Good heavens. Did someone actually make up, and then convince others
to use, the word "Flektogon"? I'm so impressed. -T
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Got my tilt setup from the post office last Thursday. It is Ukrainian tilt
> adapter (Pentacon 6 to K mount, n
On 8/14/2011 05:21, Michael Beacom wrote:
Sounds like fun- any hope for a portrait of the happy couple?
Cheers
Mike
Mike, I am not any good in object photography, but I will try to make a
picture of my combo. Alternatively you can google it. I should point out
that Flektogon 50/4 has outrage
On 8/13/2011 17:54, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Boris,
I happen to have exactly the same couple.
Had no chance to seriously try them, though :(
Anxiously looking for your experiences...
Bulent
Bulent, you certainly ought to try it. This lens is quite remarkable.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
Sounds like fun- any hope for a portrait of the happy couple?
Cheers
Mike
On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Got my tilt setup from the post office last Thursday. It is Ukrainian tilt
> adapter (Pentacon 6 to K mount, no electronics) and CSJ Flektogon 50/4 in the
>
Boris,
I happen to have exactly the same couple.
Had no chance to seriously try them, though :(
Anxiously looking for your experiences...
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=22
Hi!
Got my tilt setup from the post office last Thursday. It is Ukrainian
tilt adapter (Pentacon 6 to K mount, no electronics) and CSJ Flektogon
50/4 in the said Pentacon 6 mount. Big and heavy but certainly fun to
work with. Presently I am in the process of getting to know tilt
photography,
On 4/15/2011 8:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 15/04/2011 1:22 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Welcome to the club Bill, welcome to the club.
Thanks Peter. You do a lot of your work with the 43, don't you?
It's pretty much my low light go to lens these days. Though I have to
say, I also liked it on f
On 15/04/2011 1:22 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Welcome to the club Bill, welcome to the club.
Thanks Peter. You do a lot of your work with the 43, don't you?
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
Welcome to the club Bill, welcome to the club.
On 4/10/2011 10:15 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 10/04/2011 7:39 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bill,
It is a nice lens although often overlooked.
I think Rick Wormer has had his out recently for a stroll.
I got to thinking (which for me ALWAYS costs money
On 4/12/2011 06:21, William Robb wrote:
That's the beauty of it, no? So many excellent choices?
Exactly right, Bill, exactly right.
I had a very hard time letting my FA50/1.4 go, and in fact, it is only
one of perhaps a dozen I have sold over the years, and the bulk of that
dozen was Nikkors
On 11/04/2011 5:45 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I quite like mine, but FA 50/1.4 or A 50/1.2 are excellent lenses too...
That's the beauty of it, no? So many excellent choices?
I had a very hard time letting my FA50/1.4 go, and in fact, it is only
one of perhaps a dozen I have sold over the
On 4/11/2011 04:33, William Robb wrote:
Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for everything else
so
I decided that perhaps a 43 LTD was in my future, and probably sooner
rather than later.
Looked on Adorama's website and thought the price was OK, especially
since the Canadian
Damn Bill, you're a poet.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:33:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Another enablement
Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for
On Apr 10, 2011, at 7:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 8:44 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>> Nope, I don't have any limited lenses. My primes are an FA 28/2.8 and
>> 50/1.7, and a couple of macros.
>>
>> Bill, what don't you like about the 40? Send me an email if you decide to
>> sell it.
On 10/04/2011 8:44 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Nope, I don't have any limited lenses. My primes are an FA 28/2.8 and 50/1.7,
and a couple of macros.
Bill, what don't you like about the 40? Send me an email if you decide to sell
it.
It's small and it's slow.
Other than that, I can't fault the th
Nope, I don't have any limited lenses. My primes are an FA 28/2.8 and 50/1.7,
and a couple of macros.
Bill, what don't you like about the 40? Send me an email if you decide to sell
it.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Bill,
> It is a nice lens
On 10/04/2011 7:39 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bill,
It is a nice lens although often overlooked.
I think Rick Wormer has had his out recently for a stroll.
I got to thinking (which for me ALWAYS costs money) that when I was
shooting 4x5, the 210 was my got to lens, and on the 6x7, the 135 was my
Bill,
It is a nice lens although often overlooked.
