GREEN histogram change when I
> modify the RED gain (after pressing "redraw")?
Is it possible to adjust the gain of the colours separately? I seem to
recall Ed talking about different integration times for t
"Alan Rew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone on the list had problems using the APS film adaptor for a
> CanoScan FS2710 (or similar scanners)?
FWIW I've scanned about a dozen APS films with the APS adaptor for the
Nikon LS30 and I don't recall seeing any scratches.
Rob
Moreno wrote:
>I've also had some banding issues, but if I scan 14 bit, at either 2000
or
>4000 dpi, with 1x multisampling, the images are clean.
Don't shoot me, but I wonder if this is a new variant of the jaggies issue
from the earlier scanners?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL
ook were
Kodak Supra 100 and I used the neutral setting instead of white balance.
I just used the generic colour neg, gamma 1, brightness 1. White balance
with that particular film tended to make the image too green. But this
is on an LS30 which may have quite different colour behaviour to the ac
"Colin Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Geraghty wrote:
> >I just used the generic colour neg, gamma 1
> Crikey, what is going on? You use gamma 1 and Alex is using 0.8.
> Aren't the results dark? I use gamma 2.2 (W98)
Sorry I was at work at the time and couldn't check. The gamma was
Peter wrote:
>Your presumption is correct. I have had Nikonscan (various versions) and
>Vuescan (lots of versions) living happily together under Win 95, Win 98SE,
>Win 2000.
Peter, did you have to load ASPI drivers to get the Nikon scanner working
in Win2K?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL
Alan wrote:
>Make sure you have your scanner on BEFORE you start vuescan, it does a
scsi
>bus scan on startup.
Preferably switch the scanner on before you switch on the PC, or you'll
have to do a refresh in Device Manager before any software can see it.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROT
Does anyone use Photoshop Elements? What critical features are missing
(compared to the full PS6) for someone who does a lot of film scanning?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ager WITHOUT me doing a refresh.
This isn't the case on my computer - Win98SE, LS30 connected through an
Adaptec SCSI adapter. If I don't switch on the scanner and do a refresh
in the device list, all I get from Vuescan is the scan from file option.
What OS are you using and how is the scan
o
>consider to buy the Nikon 8000 REALLY for the ICE and ROC features
The problem described was about banding, not a problem with ICE, ROC or
GEM. ICE works just fine.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
still cycles
continuously. Since it's three months out of warranty I'm going to try
opening the case and using a "normal" brush on the sensor.
Rob
(but first find a brush...)
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ew slides per day, ICE will save you hours per week.
Amen to that. I *always* use Infrared dust removal in Vuescan with my LS30
and it saves a huge amount of time scanning. It takes long enough to get
the curves, levls, colours, contrast etc right. I can do without spotting
as well!
Rob
Rob
"David Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, although the brush does work - I have seen it fix "my" problem on a
> friends machine, you may have more serious trouble.
> Good luck opening the box but I think you may be sending it to Polaroid.
Maybe, but it's worth at least giving cleaning a try
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've considered it--but how would I get the pictures back and forth
between the
> two machines? I'd need to buy a router, at the very least, so add a few
hundred
> more dollars.
Huh? Where did you get that idea? Worst case scenario you could use
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > don't get mad at nikon.
> Why not? They could have just as easily included an SCSI interface and NT
> drivers, as they did for previous scanners. I know I'm not alone in
running
> configurations like this. I guess they didn't want our business.
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have USB, and Windows NT is not supported for the LS-40. So
scratch the
> LS-40 as well.
Actually, scratch all the USB scanners since NT 4.0 doesn't support USB.
Even a PCI USB card wouldn't help without changing OS.
Rob
"Tomasz Zakrzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question to people writing to this list: do all of you use still
> film only because digital cameras as not good enough yet? Or are here
people
> who see clear benefits of silver halide technology for themselves?
There's still a lot of peo
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay. What other options are there besides the LS-4000? It has to run
under
> Windows NT, no later than SP4, and it has to be SCSI.
You forgot to mention ICE, which is the requirement that paints you into a
corner.
> > Either way your computer w
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently have a continuous external Internet connection on the NIC.
Then you have a security issue, but you don't necessarily need a router.
A four port switch would do it, and that won't cost you thousands - for
that matter there are combined s
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob writes:
> > You forgot to mention ICE, which is the
> > requirement that paints you into a corner.
> I can do without ICE, as long as I get substantially better resolution
and/or
> dynamic range (and no _less_ than the LS-2000, in any case).
Th
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CD-R is too slow. CD-RW is ten times worse.
So you're painted yourself into a corner again.
> I have always heard that Polaroid scanners are not as good as Nikon
scanners. I
> would not want to take a step backwards.
=8^o I've heard quite the
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, my main point is that France, if like much of Europe, would tend
> to be more expensive for consumer electronics, so quoting US prices, or
> even English or Australian ones, doesn't mean a whole lot.
France has higher prices than Australia wit
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So you're painted yourself into a corner again.
> How so? Everything works for me.
You can't upgrade.
> I was thinking of the LS-2000, not the LS-30. The hardware is identical,
of
> course, but the firmware is crippled in the LS-30, and one of
be
about as good as it gets.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
d for
sending the brush even though it didn't resolve the problem in this case
- they even sent a replacement when the first one took over a week to arrive.
Now I can bring in some slides tomorrow and try a comparison with the LS30.
:)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VueScan documentation warns that it might not work very well on
Polaroid
> scanners, though, as I recall.
I doubt that it would. The Polaroid has more dynamic range than the LS30
without
multiscanning. What I *don't* know is whether the SS400
"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've consistently heard that it isn't as good as the LS-2000, and some
sample
> scans I've seen appear to support this. Specifically, it appears to have
a
> smaller dynamic range.
