hey, all.
Recently I account a problem about using cvsup. I wanna use cvsup to
upgrade my ports tree, but I cannot connect to any cvsup website.
The situation is my IP address is 192.168.*.*, which seems to be a NAT
IP address. And I guess the LAN administrator may close some ports to
prevent
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:10, Jose Borquez wrote:
> In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean
> I should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little
> confused, so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jose
>
>
On 3/1/06, Jose Borquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean I
> should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little confused,
> so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated.
from man 1 cvsup:
--- Jose Borquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr.
> Does that mean I
> should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am
> a little confused,
> so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly
> appreciated.
Please see the Handbook:
http://w
In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean I
should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little confused,
so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Jose
___
freebsd-questions@
> > *default release=cvs tag=.
> > >
> > > I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I
> > > don't
> >
> > want
> >
> > > ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
> >
> >
SD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I don't
> want
> > ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
> >
>
> No, but you need to have at least two cvsup files, one for the system
> and the other for ports
Maybe I'm doing something wr
On 2/24/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Now install FreeBSD, delete the old slices first with fdisk and don't
> install X11, the only package you should install is cvsup-without-gui.
> After FreeBSD is installed run cvsup to get all the new ports,
oing to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
>
No, but you need to have at least two cvsup files, one for the system
and the other for ports and everything else so keep reading (all
the way to the end!)
Change "*default host" to the cvsup server of your choice, servers are
listed a
eBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I
> > don't want
> > ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
>
> No, that's the way it should be. The Handbook is quite clear on this
> point:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/h
t aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
No, that's the way it should be. The Handbook is quite clear on this
point:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS
Hey people,
I notice that in my supfile, I have this:
*default release=cvs tag=.
I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I don't want
ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool
Chris Maness wrote:
I have a question in regards to CVSUP. Does it sometimes not delete
old files. I did a sync on my ports. I built CUPS and the install
scripts were putting files in the wrong place. I fixed it by manually
deleting the cups directory and getting the fresh tarballs from
I have a question in regards to CVSUP. Does it sometimes not delete old
files. I did a sync on my ports. I built CUPS and the install scripts
were putting files in the wrong place. I fixed it by manually deleting
the cups directory and getting the fresh tarballs from from the ports
site
At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote:
Hi,
I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm
wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile?
Something like:
*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default rele
Hi,
I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm
wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile?
Something like:
*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3
*default release=cvs
wo_shi_big_stomach wrote:
> Thanks -- I have that system back. Whew.
[ ... ]
You're welcome.
> The upgrade routine warned that it could not replace
> the /usr/src tree and that cvsup was the right way to
> do this.
>
> To get this system from 5.4-RELEASE to RELENG_5_4, a
from
> that. You should have run "mergemaster -p" before
> the initial buildworld, and
> you should run mergemaster without the flag
> afterwards...
Thanks -- I have that system back. Whew.
The upgrade routine warned that it could not replace
the /usr/src tree and that cvsup was
wo_shi_big_stomach wrote:
> Greetings. I need help recovering a system that became
> unresponsive during an upgrade. Steps:
Download the FreeBSD 5.4 .iso image, and do a binary upgrade installation from
that. You should have run "mergemaster -p" before the initial buildworld, and
you should run m
Greetings. I need help recovering a system that became
unresponsive during an upgrade. Steps:
1. Using cvsup, I tried to upgrade a system from
RELENG_5_2 to RELENG_5_3 with the usual sequence:
cvsup -g -L 2 (cvsup file)
make -j 4 buildworld
make buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP
make installkernel
Jose Borquez wrote:
> I would like to synchronize a server which I did a minimal install. I
> would like to customize the stable-supfile so as not to download
> unneeded files. I would like to know what options I need to include
> from the following to do a source sync of only the essential files
I would like to synchronize a server which I did a minimal install. I
would like to customize the stable-supfile so as not to download
unneeded files. I would like to know what options I need to include
from the following to do a source sync of only the essential files:
#src-base
#src-bin
#s
On 2006-01-21 02:30, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, what time of day, and the day of the week, is typically
> the best time to sync up with 6-STABLE or 7-CURRENT, to minimize
> dealing with untested new commits.
