Re: how to deal with spam for good?

2005-03-09 Thread Mike Hauber
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 10:53 pm, Luciano Musacchio wrote: > Hi, > I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? > :), I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one > here give me a hint on this? > > thanks heh... I'm wo

how to deal with spam for good?

2005-03-09 Thread Luciano Musacchio
Hi, I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :), I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give me a hint on this? thanks -- www.eXactas.org - La Universidad Evolutiva ___ freebsd-questions@f

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Jerry McAllister wrote: Matthias Buelow writes: And your point is..? I can see that FreeBSD marketing has a long way to go. To where?FreeBSD is not marketed in any particular way - on purpose. No one wants to do it, so no one will do it. jerry I want to, and frequently do, market FreeB

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Kevin Kinsey writes: > I'm guessing *you* are atypical in this. I know that I am not. About 95% of all problems with Windows machines are experienced by about 5% of the user base. The rest of the world has no problems. > Most of our Windows boxes are rather stable. But our FreeBSD ones are > s

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: > Well, if you just run a set of 1-3 applications, and don't do anything > else with the computer, there shouldn't be much of a difference. True, if those applications run identically on both platforms. > Apart from making a political statement, the advantage is > of cour

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Anthony Atkielski wrote: Jeremy C. Reed writes: Being able to run a desktop for over a hundred days without reboots, without annoying continuous software failures, without worry of malicious (or anoying) pop-ups, virus, and malware, and being able to quickly do my desktop work is a good reason t

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
Anthony Atkielski wrote: Or the city administration of Munich, which intends to move its Windows desktops to a Linux/KDE-based installation. Why not just burn taxpayer euro in a bonfire? It would have the same end result and it would be faster. Well, if you just run a set of 1-3 applications, and

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: > This is not so much about FreeBSD, as the Unix+X11 combination in > general. It does not provide the fully integrated system the typical > end-user, coming from a Windows or Mac perspective, expects. That it > nevertheless works well enough for persons with a technica

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
Jeremy C. Reed wrote: (Nevertheless, it is not time to advertise FreeBSD as a "desktop" alternative.) This is not so much about FreeBSD, as the Unix+X11 combination in general. It does not provide the fully integrated system the typical end-user, coming from a Windows or Mac perspective, expects

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-12 Thread Stephan Lichtenauer
Am 12.02.2005 um 00:00 schrieb Johnson David: From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's also well suited for the desktop. That doesn't mean that we should be stressing the des

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Jerry McAllister
> > Matthias Buelow writes: > > > And your point is..? > > I can see that FreeBSD marketing has a long way to go. To where?FreeBSD is not marketed in any particular way - on purpose. No one wants to do it, so no one will do it. jerry > > -- > Anthony > > > ___

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > That depends on the OS to which you compare it. In isolation, FreeBSD > works on the desktop, just as most UNIX operating systems do, but in > comparison to Windows or the Mac, it's a rather sorry excuse for a > desktop. But no OS can do it all, no

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire . Net LLC
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:49 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: Not in public it doesn't. That is irrelevant to the discussion. FreeBSD does not work on my PPC HW either. Score: 12 out of 100. The meeting is over, and a security guard will show you the door. Try again. D

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Robert Marella
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 04:34 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Robert Marella wrote: > > >>MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD". It is available today, and it works > >>better than anything else at being a "desktop". > > Does it work on my intel hardware? > > And your point is..? > > mkb. Market share

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: > And your point is..? I can see that FreeBSD marketing has a long way to go. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > Not in public it doesn't. That is irrelevant to the discussion. > FreeBSD does not work on my PPC HW either. Score: 12 out of 100. The meeting is over, and a security guard will show you the door. Try again. -- Anthony _

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Robert Marella writes: > Does it work on my intel hardware? Two basic responses, one right, one wrong: Wrong: "Of course it does, you idiot! Don't you know anything about hardware?" Right: "FreeBSD easily supports the full range of Intel microprocessors and virtually all Intel motherboards and

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Matthias Buelow
Robert Marella wrote: MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD". It is available today, and it works better than anything else at being a "desktop". Does it work on my intel hardware? And your point is..? mkb. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire . Net LLC
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Robert Marella wrote: On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:14 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: Johnson David wrote: Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix shops. But that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the desktop today. We need to s

