> >
> > Has anybody gained experience in setting up/using CCL?
> > Any tips/hints are welcome.
> >
>
> You might find this helpful:
>
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246298.html?Open
>
Or you could get your boss to spring for a ticket to Interaction
(Australia) next month ;-)
One of th
On Jun 28, 2005, at 5:44 PM, Gabe Torres wrote:
Hello List,
I have gleaned the Archives on this subject, and have found NEW ERA's
FAST DASD ERASE, and IBM's DFDSS, ICKDSF and IEBDG.
Is the List aware of any other Vendors or products that offer a
solution
($$) to writing over DASD at a DR si
Hi Marian and Walter,
We've been running ADABAS V7.1.3 under z/OS 1.4 for a long time now. I'm not
aware of any problems we
encountered during our migration from OS/390 2.10.
Regards,
Fred
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:09:32 +0100
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[log in to u
There certainly may have been a problem earlier, but when I click on the
link
http://www.ibm.com/news/usalet/
It does redirect me to a site with today's announcements AND I can click on
any specific announcement and get to the requested announcement.
"Eric Chevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I don't understand your comment.
As previously indicated the FLAG(I,I) option became the default at the same
time as DBCS.
Therefore, the compiler error message WILL appear in the listing IMMEDIATELY
after the line inserted by the translator (indicating the column in that
line with the problem)
Had initially mentioned "only reference i've found so far is that z/OS 1.4
can coexist with z/OS 1.5, thru 1.7, but nothing about parallel sysplex".
In hindsight that was obviously poorly proof-read.
i had been unable to find anything stating that zOS 1.4 can co-exist in a
parallel sysplex with 1.
R.S. wrote:
IMHO it's good. At least for the companies. System programmers should do
system programming, working in companies which produces systems.
Companies which *buys* systems should have system exploitation staff.
Last but not least: it is much less probable to blow up the system when
usi
That's ok.
I thought Love Canal was a song by The B52s.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of John Mattson
Sent: Tue 28/6/05 19:11
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Oxygenated morons
I thought an oxymoron was an idiot who worked for Armand Hamm
Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
I so much missed the memo that I still use the capability hundreds of
times every day on z/OS 1.6 Ed, what are you talking about?
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0506&L=ibm-main&P=R102705
--
--
> From: Edward E. Jaffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:49 AM
>
>>>Huh?? Which form of IDENTIFY do you believe can be used to create a
>>>major CDE from GETMAINed virtual storage?
>>
>>The one documented in the old Linkage Editor and Loader PLM.
>
> That capability was
On 24 Jun 2005 07:38:47 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>In
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>on 06/23/2005
> at 01:56 PM, "Duffy, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Something came up yesterday that I thought was worth sharing, as I'm
>>concerned about it. This looks like a wave of the future
Another way around this that I've seen is to load a non-reentrant module and
modify it to point to your getmained program. Do an IDENTIFY to that glue
code and then you can LINK/ATTACH etc.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Well, he's not the only graybeard who didn't get that memo. I
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/28/2005
at 08:48 AM, Joe Zitzelberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>While column 50 might look blank iff you are using a printed listing
> (a rarity in the days of syntax highlighting editors
Editors? It doesn't exist in the source file, so the editor doesn't
see it
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/28/2005
at 10:10 AM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Well, he's not the only graybeard who didn't get that memo. I missed
>it too. I just looked it up,
Where? The Devil is in the details.
>IDENTIFY *must* specify an
>address within an already
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/28/2005
at 05:46 AM, "Edward E. Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>That capability was removed in MVS. Didn't you get the memo?
No. The authors of SY28-3814-0 didn't get it either, since they list
IDENTIFY as being done by HEWLOAD/HEWLOADR and give the PLIST on p13
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Wow! Looks like the CDE resulting from the "secret" SVC 41 interface
does *not* have the CDSYSLIB bit turned on, meaning any
authorized/privileged program that tries to LOAD the resulting module
will receive abend S306. Understandable.
Thanks to Alex Brodsky for point
You mean besides FDR ?
http://www.innovationdp.fdr.com/products/fdrerase/index.cfm
Mike
On 6/28/05, Gabe Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
> I have gleaned the Archives on this subject, and have found NEW ERA's
> FAST DASD ERASE, and IBM's DFDSS, ICKDSF and IEBDG.
>
> Is the List
I'd be interested in finding something like that, which can do a secure DOD
erase under z/OS...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gabe Torres
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 17:44
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Other DASD Erase progr
Jim Mulder wrote:
So, when IBM "removed" the function from MVS, they created a "secret
handshake" (available to privileged code only) to allow the loader
itself to continue using the interface? Cute!
