I'm just wondering about quantities of disk space that concern people.
Is 30GB noticeable - or in the noise?
--henry schaffer
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.
Mark writes:
> ...
> > And if they're
> > running Windows (as I would guess most may be), then wouldn't using X or VNC
> > would be equally "difficult" or "easy"?
>
> Not at all. It's much easier to run vncviewer on Windows than it is to try
> and get X running.
On Windows PuTTY is easy and do
John McKown writes:
> ... I mainly script in UNIX using Perl due to familiarity. And because
> I love regular expressions. ...
Regular expressions are a very powerful tool - and well integrated
into Perl - but there is a learning curve. I learned a lot about them
from Unix and Perl books - but
David writes:
> > Does anyone have any experience with WPS on zLinux as an alternative to
> > SAS?
>
> Depends on what you want to do. If all you use SAS for is report generation
> and various small amounts of data munging, then it's probably maybe OK. If
> you use any of the analytics functions
Scott writes:
> I've got 2+2=4 locked in myself :-)
Isn't that this a specific case, and your patent really is of "+" ?
--henry schaffer
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
David writes:
> ...
> 1) They're counting only RHEL and SLES. Doesn't count Ubuntu, which
> seems to power most of the netbooks ...
FWIW, I recently bought an ASUS eee PC900 and it runs Debian. I think
they've sold a lot of netbooks.
--
--henry schaffer
---
David Andrews writes:
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:37 -0400, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
> > PuTTY fork called KiTTY that was just recently
> > updated. It has all the PuTTY features (since it is a fork from it) and
> > more:
>
> ... plus a nasty limitation. From their website:
>
> "KiTTY is only des
Erik writes:
> ... Right now Microsoft has a choice. Rework M$
> Office such that it will happily and effectively inter-operate with
> other office productivity suites, or stop selling M$ Office in Europe.
> Difficult decision, since an inter-operable M$ Office is an M$ Office
> your company can
Dodds, Jim wrote:
> ... So now we are planning on spending close to $200,000 on Dell
> hardware and Microsoft server software. ...
Has any looked at reliability? Some hardware/sofware combinations are
boringly reliable, some not so. Does anyone care?
--henry schaffer
---
Tomasz writes:
> I have a file on Unix server. When I transfer that file from Unix to Linux
> using FTP - I'm getting file with the same size.
> When I use SFTP, I'm getting file smaller by 79 bytes. The file has 79
> lines.
> That file is then FTP from Linux to z/OS - using FTP batch job on z/O
Lea writes:
> Inefficiency? Aren't all interpretive languages inefficient by
> definition versus compiled languages?
Maybe, it depends.
Many interpreted languages call well coded / compiled routines, so the
majority of the execution time very well may be in the routines. (Think
APL. :-)
I
John writes:
> David Andrews wrote:
> > According to TIOBE
> > (http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html)
> > Ruby is the 10th most popular programming language today.
> And rising, 9th today.
> > Java is #1 and COBOL is #15. Check it out and see where
> >
Kevin R writes:
> Sounds like too little, too late to me.
The release of Symphony may be much less significant that IBM's
involvement in OpenOffice.org
I often use Star / Open Office and its an excellent set of
productivity tools. In my experience its main downside is that
sometimes it has t
Dave writes:
> From the IBM-MAIN list:
>
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/11/technology/11novell.html?ref=business
> >
> >"In the 102-page ruling, the judge, Dale A. Kimball, also said Novell
> >could force SCO to abandon its claims against I.B.M."
Perhaps the best place to read all the det
John Summerfield writes:
> ...
> btw, not every implementation if vi is equal, vile is well-named, nvi is
> ok, vigor is an enhanced nvi, but my favourite is vim, because there's a
> GUI version of it (and a build for Windows).
I agree about vim - it's what vi should have been :-) (and probably
I'm not sure I know what is a "railroad diagram" and don't have the
Pascal book handy (hey, I don't learn every new language which comes
along. :-)
Are there links to URLs which show/explain these things?
--
--henry schaffer
John writes:
> I want to find the first comment line that begins with a target string
> in column 1 (#target) and replace only that first target line with
> another string.
> There are multiple lines that begin with #target.
>
> I've struck out with sed (not that I know sed).
>
> Any quick hints on
John Summerfied writes:
> ...
> I have not heard of any failed Intel or AMD CPUs in a very long time.
> Accompanying system components such as RAM, disks, NICs, yes, but not
> the CPU itself. The systems I use are built to be cheap; one can have
> greater reliability for a greater price. I imagine
On my Sun/Solaris I'm running VIM version 6.3 and it handles (as I
wrote earlier) both vim -o test1 test2 and vim -o3 properly.
My Intel/Linux runs version 6.3.71 (from the Fedora distribution) and
does exactly the same thing. (vim -h only says 6.3)
--henry schaffer
---
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:30:54AM -0700, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
> The quoted documentation corresponds to my understanding to the -o
> option. As I stated in my question: vim -o file1 file2 should open
> two windows, one with file1 and the other with file2. It doesn't do
> that on the Intel Linux
20 matches
Mail list logo
