Re: [opensuse-factory] gnomebaker

2007-04-27 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 27 April 2007 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > I'm not sure a d1{gnome,kde}-*.iso is what I'd like to see in openSUSE. Hi Dominic, I'm sure that I wouldn't like. Presence of both is openSUSE advantage. That is what many describe as more polished and useful. While I can agree wi

Re: [opensuse-factory] gnomebaker

2007-04-27 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:02, James Tremblay wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2007 10:00, Rajko M. wrote: > > It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit > > discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look > > better a

Re: [opensuse-factory] gnomebaker

2007-04-27 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 27 April 2007 13:33, James Tremblay wrote: > I'm not suggesting that anyone use the first cd as a daily desktop I'm just > asking that it get us to a runlevel 5 desktop that will allow further > installation of applications from the other disks. I agree. I just wanted to point out that

Re: [opensuse-factory] gnomebaker

2007-04-29 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 29 April 2007 08:15, Lars Rupp wrote: > I think we have something like a "chicken or the egg problem" here: > without any examples we can't reach the normal user. Without reaching > the normal user, we can't get a "cool solution"... ;-) Yes, it is. Project probably needs some incentive

Re: [opensuse-factory] How to get rid of allmost out of space message?

2007-05-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 10:13, M9. wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to expand /usr, and /var, by mount --bind to a free partition. > This does not take the message away.. > for some reason /var is spammed full with zypp stuf and xml-files, which > are, imho unnessesary.(only, i do not know what i can throw a

Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote: > Has anyone noticed this problem?  It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing > with the sda drive and not hda Can you give output of hdparm that is making trouble to you. The transfer rate of 66 interface is lower than the 66 MB/s. How much lower

Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 06 May 2007 17:51, Donn Washburn wrote: > Rajko M. wrote: > > On Sunday 06 May 2007 13:15, Donn Washburn wrote: > >> Has anyone noticed this problem? It maybe a problem with hdparm dealing > >> with the sda drive and not hda > > > > Can you give

Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-07 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 07 May 2007 09:43, Sid Boyce wrote: > Rajko M. wrote: ... > > The speed test > > hdparm -t /dev/hda > > shows speed of 55 MB/s for ATA 100 drive, which seems to be right. For > > details on transfer rates > > http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?Arti

Re: [opensuse-factory] Topics dist meeting 2007-05-10

2007-05-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 18:14, JP Rosevear wrote: > > Do you think a small system which has only 128MB of software storage > > space (hard disk, flash card, ...) has >=256MB of RAM to run SUSE > > version-any on? > > Sure, thin clients do.  This requirement is not being pulled out of thin > air.  

Re: [opensuse-factory] hdparm

2007-05-10 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 10 May 2007 02:24, Ladislav Slezak wrote: > The cause is the transition to libata IDE drivers. Libata currently doesn't > support DMA mode change. See > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264681#c14 for details. Thanks for the fedback Ladislav. I had similar error messages l

Re: [opensuse-factory] Changing /dev/hda to /dev/sda

2007-05-13 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 11 May 2007 21:05, Sid Boyce wrote: ... > If I use mkinitrd to change rootdev to /dev/sda1, resume to /dev/sda2 > and also fstab, sda1 is seen, but only if I leave menu.list pointing to > /dev/hda1 as root, sda2 as swap isn't registered. "swapon /dev/hda2" works. > When Alpha4 upgrade hi

Re: [opensuse-factory] Changing /dev/hda to /dev/sda

2007-05-13 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 13 May 2007 19:26, Sid Boyce wrote: > I presume I need to change hdb to sdb, hda to sda and sdb to sdc. > With the above, somehow it did the translation. That was the only missing piece. I got similar problem when I moved 10.3 installation from reiserfs to ext3 partition, changing on

[opensuse-factory] Kickoff menu 10.3 alpha 4 on x86_64

2007-05-20 Thread Rajko M.
First good: I like Application tab as a second to the Favorites. Now bad: Kickoff menu has strange ways to switch betwen click to focus to a tab and focus on hower modes. Start Kickoff menu and hover works fine left and right. Hover over Favorite and click on it and hover right. Hover doesn't

