eeds to be looked at
occasionally.
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Thanks all for the answers.
>>
>> It turns out that duramedonline is no longer on this server. It should
>> have a user not found response or similar. It turns out it was moved to
&
matter of maintenance?
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I am just curious what is happening here. duramedonline.com is a user
>> on this toaster.
>>
>> 09-30 09:24:19 tcpserver: pid 21404 from 187.5.121.245
>> 09-30 09:24:19 tcpserver: ok 21404 m
I am just curious what is happening here. duramedonline.com is a user
on this toaster.
09-30 09:24:19 tcpserver: pid 21404 from 187.5.121.245
09-30 09:24:19 tcpserver: ok 21404 mail.area510.net:192.168.250.25:25
:187.5.121.245::4666
09-30 09:24:32 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
remote
<[187.5.121
Mike,
If you have a toaster setup you can easily try Webmin/Virtualmin and
remove it if you don't like it. The QMTISO serves very nicely as a base
web/email hosting platform.
.02
CJ
Michael Colvin wrote:
I've never used a Hosting Control Panel in our hosting operation... I've
always just
Is the queue_repair logged? If so I can forward it to you. Tell me
what file you want.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Thanks Lucian.
>
> We still don't know for sure how the queues became borked. Nothing in
> that area has changed that we know of.
>
> At any rate, if anyone experiences delayed deliveries
I have been reading until my eyes bleed, but it's nice to have someone
to bounce a question off from time to time. Especially when you think
you finally understand what's going on only to find you're still in the
dark. DNS on it's own is enough to keep anyone occupied full time and
never really
throwing me a curve. Jake was right on the mark.
At your suggestion I don't use VQAdmin to add or remove users. CLI
It all appears to be back to normal.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> You need to be more specific, including how you did what.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>>
Yes, but doesn't it process the whitelist first?
Eric Shubert wrote:
> No, spamdyke uses DNS extensively, so broken DNS leads to broken
> spamdyke.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't
>> Sp
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I am sending it to the account that I just created (i...@example.com)
>> and it's showing the address (maill...@example.com) that no longer
>> exists in the header.
>>
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at
e.com/mailloop
Eric Shubert wrote:
> I'm sorry Max, but you're not providing enough information for me to
> even hazard a guess.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> There is no directory or .qmail file. I created a new user
>> i...@examplec.com and when I send a message to
OK, I'll go through it in more detail. Once I get the DNS working the
way I want. I am sure it's blatantly apparent and simple.
Thanks for all your help and time.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> That is explained quite thoroughly in the documentation.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>
owing addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
mail is looping
I did not send it to the account that does not exist I sent it to the
new account I just created.
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> There is no directory or .qmai
There is no directory or .qmail file. I created a new user
i...@examplec.com and when I send a message to that account it comes
back with the looping message to the account that was deleted.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Any ideas on this
Eric,
Any ideas on this? I have deleted the account and still get the same
message.
I have one account that if I send an e mail to it bounces with this
error. mail is looping Other accounts to this same domain are fine,
and the user of the account can send and receive mail. What could cause
t
I agree to a certain point to. Originally my question was why doesn't
Spamdyke allow those addresses in my whitelist's Even if I have the
pacbell address in the whitelist. According to the documentation this
should allow these through the filter, regardless of my DNS configuration.
Eric Shuber
What are the options in your named.conf file?
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
> W dniu 28.09.2009 20:10, Maxwell Smart pisze:
>> [...] Are you running a
>> caching nameserver on yours?
>>
> Yes I am.
> package: caching-nameserver
> FIles from /etc:
> /etc/na
ching nameserver on yours?
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
> W dniu 28.09.2009 19:46, Maxwell Smart pisze:
>> [...] I may
>> have to separate my DNS server from my web/mail server even though it's
>> only a slave server.
>>
> Wh
That's what I thought.
I think I have a couple of things I need to sort out with my DNS. I may
have to separate my DNS server from my web/mail server even though it's
only a slave server.
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
> W dniu 28.09.2009 19:18, Maxwell Smart pisze:
>> [...]
Same issue I had.
