Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
helper/include/odp/helper/icmp.h | 11 ++
helper/include/odp/
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
platform/linux-generic/include/odp/api/debug.h
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/traffic_mngr.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/pool.h | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/classification.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:26 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <pet
and then it can be pulled forward to master.
>
> -Petri
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Bill
> > Fischofer
> > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 1:35 AM
> > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.o
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>I looked at the shmem pool APIs for allocating smaller chunks of
> shared memory. Following are the APIs I am looking at:
>
> odpdrv_shm_pool_create
> odpdrv_shm_pool_destroy
>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <
dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Add proper handling for errors returned by odp_packet_copy_from_pkt().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org>
>
Reviewed-by: Bil
I. However linux-generic
> testsuite was not updated to call script instead of binary, resulting in
> test failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org>
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> /** Email
nnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org>
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> helper/cuckootable.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/helper/cuckootable.c b/helper/cuckootable.c
> index 80ff498..0d46300 100644
> -
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> Dmitry, please name patches as API-NEXT PATH v5, not as API-NEXT.
>
API-NEXT PATCH v5
>
> Maxim.
>
>
> On 19.04.2017 16:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/classification.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/traffic_mngr.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
platform/linux-generic/include/odp/api/debug.h
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/classification.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
helper/include/odp/helper/icmp.h | 11 ++
helper/include/odp/
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/pool.h | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952 by adding
additional field documentation to avoid problems with doxygen 1.8.13
and higher.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/api/spec/traffic_mngr.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Bill and Maxim,
> It is my understanding that discussions on the following patches
> from V2 series have been concluded and they can be merged to API-NEXT.
>
>
esult. Threat only segfault as actual error. Linaro CI
> will still do full test.
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../
See comments below based on today's discussions.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Matias Elo wrote:
> Add fields to odp_pool_info_t for maximum number of packets of any length,
> maximum number of minimum length packets, and maximum number of maximum
> length packets.
>
>
Do I understand this patch correctly that it attempts to run the test and
if it fails for any reason other than a segfault and we are running in
Travis that it is then just ignored? That seems reasonable.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> ping. If
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Bill
> > Fischofer
> >
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2942 by adding
casts needed to avoid compilation failures when using clang 4.0.0
included in Ubuntu 17.04, which is stricter than clang 3.8.1 which
is in Ubuntu 16.10.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the special enum for
> feature support levels (unsupported/supported/preferred).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 14.04.2017 17:35, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> Perhaps something like:
>>
>> typedef enum odp_feature_t {
>> ODP_FEATURE_UNSUPPORTED = 0,
>
4.2017 16:25, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Bala Manoharan
>> <bala.manoha...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Regards,
>>> Bala
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 April 2017 at 16:52, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linar
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Bala Manoharan
<bala.manoha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Regards,
> Bala
>
>
> On 14 April 2017 at 16:52, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> &l
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the special enum for
> feature support levels (unsupported/supported/preferred).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Next version should be marked API-NEXT, whether or not it is still an
RFC since IPsec APIs cannot move to master until we have a complete
implementation / validation test suite.
I realize this is an RFC, but it doesn't apply to the current api-next:
Applying: linux-gen: ipsec: draft IPsec
For this series: Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
This should still have Honnappa's review as well.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Petri Savolainen
<petri.savolai...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Added capability information about maximum number of queues
> and
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:57 PM
>> To: Savolainen, Petri
Ping. This patch seems to have stalled. Does it need revision or just a review?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 February 2017 at 00:56, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
<matias@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 22:52, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Matias Elo <matias@nokia
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Krishna Garapati
<balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Balakrishna Garapati <balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org>
>
> /Krishna
>
> On 13 April 2017 at 13:48, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
&
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> I vote for default build will not build with deprecating support. Yes all
> general propose distributives will need to enable --enable-deprecated-api
> to support some old software. But developers who work with git
Reported-by: Krishna Garapati <balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
v2:
- Incorporate changes suggested by Krishna
- Added Reported-by attribution
include/odp/arch/default/api/abi/packet.h | 7 +--
.../include/
Thanks. v2 sent.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Krishna Garapati
<balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 13 April 2017 at 00:06, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> When running in --enable-abi-compat=yes mode, all ODP typ
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
include/odp/arch/default/api/abi/packet.h | 7 +--
.../include/odp/api/plat/packet_inlines.h | 21 ++---
.../include/odp/api/plat/packet_types.h | 10 ++
platform/linux-g
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Matias Elo wrote:
> On some packet pool implementations the number of available packets may vary
> depending on the packet length (examples below). E.g. a packet pool may
> include
> smaller sub-pools for different packet length ranges.