[opensuse-factory] DHCP in 10.3 alpha 4 x86_64

2007-05-20 Thread Rajko M.
It seems that dchp didn't released lease after shutdown. I can't recall that this happened before. I can see computer still listed in router after boot to 10.2 that has static network setup. Computer IP MACLease expiration linux-xyz 192.168.0.100 00-xx-xx-xx-x

Re: [opensuse-factory] kernel update brake the boot

2007-05-22 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 07:44, jdd wrote: > You are probably already informed :-), but the last 10.2 kernel update > brake the computer boot... Here was mess. In menu.lst initrd was listed with version string. for both old and new kernel. Old version of kernel and initrd that should be rescu

Re: [opensuse-factory] kernel update brake the boot

2007-05-22 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 19:35, Rajko M. wrote: > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 07:44, jdd wrote: > > You are probably already informed :-), but the last 10.2 kernel update > > brake the computer boot... > > > > Here was mess. It was, but not as described. Old kerne

Re: [opensuse-factory] Grub-entries, partitioning differences between 10.2 > 10.3.

2007-05-23 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:05, M9. wrote: > M9. schreef: > > I must say that it is very difficult to handle, because when an entry in > > grub does not work, because 10.2 reads different as 10.3, it is > > impossible to mount a 10.3 ext2 /boot partition, in the 10.2 partitioner. > > This way the w

Re: [opensuse-factory] Grub-entries, partitioning differences between 10.2 > 10.3.

2007-05-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 24 May 2007 04:45, M9. wrote: > M9. schreef: > > M9. schreef: > >> Rajko M. schreef: > >>> On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:05, M9. wrote: > >>>> M9. schreef: > >>>> > >>>> in the 10.2 grub is written: title openSU

Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug Day/s Lets Get it going.

2007-06-03 Thread Rajko M.
Hi Ted, On Friday 01 June 2007 08:34, Ted Bullock wrote: > Now is probably the latest time to run this bug day thing if it is going > to have any sizable effect on 10.3. Alpha period is almost over (only > two alpha releases left to make changes in). > > Suggessted Wiki Node for Bug Triage Day >

Re: [opensuse-factory] opensuse-updater: "Check for any kind updates" option?

2007-07-02 Thread Rajko M.
Hi Benji, On Monday 02 July 2007 15:51, Benji Weber wrote: > It may be we need 3 policies: > > - Updates only (as default now) This is important for every user, and leaves system stable. > - Updates and version upgrades from same vendor as installed package > (e.g. if you install xine from pack

Re: [opensuse-factory] opensuse-updater: "Check for any kind updates" option?

2007-07-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 13:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2007/7/4, Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Anyway, I suppose that if the user has activated a dozen repos, he must > > be prepared for some confussion, but he surely must be interested in > > knowing what is new from all, sorted some

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Results of survey on use of proprietary software in openSUSE

2007-07-07 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 07 July 2007 09:27, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Michael Löffler wrote on opensuse-announce: > > Hi, > > > > the survey we did on proprietary software can be found here: > > http://en.opensuse.org/UX#Surveys > > > > It shows that we ship on the media some software which is hardly used > > (e

Re: [opensuse-factory] New susegreeter / one-click help

2007-08-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 04 August 2007 18:25, Benji Weber wrote: > Indeed, I think a clearly labled desktop icon is essential to return > to the greeter/support options. Many users are conditioned to close > all the clutter that opens on first start without much more than > glancing at it. Greeter resembles

Re: [opensuse-factory] Yast2 Alpha 5

2007-08-05 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:14:43 pm Donn Washburn wrote: > Key Group; > > I decided last night to try a "Yast2 > Software Management" on this > machine ($HOSTNAME=m1l). I deselected the Yast check dependencies every > time box due to the time it takes. I selected what I wanted and hit > "Accept"

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.3 alpha 7 KDE CD plus Factory

2007-08-05 Thread Rajko M.
It is amazing. It has some rough edges, but it works so good that it will be here default for a while. *** Package management: Runs really fast. There is no need to keep "yast2 sw_single" opened longer than needed just to skip long repository scan. Show spoiler (to major): Te

Re: [opensuse-factory] Yast2 Alpha 5

2007-08-05 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 05 August 2007 08:03:10 pm Donn Washburn wrote: > Rajko M. wrote: > > On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:14:43 pm Donn Washburn wrote: > >> Key Group; > >> > >> I decided last night to try a "Yast2 > Software Management" on this > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] support r/w for ntfs in aplha7

2007-08-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 06 August 2007 02:48:33 am Krupanský Rastislav wrote: > hello > i´d like to test support for r/w on ntfs partition, but i don´t know how i > can enable support for r/w on ntfs partition in aplha7.i installed alpha7 > cd and dvd also, but partitions ( i have /dev/sda1) with ntfs is not > m

Re: [opensuse-factory] More packages to remove from Gnome CD.

