On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:53:17AM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 10.02.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Matt Caswell:
>
> >On 10/02/15 19:23, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >>Hello everyone,
> >>
> >>I sent a mail to r...@openssl.org 3 days ago, subject "OpenSSL 1.0.2 "make
> >>test" bus error in evp_test (Solaris 10
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> (for some reason it was never received by rt@, so resending here)
Slipped through the moderation queue, sorry. It is in RT now.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke jaeni...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.
On 06/11/2014 11:10 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I still didn't get a reply from RT, so I'm just going to forward
> this for now.
>
>
> Kurt
>
Hmm. It at least does not show up in the mail log of the system hosting
RT...
Ah, I now see why: it is addressed to r...@debian.org...
Since you attached th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Due to a misunderstanding within the OpenSSL team we ran into trouble
with our mail and mailing service still hosted at the old server
(hopefully I will be able to complete the migration to the new server
over the Christmas break).
Caused by a so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
The new server currently hosting the www, git, rt, ftp, and cvs
services is going to be moved within the installation of our hoster.
As a consequence, the system will be assigned a new IP address.
Old: 178.16.220.54
New: 185.9.166.106
The move
Applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@ope
On 02/07/2013 03:35 PM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to follow the steps for cloning the git repository found on
> http://www.openssl.org/source/repos.html from behind a proxy. The proxy
> does not allow connections to the git port 9418.
>
> I tried http/https which both fai
On 01/12/2013 01:26 PM, Attila Gulyas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on implementing Maximm fragmentation length extension
> (RFC3546, obsoleted by RFC6066) and I'd like to commit my work so that it'd
> be available in later editions of openssl.
> How may I do that? (I've been looking for
On 01/15/2013 12:50 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
> its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
> change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS -> GIT, RT 3.x -> 4.x, ...) so
>
On 01/15/2013 12:50 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
> its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
> change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS -> GIT, RT 3.x -> 4.x, ...) so
>
Hi!
As you will already have noted, the OpenSSL project is currently moving
its infrastructure to a new server. This migration is combined with a
change and/or upgrade of the tools (CVS -> GIT, RT 3.x -> 4.x, ...) so
we have decided to set up the new server first and to perform a step by
step migr
Hi,
in the process of upgrading and migrating our server infrastructure I
have just put the updated Request Tracker into operation. The request
tracker stays reachable via r...@openssl.org (or the alias
openssl-b...@openssl.org).
While the migration is still in progress, the web interface is
tempo
This is a test of the upgraded RT for openssl.org
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated L
Hi!
I have just installed a new 3 year wildcard "*.openssl.org" certificate
to our web site.
Thanks to GlobalSign for the new donation.
The migration should work more or less unnoted for the users. If you
experience any problems please drop me a message.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
On 04/11/2011 11:10 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> Hi, I sent several patches to openssl-b...@openssl.org a few hours ago, but I
> haven't seen them get forwarded to this list and don't see them at
> http://rt.openssl.org/NoAuth/Buglist.html. Is this expected? Does
> openssl-bugs still work, or do all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
unfortunately the OpenSSL project has been hit by a hardware defect
(hard disk and power supply). The project hence had to be migrated to
a different server using a later version of the operating system and
tools.
Services are currently being rest
Kenneth Robinette wrote:
> Lutz
>
> How does one get access to the contributed .chm file? I looked on the
> OpenSSL site and cannot see any reference to it?
>
On the bottom of the descriptive test, right hand side, there should be
a small reference to "OpenSSL.zip".
Best regards,
Lutz
__
Harold S. Henry wrote:
> Thanks, Kyle. The problem, as identified in the delivery failure message, is
> that openssl.org's mail server has a fixed message-size limit that is
> exceeded by the size of the attachment. Sorry to be unclear.
>
Your contribution has been filed under #2342... but th
Am 28.05.2010 23:08, schrieb David Woodhouse:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 10:14 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> The state of the test-repository is a bit old (approx one year) but
>> you
>> may have a look into
>> git://login.openssl.org/openssl
>> http://ww
Am 27.05.2010 18:48, schrieb David Woodhouse:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 17:51 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:32 +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Those [i_a] b
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 21:32 +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
>
>> Those [i_a] bits are my markers in our local code base so I know which edits
>> are mine when doing a (manual) merge with 'vanilla' CVS HEAD. Yes, I know
>> there are smarter systems around, but I've been 'tracki
From: Michael Wodei
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:33:24 -0700
You can withdraw this one, I found the issue
Mike Wodei
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
In the past few days we had some problems with the hardware of the
OpenSSL server providing the public services (web, mail, etc).