Anthony, can I ask *where* you've "consistently heard" this? What
storage sheets in a binder for a while after processing
seems to help flatten the film - although the plastic does retain some memory
of the curl.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
e LS30, the data from the
Polaroid seemed to need pushing to a brightness setting of 2.0 or even more.
This was not something I expected.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
insert the strip to count the frames, so hesitating
too long before scanning frame one will curl it before you begin. I've
never tried 6 frame strips, but the curl would be worse.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
OK, I had a go at scanning some slides on the SS4K at work and scanning the
same slides on my LS30 at home. I had to recrop a photo to get a comparison
of the crop histograms because the brightness on the screen at work is
clearly utterly different to the one at home - which is why the brightness
tments for the scanner profile,
the film profile etc. If you're scanning neg film it's not inverted either.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ased B&W - I don't have many such
negs and the LS30 isn't really up to the task.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Mike Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Just a thought - I don't know the guts of how Photoshop produces
histograms,
> >so this may not work as well as I think it could... Would it be a useful
> >comparison of scanners to scan the same slide with Vuescan to raw files
> >and compare the histogr
ave a great weekend all!
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ul if it could be used in a scanner, because theoretically it
ought to be possible to remove aliasing and lens aberrations from the scanner
optics.
(but I've discussed it before and I won't bore everyone with it again! :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Martin wrote:
> My problem is that, in pursuit of perfection and with a reluctant
> willingness to spend big bucks, I try to shoot everything with the best of
> Canon lenses, though away any shots that aren't tack-sharp, and use films
> live Velvia and Provia 100F. Consequently, I am able to see
"Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not necessarily that simple, though your suggestion is first and
> foremost. The SS4k and other scanners like it, can have a dust problem,
no
> matter how clean your film is going into the scanner.
FWIW I have my Nikon scanner on the bench on
"SKID Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With regards to labs scratching negs and not slides: Perhaps you are
using the wrong lab? Most high end E-6
> machines are 'dip & dunk', and that goes for high end C41 developing
machines as well. Most scratches (in
> development) are caused by ro
on the LS30 and LS2000. And isn't
it funny that Ed's Vuescan cured both...
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
gs in Vuescan since about version 7.0 have been impossible to open
in Paintshop Pro, but can be opened in Photoshop.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
to get decent scans out of my LS30. If it wasn't for Vuescan
I would have had to sell the scanner ages ago because of the problem with
jaggies.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
rs can
be resolved in software - but of course it means the hardware isn't behaving
as it was originally designed to. Much the same as the jaggies problem
being related to the use of a command to reading 64K of data at a time and
how the hardware behaved when that command was used.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Maris wrote:
>The developer Ed Hamrick also suggests using "Image" for slide film.
Under what circumstances should "Image" be used?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
t
on negs is bonded into the emulsion during processing, or was in contact
with the film during processing so that a spot is left where the film didn't
get developed properly. Colour neg film also seems to hold static charge
better than slide film, but I may be imagining it.
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
esign fault. I didn't mean to say it
*couldn't* work. Just as lots of scanners work happily at 2700ppi without
getting jaggies like the LS30 does. ;)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use standard TIFF files, as evidenced by the many, many
> programs that have no problem reading them. I suspect ACDSee has
> a bug in handling the TIFFTAG_PREDICTOR tag.
The predictor seems to be an unusual combination for 48bit files.
Paintshop Pro 7 doesn't like
Ed wrote:
> VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2 means is
> to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before compressing.
I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would you use it?
The error I get from PSP is "A predictor of 2 is only support
Ed wrote:
> > > VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2
means is
> > > to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before
compressing.
> > I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would you use
it?
> A predictor of 7 is invalid.
> A predictor of
h which fits
the carrier and allows you to clean the sensor. In my case the brush didn't
work and I had to use canned air, but give the brush a try first.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
n the list, but this is
still exciting for me being able to go into a newsagency and see a photo
I took on the cover of a magazine. Especially when I took the photo and
scanned it! :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ry well.
Could be. In the case of PSP I think it's likely to be the earlier guess
that they weren't serious about supporting 48bit files in a 24bit editor.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
wanted wrinkles today!)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
gle rolls, but Fuji Superia
400 scans OK on the LS30. Yes, it's grainy, but it has helped a lot for
situations like taking aerial shots from ultralights that vibrate or leave
the photographer in the breeze! I want to try Provia 400F to get the same
sort of speed which hopefully less appare
s stated that
the firewire connection will only work on a Mac under OS/X? It sounds like
you won't be able to use it on your Mac with the current OS. You hadn't
mentioned prior to this what platform you were using.
Rob
PS It's called Vuescan. :)
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Jawed Ashraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >the photographer in the breeze! I want to try Provia 400F to get the
same
> >sort of speed which hopefully less apparent grain.
> Provia 400 (F? are there variants?) scans beautifully - no grain aliasing
in
> shadows on the LS40 (my mate Joel's Provia
"Jawed Ashraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never seen these options in Nikon Scan 3.0/3.1. Where should I be
> looking (I can be blind like this sometimes)?
> >= Original Message From Julian Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
> >Have you tried Scanner Extras / Prescan mode / low cont ne
e to A3 or more and print well on any medium. It just depends on how
picky you are. :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
nstead.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
the slide adapter in the LS30
so that's probably the answer to the mystery. Nevertheless I'm glad I found
the % settings. :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ly
>> if you have to crop.
> How many photos are printed at A4 size, though?
A full front cover on a magazine is close! But for magazine
purposes, larger than A4 is unlikely to be needed - again it
depends on how much you have to crop.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
301 - 400 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
