On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I chose C-Next and C-Prior for cua.bind because this is what mozilla
uses for tabs, but we can use something else (C-tab?) if there is some
existing standard.
The CUA standard is to use C-F6 and C-S-F6 for this, so you might want to
add those.
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars But is not just about resolving, but also about confirming that
|
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg The catch is what everybody above means. E.g. for bug 830, I
Georg am not a member of the set everybody.
You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
JMarc
Asger == Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Asger On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I chose C-Next and C-Prior for cua.bind because this is what
mozilla uses for tabs, but we can use something else (C-tab?) if
there is some existing standard.
Asger The CUA
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett On Mac OS X, cmd` (M-`) and cmdshift` are for next and
Bennett previous windows, respectively. (cmdtab and
Bennett cmdshifttab cycle among applications; opttab
Bennett (C-tab) is generally the same as tab alone.)
This is what I will add
Angus Leeming wrote:
The only problem is, 'Nach' and 'Bis' should be encoded in the 'German'
language.
Ok Ok ;-)
Georg
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.10.04 22:30:09:
Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest to leave validation to validating parsers, or,
if you want to validate, then use an external one,
Unfortunately it's not about validating but about producing parsable DocBook.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
Dumb question (but meant seriously): Why does such a list exist at all? Is
it documented somewhere on the bugzilla pages?
Georg
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
Georg Dumb question (but meant seriously): Why does such a list exist
Georg at all? Is it
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Am Montag, 18. Oktober 2004 16:24 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I really do not like the idea to use en.po whereas the user has set
for example LC_ALL=C. This really seems like a hack to me.
Georg Ok, you convinced me. An additional
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.10.04 23:17:04:
it is not that simple! The underscore may very well be allowed in the value of an
ID attribute, at least in SGML! This quite tricky subject is dealt in:
character _ not allowed in value of attribute ID
Andreas Vox wrote:
Well, if Chris wants to, he can of course do it. He just wont be able to produce
LyX documents which produce references which contain the new characters :-P
And if Chris manages to convince the DocBook stylesheet guys to include his
change to the SGML declaration, I'll be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Users have privileges. I have the privilege of changing users
privilege :) It is like for cvs access, we grant it as needed.
I am not sure it would be a good thing to allow everybody to confirm
bugs.
Since everybody in this context means everybody with a bugzilla
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
There is more to it than you think. here is a scenario:
- Labels become filenames:
http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/labels-as-filenames.html
- The first version of the document goes online.
- Search engines crawl and
Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is more to it than you think. here is a scenario:
...
Leave it to the SGML parser. The parser will complain - if it has to.
I understand your argument now.
What about this approach:
* change the default for new labels from sec:blabla to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
| bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
|
| Georg Dumb question (but meant
What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to EPS,PSTEX_T
in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX 1.3.x, because the
included EPS figure is not moved.
One solution is to reference the EPS figure in the
Andreas Vox wrote:
If you ask me, LyX should only export
1.) the original graphic file
2.) a PNG / JPG / PDF version, whatever is most appropiate
3.) Ghostscript EPS-wrappers for the above
Then LyX could have export *options* for
4.) Full EPS files to produce PS without Ghostscript
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
- Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is out.
First I understand your point, second the problem is precisely the
opposite
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 13:39:58:
What about this approach:
* change the default for new labels from sec:blabla to sec.blabla
(yes, right now LyX _leads_ the user to have non-standard ids! )
* have a document setting enforce standard SGML/XML ids
* use the
Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I always overwrite the standard label, so I never minded that
sec:blabla is illegal.
You want to bet how many documents with these labels are out there? :-)
Your solution is acceptable for me. But please don't make the setting
enforce standard
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:39:56PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
- Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is out.
First I
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to EPS,PSTEX_T
in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX 1.3.x, because the
included EPS figure is not moved.
...
If
Andreas Vox wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to
EPS,PSTEX_T in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX
1.3.x, because the included EPS
Jos Ablio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It violates the principle you asked for it, you got it.
That is not your principle.
What You See Is What You Mean (not What You Get).
We also have the principle You don't have to be a LaTeX initiate
to use LyX. I think this should
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas So if I ask nicely I could get the permission to change bug
Andreas status? :-)
Andreas Well then, I wouldn't mind ...
You have this permission now.
JMarc
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:36:55PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It violates the principle you asked for it, you got it.
That is not your principle.
What You See Is What You Mean (not What You Get).
We also have the principle
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Since everybody in this context means everybody with a
Georg bugzilla account: How big is the risk that somebody creates an
Georg account just for destroying bugzilla information? I really
Georg don't know.
