i agree with you, Since mysql code is GPL anyone can start developing
further wither another name say 'MySQL NEW'
I don't understand how any company can own since mysql code is GPL.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:48 AM, mos wrote:
> At 07:13 PM 4/21/2009, you wrote:
>
>> It will great if the MYSQL
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
Yeah, I'm sure Widenous is writing a check as we speak. He is busy
working on Maria, a stripped down branch of MySQL.
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/01/maria-engine-is-released.html
They w
At 07:13 PM 4/21/2009, you wrote:
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
Yeah, I'm sure Widenous is writing a check as we speak. He is busy
working on Maria, a stripped down branch of MySQL.
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/01/maria
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
They would come out making lots of money and back controlling their own
destiny.
:-)
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Arthur Fuller wrote:
> I hereby bet the farm that this shall not occur. I have $1
I hereby bet the farm that this shall not occur. I have $10 to say that this
shall not occur.
a) Who is going to challenge the deal?
b) What possible purpose would it serve to interr MySQL?
c) Assuming there is some reason for b) above, why incur the wrath of the
MySQL community and their possible
MySQL will live on regardless of who owns the brand. First and foremost
MySQL is a community and that community will continue to develop MySQL and
take it in the direction they want it to go. Sure Oracle could try and
force some 'features' or changes through but if the community didn't like
them th
Hello,
I have a rather burly Drupal based site that seems to be causing some
problems, today we had a major outage. There are many slow queries
and also mysql related iowait that causes server processes to hang, at
least that is the theory.
Here you can examine some of the stats on the server:
h
Hi,
To see what will happen to MySQL take a look at how Oracle handled
InnoDb. How many updates have they released since they purchased it? I
really don't know so someone will need to check. Is Oracle is too big
to make MySQL updates any kind of priority? It seems that the larger
the company
Nigel,
>I want to select the name and id from "Organisations"
>along with a count of the number of one-to-many
>relationships it has in each of the two tables.
Aggregation multiplies across multiple joins. For suggested solutions
see "Aggregates across multiple joins" at
http://www.artfulsoftw
We are in early stage of a start-up seeking MySQL server internals developers.
The developers will be involved in an effort to accelerate execution of a MySQL
query with a multi-core CPU running concurrent slave threads.
The effort will be made as modifications to a current release version of se
I think I probably can't do what I want, but am hoping I'm wrong. Please
help :)
I have three tables:
Organisations
- organisation_id - name -
- 1 - Org A -
- 2 - Org B -
No
I hope I start getting paid what Oracle DBA's make.
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Fuller [mailto:fuller.art...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 12:04 PM
To: russbucket
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Sun bought by Oracle
I too am a big entusiast of Sun's VirtualBox, and
I too am a big entusiast of Sun's VirtualBox, and I hope that nothing goes
sideways on this product.
A.
effects and that is VirtualBox. I've used MySQL for years and hope Oracle
> does not stop it, but you never know with Ellison encharge!
>
> Just my 2 cents.
> --
>
> ---
Konrad,
AZZOPARDI Konrad schrieb:
Hello people,
I do not know if this the right listI am migrating a very basic application from an older mysql version 4.1.9-standard to a new mysql version 5.0.45 {RedHat default package}. I have migrated DB data from one to the other and all data seems t
At 08:06 AM 4/21/2009, Gilles MISSONNIER wrote:
hello people,
bad joke is not it ?
After MySQL bought by the java maker,
and now Sun bought by Oracle,
what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
It seems like the little fish are getting eaten by the bigger fish.
I understand Microsoft is now going to
AZZOPARDI Konrad wrote:
Hello people,
I do not know if this the right listI am migrating a very basic application from an older mysql version 4.1.9-standard to a new mysql version 5.0.45 {RedHat default package}. I have migrated DB data from one to the other and all data seems to be there
Hello people,
I do not know if this the right listI am migrating a very basic application
from an older mysql version 4.1.9-standard to a new mysql version 5.0.45
{RedHat default package}. I have migrated DB data from one to the other and all
data seems to be there including the structure
Arthur Fuller wrote:
> I think that you'e being paranoid. IMO, Oracle will continue to support
> and develop mySQL. Further, I think that these concerns about the future
> of mySQL overlook the points behind the purchase:
>
> 1. To obtain the Sun hardware and thus provide a complete hardware and
Hey Gilles,
After MySQL bought by the java maker,
and now Sun bought by Oracle,
what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
Not sure what "we" are gonna run, but my office is continuing
to run MySQL when required, Firebird otherwise :-)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.ups
On 21 Apr 2009, at 14:06, Gilles MISSONNIER wrote:
hello people,
bad joke is not it ?
After MySQL bought by the java maker,
and now Sun bought by Oracle,
what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
I don't see what the problem is really. Anyway if there ever is a
problem in the future (which I doubt)
hello people,
bad joke is not it ?
After MySQL bought by the java maker,
and now Sun bought by Oracle,
what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
_-¯-_-¯-_-¯-_-¯-_
Gilles Missonnier
IAP - g...@iap.fr
01 44 32 81 36
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsub
Okay, does anyone know of a hosting site that supports 'Image::Magick'?
(the Perl package). The salesrep at AwardSpace said they didn't have it.
P.S. This is probably getting a mite off-topic. So, feel free to reply to
me off-list, if you happen to know the answer.
Thanks,
- Mark
--
MySQL Gen
Hi Keith,
I'm not sure, but this might be DST that's in your way. Have you
looked into that?
Have a nice day,
- Martijn
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 18:34, Keith Hughitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what is going on here:
>
> //Query:
>
> select UNIX_TIMESTAMP(TIMESTAMP('2003-01-01 00:00:0
23 matches
Mail list logo
