Knut wrote:
>> 2) I use an enlarger lens for macrophotography (I
>> found I get best quality
>> this way). With these lenses I cannot measure the
>> correct exposure time with
>> open diaphragm; only my LX is able to get a proper
>> exposure time if
>> diaphragm is set to f16.
Why? I mean why
Mick wrote (and my answers are in the middle)
:
Here's a thought... With an LX plus motor drive etc. costing about as much
as a new MZ-S is it really worth buying the LX?
/ Yes, if you want it instead of the MZ S. There's no "universal
answer" to this question. It depends on what of the
How Is there some kind of adaptor? I've never
heard of this before. Sounds interesting. What does
best quality mean to you? How are enlarger lenses
classified? ie. do they have 50mm and 85mm, etc; or
are they all the same focal length?
I am thinking now that the Hanimex that I got shown i
>it cost here 1.135,-- US dollars, new MZ-5n now cost about 370 US dollars
>as used LX in Vienna secodhand shop.
For the price of an used LX alone, you might just purchase a brand new Z-1p.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FREE downl
> and used LX. The price
> is roughly equal, Im able to live without AF (but
> sometimes is useful) and
> durability of LX is fine for my occassional
> trekking. But buying a LX - isnt
> it step back?
No, definitely not. I consider the LX a step forward
from my MZ-30. I love everything about it
Mike Johnston scribed:
> Well, the LX is far more popular in Albano's "Favorite Body" survey.
Yeah... far more so than the K2 I voted for :)
I found out that the guy I know at work who owns two LXes has once again
decided to buy a digital camera so he's likely to sell me an LX :) He knows
Two examples where the LX cannot be replaced:
1) Taking a shot of a building across a moderately busy street:
I have a black cap in my camerabag, whenever a single or group of cars
passes I hold it in front of the lens to avoid white and red light streaks;
the LX automatically compensates "on l
h, The LX is an amazing piece of work. Do I like if for it's "retro
feel"... I didn't realize it was retro. If you refer to ugly, bloated and
"ergonomic" as modern then yes I do like the "classic" look and feel of the
LX I like it because it offers everything I need in a camera for the work
OTECTED] |
(_/) ICQ: 48609010 |
\/ |
\ /---+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ5n versus LX
LX.
It's a experience every photographer should pass by
9 matches
Mail list logo