2007-08-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 14:32, Claes Bäckström wrote: > On 8/8/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Claes Bäckström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-05 22:37]: > > > sensors > > > > Isn't that needed for some GNOME applet that displays the CPU > > temperature? At least gkrellm uses i

Re: [opensuse-factory] Call for testing: Alpha7 Live CDs

2007-08-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 05 August 2007 09:48:41 am Stephan Kulow wrote: > Hi! > > With openSUSE 10.3 we want to try something different: > have live CDs available already during beta phase, so > as a start I created live CDs of the installation set of > the i386 GNOME CD and i386 KDE CD (the final version > migh

Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta1 on VMWare requesting host clock rate change

2007-08-12 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 12 August 2007 06:49:32 am Vahis wrote: > So M$ supports Linux quite well... If you ask them ;-) With QEMU I've seen that kernel switched to clock pit during installation or boot, but I can't recall was that with Beta1 or Alpha 7 where I started using QEMU with kqemu (kernel level acc

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 CD1 Gnome Beta1 issues

2007-08-12 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 12 August 2007 11:00:10 am James Tremblay wrote: > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 23:33 -0400, James Tremblay wrote: > > Today I put my play disk back in my laptop (IBM r51) to try CD1 B1 and > > it still does not have the kernel modules to configure the IPW2200 from > > Intel (same issue as beta7

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Changes with boot/init for 10.3 ? Kernel locks in 10.3, not in 10.2 ?

2007-08-15 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 12:54, Kevin Valko wrote: > and maybe disabling parallel > services as well. I would start with that. Than you have better chance to find service that makes trouble. -- Regards, Rajko. - To unsubscri

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Changes with boot/init for 10.3 ? Kernel locks in 10.3, not in 10.2 ?

2007-08-15 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 22:22, Kevin Valko wrote: > On Wednesday 15 August 2007 09:10:45 pm Rajko M. wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 August 2007 12:54, Kevin Valko wrote: > > > and maybe disabling parallel > > > services as well. > > > > I would start with t

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Changes with boot/init for 10.3 ? Kernel locks in 10.3, not in 10.2 ?

2007-08-16 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 16 August 2007 06:04, Andreas Vetter wrote: > > The other method to isolate script would be add echo command to scripts > > that will give on the screen script name. For instance > >   echo $0 >> /tmp/startup.log > >   > > That will at least tell what was loaded before lockup and it wil

[opensuse-factory] Configuring update Factory

2007-08-23 Thread Rajko M.
I added 10.3 update repository, and it takes quite some time to see the end Online Update configuration. What is purpose of refreshing all repositories when one wants to configure online update? -- Regards, Rajko. - To unsub

[opensuse-factory] Konqueror KDE 3.5.7-6 from Factory.

2007-08-23 Thread Rajko M.
Konqueror 3.5.7-6 is freezing on many pages, waiting on missing images. It can be terminated by the system, otherwise no response. http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=697&tag=nl.e539 http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=18E26C3:C77A76F176CA0254F8962FADCC4E786AEFF29049075316B4 etc. Anybody notic

Re: [opensuse-factory] Konqueror KDE 3.5.7-6 from Factory.

2007-08-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 24 August 2007 02:30:32 am Peter Buschbacher wrote: > Rajko M. schrieb: > > Konqueror 3.5.7-6 is freezing on many pages, waiting on missing images. > > It can be terminated by the system, otherwise no response. > > > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/

Re: [opensuse-factory] Configuring update Factory

2007-08-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 24 August 2007 03:43:43 am Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > Dňa Friday 24 August 2007 10:33:46 Andreas Jaeger ste napísal: > > "Rajko M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I added 10.3 update repository, and it takes quite some time to see the >

Re: [opensuse-factory] Configuring update Factory

2007-08-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 24 August 2007 04:41:38 am Christoph Thiel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:35:59AM -0500, Rajko M. wrote: > > On Friday 24 August 2007 03:43:43 am Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > > > Dňa Friday 24 August 2007 10:33:46 Andreas Jaeger ste napísal: > > > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] Configuring update Factory