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Robert Marella
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:14 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Johnson David wrote: > > > Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix shops. But > > that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the desktop > > today. We need to stop the official discouragement of d

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Matthias Buelow writes: > MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD". It is available today, and it works > better than anything else at being a "desktop". Considering the sorry > state of integrated "desktops" on Unix today (i.e., Gnome and KDE) and > compare it with Windows, do you really think that will co

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Matthias Buelow
Johnson David wrote: Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix shops. But that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the desktop today. We need to stop the official discouragement of desktop FreeBSD. MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD". It is available today, and i

Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire . Net LLC
On Feb 11, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Johnson David wrote: From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's also well suited for the desktop. Anthony had the same misguided opinion in the Apac

RE: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...

2005-02-11 Thread Johnson David
From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's also well suited for the desktop. That doesn't mean that we should be stressing the desktop to those shopping for servers, instead

RE: SPAM: Score 2.5: Re: FreeBSD logo design competition

2005-02-10 Thread stheg olloydson
--- Johnson David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: stheg olloydson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Now as to the "need" to change the logo, to quote the announcement, > > "This character sometimes treated with misinterpreted in the > > religious and cultural context." Over the years, the onl

RE: SPAM: Score 2.5: Re: FreeBSD logo design competition

2005-02-09 Thread Johnson David
From: stheg olloydson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Now as to the "need" to change the logo, to quote the announcement, > "This character sometimes treated with misinterpreted in the > religious and cultural context." Over the years, the only complaints I > have ever heard have come from America's

Re: FreeBSD servers blacklisted for spam ... ?

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Norgaard
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:49:11PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?216.136.204.119 This list can't fix it, talk to postmaster. I posted the same in previous thread, then mailed postmaster: =snip= >> But it may >> cause a lot of bounces and

Re: FreeBSD servers blacklisted for spam ... ?

2005-02-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:49:11PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?216.136.204.119 This list can't fix it, talk to postmaster. Kris pgpJ2SeMTSu5x.pgp Description: PGP signature

FreeBSD servers blacklisted for spam ... ?

2005-02-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?216.136.204.119 Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin

Re: [SPAM] Re: Transferring directories over a network

2004-12-22 Thread Roger Merritt
At 12:44 PM 12/22/04, you wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:24:59PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > I hope this isn't too common a question. I couldn't devise a good set of > keywords to use Google. > > I just received a new machine to replace my ancient server/gateway. I > decided the best way to go

Re: are you spam?

2004-12-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:40:29PM +0900, Koichi Mori wrote: > Dear Administrator, > > you are always SPAM by my spam filter. > > please check this URL > > http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=freebsd.org&ip=216.136.204.18 Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you believ

are you spam?

2004-12-13 Thread Koichi Mori
Dear Administrator, you are always SPAM by my spam filter. please check this URL http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=freebsd.org&ip=216.136.204.18 -- Koichi Mori ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: Sendmail Anti-Spam

2004-10-29 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Sean Murphy wrote: I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for you. milter-greylist in combination with clamav-milter, a few select DNSBLs, and entries in access.db for the

Re: Sendmail Anti-Spam

2004-10-29 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Sean Murphy wrote: I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for you. A few months ago I tried amavisd-new in the "Sendmail Dual" configuration with clamav for antivirus and SpamAssassin f

Sendmail Anti-Spam

2004-10-29 Thread Sean Murphy
I want to add an anti-spam solution to sendmail. I was wondering what solution you chose for server side anti-spam and how well it works for you. -- Sean Murphy Network Technician California Institute of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SPAM] Re: 5.3-STABLE

2004-10-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:19:31PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Is it bad for a production server to maintain 5.3 stable vs. release? See the handbook for discussion of this issue. Kris pgprWuPpeU4oY.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: [SPAM] freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 70, Issue 5

2004-07-26 Thread Ara
Can you give more info, like what operating systems are you ruining on your hard drive and i assume you have 2 primary fat partitions right? so yo u have to have access to make a third one one thing you have too keep in mind is when it asks to install FreeBSD boot manager, say yes, sorry can't help

Killing spam on FreeBSD

2004-07-13 Thread Kirk Strauser
I recently started rejecting about 99.9% of incoming spam *without* using challenge-response or other load-increasing methods. For details, read: http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/FilterMailWithPostFix In a nutshell, before implementing this plan, I was receiving about 600