CURRENT is, by definition, a fair bit unpredictable. Unles
For example, what time of day, and the day of the week, is typically
the best time to sync up with 6-STABLE or 7-CURRENT, to minimize
dealing with untested new commits. Same goes for the ports system. Are
there any cvs usage stats or web server usage stats for the FreeBSD
project?
I'd like to setu
Laurence Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but
> attempting to make buildkernel fails:
>
> HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include
> -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_t
I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but
attempting to make buildkernel fails:
HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c:2536:35:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 09:01, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all
What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ?
cvsup only runs on a very limited set of architectures and forces you
to build or fetch INDEX files yourself.
Having said that, it's useful in non ports/ situations
> What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ?
The package description covers that.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/sysutils/portsnap/pkg-descr?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
Hi all
What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ?
Lots of thanks.
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
Heure local/Local time:
Mon Jan 9 10:00:00 CET 2006
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
Vasile C wrote:
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?
Not without modifying the source code to cvsup.
What I recommend you do is add the '-1' flag to your cvsup command line
-- so cvsup will t
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?
On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:54, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
> Vasile C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: cvsup que
On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
Vasile C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvsup question
Wrote these words of wisdom:
> I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I
> want
> to change the reconnect time ..
>
>
> On Sunday 11 De
Vasile C wrote:
>> A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
>> server...
> I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I
> want
> to change the reconnect time ..
I hope this is a testbed and is not a productio
I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want
to change the reconnect time ..
On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Vasile C wrote:
> > How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
>
> A more useful approach wou
Vasile C wrote:
> How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
server...
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
--
Regards , Vasile C
pgpwwFwjDujVT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 14:43, Charles Haynes wrote:
> Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD.
>
> I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using:
>
> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0
>
> Tonight I added the package:
>
> cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2
>
Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD.
I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using:
FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0
Tonight I added the package:
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2
and ran:
# cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-supfile
After it ran (which took over an hour), I realized
Jon Hancock wrote:
> I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the
> ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of
> the system that don't understand.
>
> My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase a
I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the
ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of
the system that I don't understand.
My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase article
http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.as
I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the
ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of
the system that don't understand.
My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase article
http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.as
On Friday 02 December 2005 09:06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:05:11AM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
> > I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add
> > -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error:
> >
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:05:11AM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
> I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add
> -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error:
>
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/Fre
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 08:05, Jose Borquez wrote:
> I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add
> -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error:
>
> Error: FTP Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packa
I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add
-r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error:
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.4-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz:
File unavailable
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:19:54PM +0100, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
> hal wrote:
>
> >I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to
> >6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way?
> >
> Afaik, You must upgrade to 5.x first and then You can move to 6.x.
Yes. It mig
hal wrote:
I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to
6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way?
Afaik, You must upgrade to 5.x first and then You can move to 6.x.
Anyway FreeBSD 4.x uses an older and slower filesystem UFS1, whilst
FreeBSD 5.x and newer uses UFS2. Accordingly, a
I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to
6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way?
hal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
On 2005-11-26 23:28, Efren Bravo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason, David, Chen and the others, !=Chris,
>
> I don't lose my time to answering him because I wouldn't have
> time to read the CVSup man pages as Chris suggests, jajajajaja
>
> thanks for your help.
Jason, David, Chen and the others, !=Chris,
I don't lose my time to answering him because I
wouldn't have time to read the CVSup man pages as
Chris suggests, jajajajaja
thanks for your help
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> vizion wrote:
> >
Chris wrote:
I hate users looking for the shortcuts.
Funny. I didn't see that at all in the original email. What I saw was a
genuine misunderstanding.
He was asking about using CVSUP to track ports on a one by one basis.