The undocumented loader interface has been there at least as long as I
have been here (
Hello List,
I have gleaned the Archives on this subject, and have found NEW ERA's
FAST DASD ERASE, and IBM's DFDSS, ICKDSF and IEBDG.
Is the List aware of any other Vendors or products that offer a solution
($$) to writing over DASD at a DR site?
Our Budget and Accounting processes expect more
Dear IBM-Main Listers,
While trying to print the VSAM Transparency User's Guide, every
occurrence of a pair of parentheses causes
only their contents to print and an immediate page eject. The output is
unusable. I have had similar problems trying to
print a Data Propagator manual.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/28/2005
05:52:46 PM:
> Jim Mulder wrote:
>
> > If this is just a matter of curiosity, surely
> >you old time hackers can do more than speculate. For example,
> >look in the MVS Diagnosis Reference to find the module name called
> >by the IDENTIFY SVC
Jim Mulder wrote:
If this is just a matter of curiosity, surely
you old time hackers can do more than speculate. For example,
look in the MVS Diagnosis Reference to find the module name called
by the IDENTIFY SVC. Find some microfiche older than SP4.3.0., and
read the module prolog.
As alw
On Jun 28, 2005, at 3:00 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
"Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<1100276174-1119943968-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-8203-
@engine143>...
..
Only reference i've found so far is that z/OS 1.4 can coexist
with z/OS 1.5, thru
1.7, but nothing about p
Hi all, I'm at the point where I can start using my Crypto cards(Thanks
to all who helped me out). I currently have my local certificate
authority cert under racf as well as any certs that I signed with it. If
I wanted to move the certs to ICSF do I have to regen them and the
certificates that were
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: IRRDPTAB ?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What is IRRDPTAB and is it needed if we have Top Secret
> instead o
Hi,
What is IRRDPTAB and is it needed if we have Top Secret instead of RACF?
Thanks,
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Thanks for the help this shows a lot of information that I think I will
be able to use for another purpose.
However, it appears that it only shows SVC's that it can determine names
for.
A number of our dynamic SVC's do not show.
The TASID info seems to cover my needs.
Jay Paulson
-Origina
Juan contacted me offline and we resolved this. SUM FIELDS=(30,4,BI) was
being used with a 4-byte ZD field in 30-33 (C'0001') so all of the
X'F0F0F0F0' binary values did indeed overflow. Changing the SUM statement
to SUM FIELDS=(30,4,ZD) gave Juan what he wanted.
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Team (IBM)
If you don't have SHOWMVS, MXI, or TASID installed on your system, try
entering TSO ISPVCALL twice from within ISPF. It should display the active
SVCs on your system. Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Hank Medler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Thanks. This is just what I needed.
I appreciate the help.
Jay Paulson
612-667-9585
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Text message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell Phone: 612-710-3216
>This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
a
TASID has a SVC display. - Miscellaneous displays - SVC list
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jay Paulson
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DYNAMIC SVC QUESTION
I am looking for a way to dis
Try showmvs from CBT or MXI
Project Leader - MVS HIP
32 Old Slip
New York N.Y. 10005
212-806-4054
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jay Paulson
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DYNAMIC SVC Q
I am looking for a way to display the SVC's that are running on our
systems (mainly the dynamically installed ones).
We have a couple of products that do this (i.e. Resolve and CA-EXAMINE).
However, these products don't run on all of our systems.
I mainly want to just know the SVC #'s that are in u
Hi John,
Thanks - just what I was looking for.
Cheers!
<*BobL*>
| -Original Message-
| From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of McKown, John
| Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 1:32 PM
| To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
| Subject: Re: AS/400 iSeri
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lester, Bob
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 2:27 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: AS/400 iSeries listserv
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone know of a list server that offers AS/400,
Hi All,
Anyone know of a list server that offers AS/400, iSeries, I5 topics?
just an old mainframer trying to stay employed!
Thanks!
<*BobL*>
--
This e-mail transmission may contain information that i
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/28/2005
02:53:54 PM:
> In a recent note, Farley, Peter x23353 said:
>
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:10:25 -0400
> >
> > Well, he's not the only graybeard who didn't get that memo. I missed
it
> > too. I just looked it up, and Ed is correct -
In a recent note, Farley, Peter x23353 said:
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:10:25 -0400
>
> Well, he's not the only graybeard who didn't get that memo. I missed it
> too. I just looked it up, and Ed is correct -- IDENTIFY *must* specify an
> address within an already-loaded/fetched/etc. pr
John implicitly raises a question I was going to ask. What the heck is
the security exposure in letting a program define a new entry point in
GETMAIN storage (but not in defining a new entry point in CSECT
storage)?
