On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:57:56PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:46:19PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > ...
> > And this is the big difference between lpd and LPRng. With LPRng you
> > can specify who can use what of those printers even if al
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:04:57PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:30:51AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >>On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:15:11PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> >The difference between lpd and LPRng
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0100, knitti wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > of philosophy. Linux is about making all kinds of toys work in a
> > hot-plug way and allow people to boast about their uptime. OpenBSD is
>
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:38:38PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> I had a hard drive die and used the chance to move to 4.2. Since the
> 'new' machine is of the same vintage as the one it replaced, I expect it
> to start grinding to a halt soon, too.
>
> Is there a way to copy one entire hard drive
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:30:51AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:15:11PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > Any strong opinion on LPD vs LPRng vs CUPS issue? I am not a
> > professional system administrator and there is way too much Linux and
> > CUPS around me for my
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:27:16PM -0800, new_guy wrote:
> Darren Spruell wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sadly, justifying the obvious through these means is often a requirement.
> >
> > Here's an approach you might consider. Take a best practice /
> > standards guide such as from NIST:
> >
> > http://www.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:35:31AM -0800, new_guy wrote:
> Aaron Martinez wrote:
> >
> > can you log in using single user mode?
> >
> > boot> boot -s
> >
> > then change it?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > I forgot to mention the box was headless. I had to return to the site. I
> > was hoping there wa
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:23:55PM +1100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:26:04 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> >
> >Perhaps there needs to be a new fork: OldBSD: Unix for the Ages.
>
> s/Ages/Aged/ ??
>
> Given that I joined IBM in 1962, I am allowed to ma
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:11:55PM +0100, ropers wrote:
> On 06/11/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is using a larger disk in the example a problem? Using a 20G disk makes
> > the point of showing how usable the system is even on a small disk, but
> > 20G disks don't really exist anym
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:54:45AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Sep 25 10:11:04, Joel Knight wrote:
> > --- Quoting Jan Stary on 2007/09/25 at 15:48 +0200:
> > > afterboot(8) mentions /altroot, which is a nice feature.
> > >
> > > But you only learn about /altroot when you read afterboot(8).
> > >
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:55:42PM -0500, Wade, Daniel wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Unangst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 11/5/2007 7:43 PM
> To: Wade, Daniel
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: avail mem is only 66% of real mem
>
> >>On 11/5/07, Wade, Daniel
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:16:39PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:06:21PM -0500, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > Thank you. I also have a need to be able to write UTF-8 on my non-X
> > systems. Do you have any thoughts on the matter?
>
> We don't have a console that supports utf8
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 07:47:27PM +, Adrian Fisher wrote:
> How much modern computer hardware is fully open source or at least has fully
> open interfaces that allow anyone to create device drivers? I Sun and
> another company (Anglo-Italian firm Simply-RISC) released a processor based
> on S
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:45:36AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> >From the replies I got (none of which actually answered my question) it looks
> like the "nice" state might be a state where the nice value != 0. Or less than
> zero would also make sense. But it could be also that OpenBSD has the
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:03:31PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:41:35AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > --- Paul Irofti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:22:53AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > > > On 11/1/07, Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 02:58:42PM +0100, Przemys?aw Pawe?czyk wrote:
>
> I dloaded the file from two different servers.
> Here's what I got running md5sum:
>
> 1) MD5s for downloaded files
> md5sum install42.iso
> 03dc43a1d18d3003843a1f13b3861917 install42.iso
>
> Just for checking:
> md5sum c
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:11:01AM -0400, bofh wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if nobody makes really good hardware then there's nobody to reward
> > for it, so you end up buying bad hardware and rewarding the maker for
> &g
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:53:38PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> Martin SchrC6der wrote:
> > 2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?
> >
> > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> > (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (I
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:31:31PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> It's a pretty simple concept, really.