What he didn't understand is that a person really want
vizion wrote:
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Efren Bravo
>>Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:39 AM
>>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>Subject: CVSup doubts
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Efren Bravo
> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:39 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: CVSup doubts
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to confi
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Efren Bravo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only
> ports but I've several doubts about it. I took
> /usr/share/examples/ports-supfile file. (freeBSD
> 6.0 RELEASE-i386)
>
> 1- When I updat
Hi,
I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only
ports but I've several doubts about it. I took
/usr/share/examples/ports-supfile file. (freeBSD
6.0 RELEASE-i386)
1- When I update a specific port, only is updated
his skeleton or his binary files are downloaded
too?
2- For i
Peter wrote:
With 5.4 I received an error using portsdb after updating my ports tree
with a refuse file. How does one deal with this?
# portsdb -U
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..p5-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.09: "/usr/ports/japanese/p5-Jcode" non-existent
-- dependency
mplete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are
not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in
particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the "ports-all"
collection, and have no "refuse" files.) If that is the case, then
report the failure t
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:33 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > > > >
is be? I verified my cvs-supfile, and
> >>everything is pointing to 5.4.
> >
> >Show us your cvsupfile.
> >
> >Kris
>
> %more /root/cvs-supfile
> *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org
> *default base=/usr
> *default prefix=/var/db
> *default tag=RELENG_5
base=/usr
*default prefix=/var/db
*default tag=RELENG_5_4
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
src-all
doc-all
Same cvsup file I've always used...
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
http://www.secur
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:31AM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Two days ago, I cvsupped the RELENG_5_4 tag, and rebuilt the system
> using make buildworld, make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel, make
> installworld, make installkernel KERNCONF=mykernel. Before I
> started, I w
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:30, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 2:09 PM + 11/12/05, Robert Slade wrote:
> >Hiya,
> >
> >I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile
> >gives Release not specified for collection "default" with
At 2:09 PM + 11/12/05, Robert Slade wrote:
Hiya,
I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile
gives Release not specified for collection "default" with the supfile
(based on standard-supfile) containing:
default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
default base=
nd it kept feeding me 6.0-RC1. I suggest trying
another cvsup server.
--
Regards,
Doug
I've tried 3 of them so far...
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
http://www.secure-computing.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
Hiya,
I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile
gives Release not specified for collection "default" with the supfile
(based on standard-supfile) containing:
default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
default base=/var/db
default prefix=/usr
default release=
feeding me 6.0-RC1. I suggest trying
another cvsup server.
--
Regards,
Doug
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello list,
Two days ago, I cvsupped the RELENG_5_4 tag, and rebuilt the system
using make buildworld, make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel, make
installworld, make installkernel KERNCONF=mykernel. Before I
started, I was at 5.4-RELEASE #2. Now that I've done this, I'm at
5.3-RELEASE #3.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 03:49:05PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> On 11/12/05 15:23 Kris Kennaway said the following:
> >There is no /etc/defaults/make.conf any longer (it's in
> >/usr/share/examples/etc now)
>
> ok, understandable.
>
> >>2. pccardd not being built in a 'make buildworld' due to
On 11/12/05 15:23 Kris Kennaway said the following:
There is no /etc/defaults/make.conf any longer (it's in
/usr/share/examples/etc now)
ok, understandable.
2. pccardd not being built in a 'make buildworld' due to
/usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/Makefile not having pccardd in the SUBDIR
And this
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 01:57:59PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> On 11/12/05 07:07 Kris Kennaway said the following:
> >No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he
> >expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is
> >handin
On 11/12/05 07:07 Kris Kennaway said the following:
No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he
expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is
handing out old files?
a cvsup against RELENG_6 last saturday has resulted in the following for m
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > > > I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >
> > You're trying to do something different: upgrade to
> > 6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If
> > it
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> You're trying to do something different: upgrade to
> 6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If
> it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating in the 6.0-RC1
> timeframe, neither w
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > > > I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
>
t; worked for me!
