. Thank
you Kees ...
Roger Steyn
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
s to access the proclib
irrespective of DISP=SHR ?
TIA
Roger Steyn
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
hin a JCL having multiple steps . But the
job which had a DISP=OLD in my system had only one step and it was hanging
because someone had opened the logon proc in edit mode and forgot to come out
of the session .
TIA
Roger
You can also look at SMF types 74 , 78 and 30 records (IO related fields )
On Sunday, April 20, 2014 1:38 PM, baby eklavya wrote:
Thanks Lizette and Jake . We are looking into performance reports now ..
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Jake anderson wrote:
> I agree with lizette. I/O repo
John ,
" This talks about the _BPX_SHAREAS environment
variable. This environment variable is not mentioned anywhere in the
documentation of tcsh."
Your are right . BPX_SHAREAS cannot be used for tcsh . It is documented in USS
planning guide .
_BPX_SHAREAS
Specifies whether the spawned chi
Hello David ,
" DB2 support also says set dump services to allow for 16Gb SVC dumps to
accommodate DB2 "
Since you say 16 GB for SVC dumps , you should atleast have a minimum of 48 GB
local page space to start with (that is 1:3 ratio ) When we had to increase
MAXSPACE limit to 16 GB couple of
Hello Jake ,
This actually means "The system could not add the specified path to a path
group."
Is the cable connected properly ? That's the first thing to be checked .
Also look at logrec data Sounds to me like a "no resources" condition over the
control unit . Try these commands
a) D
This is pretty old ... Have seen this several times in the past .
And of course...There are bigger fishes to fry :)
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:57 PM, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
If you have not done so, you can join the RACF newsgroup with this URL
http://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/rac
Thanks gentleman ..That was it . A standalone REORG needs space to hold the new
index and CA suggested us to do ASYNCH REORG . Thank you !
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:07 AM, Roger Steyn
wrote:
Greetings ,
Recently , we had a problem during the REORG of SAR index file . It was
Greetings ,
Recently , we had a problem during the REORG of SAR index file . It was
observed that the index file utilization increases abnormally while the REORG
job runs and comes down once the job completes. In the mean while , if the
utilization crosses 100 % , the job fails and SAR task
Hello,
Was CLPA specified in IEASYSxx when you IPL'd first time ? .If not , that could
lead to a wait 064
If not , I am wondering how you got a wait 064 for syntax error in LPALSTxx .
On Monday, October 21, 2013 3:25 PM, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
Hello,
In my LPALST member,
Baby ,
I thought you are on z/os 1.11 . If that's the case , i dont think you can do
indirect cataloging on VSAM datasets .
Lizette , please correct me if am wrong .
From: Lizette Koehler
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 4
Yes...I was referring to MFX 1.4 ...
From: "Blaicher, Christopher Y."
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
The current Syncsort mainframe sorting produc
Yes . That would work fine in the case of scheduled jobs . But in our
shop,there is one more challenge that we have a lot of Auto-sched jobs (jobs
that are trigerred externally from an MQ server ). And i do not know how many
of them use tape sorting . This makes the task more difficult .
That's correct Martin . It is the tape sort work datasets that are not
supported . Syncsort support says that they have a new function called MAXSORT
in the new release which has replaced the tape sort feature due to poor
performance .
Ravi ,
You wouldn't be having SYNCTAPE load library wit
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2 and would like to upgrade it to new
version 1.4 . In the new release v1.4 , it no longer supports tape sorting .
Hence it becomes necessary that i have to identify all the jobs which are
currently using this feature and have them converted bef
Take a look at the APAR OA22623 . This is pretty old one , but worth reading
Thank you,
Roger
From: "Vernooij, CP - SPLXM"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: MAXSPACE and central storage
I don't think performan
P=SHR,DSN=
//SYSIN DD *
SRCHFOR '
SRCHFOR '
...
SRCHFOR '
//*
Cheers, Chris Poncelet
Roger Steyn wrote:
>Hello Lizette ,
>
> Thanks for quick response
ns up
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Roger Steyn
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SRCHFOR command
Greetings ,
I know this is a silly question . Unfortunately I am not
Greetings ,
I know this is a silly question . Unfortunately I am not good at ISPF and needs
some help to fix a problem .
I have a problem with SRCHFOR command in ISPF . Normally , when a srchfor
command is issued by passing a string in 3.4 , it returns a response 'String(s)
found" or "not fou
As someone said , java is a pretty simple install . the program directory has
everything documented . you really don't need a senior systems programmer's
expertise to do this . you can read through and complete the install yourself .
But if you need any suggestions , we are always here to help .
thats correct . MVS-OE is the one for OMVS
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: OMVS OEDIT invocation help?
In
,
on 06/20/2013
at 07:00 PM, "Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN"
said:
>Is t
That's a nice article . Thanks Chris !
From: Chris Brooker
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: XCF / GRS
Hi Augie,
You may already now about this, but the GRS team wrote a Hot Topics Article
that outlines the cha
23 matches
Mail list logo