Lucian Cristian wrote:
> It seems that the problems is solved, there was some file missing and
> some permission problems on queue dir
>
> Regards
> Lucian
>
> Lucian Cristian wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> thanks for info, I tried it some seconds ago, after I sent the mail
>> to mailing lis
Bharath Chari wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
>>>
>>> 8<-- my test
>>> [a...@alexia ~]$ host 207.115.36.143
>>> 143.36.115.207.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer nlpi129.sbcis.sbc.com.
>>> [a...@alexia ~]$ host -t mx yother.com
>>> yother.com mail is handled by 10 mail.yot
Any ideas what caused this yet?
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Lucian Cristian wrote:
>> Hi everyone I have problems with the queue on to different systems,
>> the queue will not be processed as soon as possible, there is some
>> lag, if a do a qmailqtl restart the mails will be processed if not I
>> have
I have done some testing and found that it does not resolve as
expected. If I change my option in my named.conf file to recursion
yes; it then works. From what I have read I don't want to have it set
up that way. What is reason not to have recursion set to yes?
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
>
I have one account that if I send an e mail to it bounces with this
error. mail is looping Other accounts to this same domain are fine,
and the user of the account can send and receive mail. What could cause
this and how is it remedied.
es. I can't imagine what your problem might be.
Can you show an example of spamdyke's smtp log blocking message?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, I must have missed it or not got that far yet.
I am getting a lot of rDNS refusals including the qmail-toaster
list. It works great, but the toas
the whitelist_ip file and they are still
getting blocked. Maybe I just don't understand the documentation, but
it seemed to say one ip per line in the whitelist_ip file if I want to
accept from that ip. Am I reading this correctly?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
It was ju
It was just an example. Can you use CIDR notation in Spamdyke?
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 27.09.2009 17:05, Maxwell Smart pisze:
Can you use 192.168.0.1/12 in the whitelist_ip file?
12 bit netmask for this host? Look at RFC-1918 and RFC-1466
Can you use 192.168.0.1/12 in the whitelist_ip file?
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
Sounds good. Not quite up to speed with the yum thing yet. I usually
just download and install from source tarballs. I have only started to
use CentOS with the QMTISO. I am used to SuSe which is a bit different.
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>>
of an archive. It can be helpful on occasion. I
don't know if it's worth the time though since a simple request to you
or on the list would probably suffice.
Have a good weekend.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I am not sure what operator error could have caused th
correct?
Would there be any benefit to running the queue_repair weekly, monthly
as a maintenance procedure?
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Nope. Usually operator error. ;)
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
>>
>> Did you find out what caused the queue
qmailctl start
>
> I think you'll like it.
>
> Please report the output of the queue_repair.py command. I think
> you'll see some errors fixed there.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Sounds good.
>> FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expecte
y command. I think
> you'll see some errors fixed there.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Sounds good.
>> FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
>> delays.
>>
>> It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Hey Max,
>
> I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the sa
0197s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com
09-25 10:59:07 tcpserver: end 27234 status 0
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> This would be monitoring the /var/log/qm
x27;d like. Please include as much
detail (and links) as you can about them.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shu
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and
how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely
helpful.
I can get you all of the
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shubert wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need f
look.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's
l
Telnet so I cannot complete the transaction.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jake Vickers wrote:
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> Here is the header.
>>> Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
>>> Return-Path:
>>> Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
>>>
: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2)
by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Message-ID: <4abc0132.3010...@yother.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700
From: Maxwell Smart
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version:
e:
> Those are 2 different messages.
>
> Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing
> that's leading you to conclude that there are delays.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> I don't
Eric Shubert wrote:
> I don't see any highlighting.
> Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f
>> /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anyt
Peter,
Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised?
CJ
Peter Tan wrote:
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to
djbdns. Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart <mailto:c...@yother.com>> wrote:
Some additional informa
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my
toaster the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to
the same mail server. These
from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=7.99 ms
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Thanks Jake,
That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how
I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink
my entire rack configuration. I have been trying to simplify
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> I don't know off hand.
>>
>> Hey Jake, what do you know about this? (I'm guessing quite a bit!)