> A few years ago, I was giving a talk at a local high school. One of
> the students asked me why his computer crashed a lot, "why can't they
> build an operating system that doesn't crash?". I
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 05:34:17PM -0400, bofh wrote:
> Why would you do that? Go read The Software Conspiracy. The author,
> Minasi, got, on the record, interviews from VPs of development at
> Microsoft, Netscape, Sun, Oracle, etc basically saying that they don't
> give a shit about lousy soft
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:59:43AM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Where are the choices for non-x86?
> > >
> > > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> > > (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
> >
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:38:51PM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &g
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Well, there is no solution. 16 was chosen a lot of years ago as a
> > &
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I'm running an OpenBSD server with a lot of users and project groups.
> > Each project has its own group or two to protect it's files from other
> > users.
> >
> > How do you guys usually solve this problem when user needs to be
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:39:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> While those factors do exist, the biggest factor is probably that the
> clocking parts are supplied by the lowest bidder, and there is no need
> to be higher quality than the competition. Leaky capacitors? Who
> cares. Tantalum a
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:37:02PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote:
> On 25/10/2007, at 8:28 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
>
> >You are in charge of getting four ambassadors to a meeting. As
> >well as making sure they are happy and fed, you are in charge of
> >their security.
> >
> >All four are hat
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:07:59PM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> > only an idiot would think that separatey
> > physical machines would NOT increase security
>
> Many IBM PCs vs IBM mainframe
Apples and oranges. When people compare one box to many, they're
talking about the same arch of box.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:55:14PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a new Dell Optiplex 745 with an Intel Core 2 Duo.
> >
> > this system completed the install. Now on boot it hangs after:
> > wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
> >
> > the only issue I had during i
After enjoying the Xen thread, and the comments about the horrid mess
that is x86 hardware design, I'm wondering what hardware on which
OpenBSD will run _is_ well designed.
Who makes a hardware architecture that is open (enough) that OpenBSD can
run fully on it, that has good performance. I'm ass
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:35:39PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> On 2007 Oct 23, at 5:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Virtualization seems to have a lot of security benefits.
>
> ``Seems'' is the key word, here.
>
> On hardware like an IBM mainframe that can acutally support what's
> necessar
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:15:03PM +0100, Richard Wilson wrote:
> I appeal to the PF masters for some education on how to do something,
> because if I can't work out how to do it using PF, I'll have to do it
> with iptables. Eep!
[snip the details]
> That's about it really. If I can get it to wor
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:19:21AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Richard Toohey wrote:
> > > On 19/10/2007, at 8:12 PM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X BSD bits have the same
> > > sort of outcome.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:55:03PM +, Mike F wrote:
>
> is there a similar "logwatch" program as in other linux systems
What do you mean by _other_ linux systems. This isn't a linux system.
:)))
Doug.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:39:59PM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 19:34 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > I need to look something up in a catalog. The catalog doesn't come
> > in print. I phone the supplier, they say look on the web. Its in
> >
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:21:36PM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Aaron W. Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/10/16, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi, I have read the man pages of afterboot, sendmail, and also looked
> > > > at /usr/share/sendmail/README. I also have tri
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:32:21PM +0930, Edwards, David (JTS) wrote:
> I was hoping to use physical lables on the USB disks
> with labelled USB cables but I've just found out during
> testing that the connection between a USB device and a
> physical cable is not as simple as I first thought.
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:52:27AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/10/16 16:10, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
> > A peculiar thing I noticed with many ports is they need different versions
> > of
> > autoconf installed (set through the AUTOCONF_VERSION variable) - so in the
> > end, my system
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Oct 15 09:16:39, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Well, at least I know that I'm not alone in needing to use flash to get
> > real work done (not for games or other time-wasters). Which means that
> > for any bo
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:31:51AM -0500, Robert C Wittig wrote:
> Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> >Perhaps the best, but not the only. Flash i all over the net.
> >E.g to see the weather forecasts from the Swedish Meteorology
> >and Hydrology Institute (SMHI), you need Flash 8. Just a few
> >months ago yo
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:50:36PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Sean Darby a icrit :
> > I should add... there seems to be a NetBSD variant, "BPG", though I am not
> > sure of the reliability of that (does anyone here use it?).