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-09 Thread Skylar Thompson
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:40:28PM -0400, Thomas Farrell wrote: > First your going to need a licensed version of sometype of > antivirus application you can always get freeB's but they will eventually > run out. some of the AV for BSD are panda, kaspersky,. macfee, and Sophos > & fprot . Both Fpr

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Fernando Gleiser
solaris & > Windoz . > I'm using mimedefang+clamav for virus/malware. clamav is an open source antivirus which works great for me For spam, I use spamassasin called from within mimedefang. Fer ___ [EMAIL

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Thomas Farrell
to make it scan and filter > our mails. That works perfectly and so I see no need for mailmonitor at all. - Original Message - From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:35 AM Subject: Anti

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Skylar Thompson
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:35:45AM -0500, Chris wrote: > Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail > server? I'd highly recommend MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) combined with SpamAssassin (http://www.spamassassin.org) and ClamAv (http://www

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Bernt. H
Chris wrote: Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail server? Yes. You can have a look at messagewall its in the ports. www.messagewall.org Been using it for the past year now and it's works just fine. ___ [

Re: Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Eric Crist
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 10:35, Chris wrote: > Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail > server? Yeah, try SpamAssassin. I've been using it since January, and have almost zero SPAM delivered to my inbox now. I think in all that time it has only ha

Anti-Spam app for sendmail

2004-06-08 Thread Chris
Any comments on a good anti-spam app that works with sendmail for a mail server? -- Best regards, Chris ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: SPAM

2004-06-06 Thread Gary
Hi Joshua, On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT) UTC (6/6/2004, 7:41 PM -0500 UTC my time), Joshua Lewis wrote: J> I received spam from these addresses and they got my name from the mailing J> list. Is there a way to report these names? J> [EMAIL PROTECTED] J> Marion N. Cas

SPAM

2004-06-06 Thread Joshua Lewis
I received spam from these addresses and they got my name from the mailing list. Is there a way to report these names? (subject came in from [kde-freebsd]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marion N. Castle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thank you, J

Re: **heads-up** : likely spam using [name]@freebsd.org

2004-05-18 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 07:28:59PM +0200, Remko Lodder typed: > Try to delete them and update your virusscanner regularly and you would > be fine ;-) Or stick to FBSD and you won't have to run any AV scanner at all :) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis

Re: **heads-up** : likely spam using [name]@freebsd.org

2004-05-18 Thread Remko Lodder
Dude, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/ is a valid URL, because yar is indeed a committer. this said, something (read: mailer-daemon error) tells me that yar's e-mail below (bottom) is not quite right. haven't bothered to open the attachement and don't really see the point,

**heads-up** : likely spam using [name]@freebsd.org

2004-05-18 Thread epilogue
mail address or... hello yar, i am not sure what this message is all about. 1) did i just misunderstand? 2) was this intended for someone else? or 3) is someone sending spam and faking that you are the sender? cheers, epi - Begin forwarded message: Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:02:24 +0

Re: spam spoofers

2004-05-11 Thread Peter Risdon
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I also have a woman getting mail from a sick person with the address and return the same as her address. the police, FBI, are no help.. That may change. You probably know this already, but Received headers are your friend. PWR. __

Re: spam spoofers

2004-05-11 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 11 May 2004 at 9:34:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am getting hundreds of spam with return addresses on it from MY server.. > the ip addresses are different and they didn't originate from my server . > now I am getting notices from AOL and other they

RE: spam spoofers

2004-05-11 Thread Buck
I am running my mail server. I have notified the ISP's and thanks for the term I was looking for joe-job -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Freebsd-Questions Subject: Re:

Re: spam spoofers

2004-05-11 Thread Gary
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:34:25AM -0700 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am getting hundreds of spam with return addresses on it from MY server.. > the ip addresses are different and they didn't originate from my server . > now I am getting notices from AOL and oth

spam spoofers

2004-05-11 Thread Buck
I am getting hundreds of spam with return addresses on it from MY server.. the ip addresses are different and they didn't originate from my server . now I am getting notices from AOL and other they are going to stop excepting mail from me...while this is no loss to me, I see a problem here..

