On 12/16/09 11:07 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
>> Yes, I wrote requirements. IBM even read them. SMOP. Someday. Play the
> Alan
>> "show us the business case" tape. Curtain. Two encores. Film at 11.
>
> Putting RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH calls in the IBM subsystems is, in fact, on
> the to-do list.
Gu
On Wednesday, 12/16/2009 at 09:21 EST, David Boyes
wrote:
> :grump.
>
> On 12/16/09 5:03 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
>
>
> > So. You had to push the Do Not Push button? ;-) You are painting
with a
> > too-wide brush. "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. When
choosing an
> > ESM, you n
:grump.
On 12/16/09 5:03 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> So. You had to push the Do Not Push button? ;-) You are painting with a
> too-wide brush. "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. When choosing an
> ESM, you need to assess, aside from cost:
*sigh*
While your points are well argued, I
I thought that being a CMS bigot was the first prerequisite for being on this
list :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> - Command syntax. Not. :-) I give high marks to VM:Secure
> for CMS bigots.
Hi, Barbara.
I've had good luck with the IBM system management products, with the
exception of the Archive Manager, which I haven't used at all. IBM
Support is also very good, imho.
I'd be more than happy to discuss this with you in more detail off-list,
if you'd like. Happy Holidays.
On 1
On Wednesday, 12/16/2009 at 02:13 EST, David Boyes
wrote:
> The CA products are significantly more expensive, but are substantially
more
> polished and functional. If you go CA, seriously consider VM:Secure as
well
> -- it's dramatically better than RACF/VM if you don't need to share a
> databa
2009 3:01 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Recommendation on Backup product for z/VM
Hi David,
Here's the mod to HCPDDR in all it's glory:
./ I 56317202 $ 56317702 500 11/28/07 15:19:06
* TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION MODIFICATIONS START HERE PART 1/
CA's VMBackup HiDRO does everything except Linux file-level backups. We
use it here to backup CMS minidisks, SFS, and full DASD images. As a
bonus, it has a standalone module for bare metal DR restores. It will
backup and restore whole Linux volumes but as stated before, the Linux
instance better b
...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: December 16, 2009 14:56
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Recommendation on Backup product for z/VM
> What you use for backup depends on how you use the system. Do you have
> lots of CMS users, or do you just use CMS for VM and Linux
> What you use for backup depends on how you use the system. Do you have
> lots of CMS users, or do you just use CMS for VM and Linux
> administration? With lots of CMS users, you will need a file level
> backup program, such as VM:Backup.
Or if you plan to use any of the newer goodies in VM like
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Barbara Andrews
Sent: December 16, 2009 13:53
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Recommendation on Backup product for z/VM
We are looking for a replacement to our current backup method
The CA products are significantly more expensive, but are substantially more
polished and functional. If you go CA, seriously consider VM:Secure as well
-- it's dramatically better than RACF/VM if you don't need to share a
database with z/OS any more.
Too bad TSM/VM isn't really viable any more. T
We are looking for a replacement to our current backup methods and are
looking for recommendations. We are currently running several Linux
virtual machines on two VM LPARs and have been backing these up, as well
as our VM system volumes, via our z/OS system using ADRDSSU. We also use
TSM to
13 matches
Mail list logo
