On 3:55 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
The tools I downloaded all required me to play the file in some other
program in order to get the waveform (instead of reading it directly
from the file). This means that those programs were capturing the
output from my soundcard, which means that this output
On 28.09.2005 23:39 Uhr Lee Actor wrote:
You are right that the software of necessity must analyze the digital
stream
before the D/A conversion, Johannes. However, real-time playback is
not
necessary to do a spectrum analysis.
I realize that. However, I got the impressions that David
on 9/28/05 12:50 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Yep, there's an incredibly easy way to do this.
In the Page Layout tool, just right-click (or control-click on a Mac)
the system's upper-left handle and choose Insert Page Break.
THANK you (and everyone else who answered!) - I knew there had to be
FYI:
More Flaws in Firefox Than IE, Symantec Says
News Story by Todd R. Weiss
SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 (COMPUTERWORLD) - In its semiannual report about
Internet security threats, released last week, IT security vendor Symantec
Corp. said the open-source Firefox Web browser had more confirmed
On 29 Sep 2005 at 12:39, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 28.09.2005 23:39 Uhr Lee Actor wrote:
You are right that the software of necessity must analyze the
digital stream before the D/A conversion, Johannes. However,
real-time playback is not necessary to do a spectrum analysis.
I realize
On 29 Sep 2005 at 12:58, Phil Daley wrote:
FYI:
More Flaws in Firefox Than IE, Symantec Says
News Story by Todd R. Weiss
This is old news. And it's malarkey. The following is a lengthy post
I made in another forum in response to reading Symantec's security
report (which was really a
On 20:29 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
I think you certainly recognize that if the spectrograph analyzer is
looking at the playback of the file rather than the file itself that
the result will include distortion introduced by my soundcard.
David,
I am still absolutely convinced that your
So I've got a word extension that looks a little wierd. The lyric it's
attached to is pretty close to the measure's right barline, and the
barline is stretching across staves so that the extension line just
barely intersects the group barline.
I'd like to be able to move the left side of the word
On 29 Sep 2005 at 21:21, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 20:29 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
I think you certainly recognize that if the spectrograph analyzer is
looking at the playback of the file rather than the file itself that
the result will include distortion introduced by my soundcard.
I
I would get rid of the extension and use a custom line.
BF
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
So I've got a word extension that looks a little wierd. The lyric it's
attached to is pretty close to the measure's right barline, and the
barline is stretching across staves so that the extension line just
barely
On 22:27 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, Johannes, you're just WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Thanks for keeping your voice down. (You manage to become really
offensive in the course of any discussion. Why is that? Is this some
kind of ego trip you have been on for the last few years? I for one am
On 29 Sep 2005 at 23:11, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 22:27 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, Johannes, you're just WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
Thanks for keeping your voice down. (You manage to become really
offensive in the course of any discussion. Why is that? Is this some
kind of ego trip you
On 9/29/05, Burt Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
I'd like to be able to move the left side of the word extensionto the
right, because a) the editor of this project has asked me to and b)
the collision looks absurd, even if I hadn't been instructed to fix
it.
I would
Sure, select it and press delete (choose lyrics - edit word extensions first
of course)
- Original Message -
From: Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Edit left side of word extension?
On 9/29/05, Burt
On 9/29/05, Barbara Touburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, select it and press delete (choose lyrics - edit word
extensions first of course)
Thanks!
Sometimes I'm looking so hard for a workaround that I don't even see
the things that are staring me in the face... thanks for pointing out
my
On 29.09.2005 23:41 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
So they listen for the soundcard input? How did you feed the MP3 into
that?
I had to initiate playback in an MP3 player, and tell it what device
to listen to.
Yes, but you still haven't answered my question: how did the output get
to the
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 9/29/05, Barbara Touburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, select it and press delete (choose lyrics - edit word
extensions first of course)
Thanks!
Sometimes I'm looking so hard for a workaround that I don't even see
the things that are
On 30 Sep 2005 at 1:07, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 29.09.2005 23:41 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
So they listen for the soundcard input? How did you feed the MP3
into that?
I had to initiate playback in an MP3 player, and tell it what device
to listen to.
Yes, but you still haven't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Johannes Gebauer
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:08 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison
On 29.09.2005 23:41 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
So they listen for
On 29 Sep 2005 at 17:20, Lee Actor wrote:
On the technical point under discussion, you are of course 100%
absolutely correct. The software must listen to the digital data
stream going into the sound card; the only output from the sound
card is the post D/A analog waveform sent to the
At 1:07 AM +0200 9/30/05, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Your post, on the other hand, was, imho,
completely unacceptable on a forum like this,
and I really ask you to come to your senses and
learn some manners. It really p§$%$sses me off
how you treat others, including me, who only
tried to help
At 08:43 PM 9/29/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 Sep 2005 at 17:20, Lee Actor wrote:
On the technical point under discussion, you are of course 100%
absolutely correct. The software must listen to the digital data
stream going into the sound card; the only output from the sound
card is
On Sep 27, 2005, at 7:10 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, that prompts a thought. Why not make the first note a tuplet,
but a 16th note in the time of three 32nds? Then with the MIDI tool,
reduce the duration by 1/3.
Would that actually work?
Have you tried this yet? Sounds to me like it
On 1:30 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote:
Yes, but you still haven't answered my question: how did the output
get to the input? Inside or outside the computer? Ie, did you
connect
the output to the input?
The soundcard is INSIDE the computer. It's a device that is part of
the audio interface of
24 matches
Mail list logo