Re: fetchmail and spam assassin

2004-04-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
op3 username "lgilbert" password "example" ssl antispam 451 is [EMAIL PROTECTED] here > Also on the subject of spamassassin a lot of junk is still getting through, > is there a FreeBSD specific spam assassin configuration tutorial or howto? I don

fetchmail and spam assassin

2004-04-12 Thread dave
gh postfix which is running on the same box and which has spamassassin and some other anti-uce filters in place. Also on the subject of spamassassin a lot of junk is still getting through, is there a FreeBSD specific spam assassin configuration tutorial or howto? Th

Re: spam in an inbox.

2004-04-11 Thread Eduardo Viruena Silva
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Peter Schuller wrote: > > How can I do that? > > > > Of course, I can make a program that decides where each message starts and > > where it ends, save it in a file and then filter it with spamassassin and > > with the filtered file use gre

Re: spam in an inbox.

2004-04-11 Thread Peter Schuller
> How can I do that? > > Of course, I can make a program that decides where each message starts and > where it ends, save it in a file and then filter it with spamassassin and > with the filtered file use grep to find "X-Spam-flag: YES to discard this > message. > >

Re: spam in an inbox.

2004-04-10 Thread Eduardo Viruena Silva
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, albi wrote: > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:03:09 -0500 (CDT) > Eduardo Viruena Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a system that uses procmail & spamassassing to filter spam, but > > there is an old account of a friend of mine that had n

Re: spam in an inbox.

2004-04-10 Thread Chuck Swiger
Eduardo Viruena Silva wrote: Is it possible now to filter the already received messages and discard the spam from them? How can I do that? Hav him open the messages using an MTA which performs it's own spam filtering, such as Mozilla or Apple's Mail.app. Use that MTA to zap and delet

spam in an inbox.

2004-04-10 Thread Eduardo Viruena Silva
Hello, FreeBSD gurus! I have a system that uses procmail & spamassassing to filter spam, but there is an old account of a friend of mine that had not activated its filter and received a lot of spam messages. Now, we have his inbox and about 9000 messages which are spam and messages he want

Re: Spam? FreeBSD Install Guide Official Launch News release (fwd)

2004-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:02:55PM +, Rus Foster wrote: > Anyone else recieve this Spam? > > Abuse reports filed.. Yes, I have reported it to postmaster, and expect that he will (at least) be banned from all FreeBSD mailing lists. Spamming is no more acceptable just because the c

Re: Spam? FreeBSD Install Guide Official Launch News release (fwd)

2004-03-18 Thread Chris
On Thursday 18 March 2004 01:02 pm, Rus Foster wrote: > Anyone else recieve this Spam? > > Abuse reports filed.. Here we go again. -- Best regards, Chris ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que

Re: Spam? FreeBSD Install Guide Official Launch News release (fwd)

2004-03-18 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Rus Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-18 11:02]: > Anyone else recieve this Spam? > > Abuse reports filed.. > > > -- > e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > t: 1-888-327-6330 > www.jvds.com - Root on your own box > www.vpscolo.com - Your next hosting compa

Re: spam scanner install failed

2004-03-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 05:42:34PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there a way to still install these programs?? I tried installing just > after doing a #cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/ports-supfile Did you do a 'make index' after cvsup'ing? As p5-Time-HiRes is currently at version 1.55 in ports.

Re: Spam? FreeBSD Install Guide Official Launch News release (fwd)

2004-03-18 Thread Jez Hancock
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:02:55PM +, Rus Foster wrote: > Anyone else recieve this Spam? Yes. > Abuse reports filed.. Ditto. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - Another FreeBSD Diary http://ipfwstats.

