Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dale wrote:
Thoughts? Something I need to check here?
Does your ISP offer IPv6? If not, are you using an IPv6 tunnel of some
kind? If not, then you don't have IPv6 connection to the Internet, so
the results look normal.
I
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You have managers that know what an IP address is?
iPod, iPhone, iPad... surely iP is something related to that.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dale wrote:
>
> Thoughts? Something I need to check here?
Does your ISP offer IPv6? If not, are you using an IPv6 tunnel of some
kind? If not, then you don't have IPv6 connection to the Internet, so
the results look normal.
wrote:
> > > > On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > >> -original message-
> > > >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
> > > >> From: Paul Hartman
> > > >> Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
> > &
OK. I rebooted and I don't think the test results changed anything.
Test with IPv4 DNS record
ok (1.003s) using ipv4
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.496s)
Test with Dual Stack DNS record
ok (0.993s) using ipv4
Test for Dual Stack DNS and large pack
gt; >> -original message-
> > >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
> > >> From: Paul Hartman
> > >> Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
> > >>
> > >> >And another bonus is that there are plenty of
> > >>
> > &
On Friday 10 June 2011 17:08:40 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:22, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >> -original message-
> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
> >> From: Pa
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:22, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> -original message-
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
>> From: Paul Hartman
>> Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
>>
>> >And
On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> -original message-
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
> From: Paul Hartman
> Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
>
> >And another bonus is that there are plenty of
>
> funny things we can spell in hexadeci
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
>And another bonus is that there are plenty of
funny things we can spell in hexadecimal. ;)
While I'm sure I'll tag the C001:D00D address for my workstation, I'
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mick wrote:
> I take it that loading this module would cut both ways. If I were to allow
> connections to my server only for *my* IP address, then that would be quite
> difficult to achieve if my IP address changed every few minutes.
Since you can have multiple ad
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 16:51:29 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> BTW, Windows Vista and 7 generate randomized host IDs for public IPv6
> >> addresses, it's generally advised to disable that. You can do that by
> >> running this at administrator cmd prompt:
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
>> IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
>> world on either network.
>
> I'm getting a headache...
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick wrote:
>> BTW, Windows Vista and 7 generate randomized host IDs for public IPv6
>> addresses, it's generally advised to disable that. You can do that by
>> running this at administrator cmd prompt:
>> netsh interface ipv6 set global randomizeidentifiers=disabl
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick wrote:
>> On my wife's Windows 7 laptop, it just worked perfectly after I
>> enabled it on my router and her wifi reconnected. All tests on
>> test-ipv6.com pass except for the last DNS test. She can go to sites
>> like http://www.v6.facebook.com no problems.
On 9 June 2011 12:16, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
>> IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
>> world on either network.
>
> I'm getting a headache...
>
> Is ther
On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
> IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
> world on either network.
I'm getting a headache...
Is there a decent guide that explains IPV6 for noobs who d
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't
hurt to hope. I just hope it w
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't
> >> hurt to hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the th
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 23:56:32 Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Read the FAQ and Info posted.
> >
> > > From the website:
> > If this test fails: it means that the DNS resolver you are using,
> > requires IPv4 to reach the DNS authoritative servers of your favoriate
> > web sites.
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually
Some stuff
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 02:25:43 Paul Hartman wrote:
> My wireless router is running DD-WRT (which is a Linux distro). It is
> running kernel 2.6.34 and has all the ipv6 modules enabled in the
> kernel. Basically, it is setup by loading the "sit" module
> (CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD in kernel config). Th
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
> hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
> or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually
Some stuff is already looking good, o
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Read the FAQ and Info posted.
> From the website:
If this test fails: it means that the DNS resolver you are using, requires
IPv4 to reach the DNS authoritative servers of your favoriate web sites. In
the near future, every web site of consequence will remain accessib
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dale wrote:
Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings.<
sighs>
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 13:59:36 Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1&1:
> >
> > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> > Test mit Dual Stack
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dale wrote:
>
> Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
> problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
> Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings. <
> sighs >
>
You owe me a new
Paul Hartman wrote:
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ipv6 before, and you should
be good to go from a basics standpoint.
After that, you need actual IPv6 service from your ISP (and modem and
router), or tunnel over IPv4 thr
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman
Date: 2011-06-09 08:25
>And now I'll try not to talk about Windows on this list again for the
>remainder of the year. ;)
Naaah, is okay... as long as you don't do it excessively :)
So
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Charter Communications cable internet:
>>
>> Test with IPv4 DNS record
>> ok (0.580s) using ipv4
>> Test with IPv6 DNS record
>> ok (0.268s) using ipv6
>> Test with Dual Stack DNS record
>> ok
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
> 2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann :
> > 1&1:
> >
> > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> > Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
> > Te
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:45 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Paul Hartman
did opine thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
> > settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones hosting this
>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Should I have the USE flag ipv6 enabled or should I leave it off for now?
> If so, anyone had any trouble with it or is this a trivial change?
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ip
2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann :
> 1&1:
>
> Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
> Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
> ok (0.665s) verwende ipv4
> Test IPv4
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
> settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones hosting this
> event and it appears their server is not ready. Makes me think. < Dale
> scratches chin a bit >
>From
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
1&1:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit D
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
1&1:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 03:18:47 Adam Carter wrote:
> > Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
> >
> > Test with IPv6 DNS record
> > bad (0.261s)
>
> Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
> transport.
>
> /home/adam$ host -t www.googl
>
> Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
>
> Test with IPv6 DNS record
> bad (0.261s)
>
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
www.google.com is an alias for www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I u
40 matches
Mail list logo