Especially when it is as easy as John describes to circumvent (or even
easier to c
I thought an oxymoron was an idiot who worked for Armand Hammer.
(The preceeding was a jest, if you don't get it, look up Armand Hammer in
Google. If you don't think its funny you probably don't recognise the pun
as the highest form of humor).
-
Mautalen Juan Guillermo wrote:
>It is probably something very obvious, but i am having a hard time
>figuring out what is wrong...I am trying to use the SUM function
>provided by DFSORT.
>My control statements are, as the documentation indicates, something
>like:
>
>SORT FIELDS=(20,5,CH,A)
>SUM FIE
Thank you for the clarification.
regards, JVD
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archiv
Hi,
It is probably something very obvious, but i am having a hard time
figuring out what is wrong...I am trying to use the SUM function
provided by DFSORT.
My control statements are, as the documentation indicates, something
like:
SORT FIELDS=(20,5,CH,A)
SUM FIELDS=(30,4,BI)
When i run the DFSOR
The "supported" part of "all supported releases" is also important. As
an example, when z/OS 1.6 came out, it co-existed with z/OS 1.3. But
z/OS 1.3 went off support March 2005, so z/OS 1.3 can no longer co-exist
with z/OS 1.6.
Don Imbriale
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Disc
Jim Ladouceur wrote:
If IBM really has changed the coexistence policy to "all supported
releases" then 1.4 will coexist with 1.8 since they've extended the EOS
date for 1.4 to 3/7 and 1.8 will be out 9/6. Can someone please point me
to the doc with the policy change?
As we announced, "Startin
Tonni J Ottosen wrote:
Hi List -
Has anybody gained experience in setting up/using CCL?
Any tips/hints are welcome.
You might find this helpful:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246298.html?Open
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is an old technology, one that is ordinarily used statically, that can
also be used somewhat dynamically to circumvent the security-orient[at]ed
restrictions that have been imposed upon the
use of IDENTIFY proper.
It employs a preassembled n-element transfer vector, each element of which
Thanks, Aaron, this area has already been covered. It's not just the
NOAUTOMOVE stuff, it's also the AUTOMOVE stuff.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mess
In a message dated 6/28/2005 10:49:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This crossed my desk. In case anyone is interested, it's about educating
our replacements...
http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;1954503653;fp;4;fpid;21
Educating my replacement(s) sounds good as
...
If IBM really has changed the coexistence policy to "all supported
releases" then 1.4 will coexist with 1.8 since they've extended the EOS
date for 1.4 to 3/7 and 1.8 will be out 9/6.
...
I never saw that doc either.
And, I follow this quite closely since I am working for a back-levelled shop
This crossed my desk. In case anyone is interested, it's about educating
our replacements...
http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;1954503653;fp;4;fpid;21
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
Craig Kittendorf wrote:
We may be about to upgrade from a 9672-R76 to a z900-104. We are running
z/OS v1.4 with CICS/TS v23, IMS v8, DB2 v7 and various CA, BMC, Compuware,
TMON, and MacKinney products.
What are the gotchas, watchouts, etc. in this upgrade? 64 bit issues?
Yes, you'll move fr
_http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/24/news/fortune500/ibm_india/_
(http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/24/news/fortune500/ibm_india/)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with th
We may be about to upgrade from a 9672-R76 to a z900-104. We are running
z/OS v1.4 with CICS/TS v23, IMS v8, DB2 v7 and various CA, BMC, Compuware,
TMON, and MacKinney products.
What are the gotchas, watchouts, etc. in this upgrade? 64 bit issues?
Thanks,
Craig
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/28/2005
10:18:52 AM:
> Ed Finnell wrote:
>
> >
> >In a message dated 6/28/2005 6:56:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >That might indicate a mismatch between your exit definitions and your
> >MIGLIB. Are you using the
So we'll most likely be asking customers to have MORE page packs (and for
ASM to have to manage them) for a while. This assertion based on my view
(driven by a little experience) that it's a rather good idea to be able to
sustain dumping those large address spaces we're getting used to having.
Mar
"Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hello,
>
> While moving to 3390-9 devices, I want to enlarge our pageds, but am not
> sure of the limits.
>
> From OW54255 I found that the maximum size is now 4GB, if SADUMP must be
> able to process it.
