On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, symphonick wrote:
> 2011/5/22, caller#6:
>> 4. Where the liner gives the key in French / English / German, I'd use
>> French as the default, simply because it's a French label. Could that
>> logic be applied to the Release Group title? That is, should the label's
>> count
2011/5/22, caller#6 :
>
>
> On 05/21/2011 03:34 PM, symphonick wrote:
>> First version of my research page for CSG release names& artists.
>>
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_release_names
>>
> 2. It seems to me (and I guess you agree) that listing /all/ the artists
>
On 24/05/11 19:50, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> I was surprised when I saw this was not on the list. We have lots of
> those (see http://musicbrainz.org/tag/format-cd-r for a sample) and I
> would say it is distinctive enough to have it as an option under CD
> (or, if not, to have another way
I was surprised when I saw this was not on the list. We have lots of
those (see http://musicbrainz.org/tag/format-cd-r for a sample) and I
would say it is distinctive enough to have it as an option under CD
(or, if not, to have another way of indicating it).
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Hello,
> So how did such a major and complete rewrite skip RFC/RFV, and become
> official within 6 days of being announced (if you count nikki's May 10 email
> as being the RFC, though not mentioned in the email's subject).
I think this misrepresents what nikki and I have done.
No major chang
On May 24, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I couldn't agree more and I've raised this issue in at least one
> discussion. I didn't expect NGS to be an excuse to change the
> guidelines by dictate rather than discussion.
I'd like to remind folks that Nikki and Warp are your BDF
On 05/24/2011 08:02 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2011/5/18 Lukáš Lalinský:
>> The original NGS documentation which was written by me [1] says that
>> works with different remixes should be merged together. The Work page
>> [2] however says that they should be kep separate. All people I've
>
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:13 PM, monxton wrote:
> On 24/05/2011 16:59, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry, but a process taking time or "being painful" is not a reason to
>>> impose
>>> the views of a few people on everyone else.
On 24/05/2011 16:59, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
> wrote:
>> Sorry, but a process taking time or "being painful" is not a reason to impose
>> the views of a few people on everyone else.
>
> I don't think that the intent of the NGS guideline updat
>and IMHO it would have been impossible to get the guidelines right in
advance
I think it would have been possible, but we would still be waiting for
NGS two or three years down the line.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.music
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
wrote:
> Sorry, but a process taking time or "being painful" is not a reason to impose
> the views of a few people on everyone else.
I don't think that the intent of the NGS guideline updates was to
impose someone's view on everyone else. But
2011/5/24 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren :
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
>>
>> azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
>> disc is considered "bonus". It does seem that this ability was lost in
>> the move
On 24 May 2011 15:38, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
snip..
> I'll let nikki and kuno speak for themselves, but just wanted to note
> that I support the complete overhaul and that the normal process has
> been circumvented. Most of the old guidelines don't make sense with
> NGS, and doing such a big c
Well, we could simply add it to the name of the bonus medium in the release?
"Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren" ha scritto:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791 > > azertus is asking if we should have a
way to record the fact that a > disc
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
>
> azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
> disc is considered "bonus". It does seem that this ability was lost in
> the move to NGS, but I'm not sure I think it's importa
2011/5/24 Philip Jägenstedt
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:34, Brian Schweitzer
> wrote:
> > For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
> > feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has
> taken
> > place. I may not be commenting on the list, bu
I have tried to find some examples to work out what is wrong and what is right.
It seems that only the current release-group-URL IMDb AR is wrong.
See a summary at
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Azertus/Potential_IMDb_Relationship_Type_Problem
Of course, this might be just a bug?
azertus
On Tue
On 24 May 2011 13:34, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
> feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
> place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still at least skim
> the style list to see
2011/5/18 Lukáš Lalinský :
> The original NGS documentation which was written by me [1] says that
> works with different remixes should be merged together. The Work page
> [2] however says that they should be kep separate. All people I've
> discussed this with agree that they should be merged. Can
>I support the complete overhaul and that the normal process has been
circumvented. Most of the old guidelines don't make >sense with NGS, and
doing such a big change by RFC/RFV would have been extremely painful. I
think we're much better off >taking the rewrite and working from there.
I couldn't
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491791
azertus is asking if we should have a way to record the fact that a
disc is considered "bonus". It does seem that this ability was lost in
the move to NGS, but I'm not sure I think it's important. Thoughts?
--
Philip Jägenstedt
__
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:34, Brian Schweitzer
wrote:
> For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
> feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
> place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still at least skim
> the style lis
For a few reasons, I've been silent here for the past while. However, I
feel I have to at least comment on the change in guidelines that has taken
place. I may not be commenting on the list, but I do still at least skim
the style list to see what's happening. Thus, when I saw an edit note
citing
Hello
I just noticed that the link name for the AR to relate a (soundtrack)
release group to its movie's URL at IMDb has been somehow merged with
the AR to indicate a recording uses samples from a movie (by linking
to its IMDb URL). Was this intentional / discussed at a previous time?
Because this
2011/5/24 Dr Andrew John Hughes
> On 23 May 2011 07:21, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> > 2011/5/22 Dr Andrew John Hughes
> >>
> >> I really don't see why we want to retain all covers verbatim; I
> >> thought MusicBrainz was a database, not a cover archive.
> >
> > Maybe because the MB database co
On 24/05/11 10:37, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:48, Kuno Woudt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>> Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
>>> could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some attribu
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:48, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
>> could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some attribute
>> for official translations, if there is such a
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:52, Dr Andrew John Hughes
wrote:
> On 23 May 2011 07:21, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>> 2011/5/22 Dr Andrew John Hughes
>>>
>>> I really don't see why we want to retain all covers verbatim; I
>>> thought MusicBrainz was a database, not a cover archive.
>>
>> Maybe becau
Thanks. I voted for it, although I don't know if the votes are taken into
account.
2011/5/23 Nikki
> By the way, there's a ticket here
> http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-684
>
> Nikki
>
> Brant Gibbard wrote:
> > Sorry, I mis-spoke. I was testing with the annotation, and I had
> forgott
Hello,
On 24/05/11 09:28, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> Going forward, I think that it would be nice if perhaps recordings
> could have aliases by language. Perhaps there should be some attribute
> for official translations, if there is such a thing. With such a
> scheme, we could get rid of lots of
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 20:45, Nikki wrote:
> Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> That sounds pretty good, but it wouldn't really be accurate for
>> karaoke tracks where the background singers are usually left in and
>> only the lead singer is left out. Perhaps a karaoke attribute would
>> work, but I'm n
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 22:53, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 22/05/11 15:53, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> Before NGS I added some releases where both English and Chinese titles
>> appear on the cover. I created one release for each language.
>> http://musicbrainz.org/release/0a4a71ed-b7d9-44f9-
32 matches
Mail list logo
