On 31 Jul 2009, at 16:36, Louis Mamakos wrote:
Also beware that gmirror in RELENG_7 will upgrade the metadata in
your mirror when you boot. This could be an issue if you need to
revert to a RELENG_6 kernel with the older gmirror. I've done a
source upgrade (months ago, though) from 6.x to
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 4:44 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> helge.old...@atosorigin.com wrote:
>
>> Willem,
>>
>>
>> Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
>>
>>> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>> W
Gót András wrote:
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 2:06 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/b
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:43 AM, > wrote:
Are you sure the kernel does not install? I have recently source-
upgraded a bunch of systems straight from 6-STABLE to 7-STABLE,
constantly observed this error, but kernel and modules did install
properly, and the machines booted up as smoothly as expe
helge.old...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed. http://svn.fr
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
>>>
>>> It is already fixed.
>>> http://svn.freebsd
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 2:06 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>
>>> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
>>>
>>> It is already fixed.
>>> http://svn
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
cvsupped last night at 1:00 +1
So the apha-particle strikes again. ;)
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:41+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:27+0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
> > So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
>
> I'd do a binary upgrade to 7.2-R. gcc doesn't understand the
> -Wpointer-sign flag used when compiling RELENG_7_0_0_RELEASE
and in 7.2-STABLE (built July 27) cvsuped today and failed with
max_iosize error
.
JeffD
_
M 0427565791
jeff.dows...@mac.com
On 31/07/2009, at 7:27 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Compiling the kernel gives me:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-
In message <4a72b8e4.6060...@withagen.nl>,
Willem Jan Withagen (w...@withagen.nl) wrote:
> Compiling the kernel gives me:
>
> cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
> -Wcast-qual -Wundef -
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
cvsupped last night at 1:00 +1
So the apha-particle strikes again. ;)
I'll update, and rerun.
--
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 -> 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:27+0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> With a 6.4 of last night
Michael Butler contributed a patch where ch->max_iosize was changed
twice to atadev->max_iosize on line 454 in src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c.
Either re-cvsup and hope for the best or apply the patch manually.
14 matches
Mail list logo