> F
We migrated to z/OS 1.3 couple of years back with ADABAS 713. We
migrated to NATURAL 315 before we upgraded the OS just to be on the
safer side of support. We again migrated from z/OS 1.3 to 1.4 last
november and also an upgrade to z/ARCH processor. Did not face any
problems due to the migration of
If your mounts are marked NOAUTOMOVE, then they will be unmounted when
their owning system goes away. You basically want your system-specific
datasets (/etc/, /var/, /dev/, stuff like that) to be NOAUTOMOVE, as it's
(generally) ok for them to be unmounted. Items like your version root,
sysplex ro
>From OW54255 I found that the maximum size is now 4GB, if SADUMP must be
able to process it.
>From z/OS V1R3.0 DFSMS Access Method Services for Catalogs: 17.1.1 I read
that the maximum size is 16M slots, so 64 GB.
I remember some APARS (sorry don't have the numbers) dealing with LARGE
page ds's
Knutson, Sam wrote:
I think the supposition is that for most people it is easier to deal with
tool output particularly from a supported stable source than to RYO. Some
would say it is sad but for most the programming has long been removed from
"Systems Programmer".
IMHO it's good. At least fo
On 28-Jun-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) wrote:
> Is there something else you are looking for? Some sinister motive perhaps?
>
> As to the Isogon acquisition, I just hope the price comes down to earth.
Nothing sinister. We're pretty much a CA shop but I'm interested in seeing
what will
And it does for me too. I guess I'll retire the old way as BAD.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Eric Chevalier
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: IBM announcement
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:10:45 -0500, Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We recently converted to SYSPLEX OMVS configuration. We have a situation
>where the HFS's for another system are being dismounted when we shut one
>system down. The command sequence is
>1. F BPXOINIT,SHUTDOWN=FORKINIT
>It seems that the systems man made some changes to the zOS to fix this
>problem before he left. He did not say what he did to fix it, and it
>will be a couple of weeks before I can find out what he did.
You not only have a software problem (possibly) you have a management
problem. If you have
I think the supposition is that for most people it is easier to deal with
tool output particularly from a supported stable source than to RYO. Some
would say it is sad but for most the programming has long been removed from
"Systems Programmer".
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson,
Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 6/28/2005 6:56:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That might indicate a mismatch between your exit definitions and your
MIGLIB. Are you using the new exit definitions from z/OS or did you
carry the old definitions forward from OS
On 28 Jun 2005 06:01:45 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) wrote:
>Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters?
How about this link:
http://www.ibm.com/news/usalet/
It seems to get redirected to:
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?infotype=an&infosubt=c
Natasa Savinc wrote:
Russell,
I know that WORM cartridge cannot be re-used once user data is written on
it. But I have a cartridge that was entered in library as PRIVATE (RMM
status USER), and has never been used. So instead of doing eject/enter
again, or delete/define via IDCAMS, I was wonderin
Well, he's not the only graybeard who didn't get that memo. I missed it
too. I just looked it up, and Ed is correct -- IDENTIFY *must* specify an
address within an already-loaded/fetched/etc. program.
Now why'd they go and do that? That means I can't use that old CompSci
trick of compile-to-mem
Richards.Bob wrote:
Steve,
I got *that far* before. It is when I click on an announcement on that page
that the problem occurs.
Bob
Huh. Strange, 'cause it works for me.
Oh well, I see you got your problem solved.
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
-
Steve,
I got *that far* before. It is when I click on an announcement on that page
that the problem occurs.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAM
Filling voids and reducing their own development costs.
Both acquisitions make sense, at least to me. Omegamon is a market leader and
so is SoftAudit. It has helped bolster the Tivoli product suites in both
Performance Management and Asset Management.
Is there something else you are looking for
That way worked, but was a different format than I was used to, Thanks.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Porowski, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: IBM announc
We're currently running Adabas V5R2.4 on z/OS 1.4 in 31, since June 2003,
with no problems.
Marian Gasparovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
06/28/2005 03:21 AM
Please respond to Marian Gasparovic
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc:
Subject
Russell,
I know that WORM cartridge cannot be re-used once user data is written on
it. But I have a cartridge that was entered in library as PRIVATE (RMM
status USER), and has never been used. So instead of doing eject/enter
again, or delete/define via IDCAMS, I was wondering if there is a way to
r
Richards.Bob wrote:
Ken,
I could not get that link to work either.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Porowski, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: IBM announce
In a message dated 6/28/2005 8:19:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is IBM's strategy with these two companies?
>>
They are now IBM properties. The speculation is there will be
a dongled version of a standalone monitor to take care of the
session managers..i
www.ibm.com > News & Newsletters (bottom right) > Announcement letters (under
related links)
Everything I see resolves to a www-306.ibm.com address
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:19 A
It is the address of the newsserver, that you specify in your newsreader's
account info.