It is not a problem of people
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
Andreas Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
Andreas to outsmart all possible converters ...
Yes, I really think we should not try to be too smart (and I am guilty
of that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andreas Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
Andreas Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
Andreas to outsmart all possible converters ...
Yes, I really think we should not try to be too smart (and I am
guilty of that sometimes).
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andreas Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
Andreas Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
Andreas to outsmart all possible converters ...
Yes, I really think we should not try to be
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternative A)
Leave the xfig file where it is and force all converters to
understand a '-d' flag for the output directory.
Nope. Bad idea for all sorts of reasons. The main one being that you
are using the directory in which your important files
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Andreas Vox's recently stuff for example (I still
think LyX can one day be an excellent DocBook editor)
| blush/
| So you didn't see the bugs which crept in?
| (No, I'm not talking about spurious spaces! ;-) )
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Since everybody in this context means everybody with a
Georg bugzilla account: How big is the risk that somebody creates an
Georg account just for destroying bugzilla information? I really
I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many polygons
that first draw the 'background' polygons and then overwrite them
with the 'foreground' ones.
Does anyone know of a utility that would strip the 'overwritten'
polygons from the file, to reduce file size etc?
--
Angus
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
(It's the specificness that you don't like, right?)
/Christian
--
Andreas Vox wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternative A)
Leave the xfig file where it is and force all converters to
understand a '-d' flag for the output directory.
Nope. Bad idea for all sorts of reasons. The main one being that
you are using the directory in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
| But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
| (It's the specificness that you don't like,
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many polygons
| that first draw the 'background' polygons and then overwrite them
| with the 'foreground' ones.
| Does anyone know of a utility that would strip the 'overwritten'
| polygons from
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many
| polygons that first draw the 'background' polygons and then
| overwrite them with the 'foreground' ones.
| Does anyone know of a utility that would strip the
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 15:24:00:
Well...that's precisely what happened to me, believe it or not.
My documents worked with underscores in the labels, then I upgraded
DocBook, openjade and the rest - and suddenly they did not work.
But then it
Chris Karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that I have thought a bit about it (and read your message a lot of times),
I come to believe that I prefer both solutions, yours and Andreas' one.
They are not mutually exclusive, so they could be implemented both.
I would then have the option to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Hmmm. I don't think I am suggesting 'too smart'. I'm
suggesting Angus that we augment these tokens understood by the
converters
Angus string const token_from($$i); string const
Angus token_base($$b); string const token_to($$o); string const
Angus
Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 18:47:26:
Something like this Document settings-SGML:
enforce valid SGML/XML ids (yes,no): yes
if yes, additional allowed chars:.:_
what you have in mind?
Second input field would be disabled if answer to first one is no,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:46:45PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
Something like this Document settings-SGML:
enforce valid SGML/XML ids (yes,no): yes
if yes, additional allowed chars:.:_
what you have in mind?
Second input field would be disabled if answer to first one is no,
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04 19:16:13:
The idea is getting better.
But I don't like the idea of a document dialog. This is an option for docbook,
not for the document. Read bellow what I propose.
You propose to control everything through that CNAME
Am Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2004 21:11 schrieb Chris Karakas:
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.10.04
19:16:13:
I propose thus that all the configuration goes in the textclass,
where it
belongs in my humble opinion:
I agree.
Maybe from some standpoint it belongs
Am Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2004 13:56 schrieb Angus Leeming:
What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to EPS,PSTEX_T
in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX 1.3.x, because the
included EPS figure is not
Georg Baum wrote:
Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
As I understand it, this means that fig2pstex.sh, which is supposed to
convert from fig to pstex, modifies its input. I don't like that. Please
enlighten me if this is a misunderstanding.
No, you understand right. The alternative is
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Maybe from some standpoint it belongs there. But it is not user-friendly
to expect the user to tweak layout files, IMHO.
IMHO if a user can modify his SGML declaration he can as well edit layout
files. The nonexpert user will
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:45:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
what I want (future stuff) is to have a nice xml file format, that is
expressive enought to produce docbook, latex, ascii etc. from. With no
direct support inside the LyX binary for this to happen.
Ah, XSLT, right?!
john
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:17:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
Kayvan,
Thanks alot, that would be great. I'm happy to compile it myself, but I seem to
have some sort of problem with my cygwin installation. Do you need to do
anything particular to get it to compile under cygwin?
Thanks,
Rod
On Oct 19, 2004, at 4:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is what I will add to mac.bind. OK?