I'm
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 04/06/17 00:16, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2779 by checking
>> the return code from odph_eth_addr_parse() and failing the call if
>
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2779 by checking
the return code from odph_eth_addr_parse() and failing the call if
dst_mac is unparseable.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Don't forget to free(local) (Maxim comment)
e
rg>
> wrote:
>> rechecked this patch and it fails:
>> https://travis-ci.org/muvarov/odp/jobs/217195437
>>
>> Maxim.
>>
>> On 02/08/17 04:04, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>> I've done a fair amount of experimentation with using variants of
>&g
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 00:45, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> Regards,
>> Bala
>>
>>
>> On 12 April 2017 at 10:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12.04.2017 17:24, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 12
Based on today's ARCH call, this seems to be a good approach, with
some slight wording clarification (noted below)
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Added capability information about maximum number of queues
> and queue sizes. Both are
This patch seems orthogonal to the rest of this series. Shouldn't this
be a separate patch?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Matias Elo wrote:
> There is no need to fail if the requested burst length is larger than the
> maximum supported. Simply use the maximum supported
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12.04.2017 15:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
<honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 10 April 2017 at 11:49, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> <honnappa.nagaraha...@
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 12.04.2017 14:50, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov [mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org]
>>> Sent:
I've added this to today's ARCH call agenda.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 12.04.2017 13:15, Joe Savage wrote:
> The problem is that when we discussed this patch on ODP call people very
> worry about having 128bit instructions in ODP
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Petri, whom review is needed for that?
We currently have conflicting approaches to this from Petri and
Honnappa. They need to come to some consensus on this to move forward.
>
> Maxim.
>
> On 11 April 2017 at
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> Hi Bala,
> Continuing the discussion from the call, as I mentioned in the
> call today, the queues need to hold all kinds of events and not just
> packets. The events need not be defined by ODP
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> Added size parameter indicating the maximum number of events in the
> queue and the corresponding queue capability changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
>
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 7 April 2017 at 14:06, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Kevin Wang [mailto:kevin.w...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 11:45 AM
>> To:
Thanks for your note Mario. As an aside, please subscribe to the ODP
mailing list otherwise I have to approve each post you make manually,
which will only add delay. Please see
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp for that. We also
have a weekly public call on Tuesdays at 15:00 UTC
t;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 3:53 PM
>> To: Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <janne.pelto...@nokia.com>
>> Cc: lng-odp-forward <lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
>
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Janne Peltonen <janne.pelto...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Update ABI spec with the new IPsec event type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janne Peltonen <janne.pelto...@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
&g
lainen <petri.savolai...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h b/include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h
> index b
;>>>>
>>>>> ev = odp_queue_deq(queue);
>>>>>
>>>>> buf = odp_buffer_from_event(ev);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!odp_buffer_is_valid(buf)) {
>>>>>
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 6 April 2017 at 13:48, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>>> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:54:10 +0200
>>> From: Ola Liljedahl
>>> To: Brian
equence, so the thread holding
the current sequence always gets the lock when it asks for it and all
others wait. So lock inversions are impossible with ordered locks
because inversions can only happen when it's unpredictable who gets
which lock. In the case of ordered locks that sequence is
We should also take into account Barry's earlier RFC for adding public
key support. See http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/4985/ as this
is closely related to this RFC.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Kartha, Umesh wrote:
> Thanks for comments, please go through my
<balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> since v1: Fixed the extra blank line
> platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am| 1 +
> platform/linux-generic/include/odp_errno_define.h | 26
>
Bala, any idea when this can advance from the RFC stage to a real patch?
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Bala Manoharan
wrote:
> Regards,
> Bala
>
>
> On 6 April 2017 at 00:53, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:54 AM,
Resolve Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2779 by checking
the return code from odph_eth_addr_parse() and failing the call if
dst_mac is unparseable.