E.g. in Outlook Express, you define a News account, on the "Server" tab you
specify this address after: "Server name:", like you would specify someting
like "news.myprovider.com" when using your own provider's
In a message dated 6/28/2005 7:55:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
would you care to elaborate a little bit on 204.153.244.171, please?
i plug that ip address in my browser and only get a message back
saying
page contains no data; i ran a nslookup on that ip address,
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
Steve (C),
if you still need a newsserver, there are a number of totally free
newsservers around on the internet, no subscription needed, usually no
posting allowed, but you don't need this since you must post via email.
If you need one, Google for "free newsservers"
If IBM really has changed the coexistence policy to "all supported
releases" then 1.4 will coexist with 1.8 since they've extended the EOS
date for 1.4 to 3/7 and 1.8 will be out 9/6. Can someone please point me
to the doc with the policy change?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Natasa,
A WORM cartridge cannot be re-used (Write ONCE, Read Many). Once data has
been written on a WORM cartridge, you can only add more data to it (either a
MOD operation to the last file or adding secondary datasets behind it).
Putting a WORM cartridge in SCRATCH status means you have destroyed
Ken,
I could not get that link to work either.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Porowski, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: IBM announcements
Here's what I us
What is IBM's strategy with these two companies?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/arch
success!! thank you!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28-Jun-05 09:02:44 >>>
Instead of http:// use news://
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tuco Bonno
Sent: 28 June 2005 13:55
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Newsgroups (Was Anothe
Here's what I use
http://tinyurl.com/don9f
-Original Message-
Richards.Bob
Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters?
The link I have brings up the first page and when I select an announcement, I
get "Page cannot be displayed" for a www6. url.
It has been th
Mike,
we had an idea to archive some data that way - one copy on one media (EMC
Centera), and another on WORM tape as some kind of backup to the first one.
HSM seemed like a logical choice, because it can fill a tape (but obviously
not WORM), and it has some kind of record keeping capability.
I ha
Instead of http:// use news://
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tuco Bonno
Sent: 28 June 2005 13:55
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Newsgroups (Was Another OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 migration
would you care to elaborate a little
Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters?
The link I have brings up the first page and when I select an announcement, I
get "Page cannot be displayed" for a www6. url.
It has been this way for a few weeks, I think.
Bob Richards
Technologist
Enterprise Technology Infr
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You can have volume full with vtoc free 50% or vtoc full with free
space on the volume.
Nu, so how does that startling revelation help the OP?
It allows the OP to call you at 3 a.m. to inform you of an imminent problem.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
-
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Sure, e.g., FDREPORT, ISPF, PDS85, StarTools.
I'm surprised nobody has offered the obvious way yet - a small assembler
program using LSPACE macro and SVC. Old form reports only free DSCBs,
new form includes free VIRs.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
---
would you care to elaborate a little bit on 204.153.244.171, please?
i plug that ip address in my browser and only get a message back
saying
page contains no data; i ran a nslookup on that ip address, which
returned a
name 'host171.octanews.net' ; when i use *that* in my browser, all i
get is a mes
...
It used to be n-3. When IBM changed z/OS to an annual release schedule,
they also changed the coexistence policy to be "all supported releases".
...
Semantics.
1.4 through 1.7 is N-3 to N.
Do the math. (8-{]}
-teD
(The secret to success is sincerity.
If you can fake that,
you've got it mad
OK, here is the output from the Z/OS 1.4 system:
BPXF041I 2005/06/28 08.42.30 MODIFY BPXOINIT,FILESYS=DISPLAY,GLOBAL
SYSTEM LFS VERSION ---STATUS- RECOMMENDED ACTION
ENGI 1. 1. 6 VERIFIED NONE
SAND 1. 4. 3 VERIFIED NO
On Jun 24, 2005, at 8:42 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
06/23/2005
at 01:33 PM, Bill Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
With FLAG(I,I) which became the default at the same time as DBCS, the
message *does* appear exactly AFTER the line (inserted by the
preprocesso
...
Non-sysplex systems do also communicate and interact (JES, GRS etc. etc.)
and the limitations also apply to that broader level, which include sysplex
systems
...
JES/NJE(P) is not restricted to n-3.
It never has been.
GRS does not communicate outside of an instance of MVS (SYSPLEX is consider
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/26/2005
at 01:38 PM, "Edward E. Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Since when??
My recollection is OS/360 Release 18. Certainly by R20.
Huh?? Which form of IDENTIFY do you believe can be used to create a
major CDE fro
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
