On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:25 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just committed a change (r29239) to allow Rakudo to build and run the
> basic tests on the pdd25cx branch. Most of it works.
New Revision: 29239
Modified:
branches/gsoc_pdd09/languages/perl6/src/classes/Scalar.pir
EW
What's this branch for, out of curiosity?
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
Belatedly add Moritz's response to the ticket.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
-- Forwarded message --
From: Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:00 AM
Subject: Re: src/jit/i386/core.jit:1031: error: 'DO' undeclared
To: tuxdna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perl 6 Internals
Can someone who is attending OSCON write up a blurb for the parrot web
site similar to the (now past) one there for YAPC::NA?
I'd be happy to post it if the person that writes it isn't Allison or
chromatic... ^_^
Thanks...
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 09 18:57:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since I closed this ticket in January, more code has been added.
>> Tonight, while writing unit tests for internal subroutine
>> _handle_ncurses_need(), I noti
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:30 PM, NotFound via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> imcc_init is now called during interpreter initialization. Does that
> solve this problem?
>
>
I'd say we'd need a passing test to close this out. =-)
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:56 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2008 09:33:31 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> Working on this, I see that we have a ^L before the coda in quite a
>> few files in, e.g.: tools/build/; This isn't Tidy.
>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda (via RT) schrieb:
>>
>> # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl
>> #56894]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this i
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:05 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tested in the 'noautopack' branch. Passed all pre- and
> post-configuration tests; built correctly; passed all tests in 'make test'.
>
> If no one objects, I'll apply this patch after tomorrow's release.
>
> Thank y
Forwarding Jerry's followup to the ticket.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: .parrot_current_rev
To: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Reini Urban <[EM
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Reini Urban via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/15 Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Will Coleda via RT schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Tue May 13 05:21:32 2008, rurban wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2008/5/13 Andr
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:31 PM, via RT James Keenan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by James Keenan
> # Please include the string: [perl #57026]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57026 >
>
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:53 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 16 16:56:20 2008, coke wrote:
>> > I suspect that the merger/committer failed either to run 'perl
>> > Configure.pl --test' or 'make buildtools_tests' prior to 'make'.
>>
>> I can't remember the last time I
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This module is written in Perl 5 and is called in a program written in
> Perl 5. In the work I've done in this project, I've taken the approach
> to return values which I think is more Perlish, namely, if a subrouti
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> This looks good; I'd ask you double check which deps are required vs.
>> optional: I'm pretty sure we don't -require- any of those pac
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Will Coleda via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jul 10 06:40:28 2008, coke wrote:
>> Using tcl, I can make parrot segfault in this branch.
>>
>> $ ../../parrot tcl.pbc -e "error eek"
>> Segmentation fault
>>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Will Coleda via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu Jul 10 06:40:28 2008, coke wrote:
>>> Using tcl, I can make parrot segfault in this branch.
>>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:31 PM, chromatic via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008 08:49:05 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> I committed a patch (r29559) that updates all the tcl.ops to be more
>> like the 'die' opcode in how the exception object is
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:25 PM, via RT Andrew Whitworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andrew Whitworth
> # Please include the string: [perl #56968]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=5696
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
>> creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
>>
>> Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Jul 21 11:15:15 2008, coke wrote:
>> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/details/8
>>
>> Clicking on the "Data Feeds" links
>>
>> /app/public_projects/feed/8 (all)
>> /app/public_projects/feed/
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters via RT
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon Jul 21 11:15:15 2008, coke wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>
>>>> that require a login. Is this intentional?
>>>
>>> No this was not. It should be fixed, so please try again.
>>
>> Nope, still asking me f
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone who is attending OSCON write up a blurb for the parrot web
> site similar to the (now past) one there for YAPC::NA?
>
> I'd be happy to post it if the person that writes it isn&#
Reminder: given the number of folks attending OSCON this week, the IRC
#parrotsketch is cancelled for tomorrow, and will resume again on July
29, 2008
Regards.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:09 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 06:34:13 Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> There are actually many problems. For example, if a TCL function returns
>> an integer, what will Perl 6 see?
>
> A PMC, which presumably performs the Integer role (in Pa
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:09 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 06:34:13 Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>>> There are actually many problems. For example, if a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:46 AM, via RT Will Coleda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
> # Please include the string: [perl #57198]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Dis
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> The user associated with these builds is 'parrot-autobot'. Anyone know
>> who that is?
>
> That's the Smolder user that "make smolder_test&quo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> The user associated with these builds is 'parrot-autobot'. Anyone know
>> who that is?
>
> That's the Smolder user that "make smolder_test&quo
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Peter Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in sprintf opc
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jun 05 19:07:49 2008, coke wrote:
>
>> We can always improve the diagnostic emitted by the PMC compiler.
>> Mismatched strings are going to be an issue whether they're in a
>> CONST_STRING declaration or just
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Michael Peters via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
>
>> Can we get the tag information included in the RSS summary articles?
>
> Absolutely. Try to wget
> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/feed
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Peter Gibbs via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in
Just move the ticket to the perl6 queue.