> >
> Last time i checked (a year ago) bpg was stalling, I had a
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:36:33PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:57:18PM -0400, Kevin Stam wrote:
> > However, it is also worth noting that some typical desktop needs and uses
> > are incompatible with the focus of OpenBSD. There are currently no video
> > cards that p
graph, with VLC.
So, if you've had great movie experiences with OpenBSD, what video card
do you use, what driver, at what resolution, full screen, deinterlaced
(blend)?
> On 10/11/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've been evaluating OpenBSD as a
I've been evaluating OpenBSD as a desktop system while learning about it
on my lesser (older) hardware. I've learned a lot and will continue to
learn about OpenBSD but I don't think it will work as my primary
desktop.
Based on what I've learned here on Misc, I'd like to start a discussion
about
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:09:35PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > In Debian amd64 Etch (stable), there is no way to use flashplayer (a
> > 32-bit binary plugin that requires a 32-bit browser. To use it, you
> > have to set up a 32-bit chroot. It ne
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:49:24PM +0200, Christopher Bianchi wrote:
> Hello everyone. My situation is this:
> i've a laptop, a Sharp pc-ax10 with Windows 2000 preinstalled , without
> cdrom, floppy. I wish install OpenBSD on it. Naturally bios can't boot
> from USB.
> So i've thinked to boot the b
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:44:05AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 10/9/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is this? Is there a security reason why the kernel is
> > single-thread; is it OBSD resource limitations (no developer time, no
> > hardw
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:51:26PM +0200, Tilo Stritzky wrote:
> I just got a brand new office PC, 64bit CPU. But I'm stuck with some
> Apps in i386 compatibility. So I installed i386 for work. Next week I'm
> going to get an USB stick and put an amd64 install on it, for play :)
>
In Debian amd
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:35:30PM +0200, Nico Meijer wrote:
>
> Somewhat OT, but I used a different approach, as I had enough IDE disks
> lying around. I got myself an external USB enclosure with swappable
> HDD brackets.
>
> Then, of course, the POS device broke, but that's not the point I am
>
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 04:50:10PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
>
> In response to the recent "easter egg" in 4.2's song, I asked about
> some possible meaning behind the "11 1010101" bit and only ended
> up more confused as a result of what one individual provided in their
> replies.
>
> Could a
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:03:18PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-09 19:34]:
> >> then, an i386 kernel should perform considerably better than amd64 for
> >> firewalling/routing/...
> >
> > That is surprising. What is the reason?
>
> we dunno really. i
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:14:53AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:10 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
> > The only thing I would use that 486 for would be an X client, with a
> > good graphics card, a router, or as a command line tinkering system.
>
> Yes, a 486 is still plenty
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:03:41PM +0200, G?bri M?t? wrote:
>
> There'll be two main servers, a web server and a sql server. We have to
> insert a timestamp and a signature in the specified rows of tables.
> Periodically the sql server will make pdf documents from the data and we
> have to sign an
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:39:57AM -0300, Marcus Andree wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a 486DX
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my
> > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB
&g
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:45:30PM +0200, G?bri M?t? wrote:
>
> A service will gather data in a database and this data has to be signed
> and timestamped for security reasons, and the archives of these data are
> also need to signed and timestamped. The data will be used for internal
> purposes, s
gt; Sorry i wasn't totally specific. Yes, later on the reciever need to
> verify the timestamp. I was looking for an oss application but couldn't
> find any for timestamping.
