Re: spellchecker

Am Samstag, 25. August 2018 09:26:27 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > Depends: python (>= 2.6), libaspell15 (>= 0.60.7~20110707), libc6 (>= > > 2.14), libenchant1c2a (>= 1.6.0), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.0), libmagic1 (>= 5.12), > > libqt5core5a (>= 5.6.0~beta), libqt5gui5 (>= 5.2.0) | libqt5gui5-gles

Re: spellchecker

On 08/25/2018 03:33 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 24.08.2018 23:53, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Wolfgang, I'm a Mint user. I suggest you start in the Software Manager (which you can find in the Mint menu). Search for "Enchant" and, if not installed, install it there. (Using the software

Re: spellchecker

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 09:00:48AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 24. August 2018 23:12:18 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak > : > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > > > just checked, but build-dep lyx is not found by synaptic and checking for > > >

Re: spellchecker

On 25.08.2018 05:12, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: just checked, but build-dep lyx is not found by synaptic and checking for build-dep gives: W: Target Translations (multiverse/i18n/Translation-en) is configured multiple times in

Re: spellchecker

On 24.08.2018 23:53, Paul A. Rubin wrote: On 08/24/2018 02:23 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 08:00 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I reinstalled LyX under Linux

Re: spellchecker

Am Freitag, 24. August 2018 23:12:18 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > just checked, but build-dep lyx is not found by synaptic and checking for > > build-dep gives: > > > > W: Target Translations

Re: spellchecker

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > just checked, but build-dep lyx is not found by synaptic and checking for > build-dep gives: > > W: Target Translations (multiverse/i18n/Translation-en) is configured > multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:3 and >

Re: spellchecker

On 08/24/2018 02:23 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 08:00 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I reinstalled LyX under Linux and want to get its spellchecking

Re: spellchecker

On 08/24/2018 08:23 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 08:00 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I reinstalled LyX under Linux and want to get its spellchecking

Re: spellchecker

On 08/24/2018 08:00 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 08/24/2018 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I reinstalled LyX under Linux and want to get its spellchecking capability. Hi Wolfgang, How did you install LyX? Custom

Re: spellchecker

On 08/24/2018 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I reinstalled LyX under Linux and want to get its spellchecking capability. Hi Wolfgang, How did you install LyX? Custom compile? If so, CMake or Autotools? I compiled LyX

Re: spellchecker

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:10:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > I reinstalled LyX under Linux and want to get its spellchecking capability. Hi Wolfgang, How did you install LyX? Custom compile? If so, CMake or Autotools? If you used a pre-compiled binary, was it from your distro's repo or

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

It would appear that on Sep 2, Scott Kostyshak did say: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:52:13PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > > > Ticket #10357 (new enhancement) > > > > How did I do? > > Looks good! I removed the keywords since we use a fixed set, which is > described here: >

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:52:13PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > It would appear that on Aug 31, Scott Kostyshak did say: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:39:34PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > > > > Please tell me that I'm not looking at (3 x 3 = 9) nine trac tickets > > > here... > > > >

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

It would appear that on Aug 31, Scott Kostyshak did say: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:39:34PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > > Please tell me that I'm not looking at (3 x 3 = 9) nine trac tickets here... > > Good point. I don't have general advice on what topics should be > grouped. If they

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:39:34PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > Please tell me that I'm not looking at (3 x 3 = 9) nine trac tickets here... Good point. I don't have general advice on what topics should be grouped. If they are topics that shoudl be addressed all at once and it would be silly to

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

It would appear that on Aug 31, Scott Kostyshak did say: > Hi Joe, > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:22:43PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > > > Hi, First let me say I'm addicted to LyX for composing almost anything I > > care about. > > It helps keep me from fat fingering multiple spaces

Re: spellchecker keybindings {Find next, Ignore & aDd} conflict with {File, Insert & Document}

Hi Joe, On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:22:43PM -0400, Joe Philbrook wrote: > > Hi, First let me say I'm addicted to LyX for composing almost anything I care > about. > It helps keep me from fat fingering multiple spaces between words etc... And > lets me set screen > font sizes I can see without

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Here the version: LyX 2.1.3 (2015-02-05) > > Built on Feb 12 2015, 11:01:23 > > Configuration > > Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu > > Special build flags: build=release > This comes from official repos and has no

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Thanks.Liviu, However, I do not understand Step 1 On the PPA's overview page How do I get this overview page? Wolfgang If you're using the most recent version of Ubuntu (or any version from Ubuntu 9.10 onwards), you can add a PPA to your system with a single line in your terminal. *Step 1:*