I think Rick Wormer has had his out recently for a stroll.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:33 PM, William Robb
wrote:
> Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for everything else
> so
> I decided that perhaps a 43 LTD
Love the 40LTD for it's field of view, hate the lens for everything else
so
I decided that perhaps a 43 LTD was in my future, and probably sooner
rather than later.
Looked on Adorama's website and thought the price was OK, especially
since the Canadian $ is a few cents more valuable than t
On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:23 PM, David Savage wrote:
>> (and I mean
>> lenses like the FA20-35 here, as opposed to the DA21... not monstrous
>> things like an FA*200/2.8 ... ;-)
>
> It isn't that big.
LOL ... I relayed one from here to my friend in Gloucester. Lovely
thing ... and huge. I'd never
On 1/10/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (and I mean
> lenses like the FA20-35 here, as opposed to the DA21... not monstrous
> things like an FA*200/2.8 ... ;-)
It isn't that big.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
On Jan 9, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Having bought the K10D I made my small photo bag obsolete. Simply put,
> if I were to put in there the K10D with Tamron 28-75 attached, it
> would mean virtually no space for anything else. So I shelled out some
> money and bought myself a LoweP
Having bought the K10D I made my small photo bag obsolete. Simply put,
if I were to put in there the K10D with Tamron 28-75 attached, it
would mean virtually no space for anything else. So I shelled out some
money and bought myself a LowePro Orion Trekker II - which is half
photo bag half regular b
Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:41 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: Yet
> > another enablement.
> >
> >>>
> >>>>> I can't take responsibi
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Doug Brewer wrote:
>> William Robb wrote:
>>> "Mark Roberts" wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>>
>> Cable stitch or blanket?
>
> Darn!
>
>>
On 12/7/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2005, at 5:33 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> > This is just another useless thread
>
> Is knot...
Is sew!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
All I have to say is "Woof".
John Forbes wrote:
You punsters have a warped sense of humour.
John
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:44:43 -, Mark Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "mike wilson"
>>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth afte
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:41 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: Yet
another enablement.
I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
On 7 Dec 2005 at 0:33, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Not another one of these.threads
They spool 'em off one after the other zip zagging from one pun to
the next
I've come to the end of my string with this yarn.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "mike wilson"
>&
What a tale you've woven..
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
On 7 Dec 2005 at 0:33, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Not another one of the
I'm sitting here on pins & needles waiting for a post that will blanket all
the others.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: Yet ano
Cotty wrote:
I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
Cable stitch or blanket?
Darn!
Well I guess that just about sews things up then.
I think we could string em a yarn, though.
This is just another useless thread
You punsters have a warped sense of humour.
John
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:44:43 -, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "mike wilson"
>>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>>> Or even a cup of coffee, i
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "mike wilson"
>
>>> >>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>>> >>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cable stitch or blanket?
>>> >
>>> >Darn!
>>>
>>> Well I guess that just about sews things up then.
>>
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Re: Yet another enablement.
>>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>
>> Cable stitch or blanket?
>
>Darn
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/12/07 Wed AM 02:06:45 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
>
> "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >From: "mike wilson"
> &
Bravo! That wraps it up!
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:51:21 +1000
On 7 Dec 2005 at 0:33, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Not a
In a message dated 12/6/2005 11:27:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>
> Cable stitch or blanket?
>
Darn!
>>> Well I guess that just a
On Dec 7, 2005, at 5:33 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
This is just another useless thread
Is knot...
- Dave
A bit intertwined though.
Tom C.
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:47 AM
> To: Pentax Discuss
> Subject: Yet another enablement.
>
> This list is very bad.
> You are all bad people.
> Anyway, based on comments I have read
>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>
> Cable stitch or blanket?
>
Darn!
>>> Well I guess that just about sews things up then.
>>>
>>
>> I think we could string em a yarn, though.
>>
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:47 AM
> To: Pentax Discuss
> Subject: Yet another enablement.
>
> This list is very bad.
> You are all bad people.
> Anyway, based on comments I have read
On 7 Dec 2005 at 0:33, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Not another one of these.threads
They spool 'em off one after the other zip zagging from one pun to the next
winding each other up until the whole thing unravels, coil it what you like but
baste on what I've read I think its tack less. I gathe
On Dec 7, 2005, at 5:33 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
This is just another useless thread
Is knot...