\bind C-grave buffer-next
\bind C-asciitilde buffer-previous
Sounds good!
Bennett
LyX developers:
I've noticed several instabilities concerning the math editor and
subscripts/superscripts. In the following, I give the recipe for one crash
and one odd behaviour of LyX 1.3.5 (also happens in 1.3.4):
CRASH:
* Math-display.
* type ab, for example.
* LEFT CURSOR, so that
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I chose C-Next and C-Prior for cua.bind because this is what mozilla
> uses for tabs, but we can use something else (C-tab?) if there is some
> existing standard.
The CUA standard is to use C-F6 and C-S-F6 for this, so you might want to
add
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> | Lars> But is not just about resolving, but also
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> The catch is what "everybody" above means. E.g. for bug 830, I
Georg> am not a member of the set "everybody".
You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
JMarc
> "Asger" == Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I chose C-Next and C-Prior for cua.bind because this is what
>> mozilla uses for tabs, but we can use something else (C-tab?) if
>> there is some existing standard.
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Mac OS X, ` (M-`) and ` are for next and
Bennett> previous windows, respectively. ( and
Bennett> cycle among applications;
Bennett> (C-tab) is generally the same as alone.)
This is what I will add to mac.bind. OK?
\bind
Angus Leeming wrote:
> The only problem is, 'Nach' and 'Bis' should be encoded in the 'German'
> language.
Ok Ok ;-)
Georg
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.10.04 22:30:09:
>
> Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suggest to leave validation to validating parsers, or,
> if you want to validate, then use an external one,
>
> Unfortunately it's not about validating but about producing
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
> bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
Dumb question (but meant seriously): Why does such a list exist at all? Is
it documented somewhere on the bugzilla pages?
Georg
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
>> bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
Georg> Dumb question (but meant seriously): Why does such a list exist
Georg> at
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Montag, 18. Oktober 2004 16:24 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> I really do not like the idea to use en.po whereas the user has set
>> for example LC_ALL=C. This really seems like a hack to me.
Georg> Ok, you convinced me. An
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.10.04 23:17:04:
>
> >
> > it is not that simple! The underscore may very well be allowed in the value of an
> > ID attribute, at least in SGML! This quite tricky subject is dealt in:
> >
> > character "_" not allowed in value of
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Well, if Chris wants to, he can of course do it. He just wont be able to produce
> LyX documents which produce references which contain the new characters :-P
>
> And if Chris manages to convince the DocBook stylesheet guys to include his
> change to the SGML declaration,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Users have privileges. I have the privilege of changing users
> privilege :) It is like for cvs access, we grant it as needed.
>
> I am not sure it would be a good thing to allow everybody to confirm
> bugs.
Since "everybody" in this context means "everybody with a
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
>
> There is more to it than you think. here is a scenario:
>
> - Labels become filenames:
>
> http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/labels-as-filenames.html
> - The first version of the document goes online.
>
> - Search engines
Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is more to it than you think. here is a scenario:
...
> Leave it to the SGML parser. The parser will complain - if it has to.
I understand your argument now.
What about this approach:
* change the default for new labels from "sec:blabla" to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >> You can now. Of course, we want to add more people to the list of
| >> bugzilla helper. So if you want to help, ask now!
|
| Georg> Dumb
What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to EPS,PSTEX_T
in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX 1.3.x, because the
included EPS figure is not moved.
One solution is to reference the EPS figure in the
Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> If you ask me, LyX should only export
> 1.) the original graphic file
> 2.) a PNG / JPG / PDF version, whatever is most appropiate
> 3.) Ghostscript EPS-wrappers for the above
>
> Then LyX could have export *options* for
> 4.) Full EPS files to produce PS without
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
> >
> > - Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is "out".
>
> First I understand your point, second the problem is precisely the
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 13:39:58:
>
> What about this approach:
>
> * change the default for new labels from "sec:blabla" to "sec.blabla"
> (yes, right now LyX _leads_ the user to have non-standard ids! )
> * have a document setting "enforce standard SGML/XML ids"
>
Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I always overwrite the standard label, so I never minded that
> "sec:blabla" is illegal.
You want to bet how many documents with these labels are out there? :-)
> Your solution is acceptable for me. But please don't make the setting
> "enforce
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:39:56PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
> José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 13:32:21:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote:
> > >
> > > - Somebody in the DocBook committee decided that underscore is "out".
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
< What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
< improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to EPS,PSTEX_T
< in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX 1.3.x, because the
< included EPS figure is not moved.