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Thanks.Liviu, > > However, I do not understand Step 1 > On the PPA's overview page > How do I get this overview page? > This is the PPA Overview page: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Am 03.09.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Thanks.Liviu, However, I do not understand Step 1 On the PPA's overview page How do I get this overview page? This is the PPA Overview page:

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Am 03.09.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am 03.09.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Thanks.Liviu,

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Am 03.09.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Liviu Andronic: >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks.Liviu, >>> >>> However, I do not understand

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Am 03.09.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am 03.09.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am 03.09.2015 um

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Am 03.09.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Liviu Andronic: >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 03.09.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Liviu Andronic:

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Have you tried apt-get --purge -f from a terminal window? (see for example http://askubuntu.com/questions/438345/how-to-remove-install-a-package-that-is-not-fully-installed ) Regards Jes 2015-09-03 21:17 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann : > > > Am 03.09.2015 um 21:05

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Am 03.09.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Liviu Andronic: >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 03.09.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Liviu Andronic:

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Jes and Liviu, both proposals did not work. Will try on another list. Thanks for taking your time. I appreciate it. Wolfgang Am 03.09.2015 um 21:47 schrieb Jes Drost Nissen: Have you tried apt-get --purge -f from a terminal window? (see for example

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > the spellchecker for my kubuntu 14.04 can not be selected. > Under Preferences>Language settings>Spellchecker > the Spellchecker engine box v can not be klicked (grayed out) > same with the other menu items

Re: spellchecker kubuntu 14.04

Here the version: LyX 2.1.3 (2015-02-05) Built on Feb 12 2015, 11:01:23 Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags: build=release C++ Compiler: g++ (4.8) C++ Compiler LyX flags: C++ Compiler flags: -O2 Linker flags: Linker user flags: Qt 4 Frontend: Qt 4 version:

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 23-03-15 om 08:38 schreef Michael Berger: On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 23-03-15 om 08:38 schreef Michael Berger: On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 23-03-15 om 08:38 schreef Michael Berger: On 03/22/2015 03:36 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: I don't exactly understand what you mean by start Lyx with a clean configuration but this is what I tried: lyx saves its configuration in the folder .lyx in your home directory. Back it up and delete this folder and you get a clean start. Then try

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

03/21/2015 10:56 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks like something is wrong in your

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

03/21/2015 10:56 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: I don't exactly understand what you mean by start Lyx with a clean configuration but this is what I tried: lyx saves its configuration in the folder .lyx in your home directory. Back it up and delete this folder and you get a clean start. Then try

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks like something is wrong in your

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

03/21/2015 10:56 PM, Cor Blom wrote: Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: I don't exactly understand what you mean by "start Lyx with a clean configuration" but this is what I tried: lyx saves its configuration in the folder .lyx in your home directory. Back it up and delete this folder and you get a clean start. Then

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 22-03-15 om 14:57 schreef Michael Berger: PS: neither did 'sudo' work in that ordinary console BTW: This is strange. What you also could try is make a new user on your system, log in with that user and try lyx and console there. To me it looks like something is wrong in your

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are written in English and/or German. I

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are written in English and/or German. I

Re: Spellchecker has no dictionaries

Op 21-03-15 om 19:00 schreef Michael Berger: Dear all, Lyx Preferences Path is set to: Hunspell dictionaries: /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell contains: en_US.aff en_US.dic de_DE.aff de_DE.dic User interface language: English My documents are written in English and/or German. I

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson wrote: > Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of > the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had > reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said

Re: Spellchecker

It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Spellchecker

William, Have you tried introducing some deliberate some deliberate errors into the last half to see how spellcheck behaves then? Gordon. On 22/12/13 19:13, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: I'm trying to run the

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? You

Re: Spellchecker

Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said that there were no more errors, I would have understood. All is well. Thanks.

Re: Spellchecker

It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Spellchecker

William, Have you tried introducing some deliberate some deliberate errors into the last half to see how spellcheck behaves then? Gordon. On 22/12/13 19:13, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: I'm trying to run the

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? You

Re: Spellchecker

Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said that there were no more errors, I would have understood. All is well. Thanks.

Re: Spellchecker

It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:

Re: Spellchecker

William, Have you tried introducing some deliberate some deliberate errors into the last half to see how spellcheck behaves then? Gordon. On 22/12/13 19:13, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson wrote: I'm trying to run the

Re: Spellchecker

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM, William Hanson wrote: > It's 2.0.5.1. In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion > that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no > more errors in the remainder of the document. Is that plausible? >

Re: Spellchecker

Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of the document. I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't. If it had said that there were no more errors, I would have understood. All is well. Thanks.

