Had a myriad of crazy issues lashing together my test unit for this..
Somehow I ended up with a tape of level converters where the first three
were good all the rest (dozens) are counterfeit..
Anyway, the serial trace is identical to what I posted before, but here is
the behavior I am seeing shown
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:18 PM Brian White wrote:
> Dang, TS-DOS is specifically requesting the name "ROOT", which means I
> have to make PDDuino use that, and you can't have a real directory named
> ROOT.
>
> There is a macro or const you can edit in the main .ino to change that
> from "SD: "
Dang, TS-DOS is specifically requesting the name "ROOT", which means I have
to make PDDuino use that, and you can't have a real directory named ROOT.
There is a macro or const you can edit in the main .ino to change that from
"SD: " to "ROOT ".
Probably won't affect UR2 but if it's baked into
>
> I always had the idea that there could be a whole raft of virtual files
> that don't actually exist but that could be used to issue commands or
> return data like RTC time etc, like /proc /sys etc. They could even be in
> their own virtual sub dir. The dir could even be invisible where it isn't
>> That is strange. Remember, UR2 works with a real tpdd which has no such
thing as a current directory label, and as well, the whole point of the UR2
stub on-demand loader is that you don't have TS-DOS installed, either ram
or rom.
I'm probably not articulating what I'm trying to say right, it's
bkw
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021, 9:48 PM Brian Brindle wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:34 PM Brian K. White
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> master actually? or latest default branch which is not master but 0.4.1?
>> I didn't have master marked as default currently because I thought I had
>> made it worse,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:34 PM Brian K. White wrote:
>
>
> master actually? or latest default branch which is not master but 0.4.1?
> I didn't have master marked as default currently because I thought I had
> made it worse, you know like the partly-broken point mid-way in a
> refactor, so I made
On 7/12/2021 4:34 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
On 7/12/21 7:23 AM, Brian Brindle wrote:
I agree on the risk with the USB ports, you wouldn't typically design
something like this. But I appreciate the out of the box thinking
that got me past that. The current limiting etc can easily be done in
the
On 7/11/21 8:13 AM, Brian Brindle wrote:
Then you go and pop a USB jack on the BC port
I missed my que, what I meant to say was "THERE ARE NO RULES.
ELECTRONICS IS THE PURGE."
--
bkw
On 7/12/21 7:23 AM, Brian Brindle wrote:
I agree on the risk with the USB ports, you wouldn't typically design
something like this. But I appreciate the out of the box thinking that
got me past that. The current limiting etc can easily be done in the end
device, and that's what I choose to do.
July 11, 2021 2:33 PM
> *To: *m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject: *Re: [M100] A decent replacement for M100 "Feet"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021, 8:14 AM Brian Brindle wrote:
>
> > I didn't think anyone else was actually trying them out.
>
>
&
ly 11, 2021 2:33 PM
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] A decent replacement for M100 "Feet"
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021, 8:14 AM Brian Brindle wrote:
> I didn't think anyone else was actually trying them out.
BKW - I just assumed the MountT was wildly popular based on how sim
On 7/11/2021 1:33 PM, Brian White wrote:
Jim Brain did some work on it and the idea didn't work out, but there
is a lot he did that are good ideas that I'd been meaning to cherry
pick. Actually I already did some of that.
I think the master branch of my work should be fine to merge into the
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021, 8:14 AM Brian Brindle wrote:
> > I didn't think anyone else was actually trying them out.
>
> BKW - I just assumed the MountT was wildly popular based on how simple and
> awesome it was. I'm genuinely jealous that I didn't think of it.. I'll be
> honest, there is something i
> I didn't think anyone else was actually trying them out.
BKW - I just assumed the MountT was wildly popular based on how simple and
awesome it was. I'm genuinely jealous that I didn't think of it.. I'll be
honest, there is something in my training/experience that was like DO NOT
HOOK THINGS UP W
On 7/9/21 4:21 PM, Peter Vollan wrote:
You'll have to explain what that is past the printer and serial ports.
https://github.com/bkw777/MounT
https://github.com/bkw777/BCR_Breakout
https://github.com/bkw777/PDDuino
I didn't think anyone else was actually trying them out.
--
bkw
On Fri, 9 Jul
Haha, no - not Jim Brian but I appreciate the association. That's a MountT
on the BC port for power and a PDDuino TPDD Emulator on the RS232 port,
built from the info on the git repository.
I've been having a blast playing with the PDDuino over the last few months.
Learned more about the TPDD pro
looks like the old rubber doorstops.
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=door+stop&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
On Friday, July 9, 2021, 04:01:02 PM EDT, Brian Brindle
wrote:
I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local Barnes
and Noble the other day. I am slightly embarrassed to
f *Alex
> ...
> *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2021 4:42 PM
> *To:* m...@bitchin100.com
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] A decent replacement for M100 "Feet"
>
>
>
> Fancy!
>
>
> I just cut a BIC pen tube in half and stuck them in the screw holes. Works
> great.
>
>
I just love a cheap lo-tech solution!
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Alex ...
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 4:42 PM
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] A decent replacement for M100 "Feet"
Fancy!
I just cut a BIC pen tube in half
Fancy!
I just cut a BIC pen tube in half and stuck them in the screw holes. Works
great.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:01 PM Brian Brindle wrote:
> I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local
> Barnes and Noble the other day. I am slightly embarrassed to admit that I
> paid
what's plugged into your computer? I guess a USB connector for power? and
a backpack?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:25 PM Jerry Davis wrote:
> Well that looks like an awesome accessory. One of those, "Why didn't I
> think to look for one of those?", moments. I want to try one of those.
>
> Jerry
Well that looks like an awesome accessory. One of those, "Why didn't I
think to look for one of those?", moments. I want to try one of those.
Jerry
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 3:01 PM Brian Brindle wrote:
> I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local
> Barnes and Noble the
You'll have to explain what that is past the printer and serial ports.
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 13:01, Brian Brindle wrote:
> I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local
> Barnes and Noble the other day. I am slightly embarrassed to admit that I
> paid $12 for it but also
I do like how simple that is, and I have been annoyed that my plastic
legs are never exactly the right length and the unit always rocks a
little until I spend a minute adjusting. And one loose part is better
than 2 loose parts.
I like it.
And I recognize them add-ons ;)
Did you build them or
I found this thing called a "Laptop Foot" at the checkout of my local
Barnes and Noble the other day. I am slightly embarrassed to admit that I
paid $12 for it but also I've been very happy with how it works so...
It's just the one wedge, you pop it under the back of the M100 and it just
sort of t
26 matches
Mail list logo