On 7/25/08, Christoph Otto via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jul 03 14:15:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> (sorry if this arrives multiple times, br0ken ISP and all..)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although there are some similar tests in t/00-parrot/ I woul
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM, via RT Geoffrey Broadwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell
> # Please include the string: [perl #57344]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=
To properly support $tcl_precision in tcl, I need to change how I'm
currently implementing {$tcl_precision == 0}. Right now, I just fake
it by setting the precision to 16, but that isn't right.
What I really want is something like this in src/pmc/tclfloat.pmc:
if (precision)
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from James Keenan via RT
> # on Sunday 27 July 2008 18:45:
>
>>> It appears that this test assumes (multiple times perhaps?) that it
>>> may make named files in /tmp/.
>>
>>Are you saying that making named files in /tmp (
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Dec 06 08:54:35 2007, pcoch wrote:
>> Many files in the Parrot repository are lacking descriptions within the
>> pod DESCRIPTION section. This needs to be done. An appropriate
> description
>> of what the g
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:43 AM, via RT Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358 >
>
>
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from James Keenan via RT
> # on Sunday 27 July 2008 18:45:
>
>>> It appears that this test assumes (multiple times perhaps?) that it
>>> may make named files in /tmp/.
>>
>>Are you saying that making named files in /tmp (
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
>> # Please include the string: [perl #57358]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:13 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Jul 28 10:48:21 2008, particle wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Tests need to be written defensively for arbitrary parallelization to be
>> > po
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Oct 22 10:02:53 2007, pcoch wrote:
>> In src/pmc/exception.pmc:shift_pmc() there is the todo item:
>>
>> PMC *shift_pmc() {
>> /* fprintf(stderr, "don't do that then\n"); XXX */
>> return
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:13 AM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
> # Please include the string: [perl #57410]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57410 >
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
> on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
>
> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
>
> But, AFAICT, the Smolder server do
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:58:10 -0700
>
> . . .
>
> Integer is a good example of the problem, actually.
>
> The internal storage format doesn't change, but the methods you can
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:02 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:58:10 Mark Glines wrote:
>
>> Integer is a good example of the problem, actually.
>>
>> The internal storage format doesn't change,
>
> It certainly can. I imagine that Kea-CL's Integers autopromote
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:44 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Feb 14 09:09:14 2007, coke wrote:
>> Trying to build with GMP support on OSX intel. I have libgmp in
>> /opt/local/bin/
>>
>
> coke:
>
> Are you still experiencing these problems?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> k
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:35 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coke: Given the points Leo made and the fact that there has been
> nothing from the OP in 4 years, can we close this ticket?
>
> Thanks.
>
> kid51
>
Just because there's no activity or followups on a ticket doesn't
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additionally, it's scary that Parrot was segfaulting as a result of using a
> string set with null $S0 style code and then using such a string with the
> open op. Not sure what the right answer is, but the current way things are is
>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps
> complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist.
> Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error
> identical
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps
>> complaining about calls to tcl_
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In r29934 of the
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: coke
> Date: Sat Aug 2 08:20:01 2008
> New Revision: 29940
>
> Modified:
> branches/pdd25cx/languages/tcl/src/macros.pir
>
> Log:
> [tcl] The error message is actually in the 'message' slot now; having the
> wrong name here
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Christoph Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
>>
>> # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl
>> #57468]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this i
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Andrew Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I edited PDD09 tonight to try and add some details and some
> clarification on points that weren't particularly clear before. I have
> a few questions that need answering before I can do more:
>
> 1) GC_trace_normal and G
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Ronald Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Peters wrote:
>>
>> Ronald Schmidt wrote:
>> I've been meaning to update that wiki page to point to the progress we're
>> making toward this. I should also write up how Smolder already accomplishes
>> those goals (
Using svn as a backing store, how can we more easily work with long
lived branches?
I've some existing branches which are long lived, and doing the svn
merge either way is extremely slow.
I know much of our community used svk for a while; I think the usage
there has dropped off as git is the new
es in RT, but closer to the 'metal', as it were?
> Kevin
>
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>> Using svn as a backing store, how can we more easily work with long
>> lived branches?
>>
>> I've some existing branches which are long lived, and doing the svn
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> Using svn as a backing store, how can we more easily work with long
>> lived branches?
>>
>> I've some existing bran
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2008, at 11:12 AM, chromatic wrote:
>
>> Don't use long-lived branches. The smaller the merge in *any* system, the
>> easier it is.
>
>
> I agree 100%. If you think your project is so big that you have to have a
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:10 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 09:48:22 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> Branches that don't rebase from trunk regularly are out of
>> touch, yes. If you rebase regularly, then you're basically jus
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 20:57:53 chromatic wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 01:35:48 Reini Urban wrote:
>> > Attached patch adds the directory ports/cygwin with
>> > the most recent cygports file,
>> > the most recent sr
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>> From pdd19:
>>
>> The optional C<:unique_reg> modifier will force the register allocator to
>> associate the identifier with a unique register for the d
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>> Can you describe a situation where this occurs that isn't a bug in the
>> register allocator?
>>
>
> Yes. IIRC, it was added when I was worki
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:53 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For reference, here's what I got last night on Linux after a make
> realclean, svn up and perl Configure.pl.
>
>
>
> So I never got to 'make' per se; the problem is in
> tools/build/headerizer.pl's action.
>
make hea
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM, NotFound <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> make headerizer is trying to operate on files generated by make. Given
>> that it's supposed to be updating the hea
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:04 AM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>>
>>> I think basically the question remans; is there any way we could do
>>> without the :unique_reg?
>>>
>> Yes:
>>
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "jerry gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:04:24 -0700
>
> . . .
>
> also, if i understand satisfy patrick's use case in pge,
>
> 3) add the ability to select the register allocator used, or dis
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>
>> seems to me this is trying to test whether there's a defined value in
>> $!.
>
> Testing truth falls back to definedness, yes.
>
>> however, you've jumped straight into blaming parrot's Excepti
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Patrick R. Michaud via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Aug 11 18:10:30 2008, coke wrote:
>>
>> 'getclass' is dead, patch applied in r30176. All tests pass.
>
> r30176 (and it's subsequent fix for builtins.h in r30179) cause Rakudo
> to stop building with:
>
>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Aug 11 16:21:07 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> src/main.o(.text+0x5c): In function `main':
>> src/main.c:52: undefined reference to `Parrot_new'
>> src/main.o(.text+0x6a):src/main.c:53: undefined reference
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 07:00 -0700, Will Coleda wrote:
>> #not ok 1 - Line length ok
>> # Failed test 'Line length ok'
>> # at t/codingstd/linelength.t line 80.
>> # L
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:21:18PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>>From: James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:55:02 -0400
>>
>>Yes, when one of the 'make codingstd_tests' accumulates su
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: chromatic
> Date: Sun Aug 17 14:49:39 2008
> New Revision: 30286
>
> Modified:
> trunk/src/pmc/namespace.pmc
> trunk/t/pmc/namespace.t
>
> Log:
> [PMC] Fixed co-recursion bug in NameSpace, when iterating through its
> conte
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: chromatic
>> Date: Sun Aug 17 14:49:39 2008
>> New Revision: 30286
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk
cd languages && make test
Had a LOT of failures recently. I just:
- fixed up some APL that was using crufty parrot (that I myself broke
but never noticed because of...)
- ... TODO'd some more APL that used to work aeons ago that I don't
have time to diagnose before the release
- temporarily remove
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cd languages && make test
>
> Had a LOT of failures recently. I just:
> - fixed up some APL that was using crufty parrot (that I myself broke
> but never noticed because of...)
> - ... TODO&#
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> The eventual goal of this cleanup is to get these tests running via
>> smolder to give core developers more feedback on their commits. The
>> aborted test in this fil
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Will Coleda wrote:
>>>
>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simple answer is Parrot won't do any automatic mapping of types between
> HLLs. If you call a Python library function that returns a Python Dictionary
> type, you'll get back a Python Dictionary PMC. You can interact w
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, W
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:39 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:55:35PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> This causes languages/tcl/cmd_namespace.t to fail. (Reverting this one
>> change locally allows the test to pass).
>
> I'm p
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>>
>>> Any automatic mapping between multiple languages will fall down at some
>>> point in a very ugly way. I imagine modules will be developed to allow
>>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:08 PM, via RT Andy Dougherty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> # Please include the string: [perl #58078]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58078 >
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:09 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: coke
> Date: Tue Aug 19 06:09:07 2008
> New Revision: 30336
>
> Modified:
> trunk/languages/t/harness
>
> Log:
> [t] revert r24988; no test harnesses support --master, and at least one was
> reporting it as an invalid option
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:45:56 -0400
>
> On Tuesday around 13:00 UT, I will create a release branch and
> announce it to the list, after which "normal" hacking can resume on t
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cd languages && make test
>>
>> Had a LOT of failures recently. I just:
>> - fixed up some APL th
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:28:10 -0400
>
> You probably want to include my latest un-revert to
> languages/t/harness which I had hoped to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:47 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:49:59PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> > I'm pretty sure that Rakudo and Tcl want different things from NameSpaces.
>> > This code has a strong smell.
For those p
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:22 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [List-CC changed]
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Rogers schrieb:
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud t
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:15 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:00:24PM +0300, Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
>
>> Today I saw Andrew's last post in his blog about the end of gsoc.
>> Since I could not find much information about the NCI and GC projects I'm
>> asking here
http://perlbuzz.com/2008/08/big-interview-with-damian-conway.html
Talk at one point goes to perl6, and pugs vs. rakudo, and then talk
about parrot.
I am now officially warm and fuzzy for the next five minutes.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
> # Please include the string: [perl #58252]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58252 >
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch attached, diff.trunk.opsrenum.txt, is an improved solution to
> the problem posed by Coke in the OP of this RT. Here are its features,
> working from the surface (e.g., file name changes) down to the metho
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
>> parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
>> project didn't show up in his search (but it's
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> François Perrad wrote:
>> 2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parr
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 06:02:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Modified: trunk/compilers/ncigen/src/c99AST.pir
>> ==
>> --- trunk/compi
1 - 100 of 1238 matches
Mail list logo