We are now closely monitoring the system and preparing to migrate to
another server if necessary.
Thank you very much
Boyle Owen wrote:
> PPS: Although I have subscribed to this list, I am not getting the mails
> (I have to keep checking the archives). Is there anyone who can check
> out my account?
>
Hmm. If memory serves me right there was a "subscribe" message sent to
the list instead of the mailing list m
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying that, Stephen.
> Never use openssl's request racket. When I go to http://rt.openssl.org
> and use the "Quick ticket creation" option a the bottom of the page, I
> get an error: "No permission to create tickets in the queue
> 'OpenSSL-Bugs'.
> Apparently I
David McCullough wrote:
> Jivin Kyle Hamilton lays it down ...
>
>> Please mail these each as attachments to r...@openssl.org. This will
>> ensure that each gets entered into a trackable state, and also ensures
>> that the formatting for the patch files stays consistent.
>>
>
> No problems
Closing as resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> Hi Kyle,
>>
>> thank you very much for reports, they are currently sitting in the
>> moderation queue. I would kindly ask you and other testers to either
>> * send succes
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> I hope the test reports I sent to -bugs are useful. I'm on a Mac OSX
> 10.5.6 machine, Intel-based, and I ran tests in both 32 and 64 bit
> modes, both without and with the optional features. I do not have gmp
> installed, nor zlib, so I cannot vouch for their usability; I
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
Hi all.
Just wandering whether there is something I am missing about posting
bug reports/patches to 'r...@openssl.org'. I send a report there three
days ago and got neither any confirmation nor did the report get
forwarded to the development list. I resent the sam
Thanks, patch applied.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 21 14:23:50 2008]:
>
> Hello rt,
>
> During stress testing my project, suddenly got crash inside openssl
>
> openssl version - openssl-0.9.8i
> compiler - Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition (C++
> project)
> project - x64 debug compilation
>
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMA
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:01 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
>> Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
>> is not present in HEAD (0.9.9).
>>
>
> That makes sense.
>
> I assume that DTLS1_B
> [jaenicke - Fri Oct 10 12:42:51 2008]:
>
> I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
> am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
> break it.
Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
is not
present in HEAD
>From answer only sent to mailing list:
Yeah, it looks right. I haven't yet got it working with my test case,
because I need to use DTLS1_BAD_VER and there are other parts missing
from HEAD for that, on top of my patch in #1751 -- but I agree with your
assessment that it shouldn't be needed any lo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 07 10:57:04 2008]:
>
> This patch to the 0.9.8 branch fixes two bugs with misordered incoming
> packets in DTLS, which are reported as RT #1752.
Could you comment on the 0.9.9-dev branch as well?
The patch to d1_pkt.c applies fine. The "length" object is gone from th
I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
break it.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project h
Thanks, I have applied the respective patch to the 0.9.7, 0.9.8 and 0.9.9
branches, see
http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/sha/Makefile
for commits 17496 to 17498.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
David Woodhouse via RT wrote:
> (Was waiting for the RT to autoreply with a number before I followed up,
> but it doesn't seem to have arrived after half an hour, so I'll send
> anyway. Hopefully the References: header will associate this with the
> previous mail anyway...)
>
Mailings to rt are
Hi!
I have just installed a new (2048bit) certificate and key to the
OpenSSL Project webserver. It is a wildcard certifcate for *.openssl.org
catching both www.openssl.org and rt.openssl.org.
Many thanks go to Steve Roylance from Globalsign for donating a
3 year wildcard SSL certificate!!
Best r
The OpenSSL project does not have a root CA program and has decided to
not supply root CA certificates with the toolkit.
Please checkout the FAQ:
How can I set up a bundle of commercial root CA certificates?
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER16
Best regards,
Lutz
___
It seems you do not have enough licenses for your C compiler which is
thus locking up.
Sincere regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:49:01PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>>
>> The record size of the SSL record is predetermined by the sender with
>> 16k being the maximum size specified by the protocol.