>
> Douglas A. Tutty ?rta:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:21:53PM +0200, G??bri M??t?? wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:40:25PM -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 11:50:40 Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> > Here's what I'm thinking:
> >
> > wd0 (1.1 GB drive):
> > a100 MB /
> > b128 MB swap
> > c1.1
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:28:52PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
> I think the project is always in need of money. There's no steady
> supply of incoming cash except for the (dropping) CD sales etc. Always
> try to persuade your employer to donate if they're using OpenBSD or
> OpenBSD-derived soft
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:21:53PM +0200, G??bri M??t?? wrote:
> I've read a lot about timestamping a document, but dunno how it works in
> practice. How can i apply a timestamp to a digitally signed or encrypted
> document? Like i encrypt or sign a document with gnupg, but before the
> process how
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:23:03AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/2/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > As he Joined Yahoo Bangalore to his horror he found that the desktop
> &
Hello all,
I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my
P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB
drive.
I'm on dialup and would like to avoid a bad partitioning decision
requring a whole new install/download cycle (I'm on slow dialup).
The
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:10:59AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One of my best friends who was working with me for about 5 years
> > recently got job in Bangalore.
> > He had repeatedly turned down my offer to teach him OpenBSD and even
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 08:47:04AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Markus Hennecke wrote:
>
> >As it won't probe on port 0x2e8 it will not find it. Thats why it was
> >disabled, the probe will have negative effects on other hardware.
> >
> >Greetings
> > Markus
>
> that's what
I currently have OBSD running on my P-II with an 850 MB drive and 64 MB
ram. On install, I chose not to include the compiler set over concern
re drive space. The FAQ says how much space is required to minimally
run OBSD and it says how much to be able to comfortably compile ("4G is
not a bad size
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:23:37PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Todd Alan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does "lock -nv" not work? I just read about this in "BSD Hacks" last
> > night, oddly enough.
>
> # lock -nv
> lock: unknown option -- v
> usage: lock [-np] [-a style] [-t tim
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:50:08AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and
> > compiled SELinux into the libraries, although the SELinux policies
> >
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > I don't use X much and instead use lots of Virtual Terminals.
> >
> > Since I'm on dialup, sometimes I need to leave mul
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:20:34PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and
> >>compi
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:53:05AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> ...
> > Hi Nick.
> >
> > I understand your reasons. To me they look like reasons for separate
> > firewalls on separate boxes. In the scenarios you mention, would you
>
Hello all,
I'm running OBSD on my older boxes but still Debian on my big box (not
ready yet).
Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and
compiled SELinux into the libraries, although the SELinux policies
aren't ready on debian yet. The whole focus seems to be to make Linux
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:12:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> ...
> > I don't understand the logic of having multiple firewalls on one box.
> > If one box can handle the throughput requirements of all the NICs, why
> > not just one big
I don't use X much and instead use lots of Virtual Terminals.
Since I'm on dialup, sometimes I need to leave multiple VTs open to do
things, perhaps downloading something, or its just that I'm in the
middle of things.
How can I lock the whole virtual termial setup? lock(1) only lets me
lock th
> >Josh wrote:
> >>Hello there.
> >>
> >>We have a bunch of obsd firewalls, 8 at the moment, all working nice
> >>and so forth. But we
> >>need to add about another 4 in there for new connections and
> >>networks, which means more
> >>machines to find room for.
> >>
> >>So basically I have been a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
> >The One.
> >
>
> The one gonad.
>
> Get a proper email account you cowardly faggot.
Lets not get into WW II morale-boosting songs :)
Doug.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:13:48AM -0400, stuart van Zee wrote:
> There is no such thing as "Solving Security". It does not exist.
> It could only exist in a perfect world and as you know, or at least
> should know, this is NOT a perfect world.
I have one absolutely secure computer. Actually I
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:43:29PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> However, the old DSL provider tries to get on my ass, and I figured,
> okay boys, if you don't let me outta this contract, I'll use your
> uplink to the max 24/7 (while true; do wget -O /dev/null
> http://something.iso; done).
If y
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:12:33PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/09/19 17:46, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
> > I was wondering if the participants in misc@openbsd.org would help me
> > brainstorm. I want to give the operator group greater permissions than it
> > currently has, so that any m
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:18:05AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > > A lot of people has praised the current OpenBSD installer.
> > > I too. I think it is at the right level and does the right
> > > things, w
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > >>I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
> > >>to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
>
> There is no _need_ for a "nice curses setup" - the current installer
> already "has ease to it"w, to put it mild
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:36:54AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2007, at 11:03 AM, "Tang Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I had a soekis 4801 and pf performs only about 28Mb/s I think.
> >
> >I trying to set up a router for about 50-100 users and only with
> >28Mb/s i hadn't enough
Hello,
I'm transitioning my systems from Debian to OpenBSd.
For my older boxes, this is just fine as Xorg comes with great drivers
for the video on them.
However, my year-old amd64 will need some verifying before I wipe out
debian and put on OBSD.
Its an AMD Athlon64 3800+ with 1 GB ram, with
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:53:29AM -0700, Jake Conk wrote:
> I have OpenBSD 4.1 installed on one disk and I have an exact duplicate
> disk where i want to mirror my installation to incase of disk failure.
> If this needs to be setup during install I'm willing reinstall
> everything or if there is
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:55:27AM +0200, Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
> yes, I tried this before I posted here but no way... it's not working
> in my case... mmmh... thanks anyway
Did you use TERM=screen on both ends of the ssh, i.e. on OBSD before ssh
and on linux after ssh?
>
>
> >
> > Try TERM=s
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:22:49PM +0300, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> > I have recently installed 4.1 on a P-II with an 850 MB drive and 64 MB
> > ram.
>
> > Right from the first reboot, I get
>
> > WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
>
> > The boot then gets delayed during the fsck.
>
> > I've ne
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:27:20PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Siju George wrote:
> >
> >>Can't find a DVD in
> >[snip]
> >
> >As stated in the beginning of this thread,
> >DVD discs are not available, just CDs in DVD case.
>
> Yes guys. It was my mistake in my "Divine Vas
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Vim Visual wrote:
> I had the same problem. I solved it using
>
> xterm-xfree86
>
> but now I have a different one. I cannot use backspace to scroll up.
> The error message is "Key is not bound."
>
> any idea of how to fix that?
Try TERM=screen. I did
I have recently installed 4.1 on a P-II with an 850 MB drive and 64 MB
ram.
Right from the first reboot, I get
WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
The boot then gets delayed during the fsck.
I've never had an unclean shutdown, always doing
# shutdown -h now
or
# shutdown -r now
I reviewed th
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:00:25PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:54:11PM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote:
> > On 9/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a box that runs OpenBSD that sshes
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:01:23AM +0200, Vim Visual wrote:
>
> thanks for the answers. I am looking now for a _fast_ epson.
>
> The purpose is to be able to scan pictures with a good resolution but,
> more importantly, to scan *hundreds* of pages...
>
What about a nice digital camera setup wit
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:54:11PM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a box that runs OpenBSD that sshes into my Debian box. On
> > OpenBSD, the default colour term is vt220 so when I ssh to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:40:03PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a box that runs OpenBSD that sshes into my Debian box. On
> > OpenBSD, the default colour term is vt220 so when I ssh to debian, TERM
> >
Hello,
I have a box that runs OpenBSD that sshes into my Debian box. On
OpenBSD, the default colour term is vt220 so when I ssh to debian, TERM
is set to vt220.
When I run mc, all is well; colour, line draw, whatever.
When I run lynx or mutt, I get black on white with no colour. On Lynx
this
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:23:30PM -0400, stan wrote:
> I have a new laptop.
>
> It came with Vista on it. I used gpartd to resize those partions, and added
> Ubuntu. Now I want to add OpenBSD, and FreeBSD. I'd like to do OpenBSD
> next.
>
> When I boot the 4.1 CD, I get to the partioning step, a
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
> > I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
>
> Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something
> caused all directory to becom
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:02:26PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> I couldn't agree more. The point is, while we BSD license fans know and
> expect people from private industry to take our stuff and use it, at
> least private industry does not come to the table with "hey, let's
> cooperate" - we know who
201 - 295 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