Spam? FreeBSD Install Guide Official Launch News release (fwd)

2004-03-18 Thread Rus Foster
Anyone else recieve this Spam? Abuse reports filed.. -- e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t: 1-888-327-6330 www.jvds.com - Root on your own box www.vpscolo.com - Your next hosting company -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:50:42 -0500 From: Sales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: spam scanner install failed

2004-03-18 Thread Gary
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 05:42:34PM +0800 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm trying to Install > > Qmail-scanner > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin > Amavisd-new > Time-HiRes-1.51.tar.gz > from a whole bunch of ftp sites. I checked some of the sites > for example > ftp://ftp.is.co.za/programmi

spam scanner install failed

2004-03-18 Thread rfa
I'm trying to Install Qmail-scanner p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Amavisd-new on my 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD mail box running qmail and courier-imap but I can't seem to find the file Time-HiRes-1.51.tar.gz from a whole bunch of ftp sites. I checked some of the sites for example ftp://ftp.is.co.za/programmin

***SPAM*** Score/Req: 05.00/05.00 - set two nic card's ip with dhcp method at same time

2004-03-17 Thread Warren.Sun [??]
Dear Sir : I have a machine with tow nic cards. I can set them with both fixed IP ,or one fixed IP and another dynamic ip with DHCP ,but i can not set them both with dynamic IP though DHCP at same time . Would you pls tell me how to config it the best regard _

***SPAM*** possible sendmail config problem/Perl

2004-03-17 Thread Peter W. Merritt
sed_on_MX) dnl DNS based black hole lists dnl dnl DNS based black hole lists come and go on a regular basis dnl so this file will not serve as a database of the available servers. dnl For that, visit dnl http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet/Abuse/Spam/B

Re: SPAM?: Re: Microsoft USB wireless mouse

2004-02-19 Thread HOLLOW, CHRISTOPHER
Assuming you have: deviceuhci deviceohci deviceusb deviceums compiled into your kernel, can you test the mouse with any success through sysinstall -> configure -> mouse? Check this page for some more det's: http://www.freebsddiary.org/usb-mouse.php HTH, Christopher Hollow Chungwe

Re: My fault or just Spam

2004-02-19 Thread Jorn Argelo
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 21:08, Ed Budd wrote: > It's a virus (my AV calls it Worm.Gibe.F). I bet most of the list gets > these occasionally. Heh, yeah, I'm getting it 3 times a day at least. Same goes for the mydoom A variant. It's quite anoying to have your mailbox flooding with these thi

Re: My fault or just Spam

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
nse > about a patch). In short my concern is not that me or my wife will run > this, sense we don't use Windows, but whether these emails are just spam > or if it is my fault. Not your fault at all. The 'net is being plauged at the moment by a series of Windows worm programs tha

Re: My fault or just Spam

2004-02-18 Thread luke
e windows :) Yeah, it's a real shame and trying to get people out of their comfort zone to try something else seems to be nigh impossible :). But at least I feel better about what I've configured so far... it's now time for me to learn more about stopping spam at my server. I beli

Re: My fault or just Spam

2004-02-18 Thread Ed Budd
). In short my concern is not that me or my wife > will run this, sense we don't use Windows, but whether these emails > are just spam or if it is my fault. > > If said emails are just spam, fine. Not to say that I like spam but it > gives me a reason to learn how to setup a spam

Re: My fault or just Spam

2004-02-18 Thread Aaron Peterson
a patch). In short my concern is not that me or my wife will run > this, sense we don't use Windows, but whether these emails are just spam > or if it is my fault. > > If said emails are just spam, fine. Not to say that I like spam but it > gives me a reason to learn how to set

My fault or just Spam

2004-02-18 Thread luke
this, sense we don't use Windows, but whether these emails are just spam or if it is my fault. If said emails are just spam, fine. Not to say that I like spam but it gives me a reason to learn how to setup a spam filter and/or tarpit. The reason I worry that it's not just spam is that

Re: [--SPAM--] ID hvb... thanks

2004-02-17 Thread Gael Duval
Hi, I will be out of offices until February, 22nd. I will read your message when I'm back. For any web-related content request or feedback, please contact Kadjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. For any press/interview inquiry please contact Jacques Le Marois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For icons related stuff, p

Re: spam removal

2004-02-17 Thread Gary Kline
s,, but that's about > > the extent of my knowledge. > > No problem here. The first question is: do you have your mail users in a > mysql database or they are in the system ? I don't quite understand your question. I would like to filter spam from/at

Re: spam removal

2004-02-17 Thread Michel Schwab
Hi I read this tread, great idee to add a spam feature. so i do it, install with the ports. I work with sendmail, no mysql db behind. make install done. chance the Mlocal Setting, add aliases, and restart sendmail. Now Message it's comming up to me, but when i send a email to [EMAIL PROT