Re: Spellchecker

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words. It stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the document, and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning. I've tried

Re: Spellchecker

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote: I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words. It stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the document, and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning. I've tried

Re: Spellchecker

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson wrote: > I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words. It > stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the document, > and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning. I've tried

Re: spellchecker: solved

Am Thursday, 5. September 2013, 09:39:40 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott I have compiled lyx 2.0.6 again and the spell checking works

Re: spellchecker: solved

Am Thursday, 5. September 2013, 09:39:40 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott I have compiled lyx 2.0.6 again and the spell checking works

Re: spellchecker: solved

Am Thursday, 5. September 2013, 09:39:40 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: > Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your > > configure log? > > > > Scott I have compiled lyx 2.0.6 again and the spell

Re: spellchecker

Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott Thanks, David and Scott where would I find the configure log file and is it still available after quite some time after installation?

Re: spellchecker

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott Thanks, David and Scott where would I

Re: spellchecker

Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott Thanks, David and Scott where would I find the configure log file and is it still available after quite some time after installation?

Re: spellchecker

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott Thanks, David and Scott where would I

Re: spellchecker

Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your > configure log? > > Scott Thanks, David and Scott where would I find the configure log file and is it still available after quite some time after

Re: spellchecker

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Am Wednesday, 4. September 2013, 19:32:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your > >> configure log? > >> > >> Scott > > > > Thanks, David and Scott

Re: spellchecker

How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Hello, I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker working; however select

Re: spellchecker

On 09/04/2013 01:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Hello, I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker working; however select TOOLS, PREFERENCES, LANGUAGE SETTINGS, SPELLCHECKER. is greyed out; therefore I can not select enchant or other spellchecker, which I

Re: spellchecker

How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Hello, I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker working; however select

Re: spellchecker

On 09/04/2013 01:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Hello, I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker working; however select TOOLS, PREFERENCES, LANGUAGE SETTINGS, SPELLCHECKER. is greyed out; therefore I can not select enchant or other spellchecker, which I

Re: spellchecker

How did you install 2.0.6? Did you compile? If so, can you post your configure log? Scott On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker > working; however > > >

Re: spellchecker

On 09/04/2013 01:30 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Hello, I am using lyx 2.0.6 on debian and tried (again), to get the spellchecker working; however select TOOLS, PREFERENCES, LANGUAGE SETTINGS, SPELLCHECKER. is greyed out; therefore I can not select enchant or other spellchecker, which I

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working I used this

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

Am 25.05.2013 um 16:21 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de: Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working I used this note:

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working I used this

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

Am 25.05.2013 um 16:21 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de: Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working I used this note:

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > >> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > > > > > > With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working > > >

Re: spellchecker -- was: missing libhunspell prevents starting lyx

Am 25.05.2013 um 16:21 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann : > Am Saturday, 18. May 2013, 08:57:28 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > > > With my newly installed lyx 2.0.6 I did not get the spellchecker working > > I used

Re: Spellchecker

en_US.aff and en_US.dic are both in /usr/share/hunspell EK On 08/24/2012 02:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel • Recompiled and reinstalled

Re: Spellchecker

en_US.aff and en_US.dic are both in /usr/share/hunspell EK On 08/24/2012 02:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel • Recompiled and reinstalled

Re: >Spellchecker

en_US.aff and en_US.dic are both in /usr/share/hunspell EK On 08/24/2012 02:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel • Recompiled and reinstalled

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, UD ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote: I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original question, but it did not work. My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries, and

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, UD ehud.kap...@gmail.com wrote: I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original question, but it did not work. My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries, and

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, UD wrote: > I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original > question, but it did not work. > My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make > contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries,

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original question, but it did not work. My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries, and that when I run lyx it is that version (from /usr/local/bin) that is

Re: Spellchecker

Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel • Recompiled and reinstalled lyx 2.0.4 • Told lyx that the spellchecker to use was Enchant (when I tried to use hunspell, it

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original question, but it did not work. My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries, and that when I run lyx it is that version (from /usr/local/bin) that is

Re: Spellchecker

Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel • Recompiled and reinstalled lyx 2.0.4 • Told lyx that the spellchecker to use was Enchant (when I tried to use hunspell, it

Re: Spellchecker-- AGAIN

I tried removing ~/.lyx and restarting Lyx before I posted my original question, but it did not work. My suspicion is that the compiled-from-source lyx somehow failed to make contact with the spellchecker and dictionaries, and that when I run lyx it is that version (from /usr/local/bin) that is

Re: >Spellchecker

Am 24.08.2012 um 20:21 schrieb UD: > Success-- although the progress towards it was rather tortuous. > • I compiled and installed hunspell-devel > • Recompiled and reinstalled lyx 2.0.4 > • Told lyx that the spellchecker to use was Enchant (when I tried to > use hunspell, it

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >