On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 20:38, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 00:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
> > > "minimum" install is ~450MB. Surely that can be
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 00:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
> > "minimum" install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one CD? :^) SuSE
>
> As Matthew pointed, there ar
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> snip
> > As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
> > this way:
> > The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
> > install. It decreases the
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
snip
> As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
> this way:
> The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
> install. It decreases the number of discs, and speeds my install. This
> is not a
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
> "minimum" install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one CD? :^) SuSE
As Matthew pointed, there are several kernels and several glibc shipped
with the distributio
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Mar 2003
01:13:40 -0700
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
> > ** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
> > 19:27:20 -0700
> >
> >
> > > That said, RH is already beginnin
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
> 19:27:20 -0700
>
>
> > That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
> > and non-enterprise. Since the "personal" is the base for sales (as
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
> That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
> and non-enterprise. Since the "personal" is the base for sales (as in:
> the "smallest" one), that would be a good start, IMO.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:47, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Also: "Minimal installations currently require more than a
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > Also: "Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD."
> > >
> > > Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Also: "Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD."
> >
> > Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange them such that the most commonly
> > used and smalles
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> Also: "Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD."
>
> Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange them such that the most commonly
> used and smallest installs be on the first disc, then the second, and
> the thir
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:41, Nicholas Marsh wrote:
> >> So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?
>
> If it like the beta (8.0.94), here are the release notes:
>
> http://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/beta/phoebe/en/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES
In there it says:
If you are performing anyt
13 matches
Mail list logo