>>
>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> I think I am getting it sorted. Here i
206.13.30.12;
};
};
zone "." {
type hint;
file "/etc/db.cache";
};
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart
Webmin actually has the features you are wanting. They are in modules
like Usermin and Virtualmin. It is very robust and offers a great deal
of flexibility on what you want your customers to have access to. It
also supports, bandwidth monitoring, webalizer, etc.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Michael
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>> Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>>>> Eric,
>>>>>>
&g
C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
;; Query time: 34 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Sep 22 17:18:09 2009
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 287
[r...@laetitia ~]#
I am guessing this is what you were looking for.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric,
I think I found part of my problem. It was an entry in the forwards of
my DNS server. This should really improve performance. I am not sure
how it even worked.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>>>> Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
>>>> position of
>>>>
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
>> my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
>
> It's not really ok. It's just th
p and restart qmail I get
all the mail.
Ideas on how to begin to troubleshoot? I remember someone on the list a
few days ago experiencing the same issue, but paid little attention then.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Only if they're there. ;)
> Your named has a problem.
>
> Maxwell Sm
12:14:19 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'85.194.39.201.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
Sep 22 12:14:20 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'ns.embratel.net.br/A/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
I have bind installed and it's running. It is mainly a slave server for
my main DNS server. It turns out there was no 127 address like there
should be. I fixed that and put my 127.0.0.1 in the first position.
I'll report back.
Thanks for all your help guys.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
sassin seems to work very well.
I only have spamhaus in my blacklist file.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Anyone get this yesterday?
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I wil
ks,
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight in the
members of this list, I knew someone has had, is having or can offer
info on where to look.
No on the Spamdyke.
[r...@laetitia tmp]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 206.13.3
3d50634e21bdc.s
@40004ab54c802f171784.s @40004ab6dc910d26c494.s
Those are the DNS servers. The 64.168.70.132 is my autoritative DNS server.
The qtp-check-rbls is
[r...@laetitia smtp]# qtp-check-rbls
0.194
2.021
Sending HUP signal to qmail-send.
[r...@laetitia smtp]#
Thanks,
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
;s not the one you mean, but I can't seem to
find the log your talking about. In the maillog nothing unusual. In
the /var/log/qmail/smtp there are quite a few entries. Is this normal.
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Not that your supposed to
64.168.70.132
nameserver 127.0.0.1
; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script
no caching nameserver
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
>> server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
>
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now experiencing delays of several minutes and sometimes
15 or so. What is the cause of this and how can it be resolved. Is
this traffic on the s
atedb, then locate qtp-menu.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:27 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] re: qtp-menu
>
> I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1.
I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1. I did a default
install, but no qtp-menu.
How do I resolve this?
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Co
>
> Richard
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Domnick,
>>
>> The IP address already default to my home page, which is OK. I use
>> iptables, fail2ban and OSSEC. They seem to cover the issues I have
>> faced. If anyone has any additional tips or tricks based on my
>
f you have a decent firewall you
should be ok. We use shorewall and they have a lot of good protection and
features. Taking good security practices in the httpd.conf and php.ini
should keep you fairly safe.
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, Septemb
et is to use .htaccess
Deny from All
Allow from 192.168.1.0/24
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
This is more an Apache question
could
> just stop apache. Or... if you wanna view pages locally, but block
> outsiders:
>
> In httpd.conf :
>
>
>Order Deny,Allow
>Deny from all
>Allow from 127.0.0.1
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
>
This is more an Apache question, but I know that most everyone on this
list with the exception of me knows the answer.
How do I setup my webserver not to answer to requests to my ip? I have
been reading that this can be very dangerous and mine currently answers
to my default page served up by Apa
Rajesh,
Why don't you try it like this.
206.53.144.0/20:allow,CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR3"/"
CJ
Rajesh M wrote:
sir,
i understood what you say, but if i use it in the last line then it would
mean the whole server and i did not want that.
on the safe side i just applied it to only the blackbe
Eric,
I am running the QMT ISO CentOS 5.0. That worked perfectly, all
updated now :)
What exactly was the cause?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Which distro/version?
Have you tried "yum clean all"?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someon
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on this
list can help me.
I am trying to update my toasters and I have updated all of the packages
except one on one server. I cannot get the python to update. Here is
the error message. I am not really sure what the dealio is.
The RFC actually requires abuse, postmaster, and webmaster if memory
serves me correctly.
PakOgah wrote:
> Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
>> Jake Vickers wrote:
>>>
>>> [...] Most admins no longer set up "abuse@" addresses (since they
>>> get spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - lik
CBL usually means you have a spammer in your midst, have been hacked or
victim of malware, or are an open relay.