- Dave
Not another one of these.threads
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "mike wilson"
I can't take resp
On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:41 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: Yet
another enablement.
I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
Cable stitch or blanket?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
Cable stitch or blanket?
Darn!
Well I guess that just about sews things up
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "mike wilson"
>
>>> I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
>>> Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
>>
>> Cable stitch or blanket?
>
>Darn!
Well I guess that just about sews things up then.
--
Mark Roberts
Photograph
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I'll be very intewested I mean interested in your thoughts on the A*85
when it arrives Bill.
I have another shoot this Thursday. With luck it will be here by then.
William Robb
I'll be very intewested I mean interested in your thoughts on the A*85
when it arrives Bill.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Re: Yet another enablement.
I can't take responsibility for my mouth after a couple of beers.
Or even a cup of coffee, it seams.
Cable stitch or blanket?
Darn!
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
oh, man. can I be evil too?
Right, I forgot Brewer, who hosts this madhouse.
Technically, it's all your fault Doug, my pocketbook wouldn't be victimised
at all were it not for the PDML.
William Robb
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh, man. can I be evil too?
Practice saying "Bwahahahahahahaha!"
Get back to us when you're proficient...
baa.
waa.
bra
dammit
Some people just aren't cut out for evilness.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh, man. can I be evil too?
Practice saying "Bwahahahahahahaha!"
Get back to us when you're proficient...
baa.
waa.
bra
dammit
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>oh, man. can I be evil too?
Practice saying "Bwahahahahahahaha!"
Get back to us when you're proficient...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
> It depends can you afford to purchase the stovepipe hat and Snidely
> Whiplash mustache?
Fred
It depends can you afford to purchase the stovepipe hat and Snidely
Whiplash mustache?
Doug Brewer wrote:
oh, man. can I be evil too?
William Robb wrote:
This list is very bad.
You are all bad people.
Anyway, based on comments I have read, the A* 85/1.4 is a pretty
decent lens.
I managed t
oh, man. can I be evil too?
William Robb wrote:
This list is very bad.
You are all bad people.
Anyway, based on comments I have read, the A* 85/1.4 is a pretty decent
lens.
I managed to snag what appears to be a nice one off eBay. I had thought,
right up until the last moment that I would get
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/12/06 Tue AM 11:46:20 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Cesar"
> Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Cesar"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
Ahhh but Bill you know that deep in your heart you are not innocent.
This goes beyond your commentary and remarks on Grandfather Mountain :-)
Had I been drinking?
I can't take responsibili
On 5/12/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>This list is very bad.
>You are all bad people.
>Anyway, based on comments I have read, the A* 85/1.4 is a pretty decent
>lens.
>I managed to snag what appears to be a nice one off eBay. I had thought,
>right up until the last moment that I
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Fred"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill
(even if
- Original Message -
From: "Fred"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill (even
if
you are indeed &quo
> I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
> You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill (even if
you are indeed "out in the boonies").
Fred
This list is very bad.
You are all bad people.
Anyway, based on comments I have read, the A* 85/1.4 is a pretty decent
lens.
I managed to snag what appears to be a nice one off eBay. I had thought,
right up until the last moment that I would get it for a nice price too, but
it was not to be.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: OT - Another enablement
Scored myself a Durst 606!
HAR!!
My first real enlarger was a Durst M301. A friend had the 601, and I was
always quite envious.
Yours was the next model of 6x6 enlarger after that.
It wo
The enlarger comes with an adjustable negative carrier. It works a
lot like a printing easel. The carrier provided by Durst will handle
everything from 8mm to 6x6. The really cool thing about the carrier
is that it allows for cropping the negative right on the carrier, or
for printing those tren
And it has the dichro head. You win!
I've printed with a 606, but it had a condenser head on it, and a set
of contrast filters.
Not a bad little enlarger, but I never figured out how to get it to do
a 6x7 negative (will it go bigger than 6x6?)
-Mat
On 11/20/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Scored myself a Durst 606!
eekBay auction #7563320648
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
70 matches
Mail list logo