You're trying to do something different: upgrade to
6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If
it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating in the 6.0-RC1
timeframe, neither will work with that server (hence why I asked for
confirmation), but the use
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > > I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
> > > After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:21 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > I've read on other boards about the same issue (see
> > http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I
> > upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I
> > mentioned without issues.
>
> OK,
s he
> > expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is
> > handing out old files?
> >
> > Kris
>
> I've read on other boards about the same issue (see
> http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I
> upgraded from -RC
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 15:09 -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> I've read on other boards about the same issue (see
> http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I
> upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I
> mentioned without issues.
Sorry, that wasn't by
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:07 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > Set your tag to RELENG_6_0 and all will be well.
>
> No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he
> expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is
> handing o
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
> > After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see
> > a kernel labeled:
> >
> >FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
> I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
> After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see
> a kernel labeled:
>
>FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
>
> but am instead seeing:
>
>FreeBSD 6.0-RC1
>
> I double
Hello,
I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel.
After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see a
kernel labeled:
FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
but am instead seeing:
FreeBSD 6.0-RC1
I double-checked my supfile and my tag is indeed
On 11/10/05, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew P. wrote:
> > There are a couple more points against portsnap:
> > - it lags behind by a few hours.
>
> This is true (well, 1-2 hours). However, the reason for this
> is that portsnap builds ports INDEX files, and since portsnap
> is
Andrew P. wrote:
> There are a couple more points against portsnap:
> - it lags behind by a few hours.
This is true (well, 1-2 hours). However, the reason for this
is that portsnap builds ports INDEX files, and since portsnap
is usually more up-to-date than the INDEX files fetched by
"make fetchi
On Thursday 10 November 2005 06:55 am, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Szia Andrew,
>
> Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote:
> > There are a couple more points against portsnap:
> > - it lags behind by a few hours.
>
> Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few ho
Szia Andrew,
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote:
> There are a couple more points against portsnap:
> - it lags behind by a few hours.
Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing
agains cvsup-master (to which only official cvsup mirrors have acces
On 11/9/05, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:
> >>If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
> >>it.
> >
> > Out of curi
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 11:13, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
> > it.
>
> Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse tha
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote:
> Hello All,
> I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines.
> Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying "TreeList failed:
> Network write failure: Connection closed". I googled this
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:
>>If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
>>it.
>
> Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10
> times the changes?
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote:
> If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
> it.
Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10
times the changes?
Anyway, I've fallen in love with po
r, you can see how they are impacted by a session, which is
why I am against cvsuping src, ports, and doc at the same frequency. If
you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do
it.
Kent
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
__
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote:
> Parsing supfile "/etc/ports-supfile"
> Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org
Why is everyone trying to using cvsup10 all of a sudden? I don't think I've
ever made it past 5.
--
Kirk Strauser
pgp3ei2iLFrcq.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Hello All,
I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines.
Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying "TreeList failed:
Network write failure: Connection closed". I googled this and found an entry
saying that something went awry in the checkout files. SO I d
On Thursday 03 November 2005 12:10 pm, stan wrote:
> I went to update one of my machines today, and as a precaution, i
> checked the local cvsup mirro log.
>
> here's what I found:
>
> CVSup update begins at 2005-11-03 05:33:00
> Updating from cvsup-master.freebs
I went to update one of my machines today, and as a precaution, i checked
the local cvsup mirro log.
here's what I found:
CVSup update begins at 2005-11-03 05:33:00
Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org
Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org
No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org&
> Server Error: Authentication Fails.
>
> Any tips much appreciatted. I just want to setup my
> own CVS site so I can stop downloading multiple times
> from the nice mirror sites.
Freefal is for public CVSUP servers that you are currently using.
You cannot have access to it,
Hi
I am trying out the cvsup mirror program and thought
I would laso give 6.X a whirl but I seem to have run
into a bug?
CVSup update begins at 2005-10-26 19:48:40
Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org
Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org
Authentication required, but could not open
"
501 - 600 of 1735 matches
Mail list logo