2007-08-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 24 August 2007 06:08:23 am Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > Dňa Friday 24 August 2007 11:58:25 Rajko M. ste napísal: > > On Friday 24 August 2007 04:41:38 am Christoph Thiel wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:35:59AM -0500, Rajko M. wrote: > > > > On Fri

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-factory] I‘m not able to install software via "software management" in Beta2

2007-08-26 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 26 August 2007 02:44:30 pm Krupanský Rastislav wrote: > linux:/home/user # zypper in opera Can you try zypper in -n opera -- Regards, Rajko. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mai

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-factory] I‘m not able to install software via "software management" in Beta2

2007-08-26 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 26 August 2007 03:12:40 pm Rastislav Krupanský wrote: > still the same > > > linux:/home/user # zypper in -n opera > Refreshing 'local' > * Cleaning repository 'local' cache > * Building repository 'local' cache > * Reading repository 'openSUSE-10.3-OSS-KDE 10.3' cache > * Reading reposit

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 Beta-2 + nvidia-drivers

2007-08-30 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 30 August 2007 04:05:05 pm Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > >    rpm -q kernel-smp kernel-source > > > to see that you do have the *same* versions installed > > You indicated that you used kernel-smp, but Philipp Thomas says that > kernel-default is SMP, so It was 'bigsmp' in error repo

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 Beta-2 + nvidia-drivers

2007-08-31 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 31 August 2007 01:04:46 am TooMany Secrets wrote: > 2007/8/31, Rajko M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > But there is another question, is it necessary 'bigsmp'. > > TooMany Secrets should have a big machine (> 4GB RAM, etc) to need it. > > No. My machine

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 Beta-2 + nvidia-drivers

2007-08-31 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 31 August 2007 06:53:19 am Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Rajko M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-31-07 07:30]: > > Although someone removed advice for; > >cd /usr/src/linux > >make oldconfig > >make prepare > > from article > > http:

Re: [opensuse-factory] Device already mounted or mountpoint busy error after some beta2 update, I guess

2007-09-01 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 01 September 2007 18:30, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > Hi, > > On a 10.3beta2 couple days ago my /dev/sdb1 was perfectly mountable. It was > not in in fstab on purpose, mind you. Then something got updated by > opensuse updater and sdb1 was not mountable anymore. > > mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt > sa

Re: [opensuse-factory] Device already mounted or mountpoint busy error after some beta2 update, I guess

2007-09-02 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 02 September 2007 07:42, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > I've looked > at /etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules and I wonder: Is that the > only/the right spot to get rid of serial numbers? I guess it is, but you can also use YaST Partitioner (command 'yast2 disk'). Select partition tha

Re: [opensuse-factory] Device already mounted or mountpoint busy error after some beta2 update, I guess

2007-09-03 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 02 September 2007 16:15, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: ... > > Be aware that abandoning mount by device path was forced by increasing > > number of devices that can be mounted in different order on each boot > > which results in different path. All SATA and USB devices are prone to > > that. > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] High number of serious bugs in GNOME

2007-09-03 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:52:54 am Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > Hello everyone, > during a discussion on IRC it emerged that GNOME still has a very high > number of blockers and critical bugs. > As it can be seen here: The numbers seems to be lower today. https://bugzilla.novell.com/report.c

Re: [opensuse-factory] High number of serious bugs in GNOME

2007-09-03 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 03 September 2007 13:06, Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > > And for instance: > > 301716Cri P5 open NEW Pidgin segfaults when sending > > AIM message to yourself. > > > > Taking the type of application is it really critical? > > Is that mean that critical is used for any c

Re: [opensuse-factory] Device already mounted or mountpoint busy error after some beta2 update, I guess

2007-09-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:50, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > Dienstag, 4. September 2007 Wolfgang Woehl: > > Montag, 3. September 2007 Rajko M.: > > > On Sunday 02 September 2007 16:15, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > > > > But my initial posting was about an internal device

Re: [opensuse-factory] Device already mounted or mountpoint busy error after some beta2 update, I guess

2007-09-05 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 09:25:10 am Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 Dirk Mueller: > > On Wednesday, 5. September 2007, Wolfgang Woehl wrote: > > > No. And again: I did not configure or invoke device-mapper explivitly. > > > This is a non-tweaked 10.3beta2 install and the

Re: [opensuse-factory] Kmail keeps its own list of read messages instead of quering the IMAP server

2007-09-07 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 07 September 2007 05:55:57 am Silviu Marin-Caea wrote: > Misfeature? > > It might coincide with the time that the kmail build is called > "enterprise". > > I didn't see this happen in earlier betas. But this might be because I was > carrying the home directory over installations. Now I

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.3, kernel update 2.6.22.5-12 doesn't create initrd

2007-09-07 Thread Rajko M.
The latest kernel 2.6.22.5-12-default from update repositories has bug in postinstall script that prevents creation of initrd, making system unbootable. Bootloader is on different partition and script test for menu.lst fails, making script to skip creation of initrd. This has happened in 10.

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.3, kernel update 2.6.22.5-12 doesn't create initrd

2007-09-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 08 September 2007 01:04:40 am Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 07:14:33PM -0500, Rajko M. wrote: > > The latest kernel 2.6.22.5-12-default from update repositories has bug in > > postinstall script that prevents creation of initrd, making system

Re: [opensuse-factory] broken grub after update from beta1

2007-09-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 08 September 2007 05:46:36 am Andreas Vetter wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Richard C Creighton wrote: > > Andreas Vetter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I updated a x86_64 machine from beta1 to beta3. After the packages were > > > installed I found the machine in a reboot loop. The grub boo

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.3 BETA3 refuses to run on VirtualBox

2007-09-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 08 September 2007 09:55:04 am Alexey Eremenko wrote: > hi all ! > > openSUSE 10.3 BETA3 refuses to run on VirtualBox 1.5.0. BETA2 worked. > > Host: openSUSE 10.2, Athlon XP. > > When booting kernel, it says: "PANIC: CPU too old for this kernel.". > Plus for some strange reason openSUSE

Re: [opensuse-factory] beta 3 fails in virtual box 1.3.6

2007-09-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 08 September 2007 13:40, jdd wrote: > Clayton wrote: > > There is a bug open on this... number 307676 (mentioned in the other > > thread on this problem) > > > > Some have said that if you manually switch the bigsmp kernel with the > > default, that it will work > > probably not the

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 Beta3 - YAST reports file size incorrectly when adding software after an install

2007-09-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 08 September 2007 14:30, Clayton wrote: > On 9/8/07, Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Den Saturday 08 September 2007 21:09:37 skrev Clayton: > > > I just installed 10.3 Beta3 in VMWare. The install went OK taking > > > defaults only. Post install I started YAST and sele

[opensuse-factory] opensuse wiki: proposal for Bugs:Most Annoying Bugs page format

2007-09-11 Thread Rajko M.
When adding bug to the list of most annoying bugs it would be good that everybody follow the same system. == openSUSE 10.3 Beta 3 == * the newest bug * already listed bugs that follows overall schema on the page, where newer versions are listed at the top of the page. It is also usefull t

Re: [opensuse-factory] /etc/modprobe.d/unsupported.blacklist

2007-09-12 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 12:19, Michal Marek wrote: > tail -1 /etc/modprobe.d/unsupported.blacklist Yes. -- Regards, Rajko. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse-factory] Firewall not consistent..

2007-09-15 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 15 September 2007 12:38:53 pm jdd wrote: > M9. wrote: > >> informed? > > > > spyware and datamining.. ;-) > > ( i know this is unknown to linux :-) Not yet, but when LSB kick in and it would be easy to install any program to any distro, situation may change. > if you let your comput

Re: [opensuse-factory] after 17-SEP broken update

2007-09-18 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 15:42, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Miquel A. Noguera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-18-07 15:45]: > > After 17 september broken update, I have got a lot of duplicate > > packages. > > > > I removed manually all them (is there another way?), except grub due > > to following err

Re: [opensuse-factory] Warning: Don't install kernel--2.6.22.5-21 from Factory

2007-09-18 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 13:40, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 19:27 +0200, Hans-Peter Holler wrote: > > leads to panic on boot > > see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326099 > > > > Hans-Peter > > Yet one more reason to keep the old kernel around, especially when

Re: [opensuse-factory] Yast2 printer

2007-09-18 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 18:30, Donn Washburn wrote: > Hey Group; > > In Beta 2 Yast2 seems not to create and pre configuredvia Yast printer > termcap correctly. I have to re run Yast2>Hardware>Printer each time I > need to use the printer. Don, https://bugzilla.novell.com/buglist.cgi?query

Re: [opensuse-factory] Warning: Don't install kernel--2.6.22.5-21 from Factory

2007-09-18 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 19:05, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > We should have a way to keep > the old kernel _even in an upgrade_ when testing Agree. It is all in post install script. I didn't looked in details how it works, only the part that I had problem with - not creating initrd in some c

Re: [opensuse-factory] RC1 install not completing

2007-09-22 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 22 September 2007 16:15, Glenn Holmer wrote: > OK, I can see the details in 326942, which my issue was marked as a > duplicate of within minutes.  Now I can breathe again... :) The SUSE guys are everywhere ;-) -- Regards, Rajko. --

Re: [opensuse-factory] RC1 i386 Installation

2007-09-23 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 23 September 2007 06:24:15 am Carlos E. R. wrote: > nordi wrote: > > Stephan Kulow schrieb: > > > > > > Not to speak about the timeouts that occured and caused the installation > > to be interrupted until I pressed the "try downloading again" button. > > Shouldn't the downloader be able t

Re: [opensuse-factory] Encrypted filesystem problem in 10.3

2007-09-23 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 23 September 2007 08:58:31 am Carlos E. R. wrote: > Juan Erbes wrote: > > 2007/9/23, Carlos E. R. <>: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have the following defined on 10.2 (works fine): > >> > >> /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd.crypta.x auto \ > >> ro,noauto,user,loop,encryption=twofish256 0 0 > > > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] RC1 i386 Installation

2007-09-23 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 23 September 2007 11:07:23 am nordi wrote: > Rajko M. wrote > > > The problem can be slow server response. > > I had that few times on normal days. > > Press Retry few times and installation continues. > > > > IMHO, there is no ideal solution. >

[opensuse-factory] beagle-thunderbird has too many dependencies.

2007-09-23 Thread Rajko M.
linux-kw92:~ # zypper in MozillaThunderbird beagle-thunderbird * Reading repository 'Main Update Repository' cache * Reading repository 'Main Repository (NON-OSS)' cache * Reading repository 'Main Repository (OSS)' cache * Reading repository 'openSUSE BuildService - Virtualization (QEMU)' cache *

Re: [opensuse-factory] beagle-thunderbird has too many dependencies.

2007-09-24 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 24 September 2007 10:04:14 am Joe Shaw wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/23/07, Rajko M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > linux-kw92:~ # zypper in beagle-thunderbird > > > > The following NEW packages are going to be installed: > > MozillaThunderbird a

Re: [opensuse-factory] Some 10.3 Bug Statistics

2007-09-30 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 30 September 2007 01:58:24 pm Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > on Donnerstag, 27. September 2007, Francis Giannaros wrote: > [Bug statistics] > > I have another interesting statistics: bugs per component, compared with > the releases before. First the raw data, see below for comments.

Re: [opensuse-factory] 10.3 install problem

2007-10-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:47:58 am Kenneth Schneider wrote: > Hardware: > > Compaq Presario 1720US laptop > P3 1G cpu > 256M ram > > During first attempt to install (fresh) while selecting custom software > choices the system became very sluggish and eventually crashed the > installer. In tryi

Re: [opensuse-factory] suggested work around for zypper/libzypp

2007-10-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 04 October 2007 06:35:28 pm Igor Jagec wrote: ... > BTW what is the difference between 'zypper update' and 'zypper update -t > package? 'zypper update' == 'zypper update -t patch' > Which one of these 2 commands is used by GNOME/KDE update > applet? Whatever is for patches :-) > I

Re: [opensuse-factory] suggested work around for zypper/libzypp

2007-10-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Thursday 04 October 2007 08:33:19 pm Igor Jagec wrote: > On Čet, 2007-10-04 at 19:08 -0500, Rajko M. wrote: > > On Thursday 04 October 2007 06:35:28 pm Igor Jagec wrote: > > > BTW what is the difference between 'zypper update' and 'zypper update > &g

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Incomplete suseboot directory in 10.3?

2007-10-05 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 05 October 2007 03:34:35 pm Manfred Tremmel wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007 22:02 schrieb Manfred Tremmel: > > Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007 21:53 schrieb Manfred Tremmel: > > > after three years I was able to reanimate my old PowerBook. I would > > > like to install openSUSE 10.3 on i

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Incomplete suseboot directory in 10.3?

2007-10-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 06 October 2007 04:31, Manfred Tremmel wrote: > Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007 05:58 schrieb Rajko M.: > > On Friday 05 October 2007 03:34:35 pm Manfred Tremmel wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007 22:02 schrieb Manfred Tremmel: > > > > Am Freitag,

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Incomplete suseboot directory in 10.3?

2007-10-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 06 October 2007 16:05, Manfred Tremmel wrote: > Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007 21:39 schrieb Rajko M.: > > I found both in factory oss repository in large mini iso that was all > > in one. Now it is split into ppc and x86 part. > > > > http://download.opensuse.o

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Incomplete suseboot directory in 10.3?

2007-10-07 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:59:31 am Manfred Tremmel wrote: > I see, I have to invest more time in betatesting next time and not only > in VirtualBox. The VirtualBox is kind of ideal world. All hardware is the same. -- Regards, Rajko. -

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Incomplete suseboot directory in 10.3?

2007-10-08 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 08 October 2007 01:12:58 pm Manfred Tremmel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 schrieb Rajko M.: > > What is the reason not to use: > > ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/10.3/repo/oss/suse/ppc > > install-initrd-1.0-228.ppc.rpm > > kernel-

Re: [opensuse-factory] [status report] openSUSE distribution, week 41

2007-10-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 10:33:15 am Sid Boyce wrote: > Stephan Kulow wrote: > > Hi! > > > > There is little to report status on this time, beside this: > > > > * WE'VE PUBLISHED OPENSUSE 10.3 - and it looks like a > > success all in all ( > > * Of course we've seen plenty of bugs that users re

Re: [opensuse-factory] A Zypper question

2007-10-13 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 12 October 2007 09:29:45 am Robert Lewis wrote: > On 10/12/07, Stanislav Visnovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dňa Friday 12 October 2007 14:39:40 Igor Jagec ste napísal: > > > I don't know which features for Zypper you plan to develop, so I'd like > > > to ask for one. Do you have any

Re: [opensuse-factory] Looking outside the box

2007-10-17 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 09:52:33 am Sid Boyce wrote: > I must have a good look at the opeSUSE wiki, I'm > sure there is noteworthy stuff that describes HOWTO on openSUSE, This will be good. If we would put so much time writing on wiki, as we use on mail lists the openSUSE wiki will be cited

Re: [opensuse-factory] Both 10.2 and 10.3 invalid now.

2007-10-17 Thread Rajko M.
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 08:36:17 am Monkey 9 wrote: > Robison, Jonathon (M.) schreef: > >On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 12:22 +0200, Monkey 9 wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>x-server update on 10.3 this morning, made the os unuseable, the same > >>goes for the kernel-update on 10.2, misplaced entrances in the

[opensuse-factory] YaST (or KDE4) problem

2007-10-26 Thread Rajko M.
Tried to update KDE4 to newest and got dependency problem that seems to be software management problem (or KDE4 packaging): Message 1 (there is another 2 about libkdefx.so.5()(64bit) ) -- Can't satisfy requirement libkdefx.so.5()

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: bug 234533 should be solved?

2007-11-06 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 01:05:10 pm jdd wrote: > jdd wrote: > > I'm hit by the bug #234533. It's resolved "wont fix" "because it's a > > feature, not a bug" > > > > but > > > > 1) it's a bug only on pci-e (here mini pci, laptop), why this special > > hardware hve such a feature? > > 2) the comm

Re: [opensuse-factory] Discussing problems with 10.3

2007-11-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 09 November 2007 09:49:44 pm Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > Which list is meant for discussing problems with 10.3? opensuse@ is not > the answer, and I've been told off several times here. Now it is. Before 10.3 was development version and that is opensuse-factory mail list, now it is releas

Re: [opensuse-factory] YaST (or KDE4) problem [SOLVED]

2007-11-11 Thread Rajko M.
On Friday 26 October 2007 01:02:42 pm Rajko M. wrote: > Tried to update KDE4 to newest and got dependency problem that seems to be > software management problem (or KDE4 packaging): > > Message 1 (there is another 2 about libkdefx.

Re: [opensuse-factory] YaST (or KDE4) problem [SOLVED]

2007-11-12 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 12 November 2007 03:44:23 am Stephan Kulow wrote: > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb Rajko M.: > > On Friday 26 October 2007 01:02:42 pm Rajko M. wrote: > > > Tried to update KDE4 to newest and got dependency problem that seems to > > > be software management

Re: [opensuse-factory] Xgl/Compiz 11.0 Notes (DRAFT)

2007-11-26 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 26 November 2007 07:07:18 pm Benji Weber wrote: > On 27/11/2007, Juan Erbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3- The option "1-Click-uninstall" to remove easy xgl/aiglx from the > > system. > > It is possible to make YMPs which will uninstall packages, but one can > just as easily use yast

Re: [opensuse-factory] Help Wanted: Move YaST tutorials from forgeftp.novell.com to openSUSE WIKI

2007-12-03 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 03 December 2007 01:37:08 pm jdd wrote: > J. Daniel Schmidt wrote: > > On Saturday 01 December 2007, jdd wrote: > >>> and also WIKI page for every single YaST module: > >>> http://en.opensuse.org/YaST/Modules > >>> > >>> Your example (YaST Printer): > >>> http://en.opensuse.org/YaST_Print

Re: [opensuse-factory] Help Wanted: Move YaST tutorials from forgeftp.novell.com to openSUSE WIKI

2007-12-04 Thread Rajko M.
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 03:28:23 pm J. Daniel Schmidt wrote: > > > don't !! looks like making several subpages levels is not that good > > > (see other thread) > > Which thread are you referring to? In opensuse-wiki: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-wiki/2007-12/msg1.html One of ideas i

Re: [opensuse-factory] Two separate bug numbers, same problem?

2007-12-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 03:53:28 am Vahis wrote: > In 10.3 I have this message repeatedly: > > PAM audit_log_acct_message() failed: Operation not permitted > > It seems to be bug #334559 > > I found another one in bugzilla , bug #331683 > > I don't have this one because I don't have that applica

Re: [opensuse-factory] How to add /home/RPM/ to the rpm database?

2007-12-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 07:59:30 am M9. wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason that a /home/dir can not be added to the install sources? > Than there should be a workaround, which is:? I'm a bit late with answer. It was written an hour ago, before lunch, but it adds more info, so here it is: /h

Re: [opensuse-factory] How to add /home/RPM/ to the rpm database?

2007-12-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 01:33:37 pm M9. wrote: > I presume the 2th defciency will be  corrected? > Not that it matters to me to do things more than nessesary, but just to > know that progression will happen. https://bugzilla.novell.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwords

Re: [opensuse-factory] How to add /home/RPM/ to the rpm database?

2007-12-09 Thread Rajko M.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 01:56:01 pm M9. wrote: > How to specify such a directory than? > I do not mind to move the rpm's to another directory, or change the > name... but this is not very obvious, if you ask me? From man: SYNOPSIS createrepo [options] When you are in /home/monkey9/RPM:

[opensuse-factory] factory kernel-default-2.6.24_rc5_git2-2.i586.rpm

2007-12-16 Thread Rajko M.
Hi, http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/ kernel-default-2.6.24_rc5_git2-2.i586.rpm used in factory installation in VirtualBox (latest) can start only with acpi=off, but then system timer runs very fast. Old kernel is, as usually, removed. Booting in r

Re: [opensuse-factory] new live cd 2.5

2007-12-17 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 17 December 2007 03:12:26 am Stephan Kulow wrote: > Am Sonntag 16 Dezember 2007 schrieb Ted Bullock: > > Stephan Kulow wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I updated the live CDs again to fix the remaining X config problem, > > > so if you want to try it - grab 2.5 of either gnome or kde from > >

Re: [opensuse-factory] yast2 qt frontend broken on x86_64

2007-12-17 Thread Rajko M.
On Monday 17 December 2007 02:25:19 pm Markus Koßmann wrote: > If I start yast2 it doesn't start it's qt frontend: > > libpy2wfm.so.2 => not found > warning: the qt frontend is installed but does not work > Qt GUI wanted but not found, falling back to ncurses. > > But libpy2wfm.so.2 exists in /usr/

<    1   2   3   >