Re: spam removal

2004-02-17 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
d file, and use dspam_genaliases to generate the spam aliases for each user to forward the spam to. As a general note, until you're convince the hole system works ok compile dpam with verbose_debug. As currently the port doesn't offer that, just add: CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-debug

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Gary Kline
extent of my knowledge. I've been using /etc/mail/access that catches tons of spam. It would be great if dspam could do the rest! tia, gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix __

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread David Brinegar
Gary defends qmail: > It delivers a bounce called QSBMF, and to my knowledge is the only > MTA that does. Those messages are like idiot lights, without the brevity. But qmail is besides the point -- most bounce messages are pretty weak. They work okay if the reader is computer literate. I like t

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Gary
Hi David, On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:53:40 -0800 UTC (2/16/2004, 11:53 AM -0600 UTC my time), David Brinegar wrote: D> Bounce messages are typically not good enough to avoid this. The D> other day a client tried to send an e-mail that exceeded my ISP's D> limit and was told something like "mailbox

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread David Brinegar
Paul A. Hoadley wrote: > Let's imagine that Charles gets a bounce notification, but it doesn't > reach his threshold for doing anything more about it. Bob loses > legitimate mail. Bounce messages are typically not good enough to avoid this. The other day a client tried to send an e-mail that exc

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2004-02-16T09:13:16Z, Olga Zenkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What tools can anybody > advice to stop it? My writeup on the subject starts at: http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/FilterSpam and includes inform

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Jorge Biquez
At 04:18 a.m. 16/02/04 -0500, you wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Olga Zenkova wrote: > Hi! > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What > tools can anybody advice to stop it? Now I have > sendmail with access.db, which is already used but I > think it is not very effect

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Paul A. Hoadley
klisted. Let's imagine that Charles gets a bounce notification, but it doesn't reach his threshold for doing anything more about it. Bob loses legitimate mail. > So Alice knows the email was not lost. Sure. But the intended recipient doesn't have any information at all. > Sh

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 05:57:29AM -0500, matthew wrote: > So Alice knows the email was not lost. She is now aware of why, > hence the http://url in the error mesg. And now Alice can contact > her admin, and figure out why that ip/block is spewing spam > at me/us/blacklist users. To

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
amAssassin worked well for me for several years, > but I recently changed from SA to bogofilter because SA just wasn't > keeping up with the latest craze of random word spams. Fortunately, I > had a 26,000-spam corpus with which to train bogofilter, so it's > already working q

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:13:16 -0800 (PST) Olga Zenkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What > tools can anybody advice to stop it? Now I have > sendmail with access.db, which is already used but I > think it is not very eff

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread matthew
t get delivered. She sent that email from a real mta. That mta records the error mesg Bob's dns-blacklist using email server spit out. You know what i mean, same thing goes with a user unknown. So Alice knows the email was not lost. She is now aware of why, hence the http://url in the error me

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Mike Woods
spamassassin via amavisd (Milter atm, minor issues with dual-mta for me) and dcc to provide a spam "lookup", so far the content of my inbox has droped by a fair few hundered emails and founs five viruses (3 days :D). -- Mike Woods IT Technician __

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Paul A. Hoadley
because SA just wasn't keeping up with the latest craze of random word spams. Fortunately, I had a 26,000-spam corpus with which to train bogofilter, so it's already working quite well. It seems to be learning the random word spams gradually. -- Paul. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Paul A. Hoadley
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:44:25AM -0500, matthew wrote: > > I recommend bogofilter for per-user filtering. Spamassassin is > > also highly recommended for site use. I tend to dislike DNS-based > > filtering because it has a high rate of false positives, and it > > causes your users to lose legi

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:44:25AM -0500, matthew wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:13:16AM -0800, Olga Zenkova wrote: > > > Hi! > > > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What > > &g

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread matthew
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:13:16AM -0800, Olga Zenkova wrote: > > Hi! > > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What > > tools can anybody advice to stop it? Now I have > > sendmail with access.db, which is alre

Re: spam removal

2004-02-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:13:16AM -0800, Olga Zenkova wrote: > Hi! > Some of my FreeBSD users get to much spam daily. What > tools can anybody advice to stop it? Now I have > sendmail with access.db, which is already used but I > think it is not very effective at all. May be othe

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >