s+acarrico=adamsglobalization.com at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+acarrico=adamsglobalization.com at lists.frameusers
.com] On Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:41 PM
To: Rene Stephenson; John Sgammato; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com] On Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:41 PM
To: Rene Stephenson; John Sgammato; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
Very true. However, I didn't mention that there are 4 writers on the
team who ARE using RH to create c
ginal Message-
From: framers-bounces+jsgammato=imprivata@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+jsgammato=imprivata.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "qual
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:22 PM
To: Gagne, Bernard (Bolton)
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
No, I had the same thought. Just didn't know who to ask, as I'm sure no
one will divulge such valuable information befor
Hi Lin,
Your "Quality" person is way off mark. Sounds to me like you know what you
are talking about.
By the by, in the odd case where I've been required to submit HTML files
(for help systems), I've also used FM -> Mif2Go with great results.
But, HTML is rare for me. The majority of my delive
lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf
Of Rene Stephenson
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:02 PM
To: Lin Surasky; John Sgammato; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
You could really stir the pot by throwing ePublisher in the mix as a
single-sourcing solution.There's an import utility avai
ivata.com at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces+jsgammato=imprivata.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
> Behalf Of Lin Surasky
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> No, it's not a typo. No, we're not b
ginal Message-
> From:
> framers-bounces+lin.surasky=retalix.com at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces+lin.surasky=retalix.com at lists.frameuse
rs.com] On Behalf Of Rene Stephenson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subje
Hi Lin,
Your "Quality" person is way off mark. Sounds to me like you know what you
are talking about.
By the by, in the odd case where I've been required to submit HTML files
(for help systems), I've also used FM -> Mif2Go with great results.
But, HTML is rare for me. The majority of my delive
Lin -
When you make your argument, specify your deliverables. That includes
printable PDFs, with TOC, Indexes, and an attractive, readable format
that pleases the customer and shows off the company to its best
advantage.
If RH cannot produce the required deliverables, then it is not the right
too
ata.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does
s.frameuse
rs.com] On Behalf Of Gagne, Bernard (Bolton)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> In all of this, one thought occurred to me and it regards the
> upcoming release of Frame 8 later this year.
>
CTED]
rs.com] On Behalf Of Rene Stephenson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> The last time I had to use RH to create printable output,
> there was a substantial amount of clean-up work involved
; [mailto:framers-bounces+lin.surasky=retalix.com at lists.frameuse
rs.com] On Behalf Of Rene Stephenson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> The last time I had to use RH to create printable output,
>
ne 20, 2007 11:37 AM
To: John Sgammato; Lin Surasky; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
Agreed, John. Let the expert decide the appropriate tool.
However, it may be helpful to provide a quick synopsis of the
strengths and weaknesses of each
ments.
Thanks for the support!
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Sgammato [mailto:jsgammato at IMPRIVATA.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:30 AM
> To: Lin Surasky; framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> I think you're right
ginal Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rs.com] On Behalf Of Rene Stephenson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> The last time I had to use RH to create printable output,
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does not seem to
understand why we don't use RoboHelp to create content for our software
manuals. After all, every office has RoboHelp (not the Adobe version),
so what's the big deal?
The last time I had to use RH to create printable output, there was a
substantial amount of clean-up work involved each time between creating the
Word version with all the print-friendly stuff like continuation statements on
pages, etc., and then output to PDF and all the security stuff. For a s
The last time I had to use RH to create printable output, there was a
substantial amount of clean-up work involved each time between creating the
Word version with all the print-friendly stuff like continuation statements on
pages, etc., and then output to PDF and all the security stuff. For a s
Lin -
When you make your argument, specify your deliverables. That includes
printable PDFs, with TOC, Indexes, and an attractive, readable format
that pleases the customer and shows off the company to its best
advantage.
If RH cannot produce the required deliverables, then it is not the right
too
-seattle@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+scavanaugh=nat-seattle.com at lists.frameusers.com]
On Behalf Of Lin Surasky
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:22 PM
To: Gagne, Bernard (Bolton)
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
No, I had the same thought. Just
ay, June 20, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> In all of this, one thought occurred to me and it regards the
> upcoming release of Frame 8 later this year.
> Since RoboHelp is now an Adobe product, what are the odds
> Adobe will drop WebW
: Lin Surasky; John Sgammato; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
You could really stir the pot by throwing ePublisher in the mix as a
single-sourcing solution.There's an import utility available for
ePublisher that can take any RH project and convert it to MIF, reta
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:10 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does not seem to
understand why we don't use RoboHelp to create
You could really stir the pot by throwing ePublisher in the mix as a
single-sourcing solution.There's an import utility available for
ePublisher that can take any RH project and convert it to MIF, retaining links
and mapping formats as you determine in the interface. Depending on the size of
You could really stir the pot by throwing ePublisher in the mix as a
single-sourcing solution.There's an import utility available for
ePublisher that can take any RH project and convert it to MIF, retaining links
and mapping formats as you determine in the interface. Depending on the size of
11:37 AM
To: John Sgammato; Lin Surasky; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
Agreed, John. Let the expert decide the appropriate tool.
However, it may be helpful to provide a quick synopsis of the
strengths and weakne
Agreed, John. Let the expert decide the appropriate tool.
However, it may be helpful to provide a quick synopsis of the strengths and
weaknesses of each program, followed by audience analysis, customer
expectations, and deliverable requirements, and then by drawing the inevitable
conclusion. S
Agreed, John. Let the expert decide the appropriate tool.
However, it may be helpful to provide a quick synopsis of the strengths and
weaknesses of each program, followed by audience analysis, customer
expectations, and deliverable requirements, and then by drawing the inevitable
conclusion. S
ments.
Thanks for the support!
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Sgammato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:30 AM
> To: Lin Surasky; framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: FM v. RoboHelp
>
> I think you're right on, Lin.
> You
2:10 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FM v. RoboHelp
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does not seem to
understand why we don't use RoboHelp to create content for our software
m
No, it's not a typo. No, we're not being asked to use Word
The person in charge of "quality" for our company does not seem to
understand why we don't use RoboHelp to create content for our software
manuals. After all, every office has RoboHelp (not the Adobe version),
so what's the big deal?
34 matches
Mail list logo