>>
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> I think I've discovered another problem with the current non-blocking API.
>
> I have an application which reads data into fixed-size buffers which it
> maintains per session. It uses non-blocking IO and select() when a read
> returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_{READ,WRITE}.
>
> T
Issue resolved by code modification, see ticket #1513.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automate
Respective patch applied, thanks.
The fix will be in 0.9.8h.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Au
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Bodo Moeller wrote:
> However, another intentional use of potentially unitialized data is
> still left as of
> http://cvs.openssl.org/getfile/openssl/crypto/rand/randfile.c?v=1.47.2.2
> :
>
> i=fread(buf,1,n,in);
> if (i <= 0) break;
> /* even if n != i, us
Zhichao Hong wrote:
> Thank you, Lutz, for the change set information! I have to admit that
> I am not a power user of the openssl at the source level. We are not
> controlling the server as it is a standard IIS HTTPS. The software
> is using openssl library on top of openbsd stack. So do you
Zhichao Hong wrote:
> I have sent email about a client hangs when trying to communicating
> with server using 0.9.7e version of the openssl. When looking into the
> debugger stack trace, the ssl3_read_n blocks forever in the s3_pkt.c.
> When I browsed the cvs change history, the following issue was
The missing defitions have been added.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Thanks, fixed in
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17069 (0.9.8-stable)
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17068 (HEAD)
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Devel
I have applied a different modification which is a little bit more in
line with the handling in other applications (where the handling seems
to be correct).
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17067
Best regards,
Lutz
__
Open
Closing as well according to #1552
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [E
I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
Bar-Lev.
I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
is working now as expected.
Best regards,
Lutz
OpenSSL does create keys in more components than just gen(r|d)sa. In
none of these functions any file permission mask is used.
All of the components in openssl/apps are using the file-BIO which
behaves like and does not have idea about file permissions.
People using OpenSSL to generate their keys
Andrew Lamoureux via RT wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to report a bug in openssl-0.9.8g compiled with
> Visual Studio. OS is Windows XP.
>
> Access violation occurs when BN_rshift() is used on a BIGNUM whose
> bit length is less (amount required varies) than the number of
> bits requesting to be shifted
David Erosa García wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I tried the openssl-users list but I think this may be a question for
> the devel list:
>
> I'm doing my "homework" about openssl, but *this question has nothing to
> do with it*. It's just a doubt that arised while doing it.
>
> There is one exercise w
I agree with Shaw Graham George's post on openssl-dev. Modifying system
settings upon installation would seem to be too intrusive for the
OpenSSL source package.
OpenSSL as distributed by the OpenSSL team does not modify system
settings during installation on any platform. Typically integrators
pr
That is indeed true. I have migrated RT quite a lot of time ago but did
miss the obvious references in the process.
* fixed the URI in the respective files for future releases
* added a redirection at the URI provided to the new page
Best regards,
Lutz
_
Closing according to respective email on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
a couple of days ago I've reported the bug:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1641
It looks like that Bodo's commit (see below) has fixed the reported problem.
So the bug can be closed and set to fixed.
Best regards,
Ch
Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 3 X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL unable to get certificate CRL
>
> should read
>
> 3 X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL: unable to get certificate CRL
>
> i.e. there is a colon missing. If there is any interest, I can create a patch
> but it is probably faster for both
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Lutz,
Replies to active tickets are handled automatically.
I've a ticket open where I posted a couple of times updates:
http://rt.openssl.org/index.html?q=1611
but nothing of these appear here on the list - although they are properly
listed with #1611...
can you
Bruno Bonfils wrote:
> Hi openssl's people,
>
> I'm currently writing a script to check a PKI. For this purpose, I
> wrote a small patch to display the crlNumber directly from the crl's
> app:
>
> # openssl crl -in ca.crl -crlnumber -noout
> crlNumber=42
>
> I'll happy if the patch can be include i
Robert Gries wrote:
> Well even though I get the error about the shared libraries, it did work with
> is Configure:
>
> ./Configure --prefix=~gries/usr/local/ssl --openssldir=~gries/usr/local/ssl
> threads linux-ppc64 -m64 -L/usr/local/lib -DOPENSSL_USE_GMP -lgmp -static
>
> [EMAIL PROTECT
Martin Peylo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could the following OIDs please be added to the objects.txt file? They
> are used by CMP (RFC 4210) and CRMF (RFC 4211) which I am implementing
> right now. This would make it easier for me to supply a patch which
> applies cleanly in case the objects.txt file was chan
The SHA1 was recreated and the tarball was resigned by myself.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
> [jaenicke - Fri Oct 19 11:39:05 2007]:
>
> This will never be fixed in the 0.9.8f tarball (as it was rolled "as is").