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> < What to do if the XFig picture *includes* an EPS figure? Our new,
> < improved handling of the conversion of such XFig files to
> EPS,PSTEX_T < in the tmp directory doesn't work as it did in LyX
> 1.3.x, because the <
Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It violates the principle "you asked for it, you got it".
>
> That is not your principle.
> What You See Is What You Mean (not What You Get).
We also have the principle "You don't have to be a LaTeX initiate
to use LyX". I think
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> So if I ask nicely I could get the permission to change bug
Andreas> status? :-)
Andreas> Well then, I wouldn't mind ...
You have this permission now.
JMarc
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:36:55PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
> José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > It violates the principle "you asked for it, you got it".
> >
> > That is not your principle.
> > What You See Is What You Mean (not What You Get).
>
> We also
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Since "everybody" in this context means "everybody with a
Georg> bugzilla account": How big is the risk that somebody creates an
Georg> account just for destroying bugzilla information? I really
Georg> don't know.
It is not a
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> < Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
Andreas> Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
Andreas> to outsmart all possible converters ...
Yes, I really think we should not try to be too smart (and I am
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andreas> < Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
>
> Andreas> Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
> Andreas> to outsmart all possible converters ...
>
> Yes, I really think we should not try to be too smart (and I am
> guilty of that
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andreas> < Is such a strategy possible? Thoughts?
>>
Andreas> Looks like this is getting a mess. This looks as if LyX has
Andreas> to outsmart all possible converters ...
>> Yes, I really think we
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
< > Alternative A)
< > Leave the xfig file where it is and force all converters to
< > understand a '-d' flag for the output directory.
<
< Nope. Bad idea for all sorts of reasons. The main one being that you
< are using the directory in which your
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I like Andreas Vox's recently stuff for example (I still
>> think LyX can one day be an excellent DocBook editor)
>
|
| So you didn't see the bugs which crept in?
| (No, I'm not talking about spurious spaces!
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Since "everybody" in this context means "everybody with a
> Georg> bugzilla account": How big is the risk that somebody creates an
> Georg> account just for destroying bugzilla
I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many polygons
that first draw the 'background' polygons and then overwrite them
with the 'foreground' ones.
Does anyone know of a utility that would strip the 'overwritten'
polygons from the file, to reduce file size etc?
--
Angus
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
> don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
(It's the specificness that you don't like, right?)
/Christian
--
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> < > Alternative A)
> < > Leave the xfig file where it is and force all converters to
> < > understand a '-d' flag for the output directory.
> <
> < Nope. Bad idea for all sorts of reasons. The main one being that
> you < are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> And I also admit that I don't want LyX as a DocBook editor, just as I
>> don't want LyX as a LaTeX editor.
>
| But do have anything against LyX being able to produce DocBooks?
| (It's the specificness that you don't
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many polygons
| that first draw the 'background' polygons and then overwrite them
| with the 'foreground' ones.
>
| Does anyone know of a utility that would strip the 'overwritten'
| polygons
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have some PostScript files of structures made up of many
> | polygons that first draw the 'background' polygons and then
> | overwrite them with the 'foreground' ones.
>>
> | Does anyone know of a utility that would
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 15:24:00:
>
> > Well...that's precisely what happened to me, believe it or not.
> > My documents worked with underscores in the labels, then I upgraded
> > DocBook, openjade and the rest - and suddenly they did not work.
>
>
Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
< Now that I have thought a bit about it (and read your message a lot of times),
< I come to believe that I prefer both solutions, yours and Andreas' one.
<
< They are not mutually exclusive, so they could be implemented both.
< I would then have the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Hmmm. I don't think I am suggesting 'too smart'. I'm
> suggesting Angus> that we augment these tokens understood by the
> converters
>
> Angus> string const token_from("$$i"); string const
> Angus> token_base("$$b"); string const token_to("$$o");
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 18:47:26:
>
> Something like this Document settings->SGML:
>
>enforce valid SGML/XML ids (yes,no): yes
>if yes, additional allowed chars:.:_
>
> what you have in mind?
> Second input field would be disabled if answer to first one
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:46:45PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> Something like this Document settings->SGML:
>
>enforce valid SGML/XML ids (yes,no): yes
>if yes, additional allowed chars:.:_
>
> what you have in mind?
> Second input field would be disabled if answer to first one
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.10.04 19:16:13:
>
> The idea is getting better.
> But I don't like the idea of a document dialog. This is an option for docbook,
> not for the document. Read bellow what I propose.
>
You propose to control everything through that
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