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
---
example/l3fwd/odp_l3fwd_db.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions
Adding Barry to the to list since I'm not sure if he follows the ODP
mailing list and this was something he raised.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Verma, Shally wrote:
> from yesterday meeting minutes , I see a note on this feedback on compression:
> Consider adding
Garapati
<balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org> wrote:
> makes it easy to define odp_errno to dpdk rteerrno and fixes
> linking issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Garapati <balakrishna.garap...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.or
Environment is Ubuntu 16.10.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Bill Fischofer
<bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> This is running on my desktop x86:
>
> ./bootstrap
> ./configure --enable-schedule-scalable --enable-cunit-support
> make
> cd test/common_plat/
017 at 16:12, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> When I compile configure this without --enable-schedule-scalable the
>> scheduler validation test runs normally, however if I enable the new
>> scheduler I get this output:
>>
>>
>> ...
>&
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang
> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
> ---
> platform/linux-generic/include/odp_packet_internal.h | 3 +++
> platform/linux-generic/odp_packet.c
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang
> Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl
> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 04/04 23:07:32, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 22:51, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> > On 04/04 22:01:23, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> >> On 04/04/17 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> >>> Remove erroneous assertion that is handled
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 04/04 21:59:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl
>> > Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
>> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Bill Fischofer
<bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> This is clearly orthogonal to this patch series. Ideally you should
> (a) Create a Bug to represent this, (b) Post the fix patch noting the
> Bug URL in the commit log, and (c) update the Bug ent
This is clearly orthogonal to this patch series. Ideally you should
(a) Create a Bug to represent this, (b) Post the fix patch noting the
Bug URL in the commit log, and (c) update the Bug entry with the URL
of the patch that fixes this bug.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Brian Brooks
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 04/04 23:02:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 22:48, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> > On 04/04 21:57:29, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> >> On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 04/04 14:53:23, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On 04/04 21:55:06, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> >> thi
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 04/04 15:20:06, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On 04/04 14:22:25, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> >> On
When I compile configure this without --enable-schedule-scalable the
scheduler validation test runs normally, however if I enable the new
scheduler I get this output:
...
CUnit - A unit testing framework for C - Version 2.1-3
http://cunit.sourceforge.net/
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Bill Fischofer
<bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 04/04 22:17:48, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>>> On 04/04/17 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote:
>>> >
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 04/04 22:17:48, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 21:48, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl
>> > Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
>> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 04/04 14:22:25, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> >> Signed-
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 04/04 14:11:45, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> This part has already been merged into the repo and should be removed
>> from this series as it cannot be applied since it's already part of
>> api-
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 04/04 21:55:06, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> this patch should be not part of this serries and can go to master as
>> standalone patch.
>
> Can you help to cherry pick such patches to master? They need to remain
> in this
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 04/04/17 21:47, Brian Brooks wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Brooks
>> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> ---
>> include/odp/api/spec/queue.h | 5 +
>> 1
This part has already been merged into the repo and should be removed
from this series as it cannot be applied since it's already part of
api-next.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> From: Ola Liljedahl
>
> Signed-off-by: Ola
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 03.04.2017 23:13, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Hell
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was hunting last issues in my IPsec patchset. And suddently I was hit
> by the fact that I do not fully understand semantics around
> odp_ipsec_result() function. So here comes several
For the v4 series:
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Petri Savolainen
<petri.savolai...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Added configuration option for inbound SPI range (for
> lookups). Removed unique SPI requirement and add
>
> Fixes https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2910
>
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo <matias@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> V2:
> - Improved commit log (Maxim)
>
> helper/iplookuptable.c | 8
> 1 file changed
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Added capability information about maximum number of queues
> and queue sizes. Both are defined per queue type, since
> plain and scheduled queues may have different implementations
> (e.g. one uses HW while
This patch is incomplete. Since you're adding a max_size, we need to
add a test for that. If an implementation says the max size of a queue
is n (n > 0) then we have to attempt to allocate a queue of that size
and verify that trying to add an n+1st element to it will fail.
Otherwise, we shouldn't
Au revoir! It was great working with you and I hope our paths will
cross again. Best wishes for your future success.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
> Sad to see you go Christophe, it really was energizing to work with you.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mar 31, 2017
gt; Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: after repairing test logic make distcheck failed due to
> missing targets. Added what was needed.
>
> test/common_plat/performan
bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> From: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> --
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 03/28 18:50:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> <!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left:
>> #80 2px solid; } -->
>>
>
401 - 500 of 3841 matches
Mail list logo