Gary Bowling wrote:
>
> I keep getting listed on the CBL list. I have been through all the
> recommendations for checking my server, but can't seem to find
> anything wrong. I'm sure it
Ole,
That would be great. You can just send it directly to me if you like.
c...@yother.com
I did compare the syntax to the other jail entries and it looked
correct. I'll check it again.
CJ
ole.johan...@cryonix.no wrote:
> It notified me, perhaps you typed in wrong email adress/typo error?
>
Ole,
I set mine up the way you suggested and had one attempt today also. It
ended on the 4th try, but I didn't receive my notification. Everything
appears to be working correctly except the notification.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello friends,
Just let you know.
My previous email about u
ord for 'mailhost' needs to be
a type A record (not a cname).
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and re
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and restore. Server moved to a new ip
address and domain. I am having an issue with one domain sen
Great work Ole.
I have fail2ban installed and I will test the vpopmail, since I am only
using it for ssh and ftp right now.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
*Install fail2ban:*
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fail2ban/files/fail2ban-stable/fail2ban-0.8.3/fail2ban-0.8.3.tar.bz2/download
tar
-
>>
>> *From:* Constantin IOAJA [mailto:io...@cartel-alfa.ro]
>> *Sent:* 28. august 2009 21:40
>> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] re: harvesting
>>
>>
I found out what was happening. My notifications were being blocked by
my SpamDyke. :(
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
>> how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up
I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up on it?
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Greetings fellow Qmailers,
>>
>> I am trying to find a way to block harvesters.
max.
>
> If you look a the logs in more detail, I expect you'd find that these
> attempts are coming from limited IP address ranges. You could block
> them with iptables.
>
> I don't think these are worth being concerned about though.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrot
Anyway to drop their connection after 3 tries?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
These look like script kiddies (lame crackers) to me, not harvesters.
They're simply a nuisance.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban,
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban, but
must not have it set up correctly to block the harvesters after 3
attempts. If anyone can shed some light on how to set this up it would
be greatly appreciated.
Here is my vpopmail logwatch
I didn't partition it that way. It's a default QMT install with a
mirrored drive.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> I wonder if there isn't a separate boot partition that's not being
> mounted.
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Strange indeed.
>>
>> Tried remotely
urrent on all fronts including Spamdyke.
I will likely set up this server as a back up or retire it as I have
enough hardware (primary and backup) up and running with my new config
to suit my current needs.
Thanks for all you help.
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
> Clean install on formatted drive.
grub in the mbr, but only after I thought
> there was some reason it might fix something. This definitely sounds
> like a grub misconfiguration issue. (duh)
>
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> The /boot/grub/grub.conf file reads the same. The other 2 are both
>> symlinks as expecte
kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Maxwell Smart wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> Everything worked as expected.
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
>> However, I h
3.el5)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 ro root=LABEL=/
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.img
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Perfect.
If I use the qmailtoaster-plus to install Spamdyke, do the default
config settings work for sta
or my needs.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
# yum update qmailtoaster-plus
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
OK, it worked.
How do I upgrade the qtp to the latest version?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Just say no. (that will let you select a new list)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I just tried, but it thinks
Eric,
OK, it worked.
How do I upgrade the qtp to the latest version?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Just say no. (that will let you select a new list)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I just tried, but it thinks that there are updates that need to be
done that have been done manually. It says &quo
ked/copied sandboxes have always worked for the
lastest releases though.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after
the sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while
since I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the
g updating.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I
haven't played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jak
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after the
sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while since
I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it w
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I haven't
played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Thanks guys.
But i still have a hard time to actual get the QMT u
the answer
to most all of my spam issues.
Spamdyke can use an ip blacklist by adding ips to the blacklist_ip
file in /etc/spamdyke.
Read the spamdyke documentation on configuring the list the way you
need it.
here is the link to the docs
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html
Max
Eric,
While were on the subject. Does SpamDyke use an IP blacklist?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
> amit IKF wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Whenever i go qtp-install-spamdyke from qtp-menu, I use to see below
>> message. Is this mean spamdyke is not installed on my server or not
>> getting update. How d
Ole,
The default QMT ISO install should already have this feature implemented.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Is there any possibilities to make spamassassin/qmail to automatical
> move all incoming emails who is tagged as SPAM to ”spam folder” in
> Squirrelmail/Horde?
>
>
>
> T
301 - 400 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