>
> OpenSSL 0.9.8g has now been released using a correct version code.
>
> Best regards,
>Lutz
>
__
Op
Fixed in 0.9.8g
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenSSL version 0.9.8g released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.8g of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
OpenSSL version
This should be fixed by commit
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=16682
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 17 18:11:27 2007]:
>
> Starting with OpenSSL 0.9.8f, ssl3_get_client_hello() no longer tests
> whether the client proposed a
> previous session_id before trying to process it. In previous releases,
> a new session was always
> created if no previous session was propos
Grr. The OpenSSL web site is some (semi-)automatic thing that is updated
in a magic way. Probably only Ralf Engelschall fully understands how
this works :-)
I have made sure the correct files are linked now.
Best regards,
Lutz
I have made the following modifications to the download area (not
tracked by CVS, so the
action is not logged via openssl-cvs) at Wed Oct 17, 2007, 09:30 CEST
(07:30GMT):
* updated openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.sha1
* created new openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.asc with my (Lutz Jaenicke) personal
key matching
Your statement is actually correct. Nevertheless it does not seem to be
useful to create
a new release (0.9.8g) just to correct an informational version number
code. It also
would not be a good idea to create a new tarball with the same name but
just a new
version number code.
We have therefore de
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
A respective compile time macro "PEDANTIC" (to be added to the C flags
as "-DPEDANTIC")
has been added for OpenSSL 0.9.8f. The behavior has been clarified in
the manual page
and the FAQ
__
OpenSSL Project
Nitin M wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can anyone please tell me the correct way to submit a patch here, as I
> have never done that before on this list?
>
As stated somewhere on the website: submit it by email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: wrt SPAM protection this interface is moderated so there may be some
delay(
Ben Laurie schrieb:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>>
>>> Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yes, it's desirable that that data is "unknown" however there is a
>>>> compromi
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's desirable that that data is "unknown" however there is a
>> compromise possible:
>> Complement the area. It'll mean valgrind will only complain at the correct
>> place, or possibly
Guessing on the stack being "non-predictable" does not seem to improve
entropy too much to me. I have therefore modified the code to no longer
use "uninitialized" memory in any case.
Not relying on -DPURIFY will also make valgrind users happy :-)
Best regards,
Lutz
Peter Waltenberg wrote:
> Yes, it's desirable that that data is "unknown" however there is a
> compromise possible:
> Complement the area. It'll mean valgrind will only complain at the correct
> place, or possibly not at all, and it's still random. The performance hit
> from doing that will be so s
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> [...]
> >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO
> >> will return a
> >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised
> >> * in IMAP doing a STA
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>
>> Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
>>
>>> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> [...]
> >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO
> >> will return a
> >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised
> >> * in IMAP doing a STA
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev trees.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMA
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007
> 10:34:23 -0800,
> > Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > kees> 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding
> > kees> these features to
RT access configuration has been changed.
Best regards,
Lutz
--- Begin Message ---
This transaction appears to have no content
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Lutz Jaenicke via RT schrieb:
> Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it "live".
>
Testing with modified settings. Duplicate emails to openssl-dev should
now be gone.
Hopefully...
Best r
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
>>> version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests w
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it "live".
>
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it "live".
>
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it "live".
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated L
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The OpenSSL request tracker will go down now for migration to a new
>> version of RT and another host. All incoming email requests will be
>> queued and will be uploaded once the new setup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jan 28 19:38:08 2007]:
> This ticket is opened to solve issues related to printing of subject
> and/or issuer name of a X.509 certificate and related documentation.
>
> Roumen
I am sure you will come up with more detailed information, won't you?
Regards,
Lutz
___
sudhir jha
-
Heres a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
- End forwarded message -
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Co
1 - 100 of 791 matches
Mail list logo