Re: ssl on Win NT

2003-12-10 Thread Bruce Barclay
I have had difficulty with makecert as its cumbersome at best. If you download the IBM HTTP Server software which is available at their site you can use the GUI which is similar to the IBM Global Services kit on AIX. I was able to generate self signed certificates with relative ease. Check it out.

Re: Merging MQSeries

2003-12-09 Thread Bruce Barclay
on moving full repositories around. http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/html/csqzah06/csqzah06tfrm.htm I hope you have test environment to play around in! -Original Message- From: Bruce Barclay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Merging MQSeries

2003-12-08 Thread Bruce Barclay
We have the following scenario: 1. Cluster_DD with qmgrs R1 and R2 (on AIX#1) being full repositories. QM1, QM2, QM3.. QM9 being partial repositories on AIX, W2K, Sun and z/OS. 2. Cluster_QA with qmgrs R4 and R5 (on AIX#2) being full repositories. QMA, QMB, QMC.QMX being

Re: FW: Cluster queue security

2003-12-02 Thread Bruce Barclay
name as the cluster queue(s). I think your concern would be more justified if the local alias queue Q1 were a queue of type local instead, in which case the messages would end up on this local instance of the queues Q1... Best regards, Ruzi --- Bruce Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking

FW: Cluster queue security

2003-12-01 Thread Bruce Barclay
In the example described, which queue gets the authority set, Q1 the alias or Q1 the local or both??? Isn't it dangerous to have the same name for alias' as for local queues in a cluster environment?? BB. -Original Message- From: Ruzi R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 01 December,

Re: FW: Cluster queue security

2003-12-01 Thread Bruce Barclay
. The same applies to an alias queue resolving to a local queue (not cluster) on the same qmgr. Best regards, Ruzi --- Bruce Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the example described, which queue gets the authority set, Q1 the alias or Q1 the local or both??? Isn't it dangerous to have the same

Re: anyone familiar....

2003-11-26 Thread Bruce Barclay
I'm currently prototyping SSL in MQSeries and using the IGS kit on both AIX and W2K. Relatively easy to use but not as user friendly as I would like. When you order V5.3 you specify with or without IGS. Not sure what you want to know. Anything specific?? BB. -Original Message- From:

SSL and sniffer packets

2003-11-26 Thread Bruce Barclay
I'm prototyping SSL in a clustered environment between AIX and W2K and have installed a sniffer to capture packets to ensure that messages are being encrypted properly. Have 2 full repository queue managers and 2 'working' qmgrs on AIX and 3 'working' qmgrs on W2K. Regardless, when I send a

Re: WMQe

2003-10-16 Thread Bruce Barclay
Hi, have been doing a lot of research and have got it working on W2K but still trying it to work on a Palm driven device (in my case a Kyocera 7135). Its a whole new world. Have fun. BB. -Original Message- From: Terry House [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 16 October, 2003 12:48

Connections

2003-03-13 Thread Bruce Barclay
Have MaxChannels and MaxActiveChannels set at 2000, the MaxInitiators defaults to 3 and the ListenerBacklog at 1024. Getting Java.Channel connection rejections even though there is no indication that at any given moment in time, there are so many connections to the server. Anyone help here? Much

Re: Connections

2003-03-13 Thread Bruce Barclay
|-+--- | | Bruce Barclay | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | ES.GC.CA | | | Sent by:| | | MQSeries List | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | en.AC.AT

Problems with MQSeries Explorer (MMC)

2003-03-05 Thread Bruce Barclay
All of a sudden getting the message below when accessing the MQ Explorer. Have ensured that my userid is in both the Administrator group and the mqm group. Can do everything using a command prompt but not with the MQ Explorer. Changes had been made to the security template but the Windows experts

Re: endmqlsr

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Barclay
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: endmqlsr Hi Excuse the ignorance, but why do you have multiple listeners? Have you tried the -f option? -Original Message- From: Bruce Barclay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 February 2003 06:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: endmqlsr We have more than 1 listener

endmqlsr -f -m and -w (again) ???

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Barclay
Further on endmqlsr... I tried using the -f option to end multiple listeners and MQ doesn't accept the -f option, at least not on AIX??? I tried different combinations, like entering the options in different sequences but to no avail. Each time I try MQ just comes back with. Usage: endmqlsr

endmqlsr

2003-02-24 Thread Bruce Barclay
We have more than 1 listener running per Qmgr on AIX. We have a script that refreshes our Qmgrs by shutting them down and restarting each on request. endmqlsr -m QMGR doesn't seem to shut down all listeners but leaves at least one up and when we restart the Qmgr we get an error saying MQ can't

Re: Support Pac MS03 (SaveQmgr)

2002-10-09 Thread Bruce Barclay
downloaded this 2 days ago and it worked OK. bobbee From: Bruce Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Support Pac MS03 (SaveQmgr) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:44:41 -0400 Tried downloading latest version

Re: Support Pac MS03 (SaveQmgr)

2002-10-09 Thread Bruce Barclay
.AC.AT 10/09/02 07:28 AM Please respond to MQSeries List Buuce, FYI, I just downloaded this 2 days ago and it worked OK. bobbee From: Bruce Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List

FW: SUN Solaris Compile Script

2002-09-17 Thread Bruce Barclay
The following note was sent to me from one of our developers. It concerns the problem of being able to compile a program having several subprograms. This is not necessarily an MQ problem but all our MQ programs have to be compiled for the Sun system. We have no problem on AIX or OS/390, just Sun.

Sending messages via satellite - latency problems

2002-09-17 Thread Bruce Barclay
Transmission Unit (MTU) should be set less than 1500 (ie. 1492 or something like that). Is anyone out there using satellite transmission for MQ (not MQe) for messages? If so, how do you address this issue? Or, must we go to MQe? Thanx. BB. Bruce Barclay Cell: 613-794-8423 Instructions